‘Two Prosecutors' Review: Sergei Loznitsa Explores the Stifling Climate of Stalin-Era Russia in a Legal Drama That Burns Slowly but Brightly
Impeccably directed and impressively acted, this slow-burn story of political injustice is filled to the brim with atmosphere — specifically the stifling, claustrophobic atmosphere of the U.S.S.R. at the height of Stalin's Great Purge. For those familiar with that period, nothing in the movie, which was adapted from a 1969 book by physicist and gulag survivor Georgy Demidov, may seem surprising. But this Cannes competition entry is more about the journey than the destination, revealing what it was like to live at a time when personal freedom was all but extinguished by rampant authoritarianism.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' Review: Tom Cruise Delivers but the Convoluted Eighth Entry Takes Its Sweet Time Getting There
Nude and "Voluminous" Cannes Red Carpet Looks From Past Years That Would Violate New Dress Code
David Lynch's Son Intros 'Welcome to Lynchland' Doc in Cannes: "This Festival Meant a Lot to My Dad"
The first shot of the film is of a prison door opening and closing, and it's a clear prelude to the rest of what happens in Loznitsa's meticulously crafted narrative. Lensed by Oleg Mutu (4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days) in the box-like 1:1.33 format, the movie was photographed in color but may as well have been made in black-and-white, so much does it depict a world without warmth or hope.
Loznitsa is certainly no stranger to such backdrops, exploring the bleaker sides of both Russia and his native Ukraine in a body of work that has seamlessly shifted between fiction (My Joy, In the Fog, Donbass) and documentary (Maidan, The Event, Babi Yar. Context). Two Prosecutors is perhaps his most austere film to date — controlled as tightly as the NKVD (Stalin's secret police of the 1930s and 40s) controlled the Soviet people. It's not always an easy sit, creeping along as it moves from one suffocating situation to another. But it gradually builds into a powerful statement on Russian tyranny both then and now.
A slow-burn opening shows prisoners being assembled in a courtyard. The year is 1937 and the men all look like they've been through hell. (Indeed, in the next scene one of them falls off a scaffolding and drops dead, his body quickly hauled away.) The oldest among them (Ivgeny Terletsky) is sent alone to a cell, where he's tasked with burning the letters of fellow inmates. In what will be the first of many acts of courage against the powers-that-be, he decides to save one letter in which a prisoner claims he's been unfairly jailed and asks for legal counsel.
The sequence is telling, underscoring the sheer impossibility of justice within a system that has been designed to quash resistance at all levels, from the very bottom to the top. This is the trajectory the film itself takes, gradually following the effects of that one authority-defying act from the bowels of a provincial prison all the way to one of the highest offices in Moscow.
Our guide through the crushing bureaucracy is a bold young prosecutor named Kornev (Alexander Kuznetsov), who receives the smuggled letter and shows up at the prison to deal with the situation. He faces hostility every step of the way, from an array of brutish guards to a dismissive warden (Vytautas Kaniusonis) who keeps trying to get rid of him, and finally to the U.S.S.R's general prosecutor (Anatoli Beliy), who receives him in his office after the longest wait of all time.
What's fascinating about Two Prosecutors is that nobody directly turns down Kornev, nor do they ever let him know what they're really thinking. This is a world where everyone is so afraid that the slightest word or act could land them in jail, or possibly Siberia, that they're constantly holding their tongues as they try to strategize their way through the system. New to the game of 4D Soviet chess under Stalin's reign of terror, Kornev is the only person to truly speak his mind, and it's no surprise what winds up happening to him as a result.
The irony is that Kornev thinks he's saving the very Marxist revolution that the U.S.S.R. is meant to embody. The inmate who wrote the letter, Stepniak (Aleksandr Filippenko), is an old Bolshevik worker who was part of the 1917 uprising and has spent years in prison being tortured without reason. By trying to take a revolutionary hero's case to the highest echelons of power, Kornev foolishly believes he's fighting corruption in the regime he's meant to serve.
The compelling Kuznetsov portrays the prosecutor as a wise and stubborn lawyer who's also the last person to be in on the joke that was Communism under Stalin. This is most apparent in a late sequence — and probably the highlight of the movie — in which Kornev takes the train back from Moscow to his hometown of Briansk, riding along with two businessmen (Valentin Novopolskij, Dmitrij Denisiuk) who he suspects could be NKVD agents. After some hesitation, he decides to drink and be merry with them, enjoying an impromptu music performance as the train chugs along through the night, unaware of the fate already in store for him.
Loznitsa is much less of a dupe than the naïve young Korvev, and the director ultimately leaves the viewer back at the same prison door where his film began. The journey in Two Prosecutors is therefore a circular one — a long and winding round-trip between a rock and a hard place. This is what life was like in the U.S.S.R. at that time, and it's no secret that life in Russia under Vladimir Putin is hardly different nowadays. Loznitsa is reflecting on the past here, but for anyone who cares to look, he's holding a mirror up to the present.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
'The Goonies' Cast, Then and Now
"A Nutless Monkey Could Do Your Job": From Abusive to Angst-Ridden, 16 Memorable Studio Exec Portrayals in Film and TV
The 10 Best Baseball Movies of All Time, Ranked
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Barack Obama's dirty trick destroyed a presidency — and our trust
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard contends that new declassified documents show former President Barack Obama engaged in the plot to create the lie that President Donald Trump had conspired with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election. Of course he did. We have known for years that in July 2016, then-CIA Director John Brennan briefed Obama on how Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign had sought to 'vilify' Trump by accusing him of collaborating with Russian President Vladimir Putin. We already know that despite having this information in hand, Obama withheld intelligence about Russia from the Trump transition team and ordered agencies to compile an assessment of the situation. Now, typically such an assessment — which brings together intelligence at the highest levels — takes months to gather and analyze. This report, however, was cobbled together in just a few weeks so that the Obama administration could control not only the content but the messaging before the new Trump administration began. To understand how shoddy the assessment was, consider that it included the Steele dossier, an opposition-research document paid for by Democrats, as an annex — but not the views of two senior CIA officers from the Russia mission center who argued there was no evidence that Putin's ham-fisted meddling was intended to boost Trump's fortunes. Indeed, it turns out that numerous career officials expressed skepticism about the claim. It is utterly implausible that Obama did not know that potentially exculpatory evidence regarding Clinton's role in spreading the Russia-collusion hoax was omitted. It is certainly worth asking him. In any event, a responsible report even intimating that a president-elect's campaign may have been involved in a seditious plot should have been undertaken with extra-special care. Instead, it was weaponized. In her very last hour in office Susan Rice, Obama's national security adviser, wrote a transparently self-preserving email to protect the president, claiming she'd attended a meeting in which he stressed to then-FBI Director James Comey that everything in the Trump-Russia investigation should proceed 'by the book.' Why? Why mention this on her last day? Did high-ranking Obama administration officials such as Comey not always conduct their investigations 'by the book?' Of course, they didn't. It was the dirtiest political trick played on the public in US history. As intended, the Russia hysteria paralyzed the incoming presidency. It probably worked even better than those who hatched it could have imagined, as the legacy media took the bait on virtually every anonymously sourced story, no matter how far-fetched. 'Mr. President,' Adam Schiff, then a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said in 2017, 'the Russians hacked our election and interfered. No one disputes this now but you.' Anyone who disputed this characterization was smeared as a shill for a foreign power. Polls found that over 60% of Democrats claimed to believe that the Russians had altered vote tallies. Not one investigation, of course, not even special counsel Robert Mueller's inquiry run by Trump-hating partisans, found any evidence that collusion had taken place. Few events have done more to undermine our trust in our elections and in our officials. Attorney General Pam Bondi has launched a 'strike force' to investigate the declassified findings regarding Obama's role. But Gabbard has already accused the former president of 'treason,' as has Trump. One suspects that Gabbard's piecemeal release of declassified documents was intended to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein mess that was partly created by Trump's administration. This, too, is over-promising. Those imagining Obama being cuffed and marched to the jailhouse in orange overalls are fooling themselves. It would be a miracle if anyone involved was indicted, much less convicted. For one thing, the statute of limitations has expired on most of these events. And Obama, thanks to Trump v. United States, would enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts — even if Bondi could prove criminality, which is doubtful. After all, this brand of corruption can't be explicitly found in any documents. Plotters don't have to have conversations. Everyone understood what was happening. And the system gives intelligence heads tremendous latitude and power. It has long been clear that everyone involved in the Russia hoax abused their position, but indicting a CIA director for, say, excluding certain information from an assessment report would be difficult — if such an action were illegal at all, which seems questionable. None of that is to contend that Obama and his underlings weren't in on the plot. Or that we shouldn't find out the truth. But it will have to be written in the historical record. That's important, too. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner. Twitter @davidharsanyi


Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Cutting interests rates is the 'number one thing that will impact affordability' for Americans, says Byron Donalds
Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., discusses the need for spending cuts to help bring down interest rates, the investigation into former President Obama's alleged role in the Trump-Russia 'hoax' and more on 'The Will Cain Show.'


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Intel, Epstein investigations grip Washington
Evening Report is The Hill's p.m. newsletter. Subscribe here or using the box below: IT'S INVESTIGATIONS SEASON in Washington, as the GOP steams ahead with probes into the Intelligence Community (IC) and subpoenas fly in search of new information tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the formation of a new task force to investigate Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard 's claims of IC abuses around the Russian election interference investigations that swamped President Trump 's first term in office. Trump's intelligence chief has released a trove of newly-declassified documents in recent days that she says are evidence the IC manufactured and manipulated intelligence to create the narrative that Russia interfered in the election to boost Trump and hurt Democrat Hillary Clinton. Gabbard does not dispute that Russia sought to sow chaos in the election by using social media. However, she says senior officials in former President Obama 's administration ignored intelligence that ran contrary to the narrative that Russia wanted Trump elected. And she says those officials relied on politicized intelligence to investigate Trump and peddle allegations of Trump-Russia collusion to the media. Gabbard has turned her findings over to the DOJ for possible criminal referrals for former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey. 'We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice,' the DOJ said in a statement. Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) are calling for a special counsel to be appointed to probe whether Obama aided in the alleged effort, as Gabbard claims. 'For the good of the country, Senator @JohnCornyn and I urge Attorney General Bondi to appoint a special counsel to investigate the extent to which former President Obama, his staff and administration officials manipulated the U.S. national security apparatus for a political outcome,' Graham posted on X. Trump has taken to accusing Obama of treason and seditious conspiracy, provoking a rare rebuke from the former president's office, which called the claims 'outrageous' and 'bizarre.' Clapper told CNN that he's lawyered up and ready to fight. 'It's patently false and unfounded,' Clapper said, citing a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report that found Russia interfered to boost Trump. The news media has largely dismissed Gabbard's claims. EPSTEIN SUBPOENAS FLY Republicans and Democrats are teaming up to push for more transparency in the Epstein case, even as Trump calls on his party to drop it and move on. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee this week approved a subpoena for Epstein's former associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence in a Tallahassee federal prison for aiding Epstein in child sex trafficking. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell on Thursday afternoon, a source told NewsNation's Libby Dean. Democrats, who are agitating for more transparency on the Epstein case, are nonetheless skeptical of the DOJ's motives in pursuing new information from Maxwell. 'Trump sending his personal lawyer, Todd Blanche, to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell stinks of high corruption and conflict of interest,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) posted on X. Meanwhile, a House Oversight subcommittee approved several subpoenas, including one instructing the DOJ to turn over material related to the Epstein case. Republican Reps. Nancy Mace (S.C.), Scott Perry (Pa.) and Brian Jack (Ga.) joined all Democrats on the panel in pushing the vote across 8-2. The vote was more palatable for Republicans because it also approved subpoenas for several high-profile Democrats and other figures, including former President Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Attorney General Eric Holder, former Attorney General Merrick Garland and former FBI Director and special counsel Robert Mueller. In addition, an amendment passed to include the release of all communications between former President Biden and his administration officials on the Epstein case. This comes after The Wall Street Journal published a new story saying Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May that his name appears multiple times in the files, along with many other high-profile individuals. The president is suing the Journal over an earlier story claiming he once sent Epstein a 'bawdy' birthday card. Trump has been photographed with Epstein and the two ran in the same social circles, but the president says they had a falling out years ago. 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement. 'This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media, just like the Obama Russiagate scandal, which President Trump was right about.' ELSEWHERE… Former White House chief of staff Ron Klain answered questions in a private interview with the House Oversight panel as part of an investigation into Biden's mental acuity and use of an autopen. Klain is the first former Biden aide to answer questions. Three other former Biden officials called before the committee invoked their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said Klain was 'fairly responsive' to the panel's questions. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) called Klain 'very credible' and said he was 'fully cooperative.' 💡 Perspectives: • Racket: The sins of the 2017 Intelligence Community assessment. • MSNBC: Obama's patience wears thin in response to Trump's hysterics. • The Liberal Patriot: Today's non-progressive progressives. • Townhall: Columbia University surrenders. • Trump-Obama feud erupts over Russia interference allegations. • Democrats to Obama: Don't get in the mud with Trump. • GOP dysfunction over Epstein leaves Senate GOP angry with House. • These 11 Republicans are backing the Khana-Massie Epstein measure. • House GOP moves to establish long-delayed Jan. 6 committee. CATCH UP QUICK Here are five things to know about the deal reached between the Trump administration and Columbia University. Kaiser Permanente will pause gender-affirming surgeries for patients younger than 19 years beginning next month. A second court ruled Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship still cannot go into effect anywhere in the country, following the Supreme Court's decision that claws back nationwide injunctions. Professional wrestling legend Hulk Hogan died at the age of 71. NEWS THIS AFTERNOON Trump heads to the Federal Reserve President Trump will visit the Federal Reserve on Thursday afternoon amid his feud with central bank chief Jerome Powell. Trump will be joined by White House deputy chief of staff James Blair, budget director Russell Vought and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte, according to Semafor. The trip comes as Trump and senior administration officials fixate on the Fed's $2.5 billion building restoration, which was approved during former President Biden 's term in office. The officials say the project has suffered $700 million in cost over-runs, leading to allegations the Fed has experienced 'mission creep' by expanding into ares that are outside its purview. 'I just want to get eyes on sort of the whole project itself,' Blair said. Trump has had an ongoing feud with Powell over the Fed chief's refusal to lower interest rates. However, Trump says he does not intend to fire Powell, whose term is up in early 2026. • After securing a trade deal with Japan, the Trump administration is turning its focus to the European Union. 'Talks are going better than they had been,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg TV. 'We are making good progress.' Countries face an Aug. 1 deadline next week to reach a deal or face higher reciprocal tariffs. Trump will travel to Scotland on Friday to celebrate the opening of a new golf course that will be named after his late mother Mary Anne MacLeod, who was of Scottish descent. The president will also meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other foreign dignitaries on the four-day trip. 💡 Perspectives: • USA Today: In-N-Out owner places order to go − out of California. • Fox News: Teamsters' boss lauds Trump tariffs. • BIG: Why Are We Pretending AI Is Going to Take All the Jobs? Read more: • Hershey plans to raise chocolate prices. • US automakers say Trump's deal with Japan puts them at a disadvantage. • Australia to reduce US beef import restrictions. • International students look to cleanse social media amid Trump visa policy. • Trump signs executive orders to fast-track AI data center construction. IN OTHER NEWS Roundup: Trump's second term approval hits new low President Trump's approval rating is at the lowest point of his second term in office, according to the Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ) polling average. Trump's net approval rating is more than 9 points underwater, with an average of 53.4 percent disapproving his job performance, against 44 percent who approve. • Tesla announced its revenue dropped by 12 percent and profits fell by 16 percent in the second quarter. Tesla's brand has been badly tarnished since Musk became involved in politics. 'We probably could have a few rough quarters,' Musk said on Tesla's earnings call. 'I'm not saying it will, but we could.' Trump has threatened Musk's companies since their falling out, saying he'd review all government contracts, subsidies and federal agencies working with the world's richest man. However, the president on Thursday extended an olive branch. 'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before! The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us. We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!' • Former President Obama is jumping into the redistricting wars, headlining an August fundraiser in Martha's Vineyard for a Democratic group fighting efforts by Republicans to redraw their maps ahead of the midterm elections. Redistricting efforts have become a surprise storyline ahead of next year's elections, as Democratic leaders in blue states threaten to redraw their maps to retaliate against GOP leaders in red states that have moved draw new congressional district lines. Redistricting typically happens at the end of the decade when the new census data is released. The Hill's Caroline Vakil and Julia Manchester write: 'The redistricting tit-for-tat threatens to roil the midterms, sowing uncertainty in an election that will reshape the remainder of President Trump's term.' • The North Carolina Senate race to replace retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C) is taking shape. Axios reports that Democrats got their man, with former Gov. Roy Cooper set to launch his campaign next week. And Politico reports that Trump's daughter-in-law Lara Trump will not run for Senate, but rather will support Republican National Committee chair Michael Whatley, who plans to launch a bid. • Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) is the latest Democrat to seek distance from New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. Shapiro, a potential 2028 presidential contender, said in an interview with Jewish Insider that Mamdani must do more to address his 'blatantly antisemitic' supporters on the left. 'If you want to lead New York, you want to lead Pennsylvania, you want to lead the United States of America, you're a leader,' Shapiro said. 'I don't care if you're a Republican or Democratic leader or a democratic socialist leader. You have to speak and act with moral clarity, and when supporters of yours say things that are blatantly antisemitic, you can't leave room for that to just sit there. You've got to condemn that.' 💡 Perspectives: • UnHerd: How Dems can win back MAGA workers. • The Hill: A reality check for Democrats. • City Journal: Medical journals care more about DEI than disease. • Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers not seeking reelection. • Senate Republicans miffed as House bolts for recess.