
‘They are a species on the brink': can trees save the salmon in Scotland's River Dee?
It is a spectacular landscape, attracting hikers, mountain-bikers and salmon fishers, the latter contributing an estimated £15m to Aberdeenshire's economy.
But according to Third, the river operations manager for the Dee District Salmon Fishery Board and River Dee Trust, the changing climate threatens the survival of spring salmon in the Dee's Special Area of Conservation, a place where King Charles learned to fly-fish.
Temperature rises on the upper tributaries, the birthplace of the spring salmon, and altered flow patterns caused by increasing winter floods, are linked to a 'massive decline' in the river's spring salmon population, Third says.
Spring salmon are renowned for their athleticism, migrating thousands of kilometres to west Greenland and back, leaping up waterfalls, to return to their natal streams to spawn.
'We have over 300km of streams classified as vulnerable to warming water temperatures,' says Third, holding up what he describes as a 'scary map' of such rivers drawn up by the Scottish government. 'We've had 27.5C in some. Salmon feel stress at anything over 23C.'
Third, who was born in Deeside, has worked on the river for three decades. He recalls a time when chunks of ice would break off and be swept downstream. But temperatures in the Dee have increased by 1.5C over 30 years.
As the yellow streaks on the map attest, many of its upper tributaries are now classified as highly vulnerable to rising temperatures. Which spells trouble ahead for the Dee – one of Scotland's 'big four' salmon rivers, those most renowned for their fishing – which has so far escaped the dramatic decline in salmon populations seen elsewhere. In Scotland, 153 rivers, or 72%, have a conservation status of 'poor' for salmon, while the Dee is among 31 (15%) rated as 'good'.
But data from the Scottish government's longest-running wild salmon monitoring programme, on a key tributary of the Dee called the Girnock Burn, near the Muick, has alarmed conservationists, anglers and landowners. It recorded a single, solitary female salmon returning to spawn in 2024, the lowest number since records began, down from 200 in 1966. Another tributary, the Baddock, had the fourth lowest returning females on record, just seven in total.
The figures mark a 'catastrophic decline' in the river's spring salmon numbers, according to the Missing Salmon Alliance, a group of conservation and angler organisations.
Alongside other warning signs, including a 96% drop in rod catches of spring salmon from 8,000 in the 1950s to fewer than 500 today, a 20-year project known as 'Save the Spring' is aiming to halt the decline.
An initial five-year, £5m partnership, between the Dee District Salmon Fishery Board, a statutory body, River Dee Trust, the Atlantic Salmon Trust and the University of Stirling and UHI Inverness, has two parts, restoring and improving habitats and a controversial pilot intervention known as 'conservation translocation'. The latter, based on a project in the Bay of Fundy, in Canada, has been used by the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland to reintroduce wildcats to the Cairngorms to save them from extinction.
The intervention will tackle the most perilous part of a salmon's lifecycle, at sea. Currently only three in every 100 salmon return, Third says. The idea is that by intervening in this part of the lifecycle, mortality will improve.
Last year, about 100 smoults, or young salmon, were caught, put in a tank and driven 200 miles (320km) to a larger seawater tank on the west coast. When they are fully grown, later this summer, they will be returned to the river.
But the bulk of the work is tree planting to bring shade and river re-engineering, to slow and improve river flow.
'The extremes of flows are one of the pressures on salmon,' says Lorraine Hawkins, river director of the Dee District Salmon Fishery Board and Trust. 'They can wash juveniles and eggs out of the river.'
Placing dead trees in the water alters the flow, creating ideal habitats for salmon to spawn and eggs to survive, she says.
Summer is becoming drier here, which increases stress on salmon, leaving them stranded in dried-up beds. Hawkins has received callouts from the public to rescue stranded fish.
Without woodland, floods and droughts can worsen, and river temperatures can rise. In the Muick, wild salmon populations, while still critically low, have shown signs of improvement after a decade of restoration, according to Save the Spring.
Third points to moorland dotted with bog cotton and, aside from the saplings of alder, birch and Scots pine his colleagues have planted, few trees. The upper Dee has 8% tree cover, he says, compared with an average of 37% in Europe.
'The river would have had woodland in the past,' he says. 'There are so many deer here, the trees don't get peace to grow.'
The deer numbers are kept up for high-paying guests to hunt on the private estates bordering the river. Balmoral and Glenmuick estate are among the project's supporters.
Save the Spring is not without its critics. A paper published last year suggests salmon restoration schemes such as the Dee are based on limited scientific evidence. It also argues that since the highest mortalities are marine, river restoration is likely to have a marginal impact. Questions have also been raised about the pilot's potential to introduce diseased fish, grown elsewhere, to a pristine river.
A spokesperson for Save the Spring says it is dealing with 'critically low wild salmon populations' facing the threat of extinction: 'They do not have the luxury of another 30 years of academic study – they are a species on the brink.'
The project is guided by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) best practice guidelines, and works with senior scientists, in consultation with experts in Atlantic salmon conservation, landscape ecology, peatland restoration, government policy and water resource management, the spokesperson says.
A spokesperson for the University of Stirling added that the fish are 'closely monitored' for health and welfare risks and subject to pre-transfer health checks prior to release.
Already, 150,00 trees have been planted along the Muick, including on a fenced-off 40-hectare site on the Balmoral estate. The shade provided, when the trees mature, can cool water temperatures by a few degrees, says Third.
The target is 1 million new trees by 2035, including native rowan, aspen, Scots pine, birch, willow and hawthorn. Fishery boards across Scotland have similar tree-planting programmes, to provide shade to lower water temperatures.
'This is about doing something now, to build up resilience for what's coming down the line in 10, 20 or 50 years' time,' says Third. 'The salmon will have a fighting chance.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Toxic algae blooms detected in Lake Powell
A toxic Algae bloom, containing harmful cyanotoxins, has been detected in Antelope Canyon at Lake Powell, Arizona, impacting Fourth of July weekend recreation. The cyanotoxin levels are at the high end of safe exposure, posing risks such as rashes, organ failure, and potentially death for humans and animals through ingestion or inhalation during recreational activities. Although Lake Powell remains open, park officials advise visitors to avoid swimming in water with visible algal blooms and to refrain from boating on scummy water to prevent toxin exposure. Harmful algal blooms, like the one at Lake Powell, are becoming more frequent and persistent due to climate change, warmer water temperatures, and nutrient run-off. This issue is not isolated, with similar blooms affecting the recreation area last autumn and increasingly plaguing other bodies of water, such as Lake Erie, where they are lasting longer than before.


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Two dead in Turkey after wildfires ripped through villages and saw 50,000 evacuated as blazes flared in Crete amid Europe's heatwave hell
Two people have died in wildfires that ripped through Turkey as blazes erupted in Crete amid Europe's heatwave hell. One elderly victim died in a fire near Odemis, around 60 miles east of Izmir, in one of three villages evacuated in the area, Turkish lawmaker Salih Uzun told Halk TV. 'The village was evacuated but an elderly, bedridden patient could not be saved,' said Uzun. A forest worker in the same area died as he battled the blazes, the country's agriculture minister Ibrahim Yumakli said on X. Turkey, which was spared the recent heatwaves that gripped the rest of southern Europe, has been battling the effects of a long-term drought brought on by climate change. On Monday, more than 50,000 people were evacuated, mostly in the Izmir area but also from the southern province of Hatay, the AFAD disaster management agency said. Another major fire raged near Cesme, west of Izmir, which began late on Wednesday and forced the evacuation of a further three villages. 'The biggest problem is the wind speed of up to 53mph which is causing the fire to spread very quickly. And it constantly changes direction,' Izmir governor Suleyman Elban said. The highway linking Izmir to Cesme temporarily closed Thursday afternoon, but was reopened in the evening, Elban said on X. In both places, a total of 'nine planes, 22 helicopters and 1,100 (fire trucks and other) vehicles are intensively fighting the fires', the governor told reporters. He said both fires in the province, as well as those that began at the weekend and were brought under control, 'were caused by power cables'. Earlier, two other fires broke out - one in the southern resort of Antalya and the second in Istanbul's Sultan Gazi forest. They were quickly contained by firefighters, officials said. Footage from Antalya showed flames raging in a forested area near a residential area in Lara, a popular tourist resort with many large hotels, but a municipal official told AFP it was under control. Since Friday, hundreds of fires have been reported across drought-hit Turkey, fuelled by high winds. It comes after a survivor of the deadly Hatay quake in February, Aysel Erbas, 57, has now faced a second tragedy as the recent Turkey wildfires destroyed her belongings while she was preparing to move into her newly built home. The blaze broke out out on June 30 in the Karaali neighborhood and spread rapidly to six nearby districts due to strong winds. Although firefighting teams have now brought the fire under control, cooling operations and damage assessments are ongoing in the affected areas. 'I was cleaning the kitchen, closing windows to prevent dust, when I saw smoke everywhere and had to run outside,' she told Daily Sabah. 'I lost my phone and all my belongings inside the house. I could only put out the sparks with the small amount of water I had. 'Everyone was trying to survive amid the fire, but thankfully, some neighbors came to help. I was later taken to an ambulance after possibly inhaling smoke,' she added. According to figures on the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) website, there have been 90 wildfires in Turkey so far this year that have ravaged almost 87,000 acres of land. The figure on Monday was over 37,000 acres destroyed in 65 fires. Citing forestry ministry figures, meteorologist Ismail Kucuk told AFP that '90 percent of forest fires' were due to man-made causes. Power cables posed a risk if they were not properly maintained, said Kucuk, secretary general of Turkey's chamber of metrology engineers. In some regions, cables broke easily because they had not been maintained since electricity distribution companies had been privatised, he said. Experts say human-driven climate change is causing more frequent and more intense wildfires and other natural disasters, and have warned Turkey to take measures to tackle the problem. The Turkey blazes comes as a rapidly spreading wildfire on the Greek island of Crete today triggered widespread evacuations of tourists, hotels and homes. The blaze, which sparked in the mountains between the villages of Ferma, Achila and Agia Fota late Tuesday, was whipped up by powerful winds and tore through Crete's coastal areas yesterday. Authorities said evacuations were ordered at three sites outside the port of Ierapetra on the island's south coast as the inferno raged out of control overnight Wednesday into this morning. Around 230 firefighters were operating in the area overnight to try and contain the blaze. This morning, 10 water-dropping aircraft were dispatched to fly regular sorties over Crete, with reinforcements sent from Athens. People living in the area support the teams by carrying water to the area with their tractors as smoke rises from burning trees while air and land intervention continues against the fire that broke out in the forest area in Cesme district of Izmir According to figures on the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) website, there have been 90 wildfires in Turkey so far this year that have ravaged almost 87,000 acres of land Reports of the number of people evacuated vary, but the president of a hotelier's association this morning told Protothema that 5,000 people - mostly foreign tourists - were moved out of homes and hotels in what is one of Greece's most popular holiday hotspots. Fire brigade spokesmen and civil protection officials have so far confirmed around 1,500 evacuees were forced to leave their accommodation. Others stranded on the beach were whisked away by boats and rescue vessels. Homes were reported damaged as flames swept through hillside forests, fanned by strong winds, and emergency services reported that several people were transported to hospital with respiratory issues. 'It's a very difficult situation. The fire is very hard to contain. Right now, they cannot contain it,' Nektarios Papadakis, a civil protection official at the regional authority, said.


Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Why is the Met Office adopting the language of climate alarmism?
I gather it's been hot down south. My sympathies. As Londoners were sweltering, we had a chilly breeze off the North Sea in Northumberland. The UK Met Office says it is 'virtually certain' that June (the hottest in England since 1884, second hottest in the UK) was made hotter by human activity. Duh! Even if temperatures were not affected by greenhouse gases, which they are, the 34.7C (94.5F) recorded in St James's Park on Tuesday might have something to do with that weather station being a low-reliability 'class 5' site with an error rating of 'up to 5C'. It's next to a very busy tarmac path. Plus, it is in the middle of a city and therefore subject to a more general 'urban heat island' effect. Research by Arup reckons London's heat island is worth 4.5C extra warmth on average. So yes, the heat is indeed partly man-made – but not necessarily in the way the Met Office means. Besides, it's not exactly unusual to have hot days in summer: it reached 36.7C (98.1F) in Northamptonshire in 1911. As the world gets slowly warmer, we will see more hot summer days, though not as much as we will see more mild winter nights: winter nighttime temperatures have risen faster than summer daytime ones, as predicted by the greenhouse effect, just as Arctic temperatures have risen faster than tropical ones. The Met Office exists to forecast the weather. But increasingly it seems bored by the day job so it likes to lecture us about climate change. And here it seems to have been embarrassingly duped by activists. Go on its climate pages and you find a forecast for the year 2070, that summers will be between one and six degrees warmer and 'up to' 60 per cent drier, depending on the region. A lot of wriggle room in those caveats, note. Then it admits: 'We base these changes on the RCP8.5 high emissions scenario.' Aha! Unbelievably, shockingly, this national forecasting body has chosen as its base case for the future of weather a debunked, highly implausible set of assumptions about the world economy that was never intended to be used this way. RCP8.5 is one of five projected futures for the world economy this century, dreamt up by economists. Here is what it assumes. First, the world becomes addicted to coal, burning 10 times – yes, 10 times! – as much coal in 2100 as we did in 2000 and even using coal to make fuel for aircraft and cars. Yes: that is really what it says. It projects that fully half of all the world's energy will be supplied by coal in 2100. Second, it assumes that the world population will have swelled to 12 billion people by 2100, way more than any demographer thinks is likely. Third, it assumes that innovation will somehow dry up so there's hardly any new technology to make our lives more fuel-efficient – and we won't even try to cut emissions. In short, this scenario is barking mad. Don't take my word for it. Here's what Carbon Brief, an activist website, has to say: 'The creators of RCP8.5 had not intended it to represent the most likely 'business as usual' outcome… Its subsequent use as such represents something of a breakdown in communication between energy systems modellers and the climate modelling community.' Even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that RCP8.5 should not be used as a forecast. And here's its chief creator, Keywan Riahi: 'I wished I would have been clearer with what I meant by 'business as usual'.' In 2020, even the ultra-alarmist BBC said RCP8.5 was 'exceedingly unlikely'. Yet here, five years later, we have the Met Office itself still basing its forecasts for 2070 on ludicrous assumptions. And no, this is no 'breakdown in communications': this is deliberately seeking extreme predictions to scare people and so get media attention. If they used more realistic assumptions, they fear, the future would sound less terrifying. Come on, Met Office, do the decent thing and ditch the climate apocalypticism. If you must try to forecast the weather in 2070 – and for all your supercomputers, you generally admit you cannot reliably forecast the weather more than a week or two ahead – then use realistic assumptions. Even if it makes the future sound less scary.