Government pressed to give clarity on student fees before budget talks
The student contribution fee has been temporarily reduced for the past three years as part of cost-of-living packages accompanying the budget.
Advertisement
Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said she had been contacted by a woman, whose two daughters are at university, who is 'at her wits' end' over the threat of student fees rising.
The fees had been €3,000 before being temporarily reduced by €1,000, costing families with multiple children at third level thousands of euros extra per academic year.
Ms McDonald accused Taoiseach Micheál Martin of being 'dismissive' and Tánaiste Simon Harris of being 'cavalier' and 'out of touch' in their responses to questions over whether student fees would rise.
'Minister, you need to be upfront with students and their families,' she told Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers during Leaders' Questions.
Advertisement
'Dancing on the head of a pin, dodging and refusing to give a straight answer is, frankly, not acceptable.
She added: 'This is the flippant, casual attitude of a Government that has no problem reinstating big pay packages for top brass executives at bailed out banks, no problem doling out cushy pay increases for your record number of junior ministers, but then pleads the poor mouth when it comes to students and their families.
'A tale as old as time when it comes to Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael.'
She and Social Democrats deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan pressed Mr Chambers to clarify what the student contribution fee would be in the future.
Advertisement
'Is it 3,000 euros? Because people have to budget for that, minister. They can't just produce it out of thin air.'
Mr O'Callaghan said: 'Now you've been asked twice, minister, I'll ask you a third time, in September, what fees are students going to have to pay? Is it going to be 2,000 euro or 3,000 euro?'
He said there was 'complete disarray' and 'open revolt' in the Government over student fees.
He also said that the economic threat was used as an excuse, but the programme for government pledge to 'continue to reduce' the student contribution fee was made in January.
Advertisement
'I'm really struggling to understand what the Government is doing here and why this fiasco is continuing to run and hasn't been sorted out.'
Mr Chambers acknowledged that people and families were still under pressure from high costs, but said 'you can't just dismiss budgetary planning'.
He said temporary reductions in the student contribution fee was based on one-off cost-of-living packages, and the Government was 'trying to take measures which can be made on a permanent basis' in the upcoming Budget.
He said that engagement on the budget would follow after the Summer Economic Statement, which sets out in July how much will be spent in the budget in the autumn, and after the announcement of the National Development Plan.
Advertisement
He also warned that because of global economic uncertainty, 'we need to be careful' and that 'ad hoc decisions' would not be taken in early July outside of the budgetary process.
Asked about whether there was a rift in Cabinet over the issue, Fine Gael leader Simon Harris said 'certainly there is not' (Liam McBurney/PA)
'It's through the budgetary decisions that we make that will then set out what the fee threshold will be next year.'
'Whatever decisions are made in the context of the budget around reducing the cost of education, obviously that would be deducted through an academic year if a decision is made on that,' he said.
Mr Chambers also said the Irish Government's position was the same as Economy Minister and Sinn Féin MLA Caoimhe Archibald's stance on college fees.
Ms Archibald clarified in May that she will not approve an increase on the tuition fee cap of £4,750 beyond the annual inflationary adjustment.
She said placing an additional financial burden on students was not the way to address the pressures facing colleges and universities, after three universities said the decision would have a 'seriously detrimental impact' on higher education in Northern Ireland.
Mr Chambers said: 'This is the hypocrisy of Sinn Féin when it comes to third level fees, because in the North, Minister Archibald, at the time wasn't ruling out hikes in student fees and she said in the context of the financial position that she has to work within that, and that's the same for this Government when it comes to Budget 2026.'
The controversy over student fees arose after Higher Education Minister James Lawless said that, as it stands, student contribution fees will increase as there is no cost-of-living package to pay for what were temporary reductions introduced amid an inflation crisis.
He said he would 'fight' his case as part of budgetary negotiations in the coming months, and was 'hopeful' that whatever interventions he gains would kick in from the start of the next year.
Opposition politicians and Government backbenchers have said they have received correspondence from concerned families over the mooted increase and asked the Government to provide clarity.
They said it was reasonable to expect based on the wording of the programme for government that the current student fee of €2,000 would reduce further, rather than remain the same or increase.
Mr Harris told reporters on Wednesday that there was no rift at Cabinet over student fee costs, while Minister of State Thomas Byrne said the coalition was 'at one' over the issue.
Mr Harris also emphasised that fees would not go up in September 2025 as those were covered under Budget 2025, but instalments are due in the new year.
Ireland
Politics watch: Names begin to emerge ahead of pre...
Read More
Mr Lawless came out on Monday and said it was the case that he currently does not have the funds to reduce fees, but would 'fight' his case as part of budgetary negotiations in the coming months.
He added: 'I don't think there is any formula that can get the September instalments addressed.'
Asked about whether there was a rift in Cabinet over the issue, Fine Gael leader Mr Harris said 'certainly there is not'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves says ‘I was upset but today's a new day' after Commons tears
Chancellor Rachel Reeves was visibly upset during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, stating the next day it was a "personal issue" she would not elaborate on. Despite the emotional moment, Ms Reeves insisted she was "cracking on with the job" when she appeared publicly on Thursday to launch the NHS 10-year plan. 'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day,' she said. Keir Starmer publicly defended Ms Reeves, acknowledging he had not fully appreciated her distress during the fast-paced PMQs. The chancellor's emotional display, alongside a £5 billion deficit in spending plans, initially unsettled financial markets, though government bonds rallied and the pound steadied after reassurances about her position. While Labour colleagues defended her, some Conservatives criticised her public show of emotion, suggesting it was inappropriate for a senior leader.
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
Amundi warns US stablecoin policy could destabilise global payments system
LONDON, July 3 (Reuters) - Europe's largest asset manager has raised concerns that a boom in dollar-backed stablecoins in the wake of the United States' GENIUS Act could cause a major shift in money flows that destabilises the global payment system. The U.S. Senate passed the GENIUS Act a bill last month to create a regulatory framework for the U.S.-dollar-pegged cryptotokens. It is expected to be passed by the House of Representatives and approved by President Donald Trump, leaving other countries worried about a wave of so-called 'dollarization' of economies if their own populations buy them. "It could be genius, or it could be evil," Amundi Asset Management's chief investment officer Vincent Mortier told Reuters, voicing his concerns about the U.S. act. JPMorgan expects the amount of stablecoins in circulation to roughly double to $500 billion in the next few years, although some estimates have put it as high as $2 trillion. As stablecoins need be pegged to the dollar under the U.S. act, it will trigger buying of U.S. Treasury bonds. That has its benefits for the U.S. as it grapples with a gaping budget deficit, but could also pose problems for the U.S. and other countries. "In doing so you create an alternative to the U.S. dollar and that could lead to more weakening of the dollar," Mortier said. "Because if a country is pushing a stablecoin, it could be perceived as pushing the message that the dollar is not that strong." Currently, 98% of all stablecoins are pegged to the dollar, but more than 80% of stablecoin transactions happen outside the United States. Italy's finance minister, Giancarlo Giorgetti, warned in April that the U.S. stablecoin policies presented an "even more dangerous" threat to European financial stability than Trump's trade war. His argument was that access to dollars without needing a U.S. bank account would be attractive to millions of people and could undermine countries' monetary sovereignty. The Bank for International Settlements issued a similar warning on the risks posed by stablecoins, noting their potential to undermine monetary sovereignty, transparency issues and the risk of capital flight from emerging economies. Mortier, who oversees the 2 trillion euros ($2.36 trillion) of assets Amundi manages - none of which are in crypto - said he still had not fully made up his mind about stablecoins, but the worry was that a mass uptake could impact financial stability. As well as the dollarization issue, they would become "quasi-banks" he said, as people will deposit money in a coin assuming they can take it out again whenever they want. They will also be used as a direct means of payment. "It could potentially destabilise the global payment system," he said. "I'm not so sure it's a good idea". ($1 = 0.8483 euros)
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Douglas Murray: Only an October 7th-style attack against a Western country would wake up the pro-Hamas mob at Glastonbury to the existential threat Israel faces
Douglas Murray launched a scathing attack on Glastonbury artists and festival-goers, branding their pro-Hamas stance a dangerous 'fetish' on the Mail's Apocalypse Now podcast. Speaking to special correspondent David Patrikarakos, the bestselling author and broadcaster drew a sobering parallel between the music event and Hamas 's attacks on the Nova music festival on October 7, 2023. Mr Murray argued that only by witnessing a similar terror attack on young Westerners would Glastonbury's 'moral reprobates' finally grasp the threat Hamas poses and Israel 's existential struggle. This year's Glastonbury courted controversy when punk-rap duo Bob Vylan led a televised crowd in chants of 'death to the IDF' – sparking a police investigation and condemnation from Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'The festival at Glastonbury has long been a sordid and immoral affair', Murray said. 'There's always support for anyone who displays a hatred of the West. It is a shame because I think music should be a non-political place. 'The fact that somebody can get a crowd to chant death to the IDF is morally despicable. We all know what that really means. This year's Glastonbury courted controversy when punk-rap duo Bob Vylan led a televised crowd in chants of 'death to the IDF' 'The IDF is a citizen army, and Israel is the only Jewish state in the world. It means they're wishing death upon thousands of brave, young men and women who fight for their country and the survival of their people.' The Spectator columnist highlighted Bob Vylan's other chant - 'you want your country back, f*** that' – labelling it hypocritical from supporters of a supposedly anti-colonialist cause. The author argued: 'This is a man who is saying that he's against colonisation – but has expressed a desire to colonise my country, Britain. 'He expressed that desire while morons are flying Palestinian flags – presumably because they too are interested in the indigenous rights of the Palestinians. 'Well maybe the indigenous rights of the British people are worth protecting too. But they don't care about that because the standard only applies if it's anti-Western, anti us, in favour of literally anyone else.' According to Mr Murray, this naive 'anti-western cult', spawned by modern social justice movements, has chosen Palestine as its 'great fetish'. The bestselling author first tackled this anti-Western ideology in his 2022 book, The War on the West. His latest work, On Democracies and Death Cults, explores how these worldviews have shaped the Israel-Hamas conflict. 'The great fetish of these people's lives is the Palestinian people', Murray told the podcast. 'But what exactly do they think will happen if their pet fetish is ever allowed to win? 'The best-case scenario would be another Arab state in the region – which would be no more successful than say, Jordan. 'Palestine would likely be another outpost of the Mullahs, as long as they're still in power in Tehran. You'd just have yet another failed Arab state. 'You won't get an outbreak of world peace and love, as these people seem to believe. It's as if were Palestine to get a state, something magical would happen. 'Suddenly this unicorn would arrive and rights would be given to people all around the world, and trans people would be freed and there would be no more racism and injustice.' Exasperated, the cultural critic concluded his attack on the festival by issuing a grave warning. 'One wishes to resist the nastiest urges but… maybe the only thing that would ever wake up these moral reprobates at Glastonbury is if something like what happened at the Nova music festival happened to them or one of their friends. 'Not more than 18 months ago, a music festival like Glastonbury had hundreds of Hamas terrorists come into it. 'I heard first-hand how women were gang raped, shot in the jaw and tortured. I pray to God these people never have to discover the consequences of their own semi-thought.' To listen to the exclusive interview with Douglas Murray, search for Apocalypse Now, wherever you get your podcasts.
