'Wrong organ was removed': Surgeon faces lawsuit over alleged kidney removal error
Wendy Rappaport of Plymouth, Minnesota, went to Abbott Northwestern Hospital in March 2022 for treatment of a spleen condition. However, the surgery took an unexpected turn when the surgeon removed her left kidney instead of her spleen, the court documents filed on May 16 claimed.
"The wrong organ was removed," Rappaport's attorney Aaron Lawrence told ABC News.
"This never should have happened. We hope that Allina takes responsibility for this negligence instead of blaming the victim," he said, referring to the Minneapolis-based Allina Health System, of which Abbott Northwestern is a part.
According to the lawsuit, Rappaport was admitted to the hospital on March 24, 2022, for concerns about a possible spleen abscess or rupture. After undergoing initial tests and consulting with doctors, she was scheduled for spleen removal surgery on March 28, 2022.
The lawsuit alleged that Dr. Devon Callahan performed the surgery and instead of removing the spleen, the surgeon removed Rappaport's healthy left kidney. The legal documents also claimed that the doctor's post-operative note indicated he had removed an intact spleen.
ABC News reached out to Callahan for comment but has not yet received a response.
MORE: Military use of AI technology needs urgent regulation, UN warns
The lawsuit stated that Rappaport remained hospitalized for nearly two months until May 25, 2022.
Rappaport's post-procedure diagnoses included "splenic abscess, left nephrectomy (left kidney removal), respiratory failure, left pleural effusion, and diastolic heart failure," the court documents stated.
She has since been diagnosed with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, for which she now requires regular dialysis treatment, according to the court documents.
Chronic kidney disease is diagnosed in stages, 1-5. Stage 5 is one of the most advanced stages, at which point the kidneys are close to failure or have completely failed, according to the Cleveland Clinic. After this point, those affected may require dialysis or kidney transplant -- at which point they would enter what is termed "end stage" kidney disease.
Rappaport is suing Callahan and Allina Health for the alleged medical mistake.
"While we will not discuss details of a patient's care due to privacy laws, the court filings don't accurately reflect the full picture of the patient's condition, or the life-saving medical care provided," Allina Health said in a statement to ABC News. "We intend to vigorously defend, in court, the care that was provided."
MORE: Biden's cancer diagnosis may change conversation about his mental acuity: ANALYSIS
The lawsuit seeks monetary damages exceeding $50,000 -- though Rappaport's legal team noted that this figure is just a procedural requirement under Minnesota law, and the actual amount sought will be higher.
"We are seeking fair compensation that exceeds $50,000," Lawrence explained, clarifying that Minnesota court rules prevent them from specifying the exact amount in their initial complaint.
'Wrong organ was removed': Surgeon faces lawsuit over alleged kidney removal error originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
More testing needed on 'forever chemicals' in the North, advocate says
An environmental group says not enough testing is being done to determine the extent of contamination from so-called "forever chemicals," especially in the North. CBC News recently published an interactive map showing some PFAS "hotspots" across Canada, based on data from the federal government's inventory of contaminated sites. But Cassie Barker, senior program manager at the Toronto-based advocacy group Environmental Defence, said it doesn't show the entire picture. "The problem with that map is that it really can't show the extent of PFAS contamination that the North is actually dealing with," she said. "PFAS is everywhere, and in the North, it's particularly harmful and concentrated." PFAS — perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances — are a group of human-made chemicals found in a wide range of products, including cosmetics, non-stick pans, and firefighting foam. They're called forever chemicals because they have a strong carbon-fluorine bond, one of the strongest in chemistry, that makes them nearly impossible to break down. They're resistant to heat, water, and oil, and they can stay in the environment and our bodies for decades. PFAS have also increasingly been linked to human health problems, such as increasing cancer risk and causing reproductive issues. According to Barker, routine testing for PFAS is limited, and contamination may be more widespread than current testing indicates, meaning much of the exposure may be unseen or unreported. PFAS levels are often higher near industrial sites, landfills, and airports. In the N.W.T., the chemicals have been found in soil at the Hay River, Fort Simpson, and Inuvik airports. The territorial government plans to begin environmental site assessments at airport properties this year, starting in Hay River. Dana Bowen with the N.W.T. government says the territory has also tested all 33 N.W.T. communities for PFAS at water treatment facilities in 2023 and 2024. Most were below detection limits, but in 2024 Norman Wells exceeded Health Canada's new recommended limit for drinking water. Exceeding the limit doesn't necessarily indicate an immediate health risk, officials say, as the guideline includes large safety margins. More testing is planned in Norman Wells, but there is no schedule for re-testing across the rest of the territory. The N.W.T. government says PFAS are considered an emerging chemical of concern, and officials are working to align with evolving science and regulations. However, Barker says governments need to move faster. She said PFAS can travel through soil, water, and even the air, and build up in the bodies of people and animals over time. She added that these chemicals can be harmful even at very low levels. She said exposure to PFAS has been linked to rare cancers, hormone disruption, and damage to organs like the liver and kidneys. "Very small amounts of PFAS have these outsized harms," Barker said. "We're talking, you know, really low levels, drops in a swimming pool, levels of toxicity." Health Canada recently revised its guidelines for PFAS in drinking water, lowering the acceptable limit. Barker said the change reflects growing evidence that even small amounts can cause harm. Barker said Indigenous leaders, such as Lucy Grey from Nunavik, have played a key role in PFAS research and are calling for stronger global regulations. Despite having no role in producing or profiting from PFAS, Barker said, researchers in Nunavik have found elevated levels of PFAS in people who rely on country foods and that Indigenous communities that live off the land are being disproportionately affected. "If you are practicing your culture and you are eating country foods," she said, "this is an impossible choice that's being set up for communities in terms of, you know, everyone needs to drink water and everyone has to eat." Canada has classified some PFAS chemicals as toxic and banned their use, including PFOS and PFOA. However, thousands of other PFAS are still legally used and sold in products such as water-resistant fabrics, food storage, and cleaning supplies. The federal government has proposed broader regulations and plans to strengthen them after further research and consultation, with new rules expected to be implemented as early as 2026. Barker said that's not good enough and she wants to see a ban on all PFAS chemicals, not just a few at a time. She wants Canada to follow other countries by phasing them out completely, making companies take responsibility for the pollution they've caused, and supporting safer, non-toxic alternatives. "We're the ones who are bearing the costs of trying to clean up our water," she said. "[PFAS producers] should pay the price for their own pollution, and not the taxpayer, not the people who certainly didn't profit from this big mess."
Boston Globe
18 hours ago
- Boston Globe
‘They're playing politics with people's lives': Trump's big bill would slash Planned Parenthood's Mass. budget in half
'They're playing politics with people's lives,' said Ireland. 'It saddens me that the legislature does not see the real humans that are being affected by this decision-making.' Advertisement Ireland, a practicing OB/GYN and assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at UMass Memorial Medical Center and UMass Chan Medical School in Worcester, said that in just the past several days, she treated three women with widely different medical needs at the league's clinics. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up One had pre-cancer of the cervix. Another had a sexually transmitted disease that she caught from an unfaithful partner. And a third was about to start a pre-med program at an Ivy League school, got pregnant, and wanted an abortion. 'We provide excellent care based on quality and patient satisfaction and I hate to see that threatened,' Ireland said. The league has four clinics in Boston, Marlborough, Springfield, and Worcester, although abortions are not performed at the one in Marlborough. The clinics provide services such as birth control, Pap smears, breast exams and abortions. Advertisement The league provided 9,462 abortions last year, and more than half of them were achieved using a combination of two medications, mifepristone and misoprostol. Federal law, specifically the 1977 Hyde Amendment, already bans states from using federal Medicaid dollars to pay for abortions. Massachusetts, like more than a dozen mostly blue states, uses its own funds to cover abortions for Medicaid recipients. The legislation that President Trump and Republicans in Congress are pushing would affect federal money that covers other medical services and helps keep clinics running. Michael King, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, an anti-abortion rights group, said there are 'plenty of other clinics that can address those needs' in Massachusetts if Congress approves the Medicaid cuts. He noted that Planned Parenthood said it performed 402,000 abortions nationwide in its 2023-24 annual report, which King called a record number. He also cited a recent study by the Washington-based Ethics and Public Policy Center, a think tank that says it applies 'the riches of the Jewish and Christian traditions' to law, culture, and politics. The study found that 11 percent of women who had medication abortions experienced serious adverse complications. This rate, which has been cited by Republican members of Congress, was significantly higher than the less than 0.5 percent rate found in clinical trials by the US Food and Drug Administration. 'If Planned Parenthood clinics closing means that the number of abortions declined, then we are very pleased that the lives of more babies will be saved in Massachusetts,' King said. Critics of the Medicaid cuts, however, said congressional Republicans are using the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' to knee-cap an organization that they have long opposed. Advertisement Although Planned Parenthood isn't mentioned in the bill, 'all they needed to add was it rhymes with wood or Hollywood,' said Fabiola De Liban, director of sexual and reproductive health at the National Health Law Program, in Los Angeles. Ireland said that if the House approves the bill containing the Medicaid cuts, the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts is committed to keeping the doors of all four clinics open and maintaining services. She said the league might seek to provide other services to bolster income, including vasectomies and treatment for perimenopause, the physical and emotional symptoms that often appear as a woman approaches menopause. Perimenopausal care includes hormone therapy, vaginal creams, and certain medications that can help manage symptoms like hot flashes and mood changes. Jonathan Saltzman can be reached at
CBS News
19 hours ago
- CBS News
Twin Cities nurses reach tentative deal to avert strike, union says; Duluth-area strike may proceed
A Minnesota nurses union says it has reached a tentative deal with several Twin Cities health care providers to avert a strike after months of bargaining, but adds the fight continues for its Duluth-area members. The Minnesota Nurse Association, which represents 15,000 nurses across 13 hospitals in the Twin Cities and Duluth area, announced the deal on Thursday morning, which resolves the planned unfair labor practices strike its members voted overwhelmingly in favor for late last month. The agreement, according to the association, includes "new language to implement Minnesota's new break law, tools to address workplace violence, a raise of 3% in the first year 4% in the second, and 3% in the third." The association says thousands of the metro health care workers it represents have been working without a contract for months, including some whose contract just expired on Monday. The union has accused Twin Cities providers — including Allina Health, Children's Minnesota, M Health Fairview, HealthPartners and North Memorial Health — of refusing to bargain in good faith, withholding information and attempting to undermine workers' rights. WCCO Roadblocks to the agreement, according to the union, have included proposed policies from hospitals to cap sick time at 48 hours a year, cancel shifts at a moment's notice, cut overtime pay and switch workers to a higher-cost health care plan. The previous agreement, reached in December 2022, also averted a planned strike, but the union went on to accuse hospitals of ignoring contract language concerning staffing ratios. It's unclear how the new tentative agreement addresses that concern. Duluth-area health care workers set to strike next week The association's Duluth-area nurses, however, are still in the midst of negotiations that began in April. Its members, who work for Aspirus St. Luke's Hospital and Essentia Health, have been working without a contract since Monday. The association says those nurses are still set to strike on July 8, and advanced practice providers will join them two days later. WCCO has reached out to the hospitals involved for comment. This story will be updated. NOTE: The original airdate of the video attached to this article is June 24, 2025. contributed to this report.
