From Olympians to Love Island stars:The famous face standing in the local elections in your area
Local councillors are usually obscure figures, passionate local activists hoping to improve their areas or ambitious party loyalists wanting to climb the electoral ladder.
But among the thousands of councillors standing across the country on Thursday, a few names stand out.
From Olympians to ousted ex-MPs, The Independent looks at how the main parties are hoping star power will help their candidates over the line in one of the most unpredictable sets of local elections in British history.
Stiliyan Petrov, the son of an ex-Aston Villa and Bulgaria captain of the same name, is standing for Reform UK in the May local elections.
His father is Bulgaria's most capped player and he hopes to represent Nigel Farage 's party in Lapworth & West Kenilworth, Warwickshire.
'I decided to stand for election because I think it's time the working-class people and the youth of this country have a voice that'll actually represent them,' the ex-professional footballer's son said.
James Cracknell
James Cracknell is standing for a seat on Oxfordshire County Council.
The double Olympic gold medal-winning rower is standing as a Conservative for Henley, having previously attempted to become the area's MP.
He was awarded an OBE for 'services to sport' in the 2005 New Year Honours list and is promising to help Henley 'get its buzz back', according to the local Conservatives.
As a rower, he has made holding water companies to account over river cleanliness a key issue he is fighting on.
Luke Campbell
Reform UK's candidate for the Hull and East Yorkshire mayoral election is also an Olympic gold medalist.
The boxer is swapping his gloves for the chance to represent the region as the first head of the new combined authority.
He is the favourite to win, according to a recent More in Common poll, in what promises to be one of the closest results of the night as Reform, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and Labour all stand a chance.
Mr Campbell, who won gold at the London 2012 Olympics, said Hull and East Yorkshire has 'given me everything' and that he now wants to fight for the region in return.
Ollie Williams
The Love Island star is hoping to strike it lucky with voters and win a Reform UK seat on Cornwall council.
Ollie Williams appeared on the ITV dating show in 2020, but left after just three days claiming he had feelings for another woman.
The 29-year-old sparked fury among viewers as photos emerged of him posing beside dead animals, leading to suggestions he was 'trophy hunting'.
He has avoided the limelight in the years since his appearance on the ITV show, but is now standing for Reform in the Lostwithiel and Lanreath ward.
'Our freedom of speech and society has been eroded for far too long and it's time to act,' he declared.
Arron Banks
Self-styled 'Brexit bad boy' Arron Banks co-founded the Leave.EU campaign alongside now Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice.
The long-standing Farage supporter is now running to become the West of England mayor for his party.
Announcing his candidacy at Reform's local election launch in Birmingham, he called on people to 'vote Banksy for Bristol'. As well as close ties to Mr Farage, Mr Banks has a history of ties to Donald Trump and was pictured with him after the US Presidential election in 2016. He has cited Mr Trump's success as being the result of connecting with voters on an emotional level.
Mr Banks and Mr Farage drew the interest of Robert Mueller as part of his investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Mr Banks described the investigation as a 'witch hunt'.
Mr Banks also made headlines after the tragic murder of Labour MP Jo Cox in 2016. At the time, he commissioned a controversial poll on whether her murder had affected public opinion on voting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Reporter
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Alexander in Taiwan for talks
The MP for Lothian East, Douglas Alexander, is in Taiwan for talks in his role as Trade Minister on Sunday and Monday. The visit is part of the UK's longstanding although unofficial relationship with Taiwan and is aimed at improving bilateral trade, worth £9.3 billion in 2024. It comes a week after the Government announced its new Trade Strategy intended to secure UK business and trading relationships. Mr Alexander said: 'We share a long-standing trade relationship with Taiwan and our trade reached an all-time high last year, but we know there are still more opportunities for British businesses to take advantage of opportunities in this dynamic economy. 'The new Enhanced Trade Partnership (ETP) Pillars will help us boost trade in some of our growth-driving sectors, delivering economic growth and helping put more money in people's pockets as part of the Plan for Change.' Digital trade pilots were completed with UK wafer company Clas-SIC Wafer Fab and the Kimbland Distillery in Orkney and Skene Scotch Whiskey as the UK tries to streamline trade with Taiwan. Mr Alexander will witness the signing of a trade agreement between the two countries which will be conducted by British Representative Taipei, Ruth Bradley-Jones, and the Representative at the Taipei Representative Office, Vincent Chin-Hsiang Yao. Douglas Alexander photographed when he was Scottish Labour Party candidate for Lothian East in 2024 Like this: Like Related
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Nigel Farage's Reform UK's rise in London 'a threat to main parties'
Is Reform UK on the rise in London?The party, led by Nigel Farage, says it has quadrupled its membership in the year since the general election, where they won five seats, including one for Farage in UK had the third-highest vote share in the country at the 2024 election - just over 14% - with half a million more votes than the Liberal Democrats. According to polling, London has a smaller share of Reform voters, but it has a higher share of people who say they would consider voting Reform in the future. Not far from the capital, Reform has control of Kent County Council, which had long been UK also has its first London Assembly member, Alex Wilson, who was elected in May 2024. London politics expert Prof Tony Travers told the Politics London programme that the party "could do very well indeed in some of the outer London boroughs, particularly I would say those that voted Leave in the Brexit referendum, so Barking and Dagenham, Havering, Bexley, Hillingdon, even Sutton".He added: "Those are the places I think they could well do a lot of damage to the incumbent parties."Laila Cunningham, a Westminster city councillor who last week defected from the Conservatives to Reform UK, told Politics London that her residents "would always point to how they were let down by the previous Conservative administration and how they wouldn't vote for them".She added: "Honesty, I think, is really lacking in politics now and I just couldn't defend their record." Cunningham said Reform UK were "serious about getting this country back on track, they're serious about cutting immigration, cutting crime, cutting waste, cutting tax and people say that's right wing but that used to be mainstream a few years ago".Deirdre Costigan, Labour MP for Ealing Southall, told Politics London that Reform UK's "key policy seems to be a massive tax cut for the rich".She added: "How are they going to pay for that tax cut? The only way of paying for that is to cut public services. So, we'll have less police on the streets of London and we won't have an NHS."Conservative London Assembly member Alessandro Georgiou told the programme that Farage "is a tax-and-spend socialist, if you take what he says". Watch the full Politics London programme on BBC iPlayer.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
History will judge this Labour government for targeting protesters
There, Donna told me about the man she knew as Carlo Neri and how he used her to gain access to the activists she hung around with. Neri, whose real name was Carlo Sorrachi, affected to like the things she liked, told her he loved her, and asked her to marry him. Then, when she had served her purpose, he disappeared. Donna has since written her own book about her experience: Small Town Girl. The public inquiry which, back then, had not yet taken evidence, has heard similar stories from other women, whose lives were co-opted by a state intent on stamping out dissent. Some of the undercover officers fathered babies with their duped partners: tiny bundles of collateral damage, their lives forever tarnished by the deceit that led to their conception. Beyond the emotional fallout, two aspects of the scandal stand out for me. The first is the way the groups chosen for infiltration were cherry-picked. The Special Demonstration Squad (then called the Special Operations Squad) was set up in 1968 to target Vietnam War protesters. In the following 50 years, it sent officers into, amongst others, the anti-apartheid movement, Camps for Climate Action, and the campaign to bring the killers of Stephen Lawrence to court. Right-wing groups were largely left alone. Read more Dani Garavelli Most of those left-wing groups are now regarded as having occupied the moral high ground. Anti-apartheid activists were standing up against the iniquity of the South African regime while Margaret Thatcher was still refusing to introduce economic sanctions. The climate action groups were ahead of the curve on the crisis facing the planet. The Stephen Lawrence campaign exposed the institutional racism the Met was trying to cover up. The second troubling aspect is the degree to which the police were prepared to cross legal/ethical lines in order to gain paltry intelligence. The women who unwittingly slept with undercover officers see themselves as victims of state-sanctioned rape. Meanwhile, many of the officers acted as agent provocateurs, actively encouraging the acts of sabotage the police could act on and the courts punish. One law for those upholding the status quo, and another for those challenging it. You might think these revelations, which have been entering the public domain in dribs and drabs over the last few years, would have given the establishment pause for thought; that governments, under whose auspices the police operate, might have asked themselves searching questions about how this was allowed to happen, and the double standards being applied. Instead, the Conservatives introduced two pieces of legislation — the Police Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and the Public Order Act 2023 — designed to further restrict the right to demonstrate, by criminalising long-established forms of civil disobedience such as chaining yourself to fences or disrupting major road networks and national events. Earlier this year, a report by the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) claimed the aggressive police use of these new laws, along with the demonisation of peaceful protesters, had become so pronounced it amounted to repression. The powers are most often used against activists who threaten those policies the government is hellbent on pursuing: the expansion of roads and airports and oil fields, for example, and the freedom to support any heinous regime it regards as useful. Yvette Cooper is targeting Palestine Action (Image: PA) Far from reversing this trend, Labour has entrenched it. Yvette Cooper unsuccessfully defended her predecessor Suella Braverman against claims the government had acted unlawfully when it reduced the threshold for police intervention from 'serious disruption to the life of the community' to 'more than minor'. Now she seems determined to proscribe Palestine Action, a protest group which is committed to 'ending global participation in Israel's genocidal and apartheid regime'. This would place it on a par with Isis, the IRA and Al-Qaeda, and criminalise not only those who take part in action, but anyone who expresses sympathy or support. So what did Palestine Action do to deserve this treatment? Did it threaten or perpetrate acts of violence? Did it cause widespread alarm or endanger lives? There is no evidence to suggest so. Mostly, its activities have involved vandalism at factories and military bases it claims to be involved in supplying weapons or assistance to Israel. In 2022, it broke into the Thales factory in Glasgow, causing more than £1m of damage to munitions produced there. Then, last week, it sprayed red paint into the engines of two Airbus Voyager aircraft. Read more: Are there problems with such tactics? I would argue there are. Thales and our military bases are also producing weapons and carrying out missions unrelated to Israel's attacks on Palestinians. Thales' Belfast factory has a contract to supply 5,000 air defence missiles to Ukraine. Aircraft from RAF Brize Norton have been involved in dropping humanitarian aid to Gaza. If there is one thing Russia's invasion of Ukraine has taught old anti-war types like myself it is that there are times when a strong defence capacity is essential. But these are arguments about specific choices, not the legitimacy of dissent. They are not a justification for increasing the gravity of the offence or the punishment meted out to those who commit it. The vandalism Palestine Action inflicted is already a criminal offence. But the four people arrested in connection with the Brize Norton attack have been arrested not, as you might expect, in connection with criminal damage, but under the Terrorism Act. This despite the fact that attacks on military air bases are not new. In 2017, two men cut through fences at BAE Warton in an attempt to target fighter jets destined for Saudi Arabia and attacks on Yemen. They were charged with but acquitted of criminal damage. In 2003, a group of anti-war protesters broke into RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire to sabotage US bombers before they flew to Iraq. Keir Starmer knows this because he defended them on the grounds they were trying to stop the planes from committing war crimes. Apparently, Starmer has no such qualms about war crimes now or at least not the ones being carried out by Israel. It's impossible — isn't it, given the way events have unfolded? — not to notice that the crackdown is being carried out selectively, and with one particular brand of activism in mind. That's what the smearing of pro-Palestinian protesters on peaceful marches exposes. A pro-Palestine protest at Westminster. (Image: PA) But the proscription of a particular group on political grounds is dangerous on multiple fronts. It may become a self-fulfilling prophecy, tipping that that group into violent acts its members would not otherwise have countenanced. And it sets a precedent for the future proscription of any protest group whose goals any government doesn't like. When suffragette statues were being attacked by trans rights activists last year, Cooper described them as honouring 'women who fought for freedom and justice' though they committed acts similar to the ones she is now trying to proscribe, and were mostly loathed by the politicians of their day. History will judge her government for its targeting of those who — in the face of establishment recalcitrance — are also driven to take direct action. Perhaps future Home Secretaries will praise pro-Palestinian protesters as champions of freedom and justice. But how many more will die in Gaza before that day comes?
