Why Isn't Sustainable Packaging Mainstream Yet?
Claire Hae-Min Gusko, Co-founder and CEO of one.five
Despite record-breaking climate pledges and the sustainable packaging market expected to maintain robust growth through 2030 and beyond, the world is still wrapped in plastic.
Sustainable packaging is gaining traction — its momentum is driven by a blend of regulatory push, shifts in consumer values, brand commitments, and innovation in material science. The packaging industry's green transition is seen as critical not only for brands' market competitiveness but for fulfilling wider sustainability and circular economy goals.
But despite considerable progress made towards greener packaging, it's still a far cry from mainstream.
Current estimates suggest that between 15% and 20% of global packaging may be classified as sustainable. However, this figure encompasses packaging that is recyclable, reusable, compostable, or made from recycled or bio-based materials.
Globally, only about 14% of plastic packaging is collected for recycling, and around 46% still ends up in landfill. This means that there is an enormous amount of greenwashing around packaging classified as recyclable.
Claire Hae-Min Gusko, co-founder and CEO of AI-powered packaging startup one.five, is harnessing the power of AI to speed up the transition to sustainable packaging. Her startup, based in Germany, uses artificial intelligence and biomaterials to prototype packaging that meets performance, price, and sustainability goals in one go. But she's quick to point out that tech alone won't solve the system-wide friction slowing adoption.
'We're not missing innovation — we're missing infrastructure, regulation, and market alignment,' Gusko explains.
like Christian Schiller (CEO of Cirplus) and Adrian Friederich (Principal at FoodLabs),
Gusko's frustration is echoed by sustainable packaging sector experts who are sounding the alarm on misaligned incentives that keep fossil-based packaging in its leading position: 'We have the tools,' says Adrian Friederich, Principal at FoodLabs. 'But without system-wide coordination, they never connect to real-world outcomes.'
The global sustainable packaging market is forecast to reach $240–$423 billion by 2034, growing at estimated 7–7.7% CAGR. Europe leads adoption due to policy drivers like the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), while Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing market for sustainable packaging. By 2025, 40% of companies are expected to adopt innovative packaging — yet real systems change still lags.
This photo taken on June 9, 2020 shows municipal workers transferring waste from a canal into a ... More garbage truck in Bangkok. - Clogged canals and landfills, polluted rivers and seas, environmentalists warn Thailand's plastic waste has surged in step with home food deliveries during the coronavirus, snuffing out efforts to reduce dependency on single-use plastics. (Photo by Lillian SUWANRUMPHA / AFP) / TO GO WITH Thailand-health-virus-environment, FOCUS by Sophie DEVILLER and Pitcha DANGPRASITH (Photo by LILLIAN SUWANRUMPHA/AFP via Getty Images)
At one.five, Gusko's team is building a platform that uses AI to predict product-market fit for sustainable packaging before prototyping — asking: will it be affordable, scalable, manufacturable, and regulation-proof?
'We didn't set out to build an AI company,' she says. 'We just needed a way to compete on speed and relevance.'
Their first commercial launch debuted earlier this year at the World Travel Catering Expo, backed by over €10.5M in funding from top-tier European climate investors.
'The biggest systemic barrier is the artificially low price of virgin plastic,' says Christian Schiller, CEO of Cirplus, calling out the outrageous reality of fossil fuel subsidies that are significantly hampering the transition to sustainable alternatives.
Despite increasing regulation and consumer awareness, plastic remains cheap, effective, and ubiquitous.
'Cost is still the elephant in the room,' adds Friederich. 'Even in climate-aware industries, price often trumps sustainability. Until we see meaningful financial incentives or penalties, sustainable packaging won't scale.'
Schiller calls for stronger price corrections: 'We need plastic taxes, subsidy reform, and mandatory recycled content quotas. Right now, business-as-usual is simply cheaper — and that's what's keeping the industry stuck.'
The next five years will be pivotal for the packaging industry. Global regulatory pressure is increasing, supply chains are shifting, and sustainable alternatives are finally approaching industrial scale — yet adoption is still starkly uneven and driven by regional government policy.
A large percentage of consumers, over 40% according to recent surveys, say they are willing to pay more for products with sustainable packaging. Brand loyalty and purchase decisions are also increasingly linked to sustainable packaging practices.
Currently, single-use plastic packaging accounts for around 40–50% of all global plastic production.
'We're at a turning point,' says Friederich, 'cities are piloting reuse models. Seaweed, fiber, and refillable formats are scaling. And regulation is finally catching up — particularly in Europe.'
Still, success depends on largely on execution and enforcement of government policy. The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) could drive meaningful reform — or risk falling short if enforcement is weak.
'With the PPWR leaving much room for revision, I don't expect targets to be met unless backed by strong political will,' says Schiller. 'Meanwhile, countries like China are building large-scale recycling infrastructure at speed. The EU may soon have to choose between importing recyclate — or lowering its own quotas.'
For startups like one.five, this landscape presents both challenge and opportunity.
'You have to live in two timelines,' says Gusko. 'One where you're building for a future that's a decade away — and another where you need to prove value today just to survive. That balancing act is what defines our path forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
2 hours ago
- Digital Trends
Sony makes one of the best OLED TVs, this deal makes it $900 more affordable
Every day we find incredible TV deals, so there's never really a point in buying a TV at the regular price. That is, unless you want one of the best TVs all around, which have more of a reason to not go on sale frequently. They already get lots of attention and have the chops to justify high prices. However, from time to time we do find a great deal on one of our favored TVs. This time around we're see a $900 discount on the 65-inch Sony Bravia 8 OLED, one of our picks for the best OLED TVs. Getting the TV now, which you can do simply by tapping the button below, will only cost you $1,900 instead of the usual $2,800. Read on to learn why the TV is so great, as well as to see the special reason why it's included in our list of OLED TVs. Why you should buy the Sony Bravia 8 OLED The Sony Bravia 8 OLED is a brilliant TV for your living room or gathering area. It's a weird thing to say, but a lot of TVs have a sort of 'hermit' personality and are really best enjoyed with a small group in a dark room. Not the Sony Bravia 8 OLED, with its wide viewing angle and ability to stand up to ambient lighting. This is a TV to grab the crew around and watch some ball or have in your living room to give you some company while you watch the kids. It's a TV to enhance your life with, but it doesn't have to So, why did this TV make it on our OLED shortlist? It happens to be the best Sony OLED for the price. And, of course, by this we mean its standard price. The quality is simply there; it has rich colors and black levels that make things pop, whether you're in the living room or not. So, why not grab it while it is $900 cheaper and you can get it for $1,900 instead of the usual $2,800.
Entrepreneur
2 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
4 Signs It's Time to Abandon Your Patent
How to make smart, strategic calls on when to abandon patents — and why doing so is essential to long-term innovation and budget health Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Patents are often filed early, before a startup knows what the market really wants. That's smart, but it comes with a challenge: Not every idea turns out to be worth protecting. Markets shift. Products pivot. And eventually, founders ask: Should we keep paying for this patent or cut our losses? It's a tough call. Abandoning a patent midway can feel like giving up. But continuing just because you've already spent money? That's the sunk cost trap, and it quietly drains your budget. Many startups keep prosecuting every idea, paying rejections, annuities and attorney fees. But a smart IP strategy means knowing what to keep and what to walk away from. Here's how to make that call strategically. Related: How to Identify the Patent-Worthy Innovations in Your Business Built-in checkpoints in patent lifecycle — use them Roughly, you can split a patent's entire lifecycle cost into three parts. The first third goes to drafting the application, another third is for arguing the patent through issuance, and the final third covers patent maintenance fees for the next 20+ years. In a way, these financial checkpoints are decision checkpoints, too. When drafting, consider whether the invention aligns with your core business or is just a side experiment that may never get to market. During prosecution, evaluate whether it's still worth the legal wrangling, as each round of argument is costly. And when renewal fees come due, ask if the patent still supports your product, blocks competitors or adds leverage against others in the market. Unfortunately, many startups treat these pivotal stages as administrative formalities. Instead of evaluating whether continued investment is justified at each stage, many companies default to pushing forward — whether by extending prosecution unnecessarily, filing continuations without a clear purpose, or simply paying maintenance fees — without assessing strategic alignment. That's how portfolios get bloated with low-impact patents. The only solution here is patent pruning: Abandon some patent filings at the right checkpoints. Related: Don't Let Patent Costs Crush Your Startup — Here's How to Protect Your IP Without Breaking the Bank What are the signs that it's time to abandon a patent? Every dollar spent defending or maintaining a weak patent is a dollar not spent protecting something truly valuable. Therefore, you must look for the signs at different checkpoints to spot a patent to discard. Here are some signs to look for: 1. No market validation A patent is only valuable if the protected product actually sells. If your invention fails to gain customer traction, the patent will be a failure. Experts emphasize focusing on "high-impact" problems with real demand. Without that market pull, even a granted patent is a dead weight. For example, Google Glass — once hyped as the future of AR eyewear — never found a viable consumer market. It was pulled from sale in 2015 (and again in 2023) due to poor adoption, illustrating how patents tied to unvalidated products offer no return. 2. Shifting industry direction Industries evolve, and a patent can lose value if the tech horizon moves on. In practice, companies are advised to ask whether their invention still aligns with "the target industry and market." If adjacent innovations eclipse your solution (for example, cloud services replacing old networking hardware), the patent's relevance vanishes. In that scenario, it makes little sense to keep paying maintenance fees. Better to refocus on protections for innovations that fit the new direction of your field. 3. Prior art kills the novelty Sometimes, what initially feels like a breakthrough ends up being something others have already attempted or fully disclosed. If prior art eclipses your claims, the chances of securing meaningful protection drop significantly. At that point, even if you receive a patent, it may be so narrow that it offers little real-world value. Continuing to prosecute a case like this can quickly become a drain on time and legal budget. 4. Weak business use case Every patent in your portfolio should earn its keep through business impact or the potential to do so on your current roadmap. If it's not protecting a revenue-generating product, blocking a competitor or supporting licensing efforts, its value is questionable. Startups often hang on to patents without a clear path to monetization or strategic use. But unless a patent strengthens your market position or serves a legal or commercial purpose, it's just another expense on the books. To actively prune your patent portfolio, just looking for signs isn't enough. As the portfolio grows, you need a deliberate, repeatable process for patent abandonment assessment. Build a patent pruning system: Health checks and ranking framework An effective patent pruning system should take two things into consideration: 1) lifecycle stage and 2) multiple perspectives. For the first one, you want to start by ranking each patent across key lifecycle stages: At the idea stage : Is this innovation aligned with your product roadmap or market differentiation? Post-filing : Has the landscape shifted? Is the application still strategically relevant? Pre-renewal: Is the granted patent still supporting revenue, blocking competitors or enhancing leverage? The higher a patent scores at a certain stage, the more you want to invest in it. Please note that not only your legal counsel team but also others, such as product, technology, marketing and finance, must contribute to this ranking system, as pruning cannot be undone. The goal is to ensure that patents are evaluated through a business lens, not just a legal one. Consider using patent management tools that provide full portfolio visibility and enable seamless collaboration as part of your patent pruning process. Related: 4 Surprising Patent Myths That Could Cost You Big — What You Need to Know Now Pruning a patent portfolio isn't just about saving money; it's about fueling what's next with the reclaimed budget. In 2020, IBM stepped back from chasing patent volume. "We're no longer pursuing patent leadership," they said. "We're being more selective." The result? Fewer filings, stronger focus and more investment in high-growth areas like AI and quantum computing. That's the lesson: Pruning isn't cutting back. It's reallocating toward where your business is growing. Because IP should follow your future, not fund your past.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Sustainable Funds Rebound With Global Inflows of $4.9 Billion
The global market for sustainable funds recovered in the second quarter after posting record-high redemptions during the first three months of the year, according to an analysis by Morningstar Inc. Against a backdrop of 'ESG backlash and volatility sparked by geopolitical tensions and US tariffs, the picture for ESG funds improved last quarter,' led by investments in European-based offerings, said Hortense Bioy, head of sustainable investing research at Morningstar Sustainalytics.
