logo
Convicted killer Bradley John Murdoch to make bombshell ‘deathbed' statement

Convicted killer Bradley John Murdoch to make bombshell ‘deathbed' statement

New York Post4 days ago

The man responsible for one of Australia's most notorious murders has claimed he will make an 'explosive' deathbed statement.
Bradley John Murdoch, 67, is close to death in Alice Springs, having been taken to palliative care from prison in recent weeks.
Advertisement
Murdoch killed British tourist Peter Falconio and tried to kidnap Joanna Lees in outback NT in 2001.
In 2005 Murdoch was found guilty of murder, and Mr. Falconio's body has never been found.
Murdoch will maintain his innocence, 7News reports, but has shared a statement with true crime author Robin Bowles.
6 Bradley John Murdoch is escorted, in handcuffs, from the Adelaide Magistrates' Court after facing an extradition hearing in 2003.
Getty Images
Advertisement
6 Peter Falconio (right) and Joanne Lees (left).
Getty Images
Peter Falconio was murdered in the NT outback before Joanna Lees managed to escape.
'I know what they are,' Ms. Bowles told 7News.
Advertisement
'And they will be explosive. It's a shame they weren't able to be released earlier,' she said.
6 The Volkswagen camper van belonging to Joanne Lees and Peter Falconio is impounded as evidence.
Getty Images
'You can't sue a dead man. So if he's making the claims and he's died, then the proverbial might hit the fan.'
Further, 7News reports Murdoch will not be 'communicating positively with police', but detectives will again speak to him in his final days.
Advertisement
This week, territory police doubled the reward to $500,000 for information leading to Mr. Falconio's body.
6 Joanne Lees (center) with Peter Falconio's brothers after the murder trial.
Getty Images
'He's (Murdoch) not being too forthcoming in regards to engaging with police, but we will continue doing what we have to,' NT police acting commander Mark Grieve told media.
'The NT police still hold out hope that someone may be able to provide some vital information to assist in this search,' he said.
Bradley John Murdoch always maintained his innocence.
6 Bradley John Murdoch always maintained his innocence.
Getty Images
'We think there's still people out there that may hold some information.'
'There may be someone out there that he's confided in, whether or not that's family or friends, we just don't know.'
Advertisement
Police had contacted Mr. Falconio's family this week, Superintendent Grieve said.
6 Police had contacted Mr. Falconio's family this week, Superintendent Grieve said.
PA Images via Getty Images
Mr. Falconio's death had 'captured the heart of the country' when it occurred and 'never gone away', Superintendent Grieve said.
On holiday from the UK, Mr. Falconio, 28, and his girlfriend Ms. Lees, then 27, were driving a Volkswagen van north of Barrow Creek in central NT on July 14, 2001.
Advertisement
Murdoch – a drug runner – waved them to the side of the road and shot Mr. Falconio.
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
Ms. Lees was bound and placed in Murdoch's Land Cruiser but escaped and hid on the side of the road for hours before flagging down help.
Advertisement
A jury unanimously found Murdoch guilty of murder in 2005.
He was sentenced to life imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 28 years, before 'no body, no parole' laws came into effect in 2016.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Not OK, Karen! Court loses it when lawyer calls someone ‘Karen' in legal papers: ‘Borderline racist, sexist, and ageist'
Not OK, Karen! Court loses it when lawyer calls someone ‘Karen' in legal papers: ‘Borderline racist, sexist, and ageist'

New York Post

time14 hours ago

  • New York Post

Not OK, Karen! Court loses it when lawyer calls someone ‘Karen' in legal papers: ‘Borderline racist, sexist, and ageist'

You Karen't say that! A British court tore into an attorney who called someone a 'Karen' in papers for a discrimination case — calling the term 'borderline racist, sexist, and ageist,' according to a report. A British employment tribunal judge ruled that Karen is a 'borderline racist, sexist, and ageist,' slang term. Witoon – Sylvia Constance, a 74-year-old black woman, was suing for discrimination after she was axed from a charity company called Harpenden Mencap — but an employment tribunal took issue when the ousted worker's rep used the phrase in court papers, the Independent reported. Attorney Christine Yates argued leadership at the charity — supports adults with learning disabilities — leadership 'acted like stereotypical Karens' — claiming they weaponized their privilege to suspend and fire Constance over 'fictitious claims, the report said. Constance accused the organization of unfair dismissal, racial and age discrimination and of launching a campaign to oust her based on prejudice, the outlet said. Yates alleged that a white, female management team had colluded with white male residents under their care to create a racist and misogynistic smear campaign, the outlet reported. Tribunal judge George Alliot took issue with the use of the term 'Karen' in legal filings. – Tribunal judge George Alliot took issue with Yates's use of the term 'Karen' in legal filings. 'We note Christine Yates uses the slang term 'Karen', which is a pejorative and borderline racist, sexist, and ageist term,' Alliot said. The tribunal ultimately dismissed Constance's claims, siding with the charity for firing her in June 2023 over an 'irretrievable breakdown' of workplace relationships, the outlet reported. Alliot also ruled that the complaints against Constance were 'legitimate,' the outlet said.

Syrian teen charged in failed terror attack on Taylor Swift concert
Syrian teen charged in failed terror attack on Taylor Swift concert

New York Post

time16 hours ago

  • New York Post

Syrian teen charged in failed terror attack on Taylor Swift concert

A Syrian teen has been charged with helping to try to carry out a bloodbath bomb attack on a Taylor Swift concert in Vienna last summer, according to authorities. The juvenile suspect, only identified as 'Mohammad A,' aided a fellow extremist by translating Arabic bomb-making instructions and hooking him up with an online Islamic State militia contact to plan the would-be terror attack at Ernst Happel Stadium, German prosecutors alleged Friday. 'Mohammad A has adhered to the ideology of the terrorist organization Islamic State (IS) since April 2024 at the latest,' a statement from the prosecutor general said. Advertisement The juvenile suspect, only identified as 'Mohammad A,' helped a fellow extremist plan a would-be attack on a Taylor Swift 'Eras Tour' Ernst Happel Stadium in Vienna last summer, authorities said. Getty Images for TAS Rights Management From mid-July to August 2024, the Syrian teen allegedly coordinated with a young Austrian suspect who was planning to unleash chaos at one of Swift's massive 'Eras Tour' concerts before the plot was foiled. Police have already made multiple arrests tied to the suspected terror cell. Three men, ages 19, 18, and 17, were previously taken into custody in Vienna. Advertisement News of the thwarted attack prompted the cancellation of Swift's three sold-out Eras shows in the city starting Aug. 8, 2024. A man arrested in the plot holds two machetes, which were weapons the fiends allegedly planned to use in addition to bombs. APA/AFP via Getty Images The suspects had planned to drive a bomb-filled car into the crowd outside the venue to kill 'as many people as possible' and had reportedly just been hired by the venue to work security. They allegedly wanted to also attack fans with machetes, security officials previously said. Advertisement Authorities believed the teens were radicalized online. Austria's coalition government agreed on a plan earlier this month to enable police to monitor suspects' secure messaging to thwart future planned militant attacks, ending what security officials have said is a rare and dangerous blind spot for a European Union country. Mohammad A's exact age has not yet been released. With Post wires

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs ‘might be cooked' on key sex crime charge, experts say, as jury preps for deliberation
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs ‘might be cooked' on key sex crime charge, experts say, as jury preps for deliberation

New York Post

time19 hours ago

  • New York Post

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs ‘might be cooked' on key sex crime charge, experts say, as jury preps for deliberation

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial came to a close after seven weeks on Friday as the rapper's defense team and prosecution completed closing arguments. Both sides saw wins and losses throughout the trial, but experts claimed Diddy 'might be cooked' on one specific charge as the jury prepares to deliberate. After his arrest in September 2024, the 'Last Night' singer was charged with sex trafficking, racketeering and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges. Former Danity Kane singer and Diddy protégé, Aubrey O'Day, has been following the trial and isn't sure what the outcome will be. While she personally believes the rapper is 'guilty of all the charges,' the musician isn't sold on the prosecution's case in court. 'The rational, justice side of me that leads a good amount of what I do nowadays says the answer should be what was proven by the prosecution, the law, and that's conflicting to what I want personally,' she told Extra. 5 The jury is about to deliberate on Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial. Getty Images 5 Experts claimed Diddy 'might be cooked' on one specific charge. REUTERS She noted: 'I don't know if the prosecution proved [Diddy's crimes] without a doubt, though.' During closing arguments, prosecutors argued that Diddy ran an alleged criminal enterprise with full control. They pointed out that the jury heard testimony, saw texts, viewed bank records and heard audio showing the rapper committing crime after crime for decades. According to the prosecution, the government showed that Diddy didn't take no for an answer. Up until today, Diddy was able to get away with crime because of his money and power, Assistant U.S. Attorney Christine Slavik said. 'That stops now.' Here's where experts say things stand for each charge against Diddy with the jury about to deliberate. 5 Sean 'Diddy' Combs listens as prosecutor Maurene Comey makes her closing arguments during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City. REUTERS Transportation to Engage in Prostitution As to the transportation to engage in prostitution charge, an expert told Fox News Digital, Diddy might be in trouble. 'The sex workers were very clear about their role and their purpose for being transported across state lines; it was for sex and not something else,' criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis explained. 'Diddy might be cooked on this charge.' However, the defense did find a way to show the jury a different explanation in an attempt to undermine the government's argument. 'Defense got an employee of one of the companies to say that Diddy was just buying the escorts' time and not any sexual performance, which the jury could use as a basis to acquit Diddy on the transportation charges,' Faddis, a founding partner of Colorado-based Varner Faddis, said. 5 Evidence photos depict Diddy's collection of lingerie. Department of Justice 'Diddy might be cooked on this charge.' Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney Racketeering Conspiracy The jury is unlikely to find Diddy not guilty of racketeering, criminal defense attorney John W. Day told Fox News Digital. 'The only thing Diddy and his team can hope for is a miracle where the jurors don't buy the government's claim that this was racketeering and that Diddy was the head of a criminal empire dedicated to fulfilling his desires,' the founder of New Mexico-based law practice, John Day Law, explained. 'A defense win is more likely if the jurors are conflicted on the racketeering charges and can't reach a unanimous verdict. That could lead to a hung jury on one or more of the charges. But the jurors spent the entire trial waiting to see how Diddy's lawyers rebutted the massive case against him, and they merely rested without putting on any witnesses. That leaves the jury picking through the government's case to see if this really rises to racketeering, and if not, they may hang or acquit on some of the charges – but it's unlikely.' 5 'The only thing Diddy and his team can hope for is a miracle where the jurors don't buy the government's claim that this was racketeering,' John Day Law, founder of a New Mexico-based law practice, said. REUTERS According to the legal expert, the prosecution 'presented overwhelming evidence' that Diddy 'presided over this little kingdom of criminal activity designed to make him happy – and made a compelling case to the jury that this met all the elements of racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation for prostitution.' 'The prosecution can withstand an acquittal or a hung jury on some of the counts, but the prosecutors really need a conviction for racketeering to claim total victory,' Day added. 'Again, that can be a difficult charge to convict on if the jurors don't buy the theory that this entire business empire was engaged in sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. But the defense needed to have convinced at least one juror that the case wasn't there, and that witnesses were lying to save their own necks. And that's a tough sell to a jury that spent weeks listening to horrific testimony about Diddy and his empire.' Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud or Coercion Things aren't as clear-cut on the sex trafficking charge, one expert told Fox News Digital. Diddy was accused of sex trafficking two of his ex-girlfriends, Cassie Ventura and Jane, who testified under a pseudonym. The prosecution claimed the rapper transported both women across state lines and then forced them to have sex with male escorts while he watched. 'On cross-examination, both Cassie and Jane admitted to willingly participating in some of the 'freak offs,' which could cause the jurors to wonder if all of the romantic encounters may have been consensual,' Faddis noted. 'Both Cassie and Jane admitted to voluntarily ingesting drugs before the 'freak offs,' which may undercut the prosecution's coercion argument.' The criminal defense attorney did note that Cassie and Jane both gave 'compelling, evocative testimony detailing physical abuse and financial coercion.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store