
Civil servants stage protest over work-from-home ban
Members of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union working for the department, including those based in London offices, will undertake action short of a strike.
The union has said its campaign is a direct response to the planned closure of six offices, the implementation of "rigid" office attendance policies, and the stopping of location-neutral recruitment practices, which allow remote working.
'From removing staff from an office before the lease expires to spuriously challenging lawful notices of industrial action, the employer seems intent to avoid proper consultation, disregard fair process and alienate its staff,' PCS president Martin Cavanagh said.
'Closing local offices while rigidly enforcing mandatory office attendance doesn't make sense. The way out of this dispute is to negotiate, not frustrate.'
A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'We have engaged with unions and staff about a number of proposals – including plans to expand four offices outside of London and close six offices over the next two years, as leases come to an end.
'The department will continue to have offices in every English region as well as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and all staff affected will be able to continue in their roles.'
The Conservative Party's Alex Burghart, shadow chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, said: 'It speaks volumes that some civil servants are walking out not over pay, but because they're being asked to show up to work and make better use of public buildings.
'Most people can't refuse to travel to their workplace, so why should Whitehall be any different?
'Labour should be clear whether they stand with the unions defending empty desks or with taxpayers who expect a civil service that works for them.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves appears to be crying as her position is questioned during PMQs– video
The chancellor appeared to be tearful after a series of questions from Kemi Badenoch, who said Labour MPs had said Reeves was 'toast', and suggested the prime minister had failed to confirm she would stay in post until the next election. Downing Street weighed in immediately to support Reeves, with aides saying she was 'going nowhere' and there would be no reshuffle


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watching Rachel Reeves crying in the Commons was quietly devastating
Imagine being Rachel Reeves, for a moment. You are sitting in the House of Commons, surrounded by your peers; there to help defend your government's decisions on welfare reforms after nights of heavy in-fighting and rebellion. The weight of being the first female chancellor in British history lies heavy on your shoulders; your already watered-down plans to make savings with welfare cuts, even more so. I must not crumble, you might tell yourself. In front of you: not only the glare of the cameras live-streaming Prime Minister's Questions to the nation and a gallery of front and backbenchers, but Keir Starmer himself – friend, loyal supporter, employer. And then, in a devastating blow, he fails to openly back you, despite stating on the record in January that you were safe in your job. I'd cry, too, if I were Reeves. Wouldn't you? The prime minister's press secretary has since issued a statement confirming that Reeves has his 'full backing', while the chancellor's own spokesperson said she was crying over a 'personal matter'. But it didn't stop Kemi Badenoch, of course, going in for the kill. She challenged the prime minister at the despatch box with a snipey: 'How awful for the chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place'; and landed a double-blow by pointing out that Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable'. She scarcely needed to. We could see it for ourselves – and it was heartbreaking. Until now, Reeves has been a perfect stoic: unwavering in tone and in message; delivering bad news (and there's been an awful lot of it in the year Labour have almost been in power) rhythmically and repetitively, without flinching. Even when pushed and criticised, she doesn't lose her cool. This has led, predictably, to accusations of being robotic and of failing to care; of being emotionless and dispassionate. It has also allowed her critics to blame her almost entirely for the poisonous legacy she inherited after 14 years of Conservative rule: the £22bn 'black hole' in the nation's finances and the many unpopular decisions (and U-turns) made afterwards. Some will say that the fact that her £9.9bn of headroom against her fiscal rules has now all but evaporated is entirely her own fault, as was her near-total (but not quite) about-turn on winter fuel payments, as was her deeply divisive spending review, as is the country's stagnant economic growth. But to my mind, the chancellor's track record of self-composure in the face of public dissent is something to be praised, even admired. She is not without feeling; she's proven that time and time again – and not just at PMQs. She revealed the soft shell beneath her steely exterior when writing for this newspaper about free school meals, talking of her childhood – she grew up in Lewisham, south-east London, to a teacher and a social worker, where she says she saw 'first hand the impact of underinvestment in our country's state schools'. 'My sixth form was housed in a couple of prefab huts in the playground,' she said. ' The library, meant to be a sanctuary of learning, was turned into a classroom simply because there were more students than space. I felt then, as I do now, that successive Conservative governments did not care about schools like mine, communities like mine, or the kids I grew up with.' This was the real Rachel Reeves: the woman behind the careful monotone, the person beneath the impossible choices. And whatever the reason for her tears, it was the real Rachel we saw today, crying openly in the Commons – not that it will do her much good. For she will now be subject to every tired and gendered stereotype that haunts women in politics and outside of it. Who can forget the images and memes of a tearful Theresa May, crying as she resigned from office in 2019? Hearing her voice crack when she said running the country she loves had been 'the honour of my life' humanised her, but also damned her. She never recovered. Nobel Prize-winning scientist Sir Tim Hunt once said women shouldn't be allowed to work in laboratories because, 'when you criticise them, they cry'. Oprah Winfrey revealed that she was criticised at US television news programme 60 Minutes for expressing too much, even in the way she said her name – and was advised to 'flatten out her voice and show less emotion'. One former Donald Trump campaign adviser called Vice President Kamala Harris 'hysterical'; and who can forget the US president describing his competitor, Hillary Clinton, as 'a totally unhinged person'? According to Forbes, as many as 13 per cent of men and women have doubts about women's emotional suitability for politics: the equivalent of one in eight people. For Reeves – our supposed 'iron chancellor' – daring to display real emotion in the gladiatorial bear-pit of politics invites all the predictable tropes of 'hysteria'; of women being 'too emotional' to make difficult decisions – let alone with the public purse. It may be human, but it will also haunt her for as long as she lasts in office.


Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Inside Everton's mass exodus as new owners look to clean up Moshiri's mess
When Everton's outgoing director of football, Kevin Thelwell, left at the end of last season, one wonders if he was tempted to leave behind a pithy note for the revamped executive team. 'Sorry there are no players left. Best of luck xx' David Moyes' squad return to training this Friday and the coach might struggle to organise an internal match, the Finch Farm dressing room doubling up as a departure lounge. In all, 15 players were out of contract on July 1. Exciting South American Carlos Alcaraz was signed on a permanent deal and veteran club captain Seamus Coleman was retained. Both Idrissa Gana Gueye and Michael Keane are understood to be close to agreeing new contracts, too. There is also a possibility Jack Harrison will return after successive loan spells. The rest constitute an exodus. Dominic Calvert-Lewin, Abdoulaye Doucoure, Ashley Young, Jesper Lindstrom, Armando Broja, Orel Mangala and back-up goalkeepers Asmir Begovic and Joao Virginia moved on. Individually, none are irreplaceable. Indeed, departures such as the already exiled striker Neal Maupay prompted sighs of relief more than anxiety. But as a collective, Moyes has a chasm to fill to ensure his squad is competitive. This is the remaining debris of Farhad Moshiri's legacy in need of cleaning up. The former owner recently broke his silence to assume credit for the £750 million Hill Dickinson Stadium which represents Everton's future. He can accept due applause for that. It should not disguise the challenge the new owners Friedkin Group (TFG) face ensuring a squad of 18 first team players will be available to play in the first Premier League home game against Brighton and Hove Albion on Aug 23. The contract situation is the consequence of years of scratching around trying to cobble a squad together, Everton maximising loan deals while paying the price for the profit and sustainability breaches of the more reckless Moshiri spending era. The problems were being pushed along the road for a later date, and now the calendar is eating up the days as the club endeavours to find enough players. 'I'm going to keep you busy this summer' The start of July was always going to bring more clarity, particularly with those who were pondering their future having been offered reduced terms - most notably Calvert-Lewin. His departure, alongside Broja's return to Chelsea, means Everton need two strikers. They also want a full back, central midfielders, wingers and at least one back-up goalkeeper. 'I'm going to keep you busy this summer,' Moyes said in the final press conference of the season, forewarning of transfer activity. Tellingly, he said this with a smile and spring in his step. Despite the work ahead, no-one at Everton is fretting yet, seeing this summer as an opportunity rather than a personnel nightmare. Internally and among the fanbase, the club has not felt so upbeat for years, the expectation being short-term difficulties will precede the longer-term stability and eventual success which eluded Moshiri. Everton are starting again under a new regime, the refresh which began with Moyes' return midway through last season gathering pace with what was described as a series of 'leadership appointments' overseen by new chief executive Angus Kinnear. Thankfully, TFG's takeover ensured Kinnear did not join a sinking ship. He still has to navigate the choppiest of waters before reaching dry land, but the strategic changes are a notable direction shift. Rather than find a like-for-like replacement for Thelwell (who has since joined Rangers), Everton have created a football unit, headhunting Technical director Nick Cox from Manchester United's academy, and Director of Scouting and Recruitment James Smith from the City Group. Chris Howarth was also appointed to direct the club's football strategy and analytics operations, while Nick Hammond is leading the club's player trading activity. For however long they are at Everton, they will never have a busier, more complicated period than their early months. Moyes had already tentatively begun working on targets towards the end of last season. Critically, there is a transfer budget available as the previous regime's PSR woes were dealt with. But Moyes and the recruiters must weigh up the merits of spending big on a couple of game-changers or spreading out the resources on those who will add to the numbers, but not necessarily transform the club's ambitions beyond Premier League preservation. Moyes is inclined to think bigger, eager to buy proven talent at a price before exploring the loan and bargain market again to swell the numbers. But as he discovered when missing out on Liam Delap to Chelsea, securing coveted targets is nigh on impossible when Champions League clubs are rivals for the signature. Even a move for Fulham's Kenny Tete was frustrated as he chose to stay in London. The core of the team which was unrecognisable in form and resilience to that which stumbled into another relegation fight under Sean Dyche remains intact; Jordan Pickford, James Tarkowski, Iliman Ndiaye, James Garner, Jake O'Brien and Dwight McNeil are the foundation of a competitive line-up. And then there is the first truly symbolic move of the summer as Jarrad Branthwaite signed a new five year contract on Wednesday morning, Everton in a stronger position to resist moves for prime assets. 'We believe he can have a huge role to play in an exciting new era at the football club,' said Moyes. Keeping Branthwaite was a necessary and reassuring statement of intent. More will be needed over the next six weeks. The 2024/25 campaign was the season of goodbye at Everton; to coaches, players, executives, owners and even the beloved stadium. Now they need this to be the summer of hello.