HS2 is delayed again - here's how much it is over budget
HS2 has come under more fire today after the Government is set to confirm that the billion-pound scheme will be delayed once again.
The railway line, which was originally set out to provide quicker and better transport links between the south and north of England, has been marred by delays, the cancellation of its northern leg and ballooning costs.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is expected to tell Parliament later today there is 'no reasonable way to deliver' the delayed high-speed railway by 2033 and within budget.
She will say she is drawing a 'line in the sand' on HS2 over 'constant scope changes, ineffective construct and bad management'.
Matthew Pennycook, the housing and planning minister, said there are 'serious problems' with HS2 and it had made Britain 'an international laughing stock' and the Government is 'determined to turn that around.'
Meanwhile, HS2 Ltd and its contractor Balfour Beatty Vinci have referred two of its sub contractors to the HMRC over fraud allegations.
The companies allegedly hired employees working on the West Midland leg at inflated rates, according to The I Paper.
Now, Alexander is set to announce two fresh reviews into the scheme which will scrutinise HS2 in an attempt to reset the ill-fated project.
The first will be delivered by HS2 CEO Mark Wild, while the second review focuses on HS2's behind-the-scenes governance and accountability to decipher what has gone wrong and what can be learned so that the same mistakes can be avoided with future projects, including Labour's Northern Powerhouse Rail.
HS2 Ltd, the government-owned company building the railway, estimated in June last year that the delayed project would cost between £54 billion and £66 billion.
However, four months ago, MPs warned costs could reach £80 billion.
HS2 will run from Euston through Old Oak Common in west London to West Midlands.
New stations will be built in Solihull, near Birmingham International Airport, and at Birmingham Curzon Street.
HS2 was meant to run to Manchester and Leeds, but in 2023 the Conservative government axed the northern leg due to spiralling costs, much to the dismay of Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham who called the move 'profoundly depressing.'
For years, uncertainty surrounded the extension of HS2 from Old Oak Common to Euston.
But in October last year, an extension was confirmed in the autumn budget, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves stating the government was 'committing the funding required' to begin tunnelling work at Euston station.
Plans are now being drawn up by the government for the works, which are suggested to create HS2 and National Rail services under a single concourse rather than create two separate stations for high speed and standard rail.
The first phase was initially due to launch by the end of 2026.
Now the opening date has been pushed back, and is estimated to be between 2026 and 2033.
The HS2 was given the green light to start in 2012 but construction did not begin until 2020.
HS2 has purchased more than 1,000 homes, farms and land along the route to make way for the tracks.
Residents who spoke to Metro previously said they were surprised at the speed in which the steel frame in the backdrop has been thrown up, but did not join in the derision that the massively delayed and over-budget infrastructure project has attracted.
The National Audit Office warned in 2016 that the project was at risk of delays and exceeding its budget.
But former Prime Minister Boris Johnson recommitted to the project in 2020 following another review.
Leading politicians have now minced their words when it comes to HS2.
Speaking to LBC, Matthew Pennicook, said: 'Because I think, frankly, when it comes to HS2, in some ways, we're a bit of a laughing stock around the world in terms of how we handle infrastructure. As a Government, we're absolutely determined to turn that around.'
In a more scathing attack, Lord Tony Berkely said the project should still be stopped after 'chaos.'
The Labour peer said: 'Rishi Sunak, after all, cancelled it 18 months ago. That was the previous government but everybody in HS2 seems to have ignored it and the Government's ignored it by continuing to pour money down it when they should have stopped 18 months ago and they should still stop today.
'They've wasted billions already.
'I think that the first thing to do is to stop digging when you don't know what you're doing and where it's going to end up, and I would put HS2 into administration. Let the administrators sort it out and then take a clear, simple look at what they want to achieve and get it done in a much more cost effective way.'
The ticket costs could change wildly by the time the HS2 opens, but they are expected to be pricier than a standard rail fare. More Trending
HS2 tickets could cost up to 30% more than standard rail travel, previous estimates show, but there are no official figures yet.
The higher cost is likely to absorb some of the construction costs and factor in faster journey times.
Inflation at the time of opening will also affect prices and whether the HS2 accepts railcards.
A spokesperson for HS2 Ltd said: 'We treat all whistleblower allegations seriously and are continuing to conduct our own investigation. Furthermore, HS2 Ltd has formally reported the allegations to HMRC, and we encourage anyone who believes they may have relevant information, which could support our enquiries, to report it in confidence via HS2's Speak Out channels.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Another e-bike brand is set to launch in London this summer
MORE: Traffic delays on M25 after multi-vehicle crash
MORE: More than 600 EasyJet cabin crew to walk out causing chaos for thousands of holidaymakers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
South Korea's Lee nominates new finance, industry ministers
SEOUL, June 29 (Reuters) - South Korea President Lee Jae Myung has nominated a former vice finance minister, Koo Yun-cheol, to be finance minister, his office said on Sunday. Koo is widely known as a policy expert, serving different positions across the government and authoring books on South Korea's innovation and growth, Lee's chief of staff, Kang Hoon-sik, told a briefing. Among other ministerial positions, Lee named Kim Jung-kwan, president of power plant builder Doosan Enerbility and a veteran bureaucrat in the energy sector, to be industry minister. The former head of South Korea's disease control agency, Jeong Eun-kyeong, was nominated as health minister. She was highly praised for her response to the COVID-19 pandemic, becoming one of the Time Magazine's 100 most influential people of 2020.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Crawley Labour MP Peter Lamb says welfare bill could be defeated
The Welfare Reform Bill could still be defeated at its second reading despite concessions from the government, a Labour MP has to BBC Politics South East, Peter Lamb, MP for Crawley in West Sussex, said: "I don't think it's inconceivable that we'll get back up to the numbers which potentially result in the bill being killed."Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced new stricter criteria would only apply to new claimants and reversed plans to freeze the health-related component of universal credit, with it rising in line with inflation for existing government said it had listened to the rebels but "what we all agree on is that we have to reform the broken system". Lamb said: "I'm part of a reasonably-sized group of people who are very clear that the conditions are still not acceptable."Responding to the changes the government has promised, he said: "This is ultimately still a cost-cutting measure and that means however they try and co-produce the system for these new people moving forwards, we're going to be taking billions of pounds out of the pockets of people with high levels of vulnerability when there are better alternatives on the table."Asked whether that meant the government could not rest easy, he replied: "They shouldn't rest easy because the proposals are not acceptable." Lamb said he would vote against the bill, regardless of a three-line whip."I will be a Labour MP when I vote down these proposals," he it was put to him that he might not be a Labour MP after the vote, he replied: "I'll be living up to the spirit of the party".He said he believed the government should invest instead in a preventative approach to mental health, which he said takes up 50% of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) he said he had not been listened to."I have made this argument for three months, three and a half months, at every possible level, and you can see the eyes glaze over," he told the BBC. On Friday, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: "Sometimes there is strength in listening. You end up in the right position when you talk to all of those with knowledge and experience."We've more to do to talk to the people over the coming days, but this plan is rooted in Labour values: work for those who can, security for those that can't."I am very hopeful that we'll get this bill through the House." Politics South East is on BBC1 at 10:00 BST on Sunday, then on the iPlayer.
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Brexit betrayal is driving Tory voters into Farage's arms
Since returning to the political front line during the middle of last year's election campaign, Nigel Farage has enjoyed remarkable success in his stated quest for Reform for replace the Conservatives as the principal party of the right in Britain. The latest British Social Attitudes (BSA) report, published this week, helps explain how and why he is succeeding. Boris Johnson rose to success in 2019 thanks to his ability to appeal to socially conservative Britain. These were the voters that provided the core vote for Leave in 2016 and which now voted to 'get Brexit done'. However, disenchanted with how Brexit has turned out and deeply distrustful of how the country is being governed, over the last twelve months these voters have been flocking to Reform in ever-growing numbers. Leave voters are decidedly unhappy about how Brexit has turned out In 2019, no less than two-thirds (66 per cent) of socially conservative Britons, who, apart from backing Brexit, tend to be concerned about immigration and to take an 'anti-woke' stance on so-called 'culture wars' issues, voted Conservative. Equally, 71 per cent of those who had voted Leave in 2016 were in the Conservative camp then too. But as the party slumped to its worst ever defeat last year, those numbers tumbled. Just 32 per cent of socially conservative Britain voted Conservative, as did just one in three (33 per cent) of those who had voted Leave. Most of this decline was occasioned by voters switching to Reform, who matched the Tories' tally among Leave voters (winning 34 per cent) and almost did so among social conservatives (28 per cent). Since the election, Tory losses among those central to Boris Johnson's election victory have simply continued apace. When respondents to BSA were recontacted in March, Reform, with 37 per cent support, were now clearly ahead among socially conservative voters, while the Conservatives were well behind on just 26 per cent. Indeed, social conservatives were now barely any more likely than those who are neither socially conservative nor liberal to say they would vote Conservative. Meanwhile, support for the Conservatives among Leave voters was now down to just 26 per cent, while Reform, with 45 per cent, was well ahead of all the competition. In contrast, just 5 per cent of Remain supporters were backing Reform. Reform's support is not simply a general protest vote; rather it is very distinctively a cry of disappointment and disenchantment by pro-Brexit Britain. Leave voters are decidedly unhappy about how Brexit has turned out. In the wake of record levels of immigration, no less than 62 per cent feel that immigration has been higher as a result of Brexit, the very opposite of what most of them had anticipated in 2016. Meanwhile, in an era of poor economic performance, 38 per cent have concluded that the economy has been made worse off by Brexit too. For a minority, these perceptions have been accompanied by a change of mind about Brexit. But for others, they have served to undermine their trust and confidence in how Britain is being governed. When it was first delivered, Brexit boosted trust and confidence among Leave voters. For example, in 2020 approaching half (46 per cent) felt that little or no improvement was needed to how Britain was being governed, almost twice the equivalent proportion among Remain supporters (24 per cent). Now, however, only 14 per cent of Leave voters take that view, even lower than the equivalent figure, 19 per cent, among those who backed Remain. And a low level of trust and confidence is a hallmark of Remain voters. In last year's election, just over a quarter (26 per cent) of those who think Britain's system of government is in need of improvement voted Reform, compared with just 5 per cent of those who feel the system needs little or no improvement. The party's name, 'Reform UK', encapsulates well the outlook of many of the party's supporters. Meanwhile, the rise of social media appears to have created something of a breeding ground for Reform support. Even though the party is backed predominantly by older voters, with those who primarily rely on social media to follow the news being predominantly young, support for the party was five points higher last year among social media users than it was among those reliant on other media for their political news. Nigel Farage's TikTok posts are, perhaps, not just reaching out to younger voters after all. In any event, the challenge posed by Reform to the future of the Conservative party is profound. Not only has it lost most of the pro-Brexit vote it won in 2019, but its grip on what has long been the core of its support – those on the right economically rather than culturally – is now under threat too. In our March survey, Reform (on 28 per cent) were only narrowly behind the Conservatives (31 per cent) among this group, something that Ukip never threatened to do. Command of the political right in Britain is up for grabs as never before.
