logo
EU-China summit – who's attending and what's on the agenda?

EU-China summit – who's attending and what's on the agenda?

Al Jazeera24-07-2025
Brussels, Belgium – Just before the summer lull hits Brussels, the European Union and China will hold a top-level summit in Beijing on Thursday, commemorating 50 years of diplomatic ties.
The mood before the meeting on Thursday, however, has not been particularly celebratory but, rather, tense with low expectations for any concrete bilateral deals. The summit which was meant to be a two-day affair, was also condensed into a single day's event by Beijing earlier this month, citing domestic reasons.
A series of trade disagreements, particularly over market access and critical rare earth elements, and geopolitical tensions, primarily Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine, have marred EU-China relations.
Gunnar Wiegand, the former managing director for Asia and the Pacific at the European External Action Service (EEAS) and currently a distinguished fellow at the Indo-Pacific Program of the German Marshall Fund's Brussels Office, told Al Jazeera that the EU's current partnership with China is complex.
'The EU views China as a partner for global challenges, an economic competitor when it comes to developing new technologies and also a systemic rival because of Beijing's governance system and its influence on global affairs,' he said, adding that the question of whether China is also a threat to European security has come up over the last few years in the context of Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine.
Who is attending the summit?
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa will visit China on Thursday, seeking to address these disputes at the summit.
'This Summit is an opportunity to engage with China at the highest level and have frank, constructive discussions on issues that matter to both of us. We want dialogue, real engagement and concrete progress,' Costa said in a statement in advance of the summit.
The EU leaders will meet Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday morning, and Premier Li Qiang will co-chair the 25th summit between the two parties, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs told reporters in Beijing on Monday.
A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson added that after 50 years of EU-China development, their ties 'can cope with the changing difficulties and challenges'.
Is Russia's war in Ukraine on the agenda?
According to EU officials, discussions with President Xi on Thursday morning will focus on global affairs and bilateral relations, followed by a banquet lunch.
However, the Russia-Ukraine war is likely to arise because of Beijing's close ties with Moscow, which has been a thorny issue for Brussels.
'You can expect the EU addressing Russia's war in Ukraine,' a senior EU official told reporters in Brussels on July 18. 'China, of course, talks to us often about core issues. Well, this is a core issue for Europe. It's an issue fundamental to European security,' the official added.
In an address to the European Parliament earlier this month, von der Leyen also accused China of 'de facto enabling Russia's war economy'.
Brussels has sanctioned several Chinese companies for facilitating the supply of goods which are used for weapons production in Russia, and on July 18, the EU also slapped sanctions on Chinese banks for the first time, for reportedly financing the supply of such goods.
China has rejected such accusations and warned of retaliations. Beijing has also reiterated that its position on the Ukraine war is all about 'negotiation, ceasefire and peace'.
But according to an article by the South China Morning Post, during a meeting with the EU's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, in early July, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing did not want to see Russia lose the war in Ukraine, since the United States would then focus on China.
Wiegand said Europe should have no illusions.
'For China, having good and close relations with Russia is of utmost importance to increase its own strength in the global context. They will not sacrifice this relationship,' he said.
'This is the most important negative factor which has impacted the overall [EU-China] relationship,' he added.
Besides the Ukraine war, EU officials in Brussels said, the 27-member bloc will also discuss tensions in the Middle East and other security threats in Asia.
How difficult will trade discussions be?
Another contentious issue between Brussels and Beijing is trade. This is likely to be central to the summit's agenda in the afternoon with Chinese Premier Li Qiang, followed by a dinner, EU officials involved in planning the summit told reporters in Brussels on July 18.
China is the EU's third-largest trading partner, but the two have recently been squabbling over a series of trade issues, including 45 percent European tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) and Beijing's control of rare earth minerals, which are vital for chip making and producing medical devices.
In her speech at the European Parliament earlier this month, von der Leyen accused Beijing of 'flooding global markets with subsidised overcapacity – not just to boost its own industries, but to choke international competition'.
The EU has a trade deficit with China of more than 300 billion euros ($352bn) as of 2024. EU exports to China amounted to 213 billion euros ($250bn), while EU imports from China amounted to 519 billion euros ($609bn), according to figures from the European Commission.
EU officials say Chinese companies are benefitting from massive government subsidies and, due to sluggish demand for goods locally, cheap Chinese goods like EVs are being shipped to the EU instead.
To protect European interests, Brussels has begun taking action and imposed tariffs of up to 45 percent on Chinese EVs last October. The bloc also barred Chinese companies from medical devices tenders in June, among other trade barriers, after concluding that European firms were not being granted access to Chinese markets.
The EU is also concerned about Beijing's export controls on rare earth minerals.
At the Group of Seven summit in Canada in June, von der Leyen accused China of 'blackmail' and said, 'No single country should control 80-90 percent of the market for essential raw materials and downstream products like magnets.'
'The present situation is not sustainable. We need rebalancing … China benefits from our open market but buys too little,' a senior EU official told reporters in Brussels before the summit. 'Trade access is limited and export controls are excessive. We will go there [to Beijing] with a positive and constructive attitude … but China has to acknowledge our concerns.'
In her speech at the European Parliament in July, the European Commission president said the 27-member bloc is 'engaging with Beijing so that it loosens its export restrictions' on rare earth minerals.
Wiegand said while trade negotiations have been ongoing, achieving common ground or any trade deal at the summit this week looks unlikely.
'There is a constructive tone [from the EU] when it comes to 'de-risking', not 'de-coupling' from China. The Chinese, however, don't like the term 'de-risking'. They think it is disinformation. But it is simply the process of reducing trade vulnerabilities by diversifying and improving our own capacities,' he said.
How does China view trading relations with the EU?
China wants the EU to view their trading partnership 'without emotion and prejudice', according to the Foreign Ministry.
He Yongqian, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, told a news conference in Beijing on Monday that China hopes that Brussels will also 'be less protectionist, and be more open'.
In an email statement to Al Jazeera before the forum, the Chinese Chamber of Commerce to the EU (CCCEU) said it hopes the summit will 'address critical challenges, including market and investment barriers faced by Chinese companies in the EU'.
'Recent EU measures, such as the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) and International Procurement Instrument (IPI), have disproportionately impacted Chinese firms in clean tech, high-tech, and medical devices. We urge constructive dialogue to ensure fair treatment,' CCCEU noted.
Will human rights be discussed at the summit?
EU-China relations have also been icy over human rights issues. In 2021, Brussels slapped sanctions on Chinese officials over reported human rights abuses against Uighur Muslims in China's Xinjiang region.
Beijing denied these allegations and retaliated by sanctioning EU lawmakers. The tit-for-tat sanctions were accompanied by a halt in bilateral dialogues between the European Parliament and the National People's Congress (NPC) of China.
Sarah Brooks, Amnesty International's China director, told Al Jazeera that on the 50th anniversary of EU-China diplomatic relations, there is 'little to celebrate' when it comes to talking about human rights in China in 2025.
'Amnesty International has regularly documented serious and widespread human rights violations, from arbitrary detention and persecution in the Uighur region, for which no official has been held to account; to assaults on the rule of law and the chipping away of civil and political freedoms in Hong Kong, despite international treaties guaranteeing those rights; to the systematic use of national security legislation to target rights defence and criticism, at home and increasingly abroad. The EU, at least on paper, has also come to similar conclusions,' she said.
'At the summit, the EU's leadership needs to ensure that those words become action and use every tool at their disposal to create positive human rights change for people – not more empty promises at the negotiating table or the speaker's podium,' she added.
While China lifted some of its sanctions in April this year and hinted at resuming political dialogues between the European Parliament and the NPC, the 2021 EU sanctions remain in place. The bloc said last week that it had 'not observed changes in the human rights situation in China/Xinjiang'.
'Promoting and protecting human rights is important to the EU. We will raise the EU's concern on the deterioration of rights in Xinjiang, Tibet, and other regions,' an EU official said.
Will the issue of US tariffs arise?
The meeting between the EU and China comes amid US President Donald Trump's global tariff war, which both Brussels and Beijing are trying to navigate.
Trump has announced imposing a tariff of 30 percent on goods EU imports from August 1, and Brussels has been holding trade negotiations with Washington, seeking to strike a trade deal.
China and the US agreed to slash tit-for-tat heavy tariffs for 90 days in May. That suspension expires on August 12. In June, the US said it would impose 55 percent tariffs on Chinese goods, down from the 145 percent Trump had imposed in April. In return, Beijing said, it will impose a 10 percent tariff on goods it imports from the US, down from 125 percent. But trade negotiations are ongoing.
Earlier this year, some analysts in Brussels hinted that tariff tensions with Washington could improve Brussels-Beijing trade ties.
The CCCEU also told Al Jazeera that with US tariffs looming, 'China and the EU share a responsibility to uphold free trade and multilateralism while mitigating external pressures' and pushed Brussels to improve its business environment for foreign companies and enhance supply chains.
But in the run-up to the summit, expectations remain low.
'It is quite clear the US tariff issue is an over-encompassing issue … we are negotiating with the US at present. It is clear that there is a need to find and engage with other actors worldwide due to the impact of US tariffs,' a senior EU official told reporters in Brussels before the summit.
'But with China, we are certainly not agreeing to compromise on our values,' the official stressed.
Wiegand also pointed out that Europe's economic relationship with the US is stronger than that with China since they are also NATO allies.
'With Russia's war in Ukraine threatening Europe, Brussels will not be pushed closer to Beijing,' he said.
'But as Brussels negotiates tariffs with Washington, certainly there will be an important China dimension in the finalisation of a deal with the US administration.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former EU ambassadors warn: Europe's silence on Gaza is complicity
Former EU ambassadors warn: Europe's silence on Gaza is complicity

Al Jazeera

time3 days ago

  • Al Jazeera

Former EU ambassadors warn: Europe's silence on Gaza is complicity

To the Presidents of the European Council, the European Commission, and the European Parliament, and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of the European Union, To the Heads of Government and Foreign Ministers of the EU Member States, We, 58 former ambassadors of the European Union, were appalled and outraged by the slaughter of innocent Israelis and hostage taking on October 7, 2023 by Hamas and others. No cause can justify such acts, and we condemn them outright. Today, however, we are witnessing the horrifying spectacle of Israel carrying out, on a daily basis, atrocity crimes against the Palestinian people – above all in Gaza, but also in the occupied West Bank, amounting to a systematic campaign of brutalisation, dehumanisation, and displacement. The European Union and nearly all of its Member States have failed to respond meaningfully to these horrific events. As former ambassadors of the EU we dedicated our professional lives to upholding and promoting core European values and international law, building the reputation of the European Union and defending the interests of its peoples. Those interests and that reputation are now in serious jeopardy as a consequence of EU inaction. For over 21 months, the Netanyahu government has pursued a relentless campaign of violence and destruction in Gaza. About ten percent of Gaza's entire population, including tens of thousands of children, have been killed, maimed and seriously injured by the Israeli military's indiscriminate bombardments. Most of Gaza has been reduced to rubble. Those who survive bombs and bullets face hunger, malnutrition, disease, and a collapsed health system deliberately targeted by Israel. The ongoing siege is starving the population by blocking supplies of humanitarian aid from UN agencies and international NGOs. Replacing UNRWA and other established international providers of aid to Gaza by a politicised and militarised aid operation run by mercenaries is a violation of the UN's humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence, which all UN Member States – including Israel – must respect in their entirety. The concrete humanitarian measures reportedly agreed under the deal the EU High Representative Kaja Kallas secured with Israel have not been made public, nor has the arrangement ever been confirmed by the Israeli authorities. To the contrary, since Ms Kallas' announcement, hundreds of men, children and women have been killed by Israeli soldiers while desperately seeking food and water for their families. This includes an alarming number of civilian deaths caused by Israeli military shooting at Zikim, one of the key border crossing points, that we understand formed part of the humanitarian EU agreement with Israel. Now, with appalling predictability, Israeli leaders are forcing swathes of Gaza's population into concentration zones – militarised enclosures designed to confine civilians under intolerable conditions, with the clear aim of pressuring them into 'voluntary' displacement. This, along with other illegal Israeli policies in the West Bank, constitutes de facto forcible population transfer, a serious war crime under international law. The Israeli ministers of defense, finance and security have all openly called for the permanent removal of Palestinians from Gaza, and a senior 'migration administration' has been created to facilitate it. These are calculated steps towards ethnic cleansing. Meanwhile, in the West Bank, violent Israeli settlers, with full protection by the Israeli military, have waged a campaign of terror against Palestinian communities. Homes are torched, inhabitants are murdered, families expelled, water sources poisoned, herding animals stolen, olive groves destroyed, and land annexed in violation of international law. The perpetrators who act with impunity are armed and encouraged by state officials. These settlers are not rogue actors – they are the front-line agents of a government-driven agenda to annex and ethnically cleanse Palestinian land. The evidence of Israeli malfeasance and its flagrant violation of all known humanitarian and human rights laws is overwhelming. The United Nations, humanitarian organisations, and independent observers – including Israeli and Jewish voices – have documented these crimes in detail. The International Court of Justice has determined that there is a plausible risk of genocide in Gaza and that Israel's prolonged occupation of Palestine is not only unlawful but even constitutes the crime of segregation or apartheid. European public opinion and the majority of young people, including in countries like Germany and Italy, are clearly in favour of their governments acting to stop this horror. We welcome the recent condemnation of Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank by 28 Foreign Ministers, including those of 20 EU Member States, but words are not enough. We call urgently on all EU leaders and governments, especially those who prevented the Foreign Affairs Council, 15 July, from acting against Israel's egregious humanitarian and human rights violations, to take all necessary and feasible measures under international, European, and national law to bring these atrocities to an end. Action should comprise the following: 1. Resume international aid deliveries immediately at scale and flood the Gaza Strip with humanitarian supplies, in full respect of the core principles of international humanitarian law. 2. Suspend with immediate effect all arms and dual-use exports to Israel. 3. Ban trade with Israel's illegal settlements in occupied Palestinian territory and prohibit EU and member states' commercial and investment relations with any entity or company doing business in or benefiting from Israel's illegal settlements. 4. Suspend all preferential commercial arrangements for Israel under the Association Agreement. 5. Cancel Israel's participation in Horizon Europe and all dual-use research, academic and technology programmes of the EU. 6. Impose targeted sanctions on Israeli Ministers, government officials, military commanders, and violent settlers responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, facilitating genocide and carrying out State-sanctioned terrorism. 7. Support international and national judicial mechanisms – including the International Criminal Court and domestic courts under universal jurisdiction – to bring perpetrators to justice. 8. Provide political, legal, and financial support to Palestinian civilian victims, human rights defenders, and humanitarian organisations operating under impossible conditions. 9. Recognise Palestinian statehood to create the necessary prerequisite for a two-state solution. On July 17, the Day of International Criminal Justice, the European External Action Service recalled that in regard to crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocides … 'history has too many moments when silence followed horror …' The world will remember how the EU and its member states respond to this catastrophic tragedy. Silence and neutrality in the face of genocide constitutes complicity. Inaction emboldens perpetrators and betrays every principle the Union and its member states claim to uphold. While continuing to call unceasingly for the return of the hostages, a permanent ceasefire and the end to the war, the European Union, long a champion of human rights and the rule of law, must act now in the name of international law, humanity, and justice for the Palestinian people – or risk forfeiting its credibility, influence and moral standing in the world. Signatories: Mikael BarfodGeoffrey BarrettAlexander BaumThierry BechetKenny BellAad BiesebroekJean-Claude BoidinGiorgio BonacciLaurens Jan BrinkhorstJean-Francois CautainPeter Beck ChristiansenTim ClarkePhilippe DarmuzeyDominique DellicourAldo Dell'AricciaWiepke Van Der GootMichael DoyleSean DoyleGiacomo DurazzoMichael EmersonManfredo FantiCarlo De FilippiKaren FoggErwan FouereMarc FrancoDavid GeerGerardus GielenWilliam HannaGeert HeikensGilles HervioAndrew JacobsRupert JoyAndroulla KaminaraJohn KjaerMichael LaidlerEneko LandaburuJeremy LesterDavid MacraeChristian ManahlBrian McDonaldHugues MingarelliJames MoranFrancesca MoscaAmir NaqviLuigi NarboneAttilio PacificiCorrado PampaloniElisabeth PapeMarc PieriniRensje TeerinkDaniela TramacerePhilippe Van DammeMarcel van OpstalSven Kuhn von BurgsdorffAlan WaddamsClaudia WiedeyMarc F WolffRichard Wright The views expressed in this article are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

Belgium refers war crimes complaint against Israeli soldiers to ICC
Belgium refers war crimes complaint against Israeli soldiers to ICC

Al Jazeera

time3 days ago

  • Al Jazeera

Belgium refers war crimes complaint against Israeli soldiers to ICC

Belgian prosecutors have referred a war crimes complaint against two Israeli soldiers to the International Criminal Court (ICC), following allegations that they participated in atrocities in Gaza. The Hind Rajab Foundation, which filed the complaint alongside the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), confirmed that the Belgian Federal Prosecutor has decided to forward the case to the ICC. The foundation said the decision was made in accordance with Belgium's obligations under international law. 'The International Criminal Court is currently investigating possible serious violations of humanitarian law in the Palestinian territories,' the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office said, according to Belgium's Belga news agency. The complaint centres on two Israeli soldiers, allegedly members of the Givati Brigade. They were seen waving their military unit's flag during the performance of an Israeli DJ at the Tomorrowland music festival in Belgium. Following the complaint, Belgian police were instructed to identify, arrest and interrogate the two soldiers, before they were later released. Legal group pushes for stronger action The Hind Rajab Foundation, based in Belgium, is named after a six-year-old Palestinian girl killed by Israeli fire in Gaza City earlier in the war. Since its formation in 2023, the group has filed dozens of complaints across more than 10 countries targeting Israeli military personnel. While the foundation welcomed the referral to the ICC with 'cautious encouragement', it criticised Belgian authorities for not taking stronger action. 'In our view, the suspects should not only have been arrested, but also detained and either prosecuted in Belgium or extradited to the ICC,' the foundation said in a statement. 'Releasing individuals credibly accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity not only undermines public trust in justice,' the group added, 'but risks reinforcing a sense of impunity and may enable those individuals to commit further atrocities.' The foundation called the referral 'a strategic pivot to the international level', and urged the ICC to act swiftly. 'Every day of inaction by international institutions is a day of continued suffering and unaccountability,' it said. 'Let it be clear: this case sets a legal and moral precedent. Israeli military personnel, no matter where they travel, are not beyond the reach of justice.' Israel summons Belgian diplomat On Tuesday, the Israeli government reportedly summoned a Belgian diplomat in protest over the arrests. The row between the two nations comes amid growing international concern over the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and Israel's ongoing war against the Palestinian people. Earlier on Wednesday, Belgium announced it would send a military aircraft with food and medical supplies destined for Gaza to Jordan, while the country also joined 27 others in signing a declaration calling for an immediate ceasefire. However, Belgium itself is facing legal pressure for allegedly failing to act against Israeli crimes in Gaza. On July 7, the Belgian state was formally summoned to appear before the French-speaking Court of First Instance in Brussels, where the claimants accuse the country of inaction and failing to meet its international obligations. They allege Belgium should take urgent steps including banning arms transport to Israel via Belgian territory, halting trade with Israeli settlements, suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement, freezing Israeli leaders' assets, and ending institutional cooperation with Israel.

Tariffs and turmoil: Rough road ahead for Europe's carmakers
Tariffs and turmoil: Rough road ahead for Europe's carmakers

Qatar Tribune

time4 days ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Tariffs and turmoil: Rough road ahead for Europe's carmakers

Agencies European carmakers viewed the trade deal struck with the U.S. as a de-escalation, but were still bracing for damages, which some industry insiders said could reach 'billions.' German auto companies in particular were in for a great deal of export pain, as their share prices indicated. Shares in Porsche, Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes-Benz all lost more than 3% in trading on Monday, a day after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, on behalf of the European Union, shook hands with U.S. President Donald Trump, reaching a preliminary trade deal. The agreement eases 'the intense uncertainty surrounding transatlantic trade relations in recent months,' Europe's main auto group, the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA), said in a statement welcoming the deal 'in principle.' But it noted that the 15% U.S. tariffs imposed on EU goods, including cars, 'will continue to have a negative impact not just for industry in the EU but also in the U.S.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his country's economy – the biggest in Europe – would face 'substantial damage' from the U.S. tariffs agreed in the deal. But, he said, 'we couldn't expect to achieve any more.' The U.S. is a key market for European automakers, which last year sent nearly 750,000 of their cars to the U.S., representing nearly a quarter of the sector's overall exports. While the 15% rate is less than the 27.5% tariff Trump imposed in April, it is far higher than the 2.5% levy European car manufacturers faced before Trump's return to the White House. A German analyst, Stefan Bratzel, said it could be expected that U.S. consumers would pay two-thirds of the price hike caused by the tariff, while car exporters would probably swallow the other third. For those companies, 'we might have to see whether it is possible for cost-cutting somewhere else,' he said. The 15% rate was similar to one reached in the deal the U.S. struck with Japan, another major car-exporting country. For German carmakers, the U.S. represents around 13% of their total exports. In the short term, a 15% tariff will cost them 'billions each year,' said Hildegard Mueller, head of the national automobile manufacturers' association VDA. The situation has compelled all automakers to lower their 2025 profit forecasts and seek ways to alleviate the pressure. BMW boss Oliver Zipse suggested in June that Europe could get rid of its own tariffs on imported vehicles made in the U.S. That could benefit his company, which last year exported 153,000 vehicles from the Americas, and imported into Europe 92,000 cars that were assembled in the U.S. Similarly, Mercedes is seeking assistance from the national or EU level. 'The deal reached between the EU and the U.S. is a first, important step that needs to be followed by other measures,' a company spokesperson told Agence France-Presse (AFP). 'Politicians need to keep working to get rid of obstacles getting in the way of free trade. We are counting on the EU and U.S. to continue their constructive dialogue in the future,' she said. Volkswagen is also facing tariff hardship for vehicles it manufactures in Mexico for the U.S. market, announcing that its first quarter results were shaved by around 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion) compared to the same period a year earlier. Its Porsche and Audi cars are also exposed as they have no production factories in the U.S. On Monday, Audi reduced its revenue and profit targets for this year, although it expects them to rise next year. Volkswagen CEO Oliver Blume has suggested reaching a side deal with the U.S. that would take into account investments his company could make in that country. Volvo Cars, the Swedish carmaker owned by China's Geely Holding, has announced steep second quarter losses because of tariffs. The European auto sector is now lobbying the European Commission to delay the timetable for transitioning the European car market to all-electric and to provide some form of industry stimulus. With no help, European car factories, already facing uphill challenges, 'will have to reduce production,' said Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer, director of the Center for Automotive Research. That, he said, could affect up to 70,000 jobs in Germany alone.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store