logo
Why London's tube fares are set for massive above-inflation price hikes every year until 2030

Why London's tube fares are set for massive above-inflation price hikes every year until 2030

Time Out6 days ago

Earlier this year a report claimed that London's public transport had officially become the most expensive in the world. And, well, the numbers seemed to back that up. In March the capital's tube and train fares rose, with the daily cap for zone 1 travel increasing by 40p and the cap for travelling across zones 1, 2 and 3 hiked to £10.50.
If Londoners were hoping for a reprieve for their wallets from tube fare increases next year, this week we bring bad news. The Standard has reported that London mayor Sadiq Khan has been told that the capital's transport fares should rise every year until the end of the decade.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has reportedly told Sir Sadiq not just to increase fares, but to hike them above the rate of inflation. An edict apparently states that TfL should increase prices by the RPI rate of inflation plus one percent in 2026, 2027, 2028 and 2029.
So, why are fares going up, and why are they increasing by so much? Earlier this month the Chancellor said that TfL will receive nearly £2.2 billion to spend on infrastructure over the next five years. Put plainly, in return for this cash TfL is being told to hike its prices.
Alexander wrote: 'The funding in this settlement is provided against an assumed scenario that overall TfL fares will rise by the value of RPI+1 for each year of this settlement.'
This is the second year in a row that TfL has been told to increase its prices by the national government. The previous transport secretary Louise Haigh told Sadiq Khan to increase prices in line with national rail fare rises, which he did in March 2025.
How much are London's tube fares going up?
Exactly how much London's transport fares will go up hasn't been confirmed, as RPI varies. Currently RPI sits at 4.3 percent, though on average it has been much lower than that over the last decade or so.
Assuming an RPI inflation rate of around 3 percent, the daily cap for travelling between zones 1, 2 and 3 could cost more than £11.80 by 2029.
The next TfL fare hike is not expected until March 2026, but may be announced sooner. Watch this space for updates.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chelsea hold new stadium talks with Mayor of London as club considers switch
Chelsea hold new stadium talks with Mayor of London as club considers switch

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Chelsea hold new stadium talks with Mayor of London as club considers switch

Chelsea have a potential site in mind if they end up leaving Stamford Bridge, and the Mayor of London has urged the club to hold conversations over what comes next Chelsea have opened talks with Mayor of London Sadiq Khan as they continue to make plans for a potential stadium move. There has been speculation over a move away from Stamford Bridge in the past, to no avail, but new plans have begun to tentatively take hold. Former owner Roman Abramovich looked at a number of potential locations before his own departure in 2022. Plans for a move haven't changed under Todd Boehly's ownership, with the American recognising the capacity limitations of the Blues' current home. ‌ According to The Telegraph, Chelsea held meetings with officials following an invitation from the mayor himself. The club are exploring a site on Earl's Court in West London, though a spokesperson for Khan indicated no formal plans were known to the elected official. ‌ 'The mayor is unaware of any recent formal proposals from the club for the Earl's Court site," they said. "The mayor and TfL can only form a view once they have seen the details of any potential proposals.' Back in May, shareholder Hansjorg Wyss indicated the Earl's Court site would likely suit the club best. "Earl's Court would be the best option we can even think of. If it's going to happen," he told Chelsea Fan TV. Chelsea's current home has a capacity of just over 40,000 - making it significantly smaller than the grounds of some of their Premier League rivals. In sending out an invitation for contact, Mayor Khan cited the size of the ground in relation to the club's objectives. "My message to Chelsea is come and speak to us in relation to what you want to do," he told The Times in April. "Chelsea are the victims of their success, and Stamford Bridge is now too small for them. After all, this is a team that has twice won the Champions League. "We work closely with all seven of our Premier League clubs but I'm sure Chelsea look with some envy at the stadiums some of their rivals in London have. We're really keen to make sure that Chelsea, as we are with all our clubs, continue to flourish and thrive, so we're open to talking to Chelsea about what plans they have. At the moment they've not approached us. But we're here.' ‌ Back in March, Boehly suggested divisions over the club's future stadium plans could even see members of the ownership group go their separate ways. 'We have to think long term about what we're trying to accomplish,' the American told Bloomberg. 'We have a big stadium development opportunity that we have to flesh out. And that's going to be where we're either aligned or we ultimately decide to go different ways.' Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Sporting dig out Man Utd star in new Viktor Gyokeres message to Arsenal
Sporting dig out Man Utd star in new Viktor Gyokeres message to Arsenal

Metro

time6 hours ago

  • Metro

Sporting dig out Man Utd star in new Viktor Gyokeres message to Arsenal

Sporting's president Frederico Varandas has highlighted the fee Manchester United spent on Matheus Cunha in his latest message to Arsenal over a possible transfer deal for Viktor Gyokeres. Arsenal are believed to be leading the race for Gyokeres, but have come up against a brick wall in their pursuit of the 27-year-old attacker, with Sporting refusing to be bullied into an agreement for their prized possession. Gyokeres' camp had been under the impression the forward could secure a move away from Lisbon should Sporting receive an offer of €60m plus €10m (£50m plus £8m) in add-ons from a potential suitor this summer. But Sporting turned down Arsenal's opening £46.8m offer for Gyokeres and the club's outright refusal to ease their demands has reportedly left the Primiera Liga top scorer 'furious'. The prolific Swede is even threatening to go on strike to force through a switch to the Emirates. It's understood Gyokeres has no interest in joining Manchester United and has told close friends and family that he expects to be playing Champions League football with the Gunners next season. Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link so we can send you football news tailored to you. However, the north Londoners would be prepared to walk away from a deal for Gyokeres and concentrate their efforts on signing RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko if Sporting continue to play hardball over the coming days and weeks. 'Sporting are very calm about Gyokeres, we does not need to sell Gyokeres,' Sporting president Varandas said ahead of the club's general assembly this weekend. 'We have already passed the stage where we have to sell our best assets. We do not have to sell him. 'But in the same way that we do not have to sell him, we are still sensitive to Viktor's dreams. 'Sporting has a commitment, made by the president, not to ask for the value of the termination clause and to be reasonable in relation to Viktor's performance last season.' While Varandas admits it is likely Gyokeres will move on, he believes the fee United spent to capture Cunha from Wolves justifies Sporting's current stance on Gyokeres. 'If you ask me today, there is a strong possibility that Viktor will leave,' he added. 'Over the last few weeks, we have been keeping an eye on the market, I saw a player like Zubimendi, who is six months younger than Viktor, go to Arsenal for €65m. 'I saw two players being sold in the Premier League – Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo – forwards who do not have the quality of Viktor, in my opinion, sold for around €75m (Brentford have not yet agreed to sell Mbeumo). We are talking about players who are 26 years old. 'So given the demands we make in relation to Viktor's value, I believe he could leave, unless he has the worst agent in the world. 'But I find that hard to believe because he is one of the best footballers in the world.' Not for the first time, Varandas 'guaranteed' that the Portuguese champions had no intention of lowering their asking price for Gyokeres. 'I won't say what the price we're asking for. It was communicated to the agent. But I can guarantee that Viktor won't leave for €60m plus €10m,' he continued. 'Viktor already knows this and I want Sporting fans to know this and to take advantage of this summer, when they're two-time champions, when they've won a double, to celebrate and be at peace. 'There are only two scenarios: a club respects Viktor's fair market value and Viktor will fulfil his dream, and from that moment on we'll be ready to attack the targets. More Trending 'The other scenario is that a club doesn't want Viktor and Viktor, with a three-year contract, stays with Sporting and we'll be very happy about that.' The likes of Juventus and Atletico Madrid have been credited with a strong interest in Gyokeres, in addition to United and Arsenal, in recent months. Reports emanating out of Portugal last week suggested had also entered the fray and opened initial talks for the forward, with the English champions looking to to find Darwin Nunez's replacement. Gyokeres, formerly of Coventry City and Brighton, has a €100m (£85.1m) release clause in his contract at Sporting, which runs through to June 2028. For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: Jonathan David transfer odds: Manchester United, Arsenal, Newcastle and Co up against it in race for Lille striker MORE: Arsenal agree personal terms to sign fourth transfer target for Mikel Arteta MORE: Ruben Amorim set for awkward reunion after £13m Man Utd transfer decision

Chelsea hold talks with Mayor of London over building new stadium
Chelsea hold talks with Mayor of London over building new stadium

Telegraph

time7 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Chelsea hold talks with Mayor of London over building new stadium

Chelsea have held talks with the Mayor of London's office over building a new stadium. Telegraph Sport has been told the club met recently with officials at City Hall after Sadiq Khan publicly urged them to speak with his team about whether they wanted to leave Stamford Bridge for Earl's Court or redevelop their existing home. Khan's call came in April after Chelsea chairman Todd Boehly suggested there were divisions between him and co-owners Behdad Eghbali and Jose E Feliciano about where the Premier League side's future lay. Hansjorg Wyss, who also holds a minority stake in the club, said after the club's 3-1 win over Liverpool on May 5 that Earl's Court would be the 'best option we can even think of'. He told Chelsea Fan TV: 'If it's going to happen, I don't know. There's a lot of obstacles. But, right now, we don't have one person who drives that project. That's what we need.' Boehly had earlier told Bloomberg: 'We have to think about the long term about what we're trying to accomplish. We have a big stadium development opportunity that we have to flush out, and I think that's going to be where we're either aligned or we ultimately decide to go a different way. 'We have 16-20 years to figure it out. Obviously, inside of London, it's really complex, but it's not as if we're building something in the middle of a rural environment. We have a lot of constituencies to make sure that we care about. Certainly, the Chelsea fanbase is one. But long term, I think we're going to be building something new, and we'll figure it out.' Chelsea declined to comment on the status of their stadium plans or on any meeting with Khan's team. A spokesperson for Khan, who would need to approve such a project, told Telegraph Sport: 'The mayor works closely with all Premier League football clubs in London across a variety of matters. 'The mayor is unaware of any recent formal proposals from the club for the Earl's Court site. The mayor and TfL can only form a view once they have seen the details of any potential proposals.' News of the meeting between the club and the mayor's office comes more than nine months after Chelsea's prospects of relocating to Earl's Court were dismissed by the company in charge of the development of the site. The Guardian reported the club's chief operating officer, Jason Gannon, had held talks about the possibility of them moving to land that is under the management of the Earl's Court Development Company (ECDC). Chelsea spoke with developers, Delancey, two years ago and Gannon, who was appointed by the club in October, is reported to have continued those discussions. Gannon is also said to have discussed the matter with Transport for London, but ECDC released a statement dismissing the possibility of such a move. The statement said: 'There is no plan within our plans for Chelsea FC to relocate to the Earl's Court site. We have a fully detailed design, shortly to be registered with both local authorities, which prioritises the delivery of thousands of homes and jobs, culture and open space through a well-designed and considered masterplan, which has evolved over four years of engagement. This will see development commence in 2026 with the first residents and occupiers moving in from 2030. This is, and will remain, our primary focus.' That stance would not rule out Chelsea making a bid to buy Earl's Court before development is due to begin next year. To move away from Stamford Bridge, they would need to hammer out an agreement with Chelsea Pitch Owners (CPO), which holds the freehold for the land the ground sits on and could block any attempted move. Chelsea's lack of progress over the future of their stadium was listed last year as one of the reasons for the breakdown in the relationship between Boehly and Clearlake Capital's Eghbali and Feliciano, with both sides wanting to buy the other out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store