FBI asked to "flag" Epstein files that mention Trump, senator says
Why it matters: In multiple letters sent to top Justice and FBI officials, Durbin sought to press for more answers from the Department of Justice that is engulfed by the Epstein investigation fallout.
Zoom In: Durbin said that the FBI agents were pressured to review about 100,000 Epstein-related records from March 14 to the end of March.
Many of the agents "lacked the expertise to identify statutorily-protected information regarding child victims and child witnesses," Durbin added.
Durbin pointed out that Attorney General Pam Bondi's previous past statements that she would release additional documents directly contradicted the DOJ's about-face earlier this month when the department said no additional releases would happen.
What they're saying: The letters asked Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino if they personally reviewed all of the files in the DOJ's possession that relate to Epstein.
Durbin also questioned why personnel were told to flag records in which Trump was mentioned, and what happened to the records mentioning the president once they were flagged.
What we're watching: Durbin letter concluded with a request for top DOJ officials to provide information and materials to a range of questions by August 1.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's FCC chair plays coy on Fox News when asked if president involved in Colbert's cancellation
Days after both he and Donald Trump gloated that CBS had canceled Stephen Colbert's late-night show, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr wouldn't give a direct answer when asked on Fox News whether the president played a part in The Late Show's demise. Carr's ambiguity regarding whether Trump was directly involved in the decision to end a long-running program hosted by an outspoken critic of the president comes amid CBS parent company Paramount's pending merger with Skydance Media, which the FCC chief is responsible for approving. Trump's hand-picked top media regulator also took the opportunity on Thursday to say that it's 'entirely possible' that ABC's The View could be in the administration's 'crosshairs' after the White House called View host Joy Behar an 'irrelevant loser' while suggesting 'her show is next to be pulled off air.' Interviewing Carr on Thursday morning's broadcast of America's Newsroom, Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer stated that CBS was still reeling from the fallout from the sudden announcement that Colbert's show will come to an end next year. Hemmer also noted that CBS morning anchor Tony Dokoupil recently broke from his network colleagues – who believe the decision was politically motivated – and defended his corporate bosses. At the same time, Hemmer kicked off the interview with Carr by saying he wanted to get something 'out of the way,' and that was whether Trump had 'anything to do with the cancellation of Stephen Colbert's show.' The Trump official, however, played coy with his response. 'What is important to keep in mind is when President Trump ran for election, he ran right at these legacy broadcast media outfits and the New York and Hollywood elites that are behind it, and he smashed the facade that they are gatekeepers that control what Americans can think and what Americans can say,' Carr responded. 'Once you do that, you have exposed a business model of a lot of these outfits as being nothing more than a partisan circus. So I think there are a lot of consequences that are flowing from President Trump deciding, I won't play by the rules of politicians in the past and let these legacy outfits dictate the narrative and terms of the debate,' he continued. 'He is succeeding.' Carr then went on to suggest that even if Trump hadn't played a direct role in the cancellation of Colbert's show, the president's ongoing war with the legacy media was the key factor in the decision. 'Look at what is happening. NPR has been defunded, PBS has been defunded, Colbert is getting canceled,' the chairman boasted. 'You've got anchors and news media personalities losing jobs downstream of President Trump's decision to stand up. He stood up for the American people. The American people don't trust the legacy gatekeepers anymore.' Hemmer, meanwhile, pointed out that he had asked Carr 'a very direct question,' but 'did not hear a yes or a no in your answer.' Instead, as the Fox anchor noted, he 'heard a maybe.' Carr's non-committal response comes two days after Skydance's general counsel sent him a pair of letters confirming that New Paramount will eliminate all diversity, equity and inclusivity (DEI) policies and hire an ombudsman to review 'complaints of bias' at CBS News once the merger is complete. Additionally, Carr also met with Skydance CEO David Ellison days before it was announced that Colbert was leaving and The Late Show franchise would come to an end. At the meeting, according to regulatory filings, Ellison asked Carr to 'promptly grant' Paramount's request to transfer over its broadcast licenses while promising CBS would be 'unbiased' under the new corporate leadership. The Ellison meeting also took place shortly after Paramount agreed to pay Trump $16 million to settle his 'meritless' lawsuit over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, leading Democratic lawmakers and free press groups to threaten lawsuits and criminal investigations into whether Paramount violated anti-bribery laws with the settlement. Colbert himself has called the payoff a 'big fat bribe' in order to help push the merger through, and he has since cast doubt that his show's cancellation was based on a 'purely financial decision,' as Paramount insisted in its announcement. CBS staffers agree with this sentiment. 'Many of us think this was part and parcel of the Trump shakedown settlement,' one network staffer told The Independent. Besides celebrating the Late Show's cancellation, Trump has also repeatedly claimed that he reached a side deal with Skydance as part of the settlement, asserting that Ellison has promised him as much as $20 million in pro-Trump advertisements and PSAs on CBS programming once the merger is complete. Paramount has denied knowledge of any secret behind-the-scenes arrangement with the incoming owner. Elsewhere in the Fox News interview, Hemmer read the White House's recent threatening message to The View, wondering if this meant that the ABC daytime talk show – which is well-known for its anti-Trump stance – is 'now in the crosshairs of this administration.' Carr, who is seen as a MAGA 'attack dog' and loyal foot soldier in Trump's onslaught against the mainstream media, suggested he could soon be taking aim at the show. 'Look, it's entirely possible that there's issues over there,' he replied. 'Stepping back, this broader dynamic [that] once President Trump has exposed these media gatekeepers and smashed this facade, there are a lot of consequences. I think the consequences of that aren't quite finished.' Asked where this could end, Carr said that 'we need a course correction' and it's 'time for America's' legacy broadcasters to return to promoting the public interest.' He then applauded Skydance for committing to eradicating diversity hiring initiatives and hiring an ombudsman before, adding that 'that's where we have to go.'Notably, Carr's remarks about The View come months after he opened an investigation into ABC and its parent company Disney – which paid Trump $16 million last year to settle a defamation suit – over its DEI policies, claiming that the corporation may have violated the FCC's equal employment opportunity regulations. And earlier this year, it was reported that Disney chief Bob Iger explicitly asked The View's hosts to tone down its anti-Trump rhetoric and pull back on political segments.
CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Justice Kagan stresses the need for government officials to obey court orders
Supreme Court Associate Justice Elena Kagan said Thursday that one of the major challenges facing the federal judiciary today is the possibility of government officials defying court orders. The comments from Kagan, one of three liberal members on the high court, come as the Trump administration has been accused of flouting orders from lower courts. 'This idea that litigants, and most especially here I'm talking about government officials, needn't obey the dictates of courts. Needn't obey court orders. And you know that just is not the way our system works, not the way rule of law in this country works,' Kagan said during a wide-ranging conversation before an audience of judges and lawyers at the 9th US Circuit Judicial Conference as she discussed several things she thought presented a challenge to the nation's federal court system. She continued: 'And that's true for the Supreme Court, and it's also true for every district court, unless and until an appellate court or the Supreme Court says otherwise — that judicial orders are judicial orders and need to be respected.' Among the other issues Kagan said are facing her colleagues in the judiciary are threats to their personal safety and the way people talk about judges in the US. She pointed to a rare statement Chief Justice John Roberts issued earlier this year after President Donald Trump called for judges who ruled against him to be impeached. 'Judges are fair game for all kinds of criticism: strong criticism, pointed criticism. But vilifying judges in that way is a step beyond and ought to be understood as such,' Kagan said at the event in Monterey, California. The administration has been accused of skirting court orders in a range of cases, but judges have largely avoided pursuing contempt proceedings against officials. The issue reached new heights last month after a fired Justice Department lawyer who worked on immigration cases filed a whistleblower complaint that claimed a top DOJ official crudely told others in the department to ignore court orders before a controversial immigration enforcement situation in March. Emil Bove, the official accused of making the comments, has denied the allegations. The US Senate is currently considering whether to confirm him to a lifetime appointment on a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court.
New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
TikTok will go dark in US if China doesn't OK sale before Trump's deadline: Lutnik
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Thursday that TikTok will have to stop operating in the United States if China does not approve a deal for the sale of the Chinese-owned short video app that is used by some 170 million Americans. Lutnick, speaking on CNBC, also said the US must control the algorithm that makes the social media platform work. Last month, President Trump extended by 90 days to Sept. 17, a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok. Trump's action took place despite a 2024 law that mandated a sale or shutdown by Jan. 19 of this year if there had not been significant progress. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick warned TikTok will go dark in the US if China doesn't approve a sale to American investors. REUTERS 'China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece. But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm,' Lutnick said. 'If that deal gets approved, by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon.' TikTok did not immediately comment. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. REUTERS Attorney General Pam Bondi sent letters to Apple, Google and other companies that provide services or host the TikTok app that were made public this month. The letters said the Justice Department was irrevocably relinquishing any claims against the companies for potential violations of the law, citing Trump's determination that an abrupt shutdown would interfere with his overseeing national security and foreign affairs. Some Democratic lawmakers argue Trump has no legal authority to extend the deadline and suggest the deal under consideration would not meet legal requirements.
