logo
Letters to the editor: We need a good attitude to work together and fix South Africa, no 'holier-than-thou' sentiments

Letters to the editor: We need a good attitude to work together and fix South Africa, no 'holier-than-thou' sentiments

IOL News2 days ago
We need a better attitude to fix SA
The visit to America by Freedom Front+ leaders is an undermining of the authority of the President and his cabinet.
As a sovereign state, South Africa has the right to make its own decisions and not be 'coerced' by American requests'. Being 'coerced' is the impression I got, because the implication is, if we don't meet their demands, our economy will suffer'.
The President has already made himself clear on the denouncement of 'kill the Boer'. It should not be taken up literally, because if it were so, we would have already seen a real genocide.
The small group of Afrikaners who exchanged their identity to become 'Amerikaners', is testimony to the fact that there is no genocide. The colonial conquest of South Africa included acts of genocide by a 'Christianing' Europe against the Khoi and San people.
I speculate that descendants of these colonists (possibly AWB, FF+, their family and circle of friends) have probably shouted during apartheid 'slaan die hotnot' and 'skiet die k****'
People of colour have lost more lives during the Struggle due to police brutality, than present day farm murders.
As a product of 1976, other students and I had to run for our lives across a field when the police shot at us. Who can forget the brutal murders of Ashley Kriel, Robbie Waterwitch, Colleen Williams, the Cradock 4, Chris Hani, Steve Biko, Hector Pieterson, et al?
If they (the FF+ and other colonialist descendants) are genuine in getting South Africa back on track, I would appeal to them not to fly to America, but to come forward on home soil to repent for the sins of their forefathers and start the process of restoration, reconciliation and restitution.
This will lay the platform for the spiritual, social and economic revival to eradicate poverty, inequality and unemployment.
Let's leave the holier-than-thou attitude behind and be humble enough to get our hands dirty in order to clean up the mess that the majority of South African find themselves in 'Helping Hands for A Better Future'. | Clive Solomon Goodwood
Poultry vaccination a game changer
The Democratic Alliance in KwaZulu-­Natal welcomes the announcement by Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen that South Africa will begin its first-ever national poultry vaccination programme against highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI).
This is a decisive step in protecting the agricultural economy – and in KZN, it could be game-changing.
KZN is home to a significant and growing poultry industry. From large-scale commercial operations to emerging black farmers and subsistence producers in rural municipalities, poultry farming remains the single most important source of both affordable protein and agricultural employment in the province.
Recent outbreaks of avian influenza have devastated producers across the country. For KZN, where rural livelihoods are often centred around backyard poultry operations or smallholder commercial ventures, the economic risks of HPAI are immense.
By proactively rolling out vaccinations, Minister Steenhuisen is not only protecting South African poultry – he is safeguarding food security, rural incomes, and economic stability in provinces like ours.
We further call on the KZN Department of Agriculture and Rural Development to:
■ Ensure full alignment with the national rollout plan, with special emphasis on rural and small-scale poultry producers;
■ Deploy veterinary support and training teams to all districts to assist with safe vaccination and biosecurity awareness;
■ Prioritise emerging black farmers and cooperatives to prevent inequitable access -to disease control interventions.
We are especially encouraged by this action as a signal of a more responsive, science-based agricultural policy environment under the new Government of National Unity.
The DA, in its role in the Government of Provincial Unity (GPU) in KZN, will continue to monitor implementation and provide oversight to ensure that this programme reaches every farmer – not just the biggest, but also the most vulnerable. | SAKHILE MNGADI, MPL DA KZN spokesperson on Agriculture
AI being willfully misused in law
As a practicing attorney and someone who has been at the side bar for almost 40 years, I'm seeing more and more attorneys using Artificial Intelligence for not only their research but also their letters.
Fortunately, their letters are completely see through and one can pick up the stultified manner in which AI writes letters.
In one particular case, acting Judge DJ Smit had the lawyer (advocate) admit that the citation emanated from AI. In a previous case lawyers have been referred to be disciplined at the Legal Practice Council.
We are probably going to see more and more of this.
However, what is becoming a real nightmare is that when you do see clients and they ask for an opinion on a legal issue or on the strength of their case, they come armed with AI advice to not only challenge you but also to second guess. The advice that they pick up is sometimes enormously problematic and wrong.
I have had quite a few clients advising me that they are going to go rather with the AI advice because it suits them better. This has had enormously destructive consequences for the clients. I suspect that they don't even bother to go and get the advice checked out by a lawyer. | MICHAEL BAGRAIM Cape Town
LETTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UN at a Crossroads: Birth Pangs of a New World Order
UN at a Crossroads: Birth Pangs of a New World Order

IOL News

time22 minutes ago

  • IOL News

UN at a Crossroads: Birth Pangs of a New World Order

A viewer looks at the 'UN Charter' exhibition ahead of the 80th anniversary of its signing at the United Nations Headquarters on June 20, 2025 in New York. Marco Cordeiro Pires On June 26, the United Nations Charter celebrated its 80th anniversary. The current international order is based on its principles, which stand out in its preamble: the prevention of war, equal rights of peoples and nations, justice, social progress and a better life for all. All multilateral institutions subsumed under its creation since 1945, such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, the Food and Agriculture Organisation and the UN Refugee Agency, etc. But unfortunately, we are seeing the principles of the UN Charter being disrespected in various parts of the world, precisely by the powers that considered themselves the creators and pillars of this order. Today, we live in a very complex international context marked by instability, regional wars, nuclear threats, attacks on the sovereignty of sovereign countries, and the exacerbation of unilateralism. The current global order is undergoing a profound stress test, which is producing challenges and many opportunities. Western powers claim to be the creators and defenders of the rules that govern the coexistence between nations. This stance is reflected in the preponderance of Western logic, which seeks to impose its political, economic and ideological models on the rest of the world as if they were universal. The history of European imperialism and colonialism in the 19th and 20th centuries contains an enormous list of atrocities committed in the name of a "civilising "and "evangelising" mission. In addition to military, political and economic domination, Western nations have developed an extensive theoretical and ideological apparatus, especially about international relations. In this field, there is a large concentration of Anglo-American voices, while few voices have been heard from countries of the Global South, as if non-Western peoples cannot have their perspectives on the essence of international politics. In undergraduate courses worldwide, international relations manuals naturalise the Western view as if it were the only truly valid analytical perspective. Realistic theorists of international relations, such as Samuel Huntington, with his theses on modernization and the clash of civilizations; Francis Fukuyama, who argued that the Western liberal model would be the end of history; and Graham Allison, who deals with the inevitability of a clash between the great powers in "Thucydides Trap", receive an amplified audience by arguing that the international order is a zero-sum game and that the security and well-being of a nation can only be sustained at the expense of the interests of other countries. In essence, realism brings with it the values of individualism and the idea that human beings are merely rational maximisers of petty interests. From there, realist political scientists extrapolate experience at the individual level to the behaviour of nation-states, postulating hegemony as the only acceptable condition for a great power. There are other Western theories of international relations, such as liberalism, which postulates the universalisation of its notion of democracy and human rights, which has often served as a pretext for interventions and regime changes around the world. Even the constructivist theory, which appears to be more progressive by incorporating non-state agents such as nongovernmental organisations, social movements, trade union federations and churches, etc, into the decision-making process, is used as an instrument of destabilisation via so-called colour revolutions, which are instruments of hybrid wars. At this point, it is worth highlighting that the three Anglo-American theories are used to maintain the status quo in the international order, in which the hegemony of the United States prevails. In this context, the ideas of Amitav Acharya are conducive to reflecting on the role of countries in the Global South in this process, as they can contribute new concepts about the relationship between civilisations, nations and people that do not mean hegemonism, supremacism, unilateralism or zero-sum logic. To this end, we could incorporate into the debate on the creation of a new international institutional framework concepts and philosophies from outside the Western world, such as the African concept of Ubuntu, which assumes that human beings are part of a broader and more meaningful relational community. According to this philosophy, people must be open and available to others, support those close to them, not feel threatened when others are capable and good, join forces to achieve better results, and understand that the differences between people are what generate growth. Likewise, we could mention the Taoist principle of Yin and Yang, in which opposites complement each other, the Confucian moral authority, and the umbilical relationship between man and nature expressed in the Inca concept of Pachamama. In conclusion, humanity should be viewed as a large garden, not a vast eucalyptus plantation. Civilisations, cultures and ethnic groups are flowers that contribute to the beauty of this garden. Humanity is facing a challenging crisis. It is necessary to strive for the birth of a new world order that guarantees all people enjoy the realisation of all the promises made 80 years ago when the UN was created. Peace, security and prosperity will be the collective fruits. * The author is a professor of international political economy at São Paulo State University in Brazil. This article was originally published at ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

The collapse of precision warfare: Iran's role in the struggle for dignity
The collapse of precision warfare: Iran's role in the struggle for dignity

IOL News

time4 hours ago

  • IOL News

The collapse of precision warfare: Iran's role in the struggle for dignity

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi arrives to attend the funeral of Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander Hossein Salami and other military commanders, who were killed during Israeli strikes on the first day of the war, during a state funeral procession at Enghelab (Revolution) Square in the capital Tehran on June developments were not 'escalations', but a culmination, argues the writer. Image: Iranian Foreign Ministry / AFP Ali Ridha Khan THE fantasy of precision warfare is collapsing. With each Israeli airstrike, each Iranian drone, and each jittery American deployment, the veneer of 'surgical retaliation' is being stripped away. What remains is raw and elemental: a struggle not merely over territory or proxies, but over dignity, narrative, and the political horizon of the Global South. And it is in this horizon that Iran has positioned itself as the last strategic spine in a region otherwise bent by American fear and Israeli force. Let us be clear. The West— then led by an ever-confused Biden and now shadowed by Trump's isolationist pantomime—still believes that violence can be compartmentalised. That one can bomb Gaza, assassinate scientists, and sanction hospitals without consequence. But this belief, like Zionism itself, is a settler delusion. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has understood something Washington cannot: reputation is a weapon more potent than warheads. The Islamic Republic's restraint during the escalations of 2023 and 2024 was not a weakness. It was the patience of the hunted turning hunter. Israel's moral currency has never been lower; its genocidal siege on Gaza has moved even the most cynical into recognition. Iran knew then that the world did not need its rockets—it needed its example: a state that would not be baited into annihilation but would strike when the strike became unavoidable. And yet, we hope—for the sake of history, for the raped soil of Gaza and the bombed flesh of Beirut—that Iran's restraint ends soon. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Not because war is noble, but because there are worse violences than war. The violence of waiting. The violence of witnessing. The violence of survival without sovereignty. This is the violence Frantz Fanon spoke of when he wrote that the colonized 'learns that he is nothing in the eyes of the settler.' And so he must rise, not simply to destroy his oppressor, but to resurrect his own worth. Iran, in this framework, becomes not just a nation-state—but a vessel of defiance. Fanon never saw 1979, but he would have recognised it immediately: a rupture in the colonial order. Ayatollah Khomeini, like Ali Shariati before him, did not believe in Westoxification—the intoxication with the West that neutralises the revolutionary soul. The Islamic Revolution was never meant to mimic the Westphalian world—it was a call to reimagine it. Today's battle lines are no longer Cold War relics. They are metaphysical. On one side, Zionism, bolstered by empire and Silicon Valley surveillance; on the other, a constellation of wounded nations refusing to forget. As Steve Biko reminded us:'The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.' Iran's war is as much epistemological as it is ballistic—it is about reclaiming truth from CNN, memory from Mossad, and meaning from a UN that counts bodies but never blames the butcher. Some will call last week's developments 'escalations.' That is incorrect. This is the culmination. The slow agony of colonised people cannot continue in half-measures. The Arab regimes, with their palatial cowardice and U.S. bases, now face a mirror they cannot avoid. To host the empire's hardware is to be targeted by the rage it generates. Iran's message is clear: if we burn, you burn with us. And what of the world's so-called 'moderates'? The liberals who pace between peace and politics, issuing statements and equivocations? Ghassan Kanafani dismissed them best: 'If the Palestinian cause is not the cause of every revolutionary, it is not a cause at all.'

FIA urges neutrality after Mayer launches presidency bid
FIA urges neutrality after Mayer launches presidency bid

eNCA

time20 hours ago

  • eNCA

FIA urges neutrality after Mayer launches presidency bid

LONDON - Motor sport's ruling body the FIA on Saturday insisted it would remain impartial after American Tim Mayer launched a potentially acrimonious challenge to incumbent president Mohammed Ben Sulayem in December's election. Mayer launched his campaign Friday at Silverstone, ahead of the British Grand Prix, with an attack on the controversial Ben Sulayem. "The FIA Presidential election is a structured and democratic process, to ensure fairness, transparency, and integrity at every stage. It is conducted in accordance with the FIA Statutes," said the FIA statement. "In line with the FIA's commitment to impartiality and to preserve equal treatment of candidates, FIA staff members are required to maintain strict neutrality throughout the process. "The Federation will continue to operate as normal, delivering on its responsibilities to its Members and across all areas of motor sport and mobility." The election will take place during the FIA General Assemblies on 12 December. The statement followed Mayer's attack on Ben Sulayem's time in office. The American said the president had delivered on none of his promises and had gone "in completely the other direction". "We have the illusion of integrity and what we've seen is wave after wave of statute changes, which are designed to concentrate power in one office, which is the exact opposite of what he promised." Mayer added that he would reverse the statute changes. He said the sport's two World Council "have been gagged and are not able to represent the people who elected them". Mayer, 59, the son of former McLaren boss Tim Mayer, is an experienced motor racing official who was dismissed as a Formula One steward last year in a text message sent by an assistant of Ben Sulayem. He launched his 'FIA Forward' campaign on Friday and was given a warm welcome by most F1 team bosses. "I like Tim," said compatriot and McLaren chief Zak Brown. "And he's got some family history with McLaren. Aston Martin's Andy Cowell also pointed to Mayer's Formula One heritage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store