logo
Harvard University found in 'violent violation' of Civil Rights Act over anti-semitism, Trump admin says

Harvard University found in 'violent violation' of Civil Rights Act over anti-semitism, Trump admin says

NBC News19 hours ago

Harvard University is "in violent violation" of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, the federal government's Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism said in a Monday letter threatening to cut all the school's federal funding if changes aren't made.
The task force, which formed earlier this year under an executive order by President Donald Trump, wrote a letter to the Ivy League institution saying the Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services concluded a Title VI investigation into anti-Semitism at Harvard.
Title VI prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin.
The letter outlined several violations the school allegedly committed, including: The majority of Jewish students reported experiencing negative bias or discrimination on campus, a quarter felt physically unsafe, Jewish and Israeli students were assaulted and spat on, and the campus was vandalized with anti-Semitic stickers.
It also highlighted campus protests in the wake of the Israel-Palestinian war, noting such demonstrations saw "calls for genocide and murder, and denied Jewish and Israeli students access to campus spaces."
The letter accused Harvard of inaction, failing to defend all groups on campus equally, and of conforming to "racial hierarchies."
The government warned that if changes aren't made, all federal funding will be cut.
"Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government," the letter said.
The government noted, "Harvard may of course continue to operate free of federal privileges, and perhaps such an opportunity will spur a commitment to excellence that will help Harvard thrive once again."
Harvard responded to the letter on Monday, saying it "strongly disagrees with the government's findings."
"Antisemitism is a serious problem, and no matter the context, it is unacceptable. Harvard has taken substantive, proactive steps to address the root causes of antisemitism in its community," a university spokesperson said.
Harvard said in response to the government's probe that it shared its report on antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias and outlined ways it has "strengthened policies, disciplined those who violate them, encouraged civil discourse, and promoted open, respectful dialogue."
"Harvard is far from indifferent on this issue," the school said. "Harvard has made significant strides to combat bigotry, hate and bias. We are not alone in confronting this challenge and recognize that this work is ongoing. We remain committed to ensuring members of our Jewish and Israeli community are embraced, respected, and can thrive at Harvard.'
In June 2024, Harvard's president announced the school would implement initiatives to combat antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias on campus. Those efforts included updating campus use rules, standardizing investigations and discipline processes, creating new programs to facilitate constructive dialogue and viewpoint diversity, expanding kosher dining options, and offering workshops to incorporate antisemitism training into educational sessions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Over 170 charities call for end to deadly new Gaza aid distribution system
Over 170 charities call for end to deadly new Gaza aid distribution system

Reuters

time39 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Over 170 charities call for end to deadly new Gaza aid distribution system

GENEVA, July 1 (Reuters) - More than 170 non-governmental organisations called on Tuesday for a U.S.- and Israeli-backed food aid distribution scheme in Gaza to be dismantled over concerns it is putting civilians at risk of death and injury. More than 500 people have been killed in mass shootings near aid distribution centres or transport routes guarded by Israeli forces since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operating in late May, according to medical authorities in Gaza. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get supplies into Gaza, largely bypassing a U.N.-led system that Israel says had let militants divert aid. The United Nations has called the plan "inherently unsafe" and a violation of humanitarian impartiality rules. As of early afternoon in Geneva on Tuesday, where the joint declaration was released, 171 charities had signed onto the call for countries to press Israel to halt the GHF scheme and reinstate aid coordinated through the United Nations. "Palestinians in Gaza face an impossible choice: starve or risk being shot while trying desperately to reach food to feed their families," the statement said. Groups signing it included Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders, Save the Children, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Amnesty International. In a response, the GHF told Reuters it had delivered more than 52 million meals in five weeks and said other humanitarian groups had "nearly all of their aid looted". "Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza," the GHF told Reuters. The NGOs accused the GHF of forcing hungry and weak people to trek for hours, sometimes through active conflict zones, to receive food aid. The Israeli military acknowledged on Monday that Palestinian civilians have been harmed at aid distribution centres in the Gaza Strip, saying that Israeli forces had been issued new instructions following what it called "lessons learned". Israel has repeatedly said its forces operate near the centres in order to prevent the aid from falling into the hands of Palestinian Hamas militants.

Bob Vylan issue furious statement over Glasto cop probe- 'We are being targeted'
Bob Vylan issue furious statement over Glasto cop probe- 'We are being targeted'

Daily Mirror

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Bob Vylan issue furious statement over Glasto cop probe- 'We are being targeted'

Punk duo Bob Vylan have released a statement saying they are being 'targeted for speaking up' after complaints were made about their set at Glastonbury Festival, which saw them chant "Death to the IDF". They said: "Not the first. Not the last. Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week, it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band. "We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use 'unnecessary lethal forces' against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza." They continued: "We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whichever sanctions we receive will be a distraction. The Government doesn't want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity. To ask why they aren't doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? "The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction. We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last and if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up too. Free Palestine." Following Bob Vylan's performance at Glastonbury, their visas for America, where they were due to perform, were rejected. United States Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau said on X: "The @StateDept has revoked the US visas for the members of the Bob Vylan band in light of their hateful tirade at Glastonbury, including leading the crowd in death chants. "Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country." The band's IDF chant came as the Israeli army admitted to shooting and killing Palestinian civilians at aid distribution sites in Gaza. Since the end of May, more than 583 Palestinians have been killed and thousands injured while waiting for food, as announced by Gaza's Ministry of Health. An Israeli naval strike also hit a seaside cafe in Gaza, killing more than 30 people, including journalists. Bob Vylan, who has since been dropped by their talent agent, performed live on the BBC at the time, but the corporation have since said they have no plans of putting it back on iPlayer. Downing Street also issued a statement following the performance as they said it was "right" for the BBC to express regret at airing the set. A Number 10 spokesman said: 'We strongly condemn the threatening comments made by Bob Vylan at Glastonbury. The Prime Minister has been clear that any performers making threats or inciting violence should not be given a platform.' He later added: 'The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast. It's right that they have now acknowledged the live stream should have been pulled and that they will look at guidance around live events going forward.' Today, the BBC issued a statement to say they should have cut the livestream to Bob Vylan's set. The set was uploaded to iPlayer and remained on the site for more than five hours before it was removed by the BBC.

I can't believe I need to spell this out – but Trump is not your daddy
I can't believe I need to spell this out – but Trump is not your daddy

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

I can't believe I need to spell this out – but Trump is not your daddy

Is your name Barron, Donald Jr, Eric, Ivanka or Tiffany Trump? No? Then I regret to inform you that President Donald John Trump is almost certainly not your daddy. I say 'almost certainly' because narcissistic billionaires do have a nasty habit of spawning willy-nilly. Just look at Elon Musk and Pavel Durov – the latter is the Telegram founder, who has more than 100 children in 12 countries via sperm donation. Still, unless you are a very high-IQ individual, with an orange glow, an insatiable appetite for money-making schemes, and a weird belief that you invented the word 'caravan', I think it's safe to say that you're probably not Trump's offspring. Why am I taking great pains to spell this out? Because a disturbing condition called Trump daddy derangement syndrome (TDDS) is sweeping the world – the main symptom of which is an irresistible urge to call the president of the United States 'Daddy'. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson bears some blame for the spread of this ailment. While speaking at a Trump rally last October, Carlson delivered an unusual speech in which he compared the US under Trump to a patriarch giving his naughty teenage daughter a 'vigorous spanking'. Rather than immediately losing the contents of their stomach because of this imagery, the Maga-loving crowd lapped it up. When Trump came on stage later they yelled 'Daddy's home!' and 'Daddy Don!' Which, of course, plays right into Trump's self-mythologising as a hypermasculine strongman who will be a protector of women 'whether they like it or not'. While TDDS remained fairly dormant for a few months after that, it seems we are suffering a new outbreak. Last week Nato secretary general Mark Rutte addressed Trump's comments about Israel and Iran not knowing 'what the fuck they're doing' by helpfully explaining that: 'Sometimes Daddy needs to use strong language.' And sometimes a Nato chief needs to watch their language. After his comments caused a social media storm, Rutte rapidly back-pedalled. 'The daddy thing, I didn't call him 'Daddy,'' Rutte told reporters later that day, despite being on the record saying just that. 'Sometimes, in Europe, I hear … countries saying: 'Hey, Mark, will the US stay with us?' And I said that sounds a little bit like a small child asking his daddy: 'Hey, are you still staying with the family?' So in that sense, I used 'daddy' – not that I was calling President Trump Daddy.' Nice try, Mark, but I'm not sure that makes things better. Rutte, a Dutchman, is basically calling Europe a helpless child who needs Trump's approval. Whatever Rutte meant, Trump and his followers seem to have taken 'daddy' as a compliment. Last week Jonathan Lindsey, a Republican lawmaker, told fellow Michigan senate members that a lot of Americans see Trump as a father figure and more people should start referring to him as 'Daddy'. Gay Democratic Michigan senator Jeremy Moss then replied: 'You don't want to know what daddy means in my community.' Just to spell it out, 'daddy' has been gay slang for an older man, often monied, who is sexually involved with a younger man for almost as long as Trump has been alive. Meanwhile, Trump spoke approvingly of Rutte's comments, saying: 'I think he likes me.' He added: 'If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back and I'll hit him hard, OK? He did it very affectionately. Daddy, you're my daddy.' Trump's fundraising operation is also flogging T-shirts with his mugshot and the word 'DADDY' on them for just $35. Sigmund Freud, sadly, could not be reached for comment on all this. But if he were available, I think even he might have said: 'Mummy, please make this stop.' Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store