Mark Carney meets with Indigenous leaders about controversial development law
'The economic value of these projects will be shared with First Nations as partners. You will help build the prosperity of your communities for generations to come,' Carney told First Nations chiefs at the Canadian Museum of History, while other delegates tuned in virtually.
'By moving forward together, we can write a new chapter … in the relationship between the government of Canada and First Nations. This isn't an aspiration. It is the law,' the prime minister said.
'In many respects, this is the first federal legislation to put Indigenous economic growth at its core.'
Carney was touting the Building Canada Act, part of a contentious piece of legislation known as Bill C-5. The law, a response to Canada's trade crisis with the United States, was rammed through Parliament last month and would grant Ottawa temporary powers to sidestep existing environmental laws and regulations to spur the development of 'nation-building' projects like pipelines, ports and mines.
The law, and its rushed passage, sparked a deluge of concerns from critics that it could compromise Indigenous rights and environmental protections.
Behind the scenes on Thursday, the prime minister's vision of partnership and progress was put to the test.
Government officials only allowed media to observe Carney's opening speech, hustling reporters out of the Gatineau venue despite a desire from First Nations leadership to allow the public to hear from chiefs as well.
'I'm sorry you're all out here. We should have been in (there), and you should have been able to hear my speech,' Assembly of First Nations (AFN) National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak told reporters outside the museum.
Woodhouse Nepinak said it was 'unfortunate' that media and the public were 'pushed out' of the remainder of the summit and said chiefs were not involved in the decision.
On Wednesday, she said the AFN had not developed the agenda with government officials, while AFN New Brunswick Regional Chief Joanna Bernard said Ottawa was 'putting up the agenda' and 'deciding how this is going to proceed.'
Agenda details were finalized in the days leading up to the summit, which kicked off with opening sessions on Wednesday before Carney's full-day confab the following morning.
As of Thursday, the agenda featured four 'working sessions' moderated by more cabinet ministers than chiefs, with the final session, titled 'Working Together,' to be led by Carney and six members of his front bench.
The sessions are expected to cover subjects including 'meaningful consultation,' the Indigenous Advisory Council in the legislation designed to ensure national-interest projects are chosen in tandem with rights-holders, and First Nations economic prosperity.
Aside from the prime minister, seven federal ministers and a group of Liberal MPs, secretaries of state and parliamentary secretaries were present at the summit. Michael Sabia, clerk of the Privy Council, also made an appearance.
Woodhouse Nepinak acknowledged Thursday that it had been many years since a prime minister had sat down with First Nations chiefs in this way.
'But I really think when the government organizes a meeting like this, to really talk to First Nations, that's so critically important,' she said. 'So we do call on the government to have a followup meeting one year from now.'
Other demands to be raised by chiefs Thursday include reviving a bill that expired before the election ensuring clean water in First Nations communities, developing further efforts to close the First Nations infrastructure gap that has left communities lacking essentials like schools, homes and roads, and putting a renewed focus on First Nations policing services.
'I think (Carney) has got to come up with some commitments, firm commitments, hopefully by the end of this day and in the weeks ahead,' Woodhouse Nepinak said.
Carney, speaking to reporters before his speech, said his focus for the day was not to identify nation-building projects but to listen to and engage with communities.
When asked whether he felt he would reach a consensus with First Nations representatives about the law, he said, 'Yes, I do.'
Summits with Inuit and Métis groups are expected to be held in the coming weeks and months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Report raises questions about First Nations ownership in major projects
OTTAWA - A new think tank report is questioning how the federal and provincial governments' sprint to build major infrastructure projects might affect Indigenous Peoples' rights — and warns that it could end up pitting Indigenous communities against each other. The report by the Yellowhead Institute, 'Buried Burdens,' takes a look at major projects through a case study of the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission Project and the Ksi Lisims facility in B.C., which are expected to transport millions of tonnes of gas per year. Owned in part by the Nisga'a Nation, the project has seen staunch opposition from other First Nations communities that did not approve or consent to it. The Yellowhead report, released this week, comes amid a countrywide push to rapidly launch major projects, including pipelines, to shore up the economy against U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. The recently passed One Canadian Economy Act gives Ottawa the power to fast-track projects it deems to be in the national interest by sidestepping environmental protections and other legislation. Governments have been encouraging First Nations leaders to support such projects through loan guarantees and promises of financial incentives. But many First Nations leaders fear their ways of life could be irreparably harmed if governments evade environmental standards. 'Right now, the narrative is full speed ahead on resource development,' said Hayden King, a member of Beausoliel First Nation who serves as Yellowhead's executive director. 'Increasingly, that includes Indigenous partners, but there's not a lot of discussion on the dynamics of investing in projects like these, and there's a risk that has to be considered … 'First Nations are not necessarily the ones merely impacted by these developments, but they're being encouraged to invest in these projects, to be partners in these projects and grant social licence to enable these projects.' Some provinces have enacted laws similar to the One Canadian Economy Act, including Bill 5 in Ontario, now the subject of a court challenge by nine First Nations. And in B.C., Premier David Eby's government passed Bills 14 and 15 — pieces of legislation meant to ramp up energy and infrastructure development that have come under fire from First Nations. Prime Minister Mark Carney has frequently pointed to Indigenous participation in major projects as a means to ensure their success and prevent delays. He has pointed to the $10 billion Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program as proof of Ottawa's commitment to ensuring Indigenous communities have a meaningful stake. The report challenges that argument altogether, calling it an 'industry-driven narrative.' 'While there are potential benefits from participating in equity ownership when compared to shorter-term impact benefit agreements and service contracts, there are also greater risks,' the report says. 'This particular philosophy of 'economic reconciliation' imagines Indigenous communities regaining control of their economies, aiming for self-sufficiency, sustainability, and self-determination. This is an industry-driven narrative that presents resource extraction as the singular pathway to achieve these ends.' That narrative, the report says, could also cause rifts between Indigenous communities that support specific projects and those that do not. 'While uncomfortable, conflict and disagreement are part of Nation-to-Nation relationships — and always have been. However, it is equally important to recognize that in true Nation-to-Nation relationships, the self-determining rights of one Nation cannot supersede the inherent rights of another,' the report says. King said potential conflicts between pro-development communities and those more hesitant lends itself to conversations about the kinds of development that align with their values. But that conversation is also about rights, King said, and how courts will strike a balance among First Nations who don't see eye-to-eye on project proposals. 'Let's not have the courts decide the answers to those questions, but let's actually work through diplomacy and figure those out on our own terms, using our own Indigenous law,' he said. King said that discussion should 'feed back into the conversation about what kind of economy … we want,' pointing to the pre-contact economies that once sustained Indigenous Peoples. 'We had these economies, and still do to a degree. So what would it look like to reimagine those, and rearticulate them in the face of the narrative that we only have one option, which is resource development?' he said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 23, 2025.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
The antisemitism task force carrying out Trump's anti-DEI agenda
For years, conservatives have criticized American universities for being too woke, too liberal, and too focused on DEI – diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. These critiques were reignited when students on college campuses around the nation began holding pro-Palestinian protests as a response to the ongoing Israel-Gaza war. Under both the Biden and Trump administrations, these protests prompted concerns over increased antisemitic sentiments. Now, under the Trump administration, an internal government group, the Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism, has been created to address these concerns. Supporters of the task force say that it will help protect Jewish students and make campuses safer for them. Opponents say antisemitism is just a pretext used for pushing a more conservative agenda on U.S. universities. Host Colby Itkowitz speaks with education reporter Laura Meckler about The Post's investigation into the Trump administration's Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism, and how this group could fundamentally change the way universities are run in the United States. Today's show was produced by Sabby Robinson with help from Thomas Lu. It was edited by Ariel Plotnick and mixed by Sean Carter. Subscribe to The Washington Post here.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Unified on Trump and Tariffs, Canada's Premiers Differ on Next Steps
The leaders of Canada's provinces and territories spoke as one during a three-day meeting when it came to condemning President Trump's annexation threats and trade war against the country. But when it came to how Canada should respond and deal with the resulting economic turmoil, their patriotic unity swiftly dissipated into the regional rifts that have long divided the country. Even after meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday, the 13 premiers still had conflicting views about further trade retaliation against the United States if Mr. Trump goes ahead on Aug. 1 and imposes 35 percent tariffs on Canadian exports. Even without a single project being announced, divisions have formed among provinces around Mr. Carney's plan to offset economic losses from reduced trade with the United States by rapidly building major infrastructure projects like oil pipelines. Still, as the meeting wrapped up on Wednesday, Doug Ford, the premier of Ontario and the host, boasted about the unity among the political leaders in the face of Mr. Trump's potentially devastating tariffs. He called it 'a united team Canada approach.' Mr. Ford repeatedly pushed for retaliation if Mr. Trump follows through on his threat or if Canada is unable to reach a deal with the United States by Aug. 1 to eliminate the tariffs the United States has already applied on Canada. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
