Senate defeats Collins proposal to raise taxes on highest earners to help rural hospitals
Senators voted 22 to 78 against a motion to waive a 60-vote budget point of order against the amendment.
Collins's amendment to President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would have established a 39.6 percent top marginal rate for individuals with income above $25 million and for married couples with income above $50 million.
The amount raised would have fully offset the cost of expanding the relief fund that Senate GOP leaders have proposed to help rural and smaller hospitals around the country that are at risk of bankruptcy because of the steep Medicaid funding cuts in the GOP megabill.
'Rural providers, especially our rural hospitals and nursing homes, are under great financial strain right now, with many having recently closed and others at risk of closing,' Collins said on the Senate floor before the vote.
'When these facilities close their doors, the people they serve are often left behind without access to health care,' she said.
Eighteen Republican senators voted in support of the amendment. They were Collins and Sens. Jerry Moran (Kan.), Roger Marshall (Kan.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Dan Sullivan (Alaska), Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.), Bill Cassidy (La.), John Kennedy (La.), John Curtis (Utah), Deb Fischer (Neb.), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Josh Hawley (Mo.), Jon Husted (Ohio), Bernie Moreno (Ohio), Mitch McConnell (Ky.), Roger Wicker (Miss.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.) and Todd Young (Ind.).
A handful of members of the Democratic caucus also voted for it, including Sens. Angus King (I-Maine), Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.).
Most Republican and Democratic senators voted against the amendment, however.
Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called it a 'Band-Aid on an amputation.'
'It provides just a tiny fraction of the nearly $1 trillion in cuts the bill will make to Medicaid. It would be much more logical to simply not cut $1 trillion from Medicaid in the first place,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida GOP Hawks Merch for Brutal ‘Alligator Alcatraz' Migrant Detention Camp
The Florida Republican Party is selling merchandise promoting its new migrant detention camp in the Florida Everglades. Dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' by its proponents, Republicans are salivating at the prospect of subjecting undocumented migrants to brutal conditions in giant plastic tents situated in the oppressive heat and humidity of backwater Florida. 'The feds have greenlit Alligator Alcatraz — Florida's gator-guarded, python-patrolled prison for illegal aliens who thought they could game the system,' reads a fundraising email from the Florida GOP. 'Surrounded by miles of swamp and bloodthirsty wildlife, this ain't no vacation spot. It's a one-way ticket to regret for criminals who'll wish they'd self-deported' 'Every shirt, hat, or koozie you grab funds our push to keep Florida tough on crime, and tougher on borders,' the email reads. Shirts for sale feature what looks to be an AIgenerated image of a prison in a swamp, with a python and an alligator in the foreground. Koozies and hats are also for sale. Alcatraz is, of course, the notorious former maximum security prison in the middle of San Francisco Bay. The prison was long believed to be inescapable given the surrounding frigid waters and deadly currents. Earlier this year, Trump said he was directing the government to rebuild and reopen Alcatraz as a high-security prison for the nation's 'most ruthless and violent offenders.' The plan has seemingly stalled, probably because the facility underwent a transformation into a museum that has been open to the public for more than half a century. In Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis is looking to replace oceans and sharks of the actual Alcatraz with gator-infested swampland. On Friday, DeSantis gave Fox News an exclusive tour of the facility, which the state is scrambling to ready for its first wave of migrants by next week. The facility is built on top of a remote 'airport' with a few scant buildings. As DeSantis put it, the federal government could 'fly these people back to their own country, they can do it [here,] one stop shop.' 'This is as secure as it gets,' the governor told Fox & Friends host Steve Doocy. 'If a criminal alien were to escape from here somehow — and I don't think they will — you have nowhere to go. What are you going to do? Trudge through the swamp and dodge alligators on the way back — 50 or 60 miles — just to get to civilization? Not going to happen.' The governor bragged that everything is being done 'by the book' and that inmates would even be given access to showers and medical care. 'It presents an efficient, low-cost opportunity to build a temporary detention facility because you don't need to invest that much in the perimeter,' Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said earlier this week in a promotional video for the camp. 'If people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons.' Creating torturous conditions for undocumented immigrants rounded up en mass seems to be a central component of the administration's immigration crackdown. The stunt in Florida evokes the specter of former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio's tent-city jail, which for decades boasted some of the cruelest and most inhumane conditions in the American prison system. Trump has also praised the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) in El Salvador, a maximum security prison that doubles as a propaganda staging ground for the autocratic Salvadoran government. Earlier this year, the Trump administration disappeared hundreds of undocumented men — many of whom had no known criminal record — to CECOT, and made a public show of frog-marching them to the facility known for human rights abuses. Given that DeSantis is already inviting in camera crews to tour the unfinished Alligator Alcatraz facility, there's a good chance the remote, uncomfortable setting of this new prison will be featured prominently in the administration's zero-tolerance immigration narrative. As DeSantis hinted to Doocy during the tour: 'If the president is watching, I'm sure that runway could probably land Air Force One.' More from Rolling Stone Kristi Noem Secretly Pocketed Cash From Dark Money Group: Report Rick Scott Demands More Cuts to Medicaid, Which His Company Allegedly Scammed Leaked Iran Call Further Shreds Trump's Narrative: Report Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rick Scott Demands More Cuts to Medicaid, Which His Company Allegedly Scammed
Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who's famous for his former hospital company's record-setting Medicare fraud settlements, is currently leading an effort to make Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' even more painful for America's poor. The legislation already cuts $930 billion from Medicaid, the nation's government health insurance program for low-income and disabled Americans, and would eliminate coverage for millions. Scott's amendment, expected to get a vote Monday, would take away another $313 billion in state Medicaid funds and force hundreds of thousands of additional people, at least, off the program. Scott has framed his proposed Medicaid cuts as necessary to preserve the program 'for those who truly need it' — and not 'able-bodied' adults. 'If you don't want to work, you're the one who decided you don't want health care,' he recently said on Fox News. He's suggested Democrats are using tax dollars to 'give illegal aliens Medicaid benefits,' even though undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid, claiming that blue states want to 'exploit this safety net.' Ironically enough, some of the claims against Scott's old hospital company revolved around exploiting Medicaid, and billing for services that patients didn't need. Scott's office did not immediately respond to Rolling Stone's request for comment Monday. The senator resigned as CEO of the hospital chain known as HCA Healthcare in 1997 amid an ongoing federal probe and a series of whistleblower complaints. He has long faced attacks from Democrats over the $1.7 billion that HCA paid to resolve fraud allegations in the early 2000s. Some of the allegations involved Medicaid. In late 2000, as part of the 'largest government fraud settlement ever' with the Justice Department, HCA pleaded guilty to criminal conduct and agreed to pay over $840 million in fines, penalties, and damages to resolve claims of unlawful billing practices. Among the claims HCA settled over: The company was accused of billing 'Medicare, Medicaid, the Defense Department's TRICARE health care program, and the Federal Employees' Health Benefits Program, for lab tests that were not medically necessary' and 'not ordered by physicians.' HCA was accused of 'upcoding,' or pretending patients were sicker than they were in order to increase reimbursements to its hospitals. 'The guilty plea includes one count relating to this upcoding practice,' the Justice Department wrote in a press release. The company was also accused of billing Medicaid 'for home health visits for patients who did not qualify to receive them or were not performed,' the department said. The civil and administrative settlement agreement between HCA and the U.S. Justice Department said the company, from 1995 to 1998, submitted claims to Medicaid, Medicare, and TRICARE, '(a) for visits to patients who did not qualify for home health services because (i) the patients were not homebound, (ii) there was no medical need for such services, or (iii) there was no medical need for skilled services; (b) for visits that were not provided; (c) for visits to deliver services that were in fact or should have been provided by an assisted living facility.' HCA and the Justice Department entered into an additional settlement agreement in 2003, in which the company agreed to pay another $631 million to resolve false claims it submitted to federal health programs. In a civil settlement agreement, the Justice Department wrote that health regulators 'contend that they have certain administrative claims against HCA under the provisions for permissive exclusion from the Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs.' Under both agreements, the Justice Department announced that HCA would pay millions of dollars to state Medicaid agencies: $13.6 million in 2000, and then $17.5 million in 2003. The department said the latter figure represented 'direct state losses.' A few decades later, Scott is now trying to extract a huge amount of money from state Medicaid funds to help finance Trump's latest round of tax cuts for the rich. Some things never really change. More from Rolling Stone Senate Republicans Pass Trump's Bill to Strip Health Care From Millions J.D. Vance Dismisses Kicking Millions Off Medicaid: 'Minutiae' Trump Teases Deporting Elon: 'We'll Have to Take a Look' Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House Pushes B.S. About ‘Big Beautiful Bill' as Popularity Craters
President Donald Trump has insisted that Republicans get his so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' to his desk by the Fourth of July. With only days left before the self-imposed deadline, the White House is now scrambling to do damage control around the deeply unpopular legislation produced by Congress. A series of recent polls shows that the bill — which will force millions off of Medicaid, restrict access to food assistance programs, and cost the poorest Americans billions over the next 10 — is underwater with the public. A Washington Post survey recently produced a net favorability rating of -19. Fox News clocked in at -21, a Quinnipiac poll produced a -26 rating, and KFF — formerly the Kaiser Family Foundation — found net favorability to be at -29 points. In the face of this widespread public disapproval and the GOP's inter-party squabbling over the bill, the White House is pushing 'fact checks' insisting that the legislation would not hurt low-income families or the economy at large, and that it is not just a dressed-up tax break for billionaires at the expense of everyone and everything else. In a 'fact check' sheet issued Sunday night by the White House Communication Office, the administration claimed that the legislation would 'put more than $10,000 a year back in the pockets of typical hardworking families,' that the 'OBBB protects and strengthens Medicaid for those who rely on it,' and that the suggestion that people will 'literally die' if denied access to health care is 'one of the most egregious deranged attacks from the Left peddling fear over the facts.' The document repeatedly emphasized that American households would be taking home an extra $10,000 in income a year. Huge, right? Unfortunately — but not unexpectedly — the figure is a gross misrepresentation. The figure, which was circulated in several communications released by the White House and touted by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt during a briefing earlier this month, is the high end of a projection produced by the Council of Economic Advisers – an internal White House agency. According to a Politifact review, the Council's range of a $7,600-$10,900 increase in annual take-home pay for a family of four was based on uniquely optimistic projections about how much total economic stimulus the 'Big Beautiful Bill' would produce. Where other independent agencies have predicted a maximum GDP increase of around 0.5-2 percent over the next 10 years, the counsel assumed an almost five percent increase over five years and a weighted 2.9-3.5 percent increase over 10 years. The $10,000 figure isn't a tangible change in income based on rewrites to the tax code, but rather a fantastical number carved out of an imaginary GDP boom. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Trump's enshrinement of his 2017 tax cuts, along with the exclusionary reforms being made to programs like Medicaid and SNAP, will cost the lowest-earning tenth of American households about $1,600 a year. 'Federal and state in-kind benefits would decrease household resources by $1.0 trillion,' the CBO wrote. 'Primarily because federal spending on benefits provided through Medicaid and SNAP would be lower. Changes to program benefits that states made in response to changes in federal policy would also reduce household resources.' Meanwhile, the richest Americans would see 'resources would increase, on average, over the projection period by about $12,000,' or even more given to the favorable pro-corporate policies packed into the bill. During Monday's press briefing, Leavitt insisted that 'this bill strengthens Medicaid,' and that rural hospitals were exaggerating the potential fallout of spending cuts to the program. According to the CBO, 11 million Americans could be squeezed out of their health care coverage over changes to Medicaid, bureaucratic red tape, more stringent work requirements, and changes to public insurance marketplaces. According to KFF, 'an estimated 1.5 million fewer people could be covered by Medicaid in rural areas under the reconciliation bill in 2034,' and the resulting drop in Medicaid enrollment could force rural hospitals and clinics — often the only nodes connecting rural Americans to the health care system — to close down. The bill 'protects' Medicaid only in the sense that the program will continue to exist, but it in no way protects the Americans who rely on it for their health. Millions of them will be forced to find care elsewhere if Republicans pass the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' More from Rolling Stone Senate Republicans Pass Trump's Bill to Strip Health Care From Millions J.D. Vance Dismisses Kicking Millions Off Medicaid: 'Minutiae' Trump Teases Deporting Elon: 'We'll Have to Take a Look' Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
