logo
Hong Kong dancer Mo Li sues 12 parties for damages over Mirror concert accident

Hong Kong dancer Mo Li sues 12 parties for damages over Mirror concert accident

The Star4 days ago
A Hong Kong dancer left paralysed after being hit by a falling giant screen at a concert by popular Cantopop boy band Mirror in 2022 is suing a government department and 11 other parties involved in the show's production for an undisclosed amount of compensation.
The defendants have been accused of negligence and breaching their duty of care.
Among those named in the claims are the Leisure and Cultural Services Department, a contractor it hired, and a Guangdong-based stage production house, according to writs filed to the High Court this month.
Injured dancer Mo Li Kai-yin, 30, was left paralysed from the neck down in the accident at the Hong Kong Coliseum, operated by the department, and is currently receiving treatment overseas.
Li, represented by his lawyers, filed three writs, claiming damages 'for the catastrophic personal injuries, loss and damage' he sustained on July 28, 2022 while working as a dancer at the Mirror concert.
During the show, a 500kg (1,100lbs) LED screen measuring four metres (13 feet) by four metres and suspended from the ceiling suddenly fell and hit Li.
Another dancer, Chang Tsz-fung, was left with a fractured pelvis.
Following the accident, backstage lights did not turn on immediately, complicating rescue efforts. Mirror members, who were wearing monitoring headsets, were unable to react in time.
Investigations revealed that the main contractor misreported the weights of the equipment and components.
The writs said the incident was 'contributed to by the negligence and/or breach of duty of care' on the part of the defendants.
Seven defendants are listed in the first writ, including the director of leisure and cultural services and Fugro (Hong Kong), which was engaged by the department to provide vetting services for the event.
The other five defendants are Engineering Impact, Infinity Project Management, Hip Hing Loong Stage Engineering, United Technical Services, and C.A.N.I.
Four other production companies were listed in the second writ. They are Li's employer, Studiodanz, The Clan Too, Hong Kong Innotech Media Production, and In Technical Productions.
Dongguan Yaolong Stage Production has been sued for damages under a separate writ. It is based in Changping township in Guangdong province's Dongguan city.
A spokesman for the department said: 'As there is an intended claim against the Leisure and Cultural Services Department, no comments will be given on this matter at this stage.'
The District Court in May acquitted three backstage staff from Engineering Impact and Infinity Project Management of conspiracy to defraud authorities after it found they lacked a motive to deliberately understate the weight of stage equipment, including the giant screen that collapsed.
The court also found that instead of the false data, it was inferior standards of work, shoddy stage design and an engineer's negligence in vetting the set-up that were to blame for the collapse.
Last week, Li shared a filtered photo of himself for the first time on his Instagram account since the accident three years ago. The filter playfully altered his facial features.
The half-body shot of him sitting in a white T-shirt also showed what looked like a surgical scar near his collarbone from a tracheotomy.
'It's me,' Li wrote in the post. 'I wanted to share a few recent small moments that have lifted my spirits and see if I can get some positive energy from all of you.' - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wahaha CEO's bank account frozen in HK
Wahaha CEO's bank account frozen in HK

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Wahaha CEO's bank account frozen in HK

The Hong Kong High Court has frozen a bank account containing US$1.8bil amid a legal battle over the inheritance of the Zong Qinghou, late founder of China's leading beverage giant Hangzhou Wahaha Group. The defendant in the case is Zong's daughter and current Wahaha CEO Kelly Zong Fuli, who has been sued by Zong's three other children. The 42-page written judgment, delivered by Deputy High Court Judge Gary Lam Chin-ching on Friday, rules that Kelly Zong is prohibited from "withdrawing or encumbering" any asset from a Hong Kong Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) account owned by Jian Hao Ventures Limited, a company incorporated under British Virgin Islands law, pending the conclusion of a parallel lawsuit in a Hangzhou court or until further court orders. She is also required to disclose the latest balance of the HSBC account, the movements of assets inside, and a full account of receipts and disbursements of the HSBC account. The case has drawn significant public attention, with dozens of spectators, including journalists, law students and members of the public gathering outside the courtroom ahead of the scheduled public hearing. However, the proceeding lasted only a few minutes and was not open to the public, with just one party's representatives present to collect the court's decision. The plaintiffs — Jacky Zong, Jessie Zong Jieli and Jerry Zong Jisheng — allege that Kelly Zong breached a family agreement by failing to establish offshore trusts worth $2.1 billion for them after their father's death in February last year. They also claimed that at least $6 million for unknown purposes was transferred out of the HSBC account. Zong Qinghou was the sole director of Jian Hao Ventures Limited during his lifetime, with Kelly Zong succeeding him after his death. As of May 31, 2024, the company's HSBC Hong Kong account held $1.799 billion, consisting primarily of bonds and other fixed-income assets, along with some cash and term deposits. The trio therefore filed a lawsuit in the Hong Kong High Court last year seeking a court order banning Kelly Zong from disposing of or transferring assets held in the account. Wahaha stated on July 14 that the lawsuits do not affect its operations. The company reported a 40 percent surge in revenue last year under Kelly Zong's leadership, reaching 70 billion yuan ($9.7 billion). Born in 1945, Zong Qinghou founded Wahaha in 1987, a Hangzhou-based beverage company later grown into a commercial empire. Once the wealthiest individual on the Chinese mainland, Zong was long seen as a symbol of traditional family values. Kelly Zong, previously believed to be his only child, took over Wahaha after his death but briefly resigned five months later due to disagreements with shareholders. She later resumed her role as CEO following negotiations. - China Daily/ANN

The ever-evergreen Aishah proves she still has game as she releases new single 'Taman Keabadian'
The ever-evergreen Aishah proves she still has game as she releases new single 'Taman Keabadian'

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

The ever-evergreen Aishah proves she still has game as she releases new single 'Taman Keabadian'

The name Datuk Aishah needs no introduction. And at the age of 60, there is no sign of slowing down for Malaysia's legendary songstress. After nearly four decades of enriching the Malaysian and international music scenes, the songstress known for her timeless ballads returns with a heartfelt gift to her fans—a brand-new single titled 'Taman Keabadian', an emotional and contemplative piece composed by the exceptionally talented Senna. This soul-stirring track is not only a tribute to her loyal fans but also a symbol of Aishah's unwavering presence in the music industry—a true artist who remains relevant, continuously creates, and touches hearts across generations. A Song Of Loss, Longing & Hopeful Reunions "Taman Keabadian" delves into the universal theme of parting with loved ones—be it parents, family members, friends, or even colleagues who have passed on. Its lyrics are laced with deep yearning, yet also offer a sense of hope—that one day, we will meet again... in the Taman Keabadian or eternal garden. 'Only our belief that we will reunite in the afterlife can soothe the longing and pain in our hearts. Pray, and believe, for one day we shall follow and meet again... in a place called Taman Keabadian,' said Aishah with sincerity. Senna: 'Only Aishah Could Sing This' According to Senna, the process of creating the song was deeply personal and meaningful. He chose Dato' Aishah as the voice of the song because he believed that only she could truly capture and deliver its spirit. 'This song is very personal to me. It demands more than technical perfection—it requires soul and spirituality. I was confident that only Dato' Aishah could breathe life into it with such depth. She sings not only with her voice, but with her entire being,' said Senna. Aishah's Message To those Grieving & Healing To all her fans and music lovers, Aishah expressed her heartfelt wish that this song brings not only comfort but strength to those who are facing loss. 'I dedicate this song to everyone who misses their dearly departed. I hope it becomes a companion in your prayers and as a comfort for your soul in times when you need strength. This is my gift to all of you,' she said. From Global Stardom To National Icon Aishah, born Wan Aishah Wan Ariffin, began her music career internationally as the lead vocalist of the New Zealand-based band Aishah & The Fan Club in the 1980s. Tracks like 'Don't Let Me Fall Alone' and the album 'Sensation' not only created waves but made her the first Malaysian artist to break into the global music market & Billboard chart. Upon returning home, Aishah continued her success as a solo artist with iconic ballads such as 'Janji Manismu', 'Cinta Beralih Arah', 'Bahtera Merdeka' & 'Kemaafan Dendam Yang Terindah' —songs that remain relevant and cherished by new generations. With accolades from Anugerah Juara Lagu (AJL), Anugerah Industri Muzik (AIM), and the prestigious title of Datuk in recognition of her contributions to music, she now stands tall as a cultural icon and a national treasure. 'I'm grateful to still be allowed to sing and create. Every song I perform is a part of my life, and I hope it becomes part of your lives too,' she shared. As part of her efforts to refresh her musical legacy, Dato' Aishah is actively engaging fans on Instagram @aishahjmm and TikTok @aishahjmm, where they can enjoy remastered versions of her evergreen hits such as 'Janji Manismu', 'Sensation', 'Fatwa Pujangga', 'Don't Let Me Fall Alone', and 'Syurga Di Telapak Kaki Ibu'. The new single 'Taman Keabadian' will be available for streaming on all digital streaming platforms from Friday (Aug 8).

What is judicial mercy, and how does it apply to Ong Beng Seng's case?
What is judicial mercy, and how does it apply to Ong Beng Seng's case?

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

What is judicial mercy, and how does it apply to Ong Beng Seng's case?

Both the defence and the prosecution noted that a fine in lieu of jail would be appropriate as Ong Beng Seng has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. - ST/ANN SINGAPORE: Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng pleaded guilty to one count of abetting the obstruction of justice on Aug 4. Both the defence and the prosecution noted that a fine in lieu of jail would be appropriate as he has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. His lawyers urged the court to exercise judicial mercy and impose a fine with no prison time. The prosecution did not object to this, noting that even if the court did not exercise judicial mercy, there was basis for it to consider Ong's ill-health as a mitigating factor for a significant reduction of sentence. ALSO READ: Singapore-based Malaysian billionaire Ong Beng Seng pleads guilty to abetting obstruction of justice in case linked to ex-minister Iswaran What is judicial mercy? Judicial mercy is the discretionary power of Singapore's courts to give a more lenient sentence because of exceptional mitigating circumstances. It has a high threshold, and so far has been exercised in only two types of situations. The first is where the offender is suffering from terminal illness. The second is where the offender is so ill that jail time would carry a high risk of endangering his or her life. The High Court previously said that when judicial mercy is exercised, the central consideration by the court is not the culpability of the offender. Instead, the sentence will be based on humanitarian considerations. These must outweigh public interests in punishing the offender for his crime. This is distinctly different from when ill-health is considered as a mitigating factor. The High Court said judicial mercy is to be invoked only sparingly. Previous cases where it was invoked saw no imprisonment, or a nominal period of imprisonment, or the statutory minimum. Difference between judicial mercy and ill-health as mitigating factor Judicial mercy has a higher threshold than ill-health as a mitigating factor. When judicial mercy is invoked, the main consideration for sentencing becomes one of humanity. When the courts pass sentences with ill-health considered as a mitigating factor, the central consideration is still the public interest in punishing one for the offence committed. The punishment would remain proportional to the offender's culpability, but may be reduced at the discretion of the court. The courts have exercised judicial mercy in cases where the offender has not long left to live or when prison time would pose a significant risk to the offender's life. Cancer-stricken woman In 2020, the court fined a woman S$5,000 (US$3,885) instead of jailing her for a week for contempt of court. The mother of two had breached court orders relating to divorce proceedings with her former husband. She had turned her children on him and harmed his reputation. The court granted judicial mercy, noting that the woman had stage 4 breast cancer, was using a wheelchair and weighed only 30kg. Six months to live In 2018, a man who managed a coffee shop had a three-week prison sentence cut to a S$250 fine after he was diagnosed with cancer and given six months to live. Lam Kim Heng, then 68, had tried to bribe a building inspection officer with a pack of cigarettes. But three weeks after sentencing, he found out he had acute myeloid leukaemia. The High Court granted judicial mercy when it heard his appeal about three months after the diagnosis. Former Tangs chairman's kidney scandal In 2008, then Tangs chairman Tang Wee Sung was jailed for a day and fined S$17,000 for attempting to buy a kidney. He suffered from multiple medical conditions, including end-stage renal disease. Tang had to undergo dialysis six days a week, and had extremely detailed checks, injections and medication daily. The court granted him judicial mercy. Tang underwent a kidney transplant in 2009 and died in 2022. Molester with nose cancer In 2006, a convicted molester was granted judicial mercy on appeal and had his original sentence of four months' jail and three strokes of the cane replaced with a S$5,000 fine. Chng Yew Chin, then 43, had molested his maid. But he appealed and a doctor told the court he could not be cured and had little time left. The court granted him judicial mercy, saying his cancer was a far harsher sentence that would kill him in the near future. - The Straits Times/ANN

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store