logo
Scientists Brought Schrodinger's Cat to Life—and Proved Something Incredible About Quantum Physics

Scientists Brought Schrodinger's Cat to Life—and Proved Something Incredible About Quantum Physics

Yahoo03-04-2025
Schrödinger's cat, the infamous thought experiment involving a cat that can be alive and dead at the same time, has been brought to life with qubits.
Schrödinger's cat experiments have been done with particles before, but all of them were cooled to near-absolute zero. It was like starting with a dead cat. This is the first time 'hot' particles were used.
In the future, the conditions under which this experiment was done could benefit applications in which it is not yet possible to put particles in a deep freeze.
Remember those hologram stickers that used to show two things at once, and all you had to do was turn the sticker slightly? There is a similar phenomenon in physics, and it even comes with a mascot.
In the famous thought experiment known as Schrödinger's cat—first proposed by physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1929—a hypothetical cat is locked in a box with poison, or something else that could possibly kill it. Following Schrödinger's line of thinking, as long as the box remained closed, the cat is both dead and alive at the same time. When you open the box and observe the cat, however, it 'chooses' a state and loses that dual nature.
This thought experiment was meant to elucidate a part of quantum theory known as superposition. Quantum superposition describes the way that, on the smallest scales, matter that hasn't yet been measured can (like the cat) basically exists in two completely opposite states at the same time. It's why things like photons can be both particles and waves. The truth of a superposition state is much more complicated than the biological state of a cat, but it can most simply be described as a combination of all the states a particle can be in. For instance, a particle may be spinning or traveling in two directions at once. It can be either one, and also both, until we measure it.
Previous experiments that brought the concept of Schrödinger's cat to life (pun intended) involved cooling particles to near-absolute zero so they could reach the state with the lowest possible energy, known as the ground state. Those particles could then be manipulated into quantum states more easily. Until now, this type of experiment had never been done with particles not cooled to the ground state, as background noise from heat excitation could get in the way of measurements.
Led by physicist Gerhard Kirchmair from the University of Innsbruck in Austria, a team of researchers have now successfully achieved a Schrödinger's cat state with 'hot' particles.
'Schrödinger also assumed a living, i.e. 'hot' cat in his thought experiment,' Kirchmairsaid in a press release. 'We wanted to know whether these quantum effects can also be generated if we don't start from the 'cold' ground state.'
Excitingly, for Kirchmair's team, it seems the effects can, in fact, be generated in non-ground states. 'Standard quantum mechanical theory predicts no upper limit on and no loss of contrast [between states] due to the [heat] of a hot cat state,' the team wrote in their study, published today in the journal Science Advances.
To create a cat, particles known as a transmon qubits were exposed to microwaves in a microwave resonator. Think of a transmon qubit as merging a qubit (a quantum bit) and a superconductor—a basic unit of information able to conduct electricity without resistance because it is less sensitive to noise. Then, the team used two 'cat state protocols' that had previously been used at lower temperatures to generate quantum cats in order to try and create a superposition at 1.8 Kelvin (which is not very hot in the grand scheme of things, but is well above ground-state temperatures).
The effort was a success, and Kirchmair saw that the same protocols which succeed at cold temperatures also work with warmer temperatures. While the states of the particles were less clear due to noise—which was filtered and controlled as much as possible—they were still clear enough to identify. This proved that, so long as the conditions of cat protocols can be created, temperature should not interfere much.
'Hot Schrödinger cat states are in principle realizable,' the team said in the study. 'This is particularly relevant for systems where long [predictability] times have been achieved but ground-state cooling is not yet available.'
Long live physics cats.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schrödinger to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 6
Schrödinger to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 6

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Schrödinger to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 6

NEW YORK, July 25, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Schrödinger (Nasdaq: SDGR) will report its second quarter 2025 financial results on Wednesday, August 6, 2025, after the financial markets close. The company will host a conference call and webcast at 4:30 p.m. ET. The live webcast can be accessed in the "Investors" section of Schrödinger's website and will be archived for approximately 90 days following the event. About Schrödinger Schrödinger is transforming molecular discovery with its computational platform, which enables the discovery of novel, highly optimized molecules for drug development and materials design. Schrödinger's software platform is built on more than 30 years of R&D investment and is licensed by biotechnology, pharmaceutical and industrial companies, and academic institutions around the world. Schrödinger also leverages the platform to advance a portfolio of collaborative and proprietary programs and is advancing three clinical-stage oncology programs. Founded in 1990, Schrödinger has approximately 800 employees operating from 15 locations globally. To learn more, visit follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram, or visit our blog, View source version on Contacts Allie NicodemoSchrödinger, 617-356-2325 Sign in to access your portfolio

Schrödinger to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 6
Schrödinger to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 6

Business Wire

time2 days ago

  • Business Wire

Schrödinger to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 6

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Schrödinger (Nasdaq: SDGR) will report its second quarter 2025 financial results on Wednesday, August 6, 2025, after the financial markets close. The company will host a conference call and webcast at 4:30 p.m. ET. The live webcast can be accessed in the 'Investors' section of Schrödinger's website and will be archived for approximately 90 days following the event. About Schrödinger Schrödinger is transforming molecular discovery with its computational platform, which enables the discovery of novel, highly optimized molecules for drug development and materials design. Schrödinger's software platform is built on more than 30 years of R&D investment and is licensed by biotechnology, pharmaceutical and industrial companies, and academic institutions around the world. Schrödinger also leverages the platform to advance a portfolio of collaborative and proprietary programs and is advancing three clinical-stage oncology programs. Founded in 1990, Schrödinger has approximately 800 employees operating from 15 locations globally. To learn more, visit follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram, or visit our blog,

Climate Change's Fingerprints Came Early, a Thought Experiment Reveals
Climate Change's Fingerprints Came Early, a Thought Experiment Reveals

Yahoo

time04-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Climate Change's Fingerprints Came Early, a Thought Experiment Reveals

Physicists are fond of Gedankenexperimente—thought experiments that are difficult or impossible to perform in the real world. Schrödinger's cat is a well-known example of a thought experiment, used to illustrate the complexities of quantum mechanics. This puzzle occupied some of the best and brightest physicists of the early 20th century. We tried the same thing recently, only with climate change. Given today's network of satellites and temperature sensors, when could scientists have first known, beyond a reasonable doubt, that increases in atmospheric CO2 from fossil fuel burning and land use change were altering our global climate? The results might surprise you, and they help to illustrate why it's critically important to continue long-term monitoring of Earth's climate. Our thought experiment used simulations of historical climate change from nine different state-of-the-art computer models. We made three key assumptions. The first was that back in 1860, scientists in our 'Gedanken world' had the technology to monitor global temperature changes in both the troposphere (the atmospheric layer extending from the surface up to about 15 kilometers) and the stratosphere (ranging from roughly 15 km to 50 km). Historically, global monitoring didn't happen until the 1940s using early weather balloon networks. More recently, since the late 1970s, we've monitored global atmospheric temperature changes with satellites. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Second, we assumed that over the period 1860 to 2024, the model simulations used reliable estimates of human-caused changes in greenhouse gases, particulate pollution and land use, as well as accurate estimates of natural changes in external factors like volcanic activity and the sun's energy output. All of these inputs to the model simulations are primarily derived from observational data. Third, we assumed the model-simulated responses to human and natural factors were realistic, and that the size of modeled 'climate noise' associated with natural phenomena like El Niño and La Niña was in reasonable agreement with observations. We tested the third assumption by comparing modeled and observed climate change and variability and found no evidence of model errors that would negate our bottom-line findings. The work of Syukuro ('Suki') Manabe helped inspire this investigation. Back in 1967, Manabe—who would later go on to receive the 2021 Nobel Prize for Physics—published one of the most famous papers in climate science. Together with his colleague Richard Wetherald at the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) in Princeton, N.J., Manabe used a simple climate model to show that increasing levels of atmospheric CO2 would lead to more efficient trapping of heat in the troposphere. The consequence? Warming of the troposphere and cooling of the stratosphere. The former has captivated most of the world's attention for good reason—it is where we humans live—but the latter turns out to be particularly useful in our thought experiment. The 1967 Manabe and Wetherald paper made a testable prediction: if humans continue to burn fossil fuels and ramp up levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, the vertical structure of atmospheric temperature will change not only in the troposphere but also in the stratosphere. But back in 1967, scientists lacked the long-term records necessary to test this prediction, particularly for the mid- to upper stratosphere, between approximately 25 and 50 km above Earth's surface. Decades after 1967, weather balloon and satellite temperature records revealed that Manabe and Wetherald were right. Their predicted pattern of change in the thermal structure of the atmosphere was observable. Importantly, this pattern of human influence—showing long-term, global-scale warming of the troposphere and cooling of the stratosphere—couldn't be confused with natural patterns of temperature change. The human 'fingerprint' on atmospheric temperature was distinctly different from the natural temperature fingerprints caused by the sun, volcanoes and internal climate noise. When climate scientists say we know people cause climate change, this fingerprint is one defining reason why. Which brings us back to our 'When could we have known?' thought experiment. Although the question is simple, the answer isn't obvious. The first 40 years of the thought experiment (from 1860 until 1899) were a time when large-scale fossil fuel burning and deforestation were just beginning to ratchet up during the industrial revolution. The resulting increase in atmospheric CO2 over this time, which we can estimate from Antarctic ice cores, was only 10 parts per million. This is small relative to the recent CO2 increase of roughly 54 parts per million over the 25 years from 2000 to 2024. Nevertheless, this modest 10 parts per million early CO2 increase is still large enough to lead to significant cooling of the stratosphere over 1860 to 1899. The size and pattern of this stratospheric cooling is very different than what we would expect from natural forces affecting temperature: the solar variability at the time, the eruption of Krakatoa in 1883, and internal climate noise. Because of these differences between signal and noise, our thought experiment shows that even the relatively small human-caused signal of stratospheric cooling could have been identified in 1885. Put differently, given today's measurement capabilities, humans could have known that our actions were significantly changing global climate even before Carl Benz patented the first gasoline-powered car. The human-caused signal of tropospheric warming emerges later, in the second half of the 20th century, partly because human and natural patterns of climate change are more similar in the troposphere than in the stratosphere. Would this advance knowledge have made a difference? Would humanity have followed a different energy use pathway given the understanding that fossil fuel burning eventually leads to large, global-scale changes in climate? That's outside of our sandbox as climate scientists—it's a question for philosophers, social scientists, and historians of science. But in our opinion, based on the history of other global environmental problems, it's certainly conceivable that early knowledge of the reality and seriousness of climate change could have spurred earlier global action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It's worth noting that our identification of the atmospheric 'fingerprints' predicted by Manabe and Wetherald was enabled by NOAA and NASA satellite remote sensing. The work of these agencies is an essential part of our research, and of the national and international climate science enterprise. But in the United States in 2025, federally funded climate science, including observation and modeling work, is being systematically dismantled. This is not a thought experiment. It is all too real. We are now observing what happens when decades of work to understand the nature and causes of climate changes are rejected, and are replaced by ideology, conspiracy theories and disinformation. Stopping climate work will lead to a data vacuum that could last years or even decades. This experiment in willful ignorance can only end poorly. This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are solely their own and not those of any organization they are affiliated with or necessarily those of Scientific American.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store