
Trans women like me are now effectively outlawed from public life – what are you so scared of?
Had the court allowed any trans people to give evidence or any doctors or scientists who work in the field of gender identity, they would have discovered two things. First, the supported 'threat' to women's rights posed by the existence of trans women does not exist. And second, the definition of 'biological sex' is infinitely more complicated and harder to pin down than a simple matter of X or Y chromosomes.
Instead, they accepted a narrative of bigotry and prejudice that bears a sickening resemblance to that used as the justification for the segregation and persecution of Black people and Jews: this group is inferior, but it is also dangerous, and its very presence is a threat to a healthy society.
But what threat do trans women actually pose? Name me the trans female who has won an Olympic medal or a tennis grand slam. There is no such name because it has never happened (and no, those two boxers at Paris 2024 were not transgender).
Give me a case of a trans woman causing trouble in a female hospital ward. In 2024, the trans rights group TransLucent contacted 102 NHS hospital trusts and, using Freedom of Information requests, asked them to provide any records of complaints against trans patients in women's wards (of whom I was one, as it happened), over the past three years. Millions of women went to hospital at that time. Only one made any complaint about a trans patient, and that was so trifling that it required no further action.
As for trans women in ladies' loos, here's an exclusive report on what we do there. We stand in line. We dash for the first available cubicle. We do our business. Then we wash our hands, check our face, brush our hair and leave.
Sound familiar? Well, so would the rest of my life. Ten days ago, a couple of girlfriends (both 100 per cent XX-chromosome natal females) and I decided to treat ourselves to a very special lunch at the Ritz. I was called madam at the front door, at the concierge desk, by the man at the cloakroom and by all the waiters. When I used the ladies' loo, no one batted an eyelid. No one ever does. I've been going full Marie Kondo on my flat, and I'm 'luv' and 'darlin'' at the council tip where I'm dumping all my rubbish, too.
It never occurs to people who meet me for the first time that I'm trans. If I tell them, they either don't care or are actively supportive. Above all, I am a woman-made woman.
Quite apart from my mum, who started the process, the psychiatrist who approved me for gender surgery is a woman, as is the surgeon who, to be blunt, gave me my labia, clitoris and vagina. (My breasts, I might add, grew without anything more than oestrogen to help them.)
A woman taught me how to speak like a woman. Women were my nurses and are my hairdressers. I go to a salon that only has female clients. Everyone knows I'm trans, and they are all friendly and absolutely at ease with my identity. Why wouldn't they be? I mean, why would I go through all the time, trouble, pain and expense of gender transition if I were hostile to women?
And yet, for all the acceptance in my everyday life, I, like all trans women, have to live in a world of persecution without justification. In 2024, a UN report into the treatment of trans people in the UK reported on the worrying rise of transphobic speech in media and politics, which was leading to a dramatic increase in violence against trans people. The people who are supposed to be such a threat face more violence and abuse than any other group in society.
The Supreme Court's judgement, coupled with the recent assault on gender-affirming medical care in the NHS in the wake of the Cass Review, just adds to the weight of state abuse of trans women, putting Britain on a par with the most bigoted states of the USA. But in America, there are at least some states that are still safe havens for trans people. There is no haven here.
And don't think it will stop with trans women. As if to echo the Martin Niemöller poem 'First They Came', the White Christian Nationalist groups who fund the anti-trans campaign in the UK, and who are open about seeking the total eradication of 'transgenderism' (which is to say, trans people) aren't stopping with us. They are coming for abortion rights. They are coming for gay rights. You could be next.
In the meantime, we trans women are being destroyed by lies and the suckers who support those lies. It's just a pity that some of those suckers sit on the Supreme Court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Diversity and inclusion experts can come to Britain on skilled work visas
Diversity and inclusion experts can come to the UK on a skilled work visa, The Telegraph can reveal. The Home Office has also safeguarded visa application routes for the vocations of 'poet' and 'blogger' on a list of protected occupations. Labour has made tackling migration one of its key targets, with a crackdown on work visas announced earlier this year after net migration neared 1 million. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, vowed to ensure that the immigration system was 'linked to skills and training'. But critics have said that ministers are protecting the wrong professions instead of focusing on importing workers who will contribute to the ailing economy. Under the 'crackdown' announced in May, a temporary list of 'shortage' occupations was drawn up outlining who would continue to be eligible for skilled work visas. Among these roles is 'equality and diversity manager'. Such jobs have become controversial in recent years for pushing concepts such as the malign nature of 'whiteness' – the political and cultural state of being white – and the idea of 'white privilege'. The profession has been branded a 'plague' on the public sector, and the Civil Service alone has spent £27 million of taxpayers' money on diversity officers in a single year. More than £13 million is being spent by NHS trusts each year on the salaries of diversity officers.


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
ICE may deport migrants to countries other than their own with just six hours notice, memo says
BOSTON, July 13 (Reuters) - U.S. immigration officials may deport migrants to countries other than their home nations with as little as six hours' notice, a top Trump administration official said in a memo, offering a preview of how deportations could ramp up. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement will generally wait at least 24 hours to deport someone after informing them of their removal to a so-called "third country," according to a memo dated Wednesday, July 9, from the agency's acting director, Todd Lyons. ICE could remove them, however, to a so-called "third country" with as little as six hours' notice "in exigent circumstances," said the memo, as long as the person has been provided the chance to speak with an attorney. The memo states that migrants could be sent to nations that have pledged not to persecute or torture them "without the need for further procedures." The new ICE policy suggests President Donald Trump's administration could move quickly to send migrants to countries around the world. The Supreme Court in June lifted a lower court's order limiting such deportations without a screening for fear of persecution in the destination country. Following the high court's ruling and a subsequent order from the justices, the Trump administration sent eight migrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Sudan and Vietnam to South Sudan. The administration last week pressed officials from five African nations - Liberia, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania and Gabon - to accept deportees from elsewhere, Reuters reported. The Washington Post first reported, opens new tab the new ICE memo. The administration argues the third country deportations help swiftly remove migrants who should not be in the U.S., including those with criminal convictions. Advocates have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language. Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for a group of migrants pursuing a class action lawsuit against such rapid third-county deportations at the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said the policy "falls far short of providing the statutory and due process protections that the law requires." Third-country deportations have been done in the past, but the tool could be more frequently used as Trump tries to ramp up deportations to record levels. During Trump's 2017-2021 presidency, his administration deported small numbers of people from El Salvador and Honduras to Guatemala. Former President Joe Biden's Democratic administration struck a deal with Mexico to take thousands of migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, since it was difficult to deport migrants to those nations. The new ICE memo was filed as evidence in a lawsuit over the wrongful deportation of Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador.


Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
The reason why this famous TV doctor travelled 360 miles for surgery
TV doctor Hilary Jones went on a 360-mile round trip for surgery to bypass his local NHS waiting list. The popular doctor from Kent underwent a second hip replacement in a hospital in Birmingham, 180 miles from home, to reduce his waiting time for treatment. Now, the 72-year-old is speaking out about his surgery to show others awaiting treatment that they can also fast-track themselves if they're able to travel. He took advantage of NHS Patient Choice after discovering a hospital that had almost no waiting list in the middle of the country. Patient choice in the NHS provides patients with a legal right to choose where they receive their NHS healthcare services, including hospitals and other providers. This will include many private hospitals if they provide services to the NHS and it does not cost the health service any more than a referral to a standard NHS hospital. Speaking after his procedure, Hilary said: 'It was 180 miles from my home to Birmingham – but as it's a new hospital and it's a private hospital that treats NHS patients, they could get me in very quickly just with a referral from my GP. 'I'd do it again in a heartbeat for faster, quality care and highly recommend it. Patient Choice gives people real power – they just need to know it's there. 'The NHS App is going to be developed further to make this easier, and you can speak to your GP about your choices. You can choose to be referred to a private hospital at the outset, or you can switch hospitals like I did if you're facing delays locally.' Hilary added that he was in a position to travel to make the operation sooner, adding: 'People don't want to be on a waiting list. They want to get on with their lives. 'Every single person who looked after me was amazing and couldn't have done any more. I am delighted with the result so far.' It follows a poll of 1,000 adults suffering from chronic aches and pains – including those in need of hip and knee replacements – which revealed people in need of NHS operations would be willing to travel if it meant they could get the surgery they're desperate for, sooner. The poll found respondents were happy to travel up to 60 miles if it meant they'd be seen within three to four weeks. One in 10 said they'd travel over 200 miles if they could get an NHS surgery within a month. Of those polled, 36% are currently on a waiting list and 17% have been in a queue for more than a year. Last year, statistics from the Liberal Democrats found that more than half of Brits using private healthcare say they decided not to use the NHS because of the length of the wait. More Trending The research also found that one in seven people in the UK decided to turn to private medical care in the past year. Among their reasons for doing so were the lack of availability in NHS treatments and the difference in quality of care. But 54% of people cited the extent of the wait times as the main reason why they or a member of their family went private. After the general election last year, Labour promised to return to meeting NHS performance standards, meaning 'patients should expect to wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral for consultant-led treatment of non-urgent health conditions'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Are millions of people actually faking being sick? MORE: UK health warning after cases of deadly bacteria C. diff soar to 12 year high MORE: NHS blood-carrying drones plan branded crazy by Londoners