
He was born to a US citizen soldier on an army base in Germany. Now he's been deported to Jamaica, a country he'd never been to
Immigration
Supreme CourtFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Born on a US military base, the son of a US citizen father serving in the Army, Jermaine Thomas never considered he might not be American.
A month ago, he found himself shackled at the wrists and ankles and forced aboard a flight for Jamaica, his father's birthplace and a country Thomas had never been to before.
'It's too hard to put in words,' Thomas told CNN. 'I just think to myself, this can't really be happening.'
He is legally stateless, he told CNN. He is not a citizen of the US, although his father was a US citizen; Germany, where he was born at a US military hospital; Jamaica, his father's homeland; or Kenya, where his mother was born.
Thomas, 39, says he spoke to CNN from a homeless shelter in Kingston, Jamaica, a city where he now finds himself stranded hundreds of miles away from his friends and family after an arrest for criminal trespass led to him being transferred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody.
Family members told CNN they are scared to visit Thomas out of fear they might be unable to return to the US – caught up in the Trump administration's sprawling deportation campaign.
Thomas says his only option now is to apply for Jamaican citizenship through his late father. But he does not plan to, since 'my life, my kids, my family is back in the States,' he said.
Jamaica is 'not a bad place,' he told CNN. 'It's just not the place for me. I don't belong here.'
Thomas was born in 1986, at a US military hospital in Frankfurt, Germany, to a mother born in Kenya and a US citizen father who eventually spent more than a decade in the military, where he repaired Army helicopters. His father became a naturalized US citizen in 1984, according to documents reviewed by CNN.
A close family member of Thomas, who asked not to be identified due to fear of 'retaliation' from immigration authorities, told CNN 'There was never a question of whether he was American,' as far as his family believed, since he was born to an American father on a US military base.
The family returned to the US from Germany in 1989. A visa form listed the nationality of 3-year-old Thomas as Jamaican, according to court filings, and he entered the country as a legal permanent resident. His father, who died in 2010, would have handled the son's paperwork, according to the family member, who said the family was unaware he was listed as Jamaican on the form.
Thomas grew up in Florida and Virginia but spent most of his adult life in Texas, where he worked a variety of odd jobs, including in construction, cleaning, and working for a car wash. He was often homeless and was convicted of various crimes, including drug possession, robbery and theft stretching back to at least 2006, which led to several years of incarceration. He served a 30-day sentence in 2011 for a misdemeanor domestic violence charge. Thomas most recently spent 2020 to 2023 incarcerated for driving while intoxicated and harassment of a public servant, a third-degree felony, according to Texas Department of Public Safety records.
Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin described Thomas as 'a violent, criminal illegal alien from Jamaica' who 'spent nearly two decades posing a significant threat to public safety' in a statement shared with CNN. 'Dangerous criminal aliens like Mr. Thomas have no place in American communities,' she said.
Thomas acknowledged he has committed crimes, including violent crimes. He said he was 'put in situations in life where, you know, your hand's forced to survive one way or another.' He has the bipolar type of schizoaffective disorder, according to medical records reviewed by CNN, and says he was taking psychiatric medication in the US – although he's now about to run out of his medications in Kingston.
His family member said Thomas has 'made a lot of wrong choices' exacerbated by his mental health problems but he is 'not violent.' They think he should face legal consequences for any crimes he has committed in the US instead of being deported to a foreign country where he has no legal standing.
Thomas says the saga resulting in him being stranded and homeless in Jamaica started in February, when he was evicted from the apartment he shared with friends in Killeen, Texas, about an hour north of Austin.
Constables serving the eviction notice took all the items out of the home and left them in the front yard, Thomas said. Thomas returned the next day to check on his and his roommates' belongings, along with his adoptive daughter's dog. Then police arrived, saying they received a call about a dog chained up. He pointed out the dog was on a leash, not chained up, and when police asked for his identification, he refused, saying he had not committed any crimes. Then officers handcuffed him and took him to jail, and the dog to the pound, he said.
Records from the Texas Department of Public Safety show he was arrested on February 21 for criminal trespass, a misdemeanor. He pleaded no contest and was sentenced to 30 days in jail, along with a $100 fine and court costs. He told CNN he pleaded no contest because his court-appointed lawyer told him trying to fight the charge could leave him in jail for months.
The Killeen Police Department told CNN they became involved after a request from Animal Control but didn't offer more details on how the arrest unfolded. CNN has reached out to the Bell County attorney's office for comment about the public defender's work on the case.
At the end of his 30-day sentence, Thomas was picked up by ICE and transferred to an immigration facility. After a few weeks, he says, he was put in a cell with men who said they were going to be deported to Nicaragua.
'I banged on the door and asked for an officer to come let me know what was going on,' he said. Then, he said, a supervisor assured him he was not going to be deported, just transferred to another facility.
But in the transport van, he said he was told some detainees were being deported to Nicaragua and the others to Jamaica. Despite his protests to the contrary, officers insisted he was a Jamaican citizen being deported to Jamaica, he said, and forced him on a plane. He said he was 'treated like a fugitive,' surrounded by 10 US Marshals on the plane. ICE referred CNN to the Department of Homeland Security's statement on the case.
Aboard a plane to a country he'd never been to on May 28, with only the clothes on his back, 'All hope was lost,' he said. 'I didn't see a future.'
Thomas said until his early 20s, he never considered he might not be a US citizen. Since his father was a US citizen, he never questioned his own immigration status.
It all changed in 2008, when he was picked up by ICE after he was released from a two-year jail sentence for felony drug possession charges. He recalled his father explained his situation to immigration authorities and he was released. Then, in 2013, he received a Notice to Appear from the Department of Homeland Security, which alleged he was a Jamaican citizen with criminal convictions in the US and thus subject to deportation.
The proceedings led to a lengthy legal battle centered on whether a US military base counts as 'in the United States' for the purposes of birthright citizenship, a legal principle clouded by uncertainty after a recent Supreme Court ruling. While his lawyers have argued, as the son of a US citizen born on a US military base, Thomas is a citizen under the 14th Amendment, a 2015 appeals court ruling found he was not a citizen and was deportable. The Supreme Court denied a petition to hear his case, which was supported by several members of Congress in 2016.
In its denial, the Supreme Court supported the lower court's finding that being born on a US military base did not count as being born 'in the United States' for the purposes of the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born 'in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.' Although the US military controls its bases abroad, they aren't considered US territory, according to the State Department.
Additionally, people like Thomas born to at least one US citizen abroad are typically automatically US citizens – though there are some restrictions, and the law has changed over time. But Thomas' US citizen father 'did not meet the physical presence requirement of the statute in force at the time of Thomas's birth,' making him ineligible for citizenship through his father, too, the appeals judge ruled. At the time of Thomas' birth, his father had only been in the United States – including his military service – for nine years; the law required he be in the country for 10 years to confer citizenship on his children. If Thomas had been born just a year later, he would be a US citizen.
In filings to the Supreme Court, Thomas' lawyers referenced John McCain, the longtime senator from Arizona, who was born on a US naval base in the Panama Canal Zone. When McCain ran for president in 2008, his birthplace attracted scrutiny, since the Constitution requires a US president to be a 'natural-born citizen,' a phrase inspiring debate. But a bipartisan legal review concluded he was indeed a natural-born citizen and eligible for the presidency. The government in Thomas' case argued the Panama Canal Zone was at the time of McCain's birth a US sovereign territory, unlike the military base where Thomas was born in Germany.
Thomas' relative said they were shocked by the court finding against him, especially considering his father served 18 years in the military.
'My question is, why would you hold a child responsible for something that he had no control over or knowledge of?' they asked.
Despite the court ruling he was not a US citizen, Thomas stayed in the country, the only home he's ever known. He said after his Supreme Court bid was rejected, he reported to immigration authorities in San Antonio for several months until, he says, an officer told him he didn't need to report back anymore.
'I'd like for all those serving any branch of government service to know that this can happen to their children when they pass away, after putting their lives on the line for this country,' he said.
Thomas struggled to understand his situation as a stateless person after the 2016 Supreme Court denial. 'Who's ever even really heard of such a thing?' he said. 'What are you supposed to do when you're stateless?'
He says he is not a citizen of Germany, where a birth certificate reviewed by CNN verifies he was born in a US military hospital, or of Jamaica, confirmed by a letter sent to Thomas by the Jamaican consulate in Miami and reviewed by CNN. Under the Jamaican constitution, children of Jamaican citizens born outside the country have to formally apply for citizenship. Neither is he a citizen of Kenya, where his mother was born and only fathers can pass down citizenship to children born abroad.
Situations like Thomas' are relatively new and uncommon in the US, according to Betsy Fisher, an immigration lawyer and lecturer in refugee law at the University of Michigan Law School.
A stateless person is 'a person whom no state considers as a national under the operation of its law,' she said. There were estimated to be over 200,000 stateless people in the US in 2022, according to the University of Chicago Law School's Global Human Rights Clinic.
Legally speaking, Thomas has likely been stateless his whole life, Fisher explained, which made him 'vulnerable to being deported and experiencing this loss of community, connections, legal identity, everything that he's experiencing in Jamaica.'
His situation 'falls kind of perfectly in these cracks between ways to be a US citizen,' she said.
US law doesn't require a person be a citizen or have any legal status in a country to which they're deported, she said, and the US isn't a party to either of two UN conventions on statelessness, which offer people at least some protections. Nonetheless, it's 'a recent phenomenon that a stateless person would be deported to a country where they don't have a legal connection.'
'It's been hard, inconvenient, and often I think seen as inhumane to deport someone to a place where they're not going to have any legal status,' she said.
Attempts during Joe Biden's administration to provide protections for stateless people in the US have been rescinded under the Donald Trump administration, she said.
'We're really moving backwards on this issue,' she said. 'This would be something that Congress could very rapidly fix if they were motivated to do so.'
Thomas' relative described his stateless status as being 'like a life sentence.'
'You live on the fringes of society, because you don't have no legal status that gives you a chance to work, to have housing, to do anything,' they said.
Waking up each day in the sweltering heat of Kingston, hundreds of miles away from his friends and family, 'it takes me a while to get a grip on reality,' Thomas said.
'I just can't realize that I'm still here,' he said. 'Like this is a bad dream. This is a nightmare, but I'm really here.'
He originally stayed in a hotel room paid for by Jamaica's Ministry of National Security, he told CNN. But he says he's now in a homeless shelter, which can be loud, hot, and chaotic. 'I'm always hungry, completely exhausted, on constant alert' in the shelter, he said.
Since he's neither a Jamaican citizen nor a foreign citizen, he's unable to apply for a legal ID and work in the country, he said. 'I don't know what I'm about to do,' he said. 'I don't know nobody.'
Although the people he has interacted with in Jamaica have been 'respectful and hospitable,' most of them speak Jamaican Patois, an English-based creole language he finds difficult to understand. 'There's a lot of barriers and a lot of complications,' he said.
Thomas' relative said it is 'horrible' to monitor his harrowing situation from afar, speaking with him daily via social media messages. His family, some of whom are not US citizens, told CNN they want to visit but feel terrified they will be barred from returning to the US.
'It's like I've lost him forever,' the relative said. 'Because I will never go there, because chances are, I will not be allowed back.'
Thomas, meanwhile, misses 'the feeling of freedom and being free to be myself' in the United States.
'I just want to know when I'm going home,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
30 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Democrats try to flip the script on red tape
Good morning, Early Birds. Are we really debating Superman's immigration status? Send tips to earlytips@ Thanks for waking up with us. In today's edition … Trump's fiction about gas prices … Democrats are already publicly angling in the 2028 presidential fight … Republicans in Congress are warming to a sanctions bill against Russia … but first … President Donald Trump's red-tape event in 2017 was not subtle: Stacks of paperwork. Large golden scissors. And a massive piece of red tape. The message was clear. Trump, a Republican who campaigned on ending regulatory burdens and cutting government regulations, was physically cutting red tape in office. 'The never-ending red tape in America has come to a sudden, screeching and beautiful halt,' Trump said. Trump's so-called Big Beautiful Bill, which the president signed into law earlier this month, does anything but that for many Americans — and Democrats have taken notice. 'It is doubling what you have to prove every year that you qualify for Medicaid. It is not just able-bodied adults who now have to do that much more or that much more often. … It is everyone,' said Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat who has led the charge against this additional paperwork. 'What you see in the projections are the expectations that people will make mistakes on double the paperwork and thus lose their coverage for a period.' Red tape and additional paperwork are central to this bill's attempt to cut the federal government's spending on Medicaid, the government health care program for a range of low-income Americans. Direct cuts to Medicaid benefits pose significant political risks for Republicans, and many have pledged not to support them. However, to cut the federal government's costs, the bill imposes a slate of additional paperwork on all Medicaid recipients, including stricter work requirements that require recipients to prove they are working and eligible for the program. As Michelle Miller-Adams and Beth C. Truesdale, researchers at the nonpartisan, nonprofit W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, put it: 'The reality is that requirements like these move people off programs not by requiring work but by requiring more reporting of work. Similar state-level policies have reduced the number of Medicaid recipients — but only by increasing the administrative burden on recipients, not by increasing the share who are employed.' The researchers noted that Arkansas implemented work requirements in 2018. While more than 95 percent of recipients either met the state's work requirement or qualified for an exemption, the required steps to prove so led to 17,000 individuals losing their Medicaid coverage. Republicans deny that the new requirements are merely a means to remove eligible people from Medicaid, arguing that verification requirements are a fair measure to protect the program. Kush Desai, a Trump spokesperson, said Democrats are 'either too disingenuous or too dumb' to differentiate between regulations on businesses and 'the current federal government ensuring that thousands of dollars' worth of taxpayer benefits meant for America's most vulnerable aren't being fraudulently funneled to illegal aliens or able-bodied adults.' But Democrats, like Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York), are rejecting that Republican view. 'They really aren't work requirements. These are red tape requirements,' Jeffries said this week on the What A Day podcast. 'These are paperwork requirements that are trying to deny people … who have earned the benefits. … Republicans are trying to find ways to disqualify them.' Democrats now plan to use the new regulations against a party that has long championed less red tape and regulation for businesses. 'No amount of cynicism or shameless spin will change the fact that more Republican red tape will result in 17 million people losing their health insurance — and we will make these frauds own that reality for the next 15 months,' said Justin Chermol, a spokesperson for the Democratic campaign committee tasked with taking back the House. The political messaging from Beshear and others turns conventional political wisdom — that Democrats favor a bigger government and Republicans are against red tape — on its head, said Donald Moynihan, professor at the University of Michigan's Ford School of Public Policy. 'This is a case where conventional wisdom fails,' Moynihan said. 'In fact, Republicans are much more supportive of a larger, more intrusive government — when it comes to accessing safety net benefits, you have to provide more information, you have to provide it more frequently, you have to spend more of your life interacting with bureaucracies.' He added: 'For a long time, that paradox or contradiction was not clear in the way it has become very clear with the passage of the Big Beautiful Bill. It has just become harder and harder for Republicans to say, 'We are the party of small government.'' Beshear, who has now won two competitive gubernatorial campaigns and may run for president in 2028, said he is now urging his administration to 'use every bit of information we have to ensure those who qualify for Medicaid stay on it' and to find ways to 'help people fill out that paperwork right.' Politically, however, the governor said he thinks this additional red tape on Americans is part of a broader Democratic messaging strategy aimed at countering the newly signed bill, one that he hopes will focus on real people's stories. 'When you remove health care from at least 200,000 Kentuckians, people die, people suffer,' said Beshear. He added later, 'People are going to lose their coverage because they fail to check this box or that box, and that is just wrong.' Republicans in Congress are showing openness to a sanctions bill against Russia for dragging its feet to make peace in Ukraine. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) told reporters yesterday that he would take up the issue with Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) next week. Trump has strengthened the push for sanctions by making his frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin increasingly obvious, as we wrote about yesterday. He said he was open to a bill by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) that would sanction the country's energy and defense industries and impose a hefty 500 percent tariff on any country that buys Russian energy. The bill has wide support across the Senate, with 80 co-sponsors. The United States already imposed sanctions on Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine and encouraged allies to diversify away from Russian energy. Several European countries, including Germany, were heavily reliant on Russian natural gas before the invasion but have made efforts to wean themselves off it. China and India are both still large consumers of Russian energy. Trump, once again, falsely claimed that gasoline costs $1.99 a gallon in multiple states and accused his opponents of lying about price increases during his second term in office. 'Yesterday, … two states, three states were selling gasoline at $1.99. You haven't seen that for a long time,' Trump said during a meeting with African leaders at the White House. 'I brought costs way down, just about every cost. I can't think of a cost that went up.' Then, referring to his opponents, Trump added: 'So what they do is they lie and say prices are going up. It's such a lie.' There is zero evidence that any state is selling gas at $1.99 a gallon. According to the AAA Fuel Prices metric, the lowest average gas price can be found in Mississippi at $2.705. The average price nationwide is $3.162. We asked the White House which three states Trump was referring to but did not receive a response. Some have noted that Trump may be referring to the wholesale price of gas, but even that price is higher than $1.99, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Is the race to be the next Democratic presidential nominee heating up? Yes, it's early. Yes, people are still tired from 2024. And yes, Democrats have a lot to focus on in opposing Trump. But, also yes, things seem to be heating up. Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, often mentioned as a possible 2028 Democratic candidate, will travel to Iowa next month. He plans to visit with voters at the famed Iowa State Fair, a frequent stop for presidential candidates, and hold a town hall with Iowa Democrats. While Iowa has fallen out of favor with Democrats in recent years, trips to the state often stoke presidential speculation. Gallego even touted the visit with a polished hype video, featuring resplendent footage of barns and corn and people chanting the senator's name, all set to Queen's 1977 hit, 'We Will Rock You.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom, another Democrat who may run, made a visit Tuesday to South Carolina, the state that led off the Democratic nominating process in 2024. 'I think it's really important for Democrats that we spend time in parts of our states, parts of our country, that frankly, we haven't spent enough time in, and so that's why I'm here,' Newsom said during his trip. Our colleague Maeve Reston tracked Newsom across South Carolina and found Democrats excited, but also worried, about another Californian at the top of their presidential ticket. There are ages between now and the 2028 presidential election, but the possible contenders are already making moves. Minnesota Reformer (Minnesota): Preppers are an interesting, yet growing, bunch, and they will be gathering soon in Minnesota. This shirt is worth the click alone: 'Noah was a conspiracy theorist … then it rained.' LebTown (Lebanon County, Pennsylvania): Rep. Dan Meuser, a Pennsylvania Republican, announced he will not run for governor in 2026, declining to challenge popular Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro. Atlanta Journal Constitution (Atlanta): Can you hear the ripeness in a watermelon? Is this why people are always knocking on watermelons in the grocery store? And, as the story asks, should you pat or slap? The Dallas Morning News (Dallas): Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said yesterday that he would convene a special session of the state legislature to respond to the devastating flooding in Texas and, among other things, to raise the possibility of redistricting the state's congressional delegation as Republicans fight to hold their House majority. We wanted to say thank you for responding to our questions about the local media you would like to see featured in our newsletter. We even included one suggestion above! Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. What do you think of the award? Is there someone you feel should receive the honor? Let us know what you think at earlytips@ Thanks for reading. You can follow Dan and Matthew on X: @merica and @matthewichoi.

Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Why do young Chinese join the Communist Party? For many, it's practical.
The growing ranks of the Chinese Communist Party are becoming a sticking point in China's fraught relations with the United States, with the Trump administration placing membership of China's ruling party front and center in its efforts to crackdown on Chinese influence operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in May said that Chinese students with 'connections to the Chinese Communist Party' would have their visas to study in the U.S. revoked.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Companies have plans for extreme weather and workplace violence. Now, some are planning for ICE raids, too.
After federal immigration agents raided a Miami construction site in May, lawyer Alex Barthet got a call from a developer client seeking advice on what he should do if they showed up at his nearby property. Barthet said he recommended closing off the premises to visitors, putting up No Trespassing signs, and being ready to turn agents away if they don't show a proper warrant. "You create this little bit of a walled garden," he told Business Insider, though he conceded that workers could still get detained once they left the work site. Employers have long had response plans for extreme weather, active shooters, and other workplace emergencies. Now, some are quietly preparing for immigration raids, too — even if they believe everyone on their payroll is legally permitted to work in the US. Human resources, crisis management, and legal professionals say they're helping clients take the extra step to keep workers safe, minimize disruption to operations, and avoid being charged with hefty fees if they lack accurate employment-authorization documents known as I-9s. Preparing for an ICE raid may be especially relevant for employers in industries such as food processing and construction, they say, as these typically rely on immigrant labor. In some cases, workers are already not showing up for shifts, fearful of getting swept up in raids — though the arrival of armed agents in the workplace could be scary for anyone. ICE did not comment for this article. "We have a responsibility to protect employees," said Kim Minnick, an HR consultant in Napa, California, who developed a rapid response template for Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids earlier this year and posted it online to share with her industry peers. It features tips such as keeping within arm's reach a list of emergency contacts for any workers who get detained. "They may have minors waiting to be picked up at school," Minnick said. More workplace raids expected Since January, ICE has highlighted arrests made at worksites across the country, including a meat-processing plant in Omaha, Nebraska, a fire-equipment company in Kings Mountain, North Carolina, and a Louisiana racetrack. It's part of an effort to meet the Trump administration's 3,000 arrest-per-day minimum. The administration has attributed the effort to protecting the nation. "Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safeguard public safety, national security, and economic stability," Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin told BI in a statement. ICE hasn't specified how many workplaces have been raided overall, though more visits could be on the horizon. Last week, President Donald Trump signed into law a bill that provides ICE with additional funding and resources to go after undocumented immigrants, including enough detention capacity to maintain an average daily population of 100,000 individuals. Developing a plan Employers are already mandated by the federal government to have at least a generic emergency response plan that is up to date, though not all do, said Bo Mitchell, president of 911 Consulting in Wilton, Connecticut. He suspects that some company leaders are fearful that preparing for the possibility of an ICE raid in particular could be misinterpreted externally to mean they're harboring undocumented workers or engaging in a political act. "Nobody wants to talk about it because of overtones of politics," Mitchell said. Yet those who don't take such caution may be putting their credibility at risk, said Michelle Sinning, a principal at Bernstein Crisis Management in Mission Viejo, California. "Your competence may come into question if you're not able to handle a high-pressure situation with confidence," she said. Companies can also face fines in the tens of thousands of dollars for every employee lacking proper I-9 documentation in the event of a surprise audit by ICE or another government entity, said Tina Ullmann, an HR consultant in Milford, Connecticut. Even a clerical error can be costly, she said. Preparing for an ICE visit In addition to ensuring those I-9s are compliant, employers should train workers who greet visitors to be ready to escort any ICE agents who show up to an area that isn't private but won't interfere with customers or other employees, such as a conference room, said immigration attorney Christine Rodriguez in Atlanta. These workers should then know to alert the right personnel to interact with the agents, such as the company's CEO, head of HR, or lead counsel, she said. ICE agents are not legally permitted to access private areas of a workplace without a judicial warrant, which will say "U.S. District Court" and bear the signature of a federal judge, said Evan Fray-Witzer, an immigration lawyer in Boston. By contrast, he said administrative warrants do not legally grant such access and so employers would be within their rights to deny entry to ICE agents bearing only one of those. Leadership or employees should never interfere with ICE agents' actions — even if they believe their actions to be illegal — or they could face obstruction charges, warned Fray-Witzer. Instead, he suggested trying to document the incident by recording video or taking notes, as these could come in handy should the matter lead to a lawsuit. "There is no benefit to the employer or the employee to try and talk ICE out of taking someone," said Fray-Witzer. "The best thing to do is get as much information as you possibly can."