logo
When an unsung Indian helped Austrian Jews escape the Nazis

When an unsung Indian helped Austrian Jews escape the Nazis

BBC News18 hours ago
"Let me tell you a secret. Your nana (grandfather) helped Jewish families escape the Nazis."That single sentence from his mother set Vinay Gupta off on a journey into his grandfather's past. What he unearthed was a tale more gripping than fiction: a little-known act of heroism by an Indian businessman who risked everything to save strangers in Europe's darkest hour.This wasn't just compassion; it was logistics, risk, and resolve. Back in India, Kundanlal set up a businesses to employ Jews, built homes to house them - only to watch the British declare them as "enemy aliens" and detain them once Word War Two broke out.Kundanlal's life reads like an epic: a poor boy from Ludhiana, married at 13, who sold everything from timber and salt to lab gear and bullock-cart wheels. He also ran a clothing business and a matchstick factory. He topped his class in Lahore - joining the colonial civil service at 22, only to resign from it all to participate in the freedom movement and a life of building factories.He shook hands with Indian independence leader and later its first prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru and crossed paths with actress Devika Rani on a steamer to Europe.In A Rescue In Vienna, a family memoir, Gupta uncovers his grandfather's extraordinary Indian rescue on foreign soil - pieced together through family letters, survivor interviews, and historical records.In the shadow of Hitler's 1938 annexation of Austria, Kundanlal, a machine tool manufacturer from Ludhiana city in the northern state of Punjab, quietly offered Jewish professionals jobs in India to get them life-saving visas. He offered work, provided livelihood and build homes for those families in India. Kundanlal rescued five families.Fritz Weiss, a 30-year-old Jewish lawyer, was hiding in a hospital, feigning illness. Kundanlal was also in the same hospital to get treatment for an illness. After Nazis forced Weiss to clean the streets outside his own home, Kundanlal handed him a lifeline: a job offer at the fictitious "Kundan Agencies." It got him a visa to India.Alfred Wachsler, a master woodworker, met Kundanlal while bringing his pregnant wife for tests. Promised a future in furniture and a sponsor for emigration, his family became one of the Jewish households to reach India between January 1938 and February 1939. Hans Losch, a textile technician, answered Kundanlal's advert in an Austrian paper for skilled workers. Offered a managerial role at the imaginary "Kundan Cloth Mills" in Ludhiana - with housing, profit share, and safe passage - he seized the chance to start over.Alfred Schafranek, once owner of a 50-employee plywood factory, pitched his skills to Kundanlal and was offered a role in building India's most modern plywood unit. His entire family, including his mechanic brother Siegfried, was rescued.And Siegmund Retter, a machine tools businessman, was among the first Kundanlal approached. As his business collapsed under Nazi rule, Kundanlal began arranging his move to India to start again.
It all began with a hospital bed in Vienna. Struggling with diabetes and hemorrhoids, Kundanlal, then 45, sought new treatments and read about a specialist in Vienna. In 1938, while recovering from surgery there, he met Lucy and Alfred Wachsler, a young couple expecting their first child. From them, he learned of rising antisemitic violence and the destruction of Jewish lives. Over the next few months, he met other men. Encouraged by this success, Kundanlal placed newspaper adverts seeking skilled workers willing to relocate to India. Among the respondents were Wachsler, Losch, Schafranek and Retter. Kundanlal offered each a job, financial guarantees, and support to secure Indian visas."A striking aspect of all of Kundanlal's elaborate scheming on behalf of these families was how close mouthed he remained, keeping up appearances of technology transfer to India until the very end," Gupta writes. "He did not share his intent or plans with any Indian or British officials. His family learned of his plans only when he returned home months later." In October 1938, Losch became the first of Kundanlal's recruits to arrive in Ludhiana. He was welcomed into Kundanlal's home - but found little comfort in the quiet town, writes Gupta. With no Jewish community, no cultural life, and a struggling cloth mill, Losch left within weeks for Bombay (now Mumbai), citing poor working conditions and little chance of profit. He never returned.Weiss lasted even less - just under two months. The company created for him, Kundan Agencies, never took off. He soon moved to Bombay, found work in flooring, and by 1947 had relocated to England. Despite their departures, Kundanlal bore no resentment, writes Gupta."My aunt told me that on the contrary, Kundanlal had been embarrassed that he could not provide a lifestyle and social environment more suited to Vienna, and felt that if he had, the two men may have stayed on in Ludhiana."
Not all stories ended this way.Alfred and Lucy Wachsler, with their infant son, arrived by sea, rail, and road - finally stepping off the train at Ludhiana. They moved into a spacious home Kundanlal built for them next door to another, prepared for the Schafraneks. Alfred quickly set up a furniture workshop, using Burmese teak and local Sikh labour to craft elegant dining sets - one of which still survives in the author's family.In March 1939, Alfred Schafranek, his brother Siegfried, and their families arrived from Austria. They launched one of India's earliest plywood factories in a shed behind the two homes. Driven and exacting, Alfred pushed untrained workers hard, determined to build something lasting. Gupta writes, the work was intense, the Punjab heat unfamiliar, and the isolation palpable - especially for the women, confined mostly to domestic life.As the months passed in Ludhiana, the initial relief gave way to boredom. The men worked long hours, while the women, limited by language and isolation, kept to household routines. In September 1939, Hitler invaded Poland. Days later, Britain declared war on Germany - the British parliament pulled India into the conflict. Over 2.5 million Indians would serve in the war, 87,000 never returned.In Ludhiana, the reality of war hit fast.
By 1940, new policies ordered all German nationals - Jewish or not - into internment camps. The Wachsler and Schafranek families were forcibly relocated to the Purandhar Internment Camp near Poona (now Pune), housed in bare barracks with kerosene lamps and minimal comforts. They had committed no crime - only carried the wrong passport.Eventually, release became possible - if they could find paid work. Alfred and Siegfried Schafranek secured roles managing a new plywood business in Bangalore and moved there with their families, starting all over again. The Wachsler family left the camp in 1942 after Alfred found a job in Karachi. The two families never met again.Purandhar Camp closed in 1946, nearly a year after the war ended. In 1948, Alfred Wachsler's cousin sponsored US refugee visas for the family. That October, they flew out of Karachi, never to return to India. The Schafraneks relocated to Australia in 1947 after a successful plywood venture in Bangalore.While researching the book, Gupta met Alex Wachsler - whose father, Alfred, had also built the Burmese teak desk Kundanlal once used in his tiny 120 sq ft office. (Alfred died in 1973.)"Despite living in US since the age of 10, and now into his eighties, Alex Wachsler still pines for his life in India, eats at Indian restaurants, delights in meeting Indians and surprises them with his knowledge of Urdu," writes Gupta.Back in Ludhiana, Kundanlal opened a school for his daughters at home, soon expanding it into one of Punjab's oldest schools - still running today with 900 students. His wife, Saraswati, grew increasingly withdrawn and battled depression.Kundanlal and Saraswati had five children, including four daughters. In 1965, Saraswati died after a tragic fall from their terrace. She spent her final years in silence, emotionally distanced from the family. Kundanlal passed away a year later, aged 73, from a heart attack. "The notion of a 'passive bystander' was anathema to Kundanlal. If he saw something, or someone, that required attention, he attended to it, never intimidated by the enormity of the problem," writes Gupta.A fitting epitaph for a man whose legacy was not just business, but quiet defiance, compassion, and conviction.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I went for dinner with strangers and it restored my faith in humanity, life and myself
I went for dinner with strangers and it restored my faith in humanity, life and myself

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

I went for dinner with strangers and it restored my faith in humanity, life and myself

As the lift ascends to the 15th floor, only one thought loops through my mind: 'I don't want to be here.' I'm attending a dinner with five total strangers. I don't know their names, ages, or any details about them. All I know is that they'll be meeting me at 7pm. I'm here to experience Timeleft, a viral dinner club designed to help groups of people meet new friends, try new restaurants and break down the barriers that the digital world has erected between us. 'Even 10 years ago we spent way more time socialising: we'd go outside, we went to the bars, we had some rituals in the week too – we went to church or the grocery market or whatever,' asserts Timeleft's founder, Parisian entrepreneur Maxime Barbier, 40. 'The online world has made us much more isolated. I don't think we're becoming less social, I think we're losing our capability to express ourselves, and that's why we created a space where people can talk to each other. That's why I think it's working well in so many different countries.' Operating in 260 cities in over 60 countries around the world, Timeleft dinners take place every Wednesday evening. Diners pay a membership fee for access (£12.90 for a single dinner, or £19.90 for a month in the UK) then can choose a date, and the algorithm pairs them up with five others. The location of the dinner isn't confirmed until the night before. Before any of this, I have to complete a personal quiz. The questions are eclectic: 'Are your opinions usually guided by logic and facts or emotions and feelings?', 'Do you consider yourself more of an author's film enthusiast or mainstream blockbuster lover?', 'From 1-10 how much of an introverted person do you consider yourself?' These answers will, in theory, be used to match me up with a group whose chemistry is perfect for potentially making friends. 'We know six people is the best size for a table, we know that gender balance is really important, we know that it's really important that there's no more than 10 years difference between the youngest and oldest at the table, we know everyone needs to speak the same language, the price of the restaurant plays a big part, we know the balance has to be right between introverts and extroverts,' says Barbier. At the end of the dinner, I can rate my fellow diners to help the algorithm refine what types of people click. Feeling apprehensive Given three million diners have used Timeleft since it launched four years ago, the algorithm should, in theory, be pretty good at putting together good groups: so as I ride the lift up to Madera restaurant on the 15th floor of the Treehouse Hotel in central London, why am I feeling so gripped by anxiety? The truth is, I used to be better at this. A few years ago I could have walked into a room of strangers and felt totally at ease. Recently though, I went through a period of what I can only describe as mild depression. I felt myself growing exhausted by social interactions with new people. The well of gregariousness which I'd always found easy to draw from dried up. It's a bewildering feeling to look back and notice a change like that in yourself; almost as though some quintessential 'Jackness' in me had been irreparably eroded, replaced by a constant concern about how I was coming across: too loud or too quiet, too verbose or too meek, too opinionated or too reticent. Self-awareness is a vital – and sadly often neglected – skill, but this went further: I could never settle on who I was or what I was bringing to people. Of course, some people are natural introverts who would simply not throw themselves into a social situation like a dinner with strangers to begin with. Perhaps I could have accepted that's who I am now. But meeting people used to fill me with joy; I always say that one of the best parts of my job is the wealth of people I come into contact with, so I wasn't prepared to go gentle into that quiet life. So: to dinner. I tell the host I'm here for the Timeleft dinner and she shows me to the bar where I meet Victor and Oli. The pair know each other already – Timeleft allows diners who've enjoyed each other's company to pair up again on future dinners. They are actually celebrating their 'Timeleftiversary': having met at a dinner a year ago, they quickly became fast friends, even holidaying together, and tonight's meeting is a celebration of that. Oli has been on 41 Timeleft dinners across London, and jokes he's an unofficial ambassador for the company. 'I signed up originally because one day I looked at my friendship group and realised they were all married, or having kids, and I had ended up left out,' he explains. 'There are so many people in London, I wanted to meet some of them and hopefully make new friends.' Gradually the rest of our party filters in and it becomes apparent that I'm the only newbie. Ruxandra has just moved to London from Bucharest for a job in the film industry and has been to two dinners to make some new friends. Jeni, a cheerful Australian with an easy laugh, also knows Oli and simply enjoys meeting people; this is her ninth dinner. Sarah, who recently returned to London from Hong Kong and wanted to relaunch herself on the social scene, is on her 19th. A safe space Despite my dinner companions' backgrounds, according to Barbier, 'around 80 per cent' of Timeleft's users are natives rather than expats seeking to form a new social circle. The 50-50 gender split of my dinner is also somewhat unusual: two thirds of users are women. 'Women get together for the purpose of gathering and men get together for the purpose of doing,' thinks Barbier, who argues that generally women are more social overall. 'We launched women-only nights two months ago and we've had more than 12,000 women participating in that.' Men-only nights are being considered to address the precipitous rise of male loneliness, but Barbier thinks they will require a bit more of an activity – he's considering football-themed meet-ups as a trial. 'You say to women that you're having a 'women-only event' and they understand immediately that it's about solidarity, making a safe space, all that stuff,' he says. 'When you say 'men-only' guys panic and suddenly think it's a dating thing. Men are socialised to be bad at this.' Once we make our introductions, conversation turns to food; Jeni volunteers to play mother and picks a selection of sharing platters for us and from there the chatter doesn't stop flowing. We joke about the deafening sound system, especially after a surly manager furiously informs us that no, he won't turn down the speakers 'because in my restaurant we want to keep up the party vibes'. We talk about previous Timeleft dinners, and the rise of in-person meet-up experiences. We chat about holidays, concerts, life in London, the cost of living crisis, the ethics of service charges (Jeni is dead set against them, and after our run-in with the grouchy restaurant manager, we quickly come round to her point of view). Conversation is brisk and free-flowing. Very occasionally we lapse into silence but Oli's endless conviviality is quick to overcome those moments. I'm happy to say that the three and a half hours we spend together flies by. Easy connections It strikes me only once we've split the bill and headed our separate ways that I still don't know a huge amount about my dining companions. I never asked their ages, their occupations, if they had partners or pets. I worry momentarily that might have been rude of me, but then I realise that in the whole time we were together I never felt the need to fall back on stock questions or small talk which might have illuminated such subjects. Instead I learnt about raves in Romanian castles, laughed about the proper 'vibes' a restaurant should aspire towards, and debated the appropriate costs for a taco. It felt rather like hanging out with friends, more than meeting strangers. I won't pretend that I wasn't exhausted by the end of the evening. I can't bear awkward silences and I kicked myself slightly for not being good enough at averting them in places. But overall it was a delight and most importantly, enlivening; proof to myself that the old, confident Jack is still inside me somewhere. And alright, I didn't necessarily make any new bosom buddies, but Oli added me to his WhatsApp group for events in London, and I've promised I'll do another Timeleft dinner. With around 30,000 diners around the world meeting up for dinners this Wednesday night, I'm sure a lot of people have felt the same apprehension I felt earlier. But I'm heartened to think that collectively we all chose meeting, engagement and friendship over the ease of doing nothing, scrolling through social media and letting the solitude of modern life win. In a world that seems endlessly desperate to drive us apart, sometimes it's nice to get a reminder of just how easy it is to connect with the people around us.

Celebrity relics are no substitute for real art
Celebrity relics are no substitute for real art

Telegraph

time40 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Celebrity relics are no substitute for real art

Throughout the 1970s, the luminous British actress Jane Birkin and her partner, the French singer-songwriter Serge Gainsbourg, were the coolest couple in Paris. Jane's signature accessory was a rustic straw basket. But in 1981 her then partner, the film director Jacques Doillon, deliberately reversed his car over it, so she boarded a flight to London carrying her belongings in a different receptacle. By chance (the story goes) she found herself sitting next Jean-Louis Dumas, head of the luxury firm Hermès, who offered to make her a better bag. A design was sketched on a handy sick-bag and the Birkin bag, that official signifier of celebrity status, as carried by Victoria Beckham, J-Lo, Lady Gaga and the ubiquitous Kardashian-Jenners, was launched. The mythology that has since accumulated around the Birkin bag is extraordinary. You can't just wander into an Hermès shop with a wad of cash and buy one, so the market for second-hand Birkins is lively, and owners are urged to keep them in pristine condition as investments. Jane Birkin did not keep her namesake bag in pristine condition: photographs show her with it crammed so full that it can't be closed, emblazoned with stickers supporting Unicef and Médecins du Monde, and hung about with trinkets. In 1994 she gave the original bag to be auctioned for an Aids charity. It later appeared in the V&A's 2020 Bags: Inside Out exhibition. At some stage the trinkets and stickers were removed – though the scars of use remain: scuffs, scratches and traces of sticker adhesive. Last week this battered object was sold by Sotheby's in Paris to a Japanese collector for €8.6 million, or £7.4 million, making it the most valuable handbag ever sold at auction. By way of context, a Titian portrait of a nobleman was sold at Christie's earlier this month for £3.4 million. What is it that makes Jane Birkin's knackered old handbag worth a couple of Titians? Humans are acquisitive creatures, and the things we collect tend to fall into two categories. Either their value resides in their beauty and superlative craftsmanship – such as the objects acquired by individual collectors that became the basis of museum collections such as the Ashmolean or the Wallace Collection. Alternatively, we desire objects that are perceived to have some precious numinous quality: thus the splinters of wood – enough to constitute an entire forest – supposed to be fragments of the True Cross and venerated as holy relics. In our secular age, stuff once owned by celebrities tends to fall into the latter category. In the league table of pricey celeb memorabilia, Jane Birkin's bag comes in well below Judy Garland's ruby slippers (£23.7 million) and level with Michael Jordan's 1998 NBA Finals jersey. But those objects have a place in cultural history that explains their price. Birkin's bag occupies more mysterious territory, not least because its restoration has stripped it of the idiosyncratic detail that made it distinctively hers. As a final indignity, a fashion editor has decreed that Birkin bags are 'no longer cool'. Jane Birkin died in 2023, as much an icon of her times as her contemporary, Marianne Faithfull. Whether her handbag can preserve that iconic quality for posterity remains to be seen. Someone in Japan evidently thinks so. But as a lasting investment, a Titian or two might prove the better bet.

Laura Woods candidly opens up on anxieties over returning to work and fears of getting ‘baby brain' on live TV
Laura Woods candidly opens up on anxieties over returning to work and fears of getting ‘baby brain' on live TV

The Sun

time40 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Laura Woods candidly opens up on anxieties over returning to work and fears of getting ‘baby brain' on live TV

LAURA WOODS has lifted the lid on her anxieties of returning to work after giving birth. The award-winning presenter gave birth to baby Leo in January and only returned to work in April. 3 3 3 However, the 38-year-old says her return to working life hasn't been easy. Speaking to The Telegraph, Woods had candidly lifted the lid on her fears of stepping back in front of camera. Her worries included concerns about her appearance due to her weight gains during her pregnancy and suffering from "baby brain". She explains how at times she had just been sitting at home and forgetting normal things like the name of a fork. Woods said: "I was very worried that I would be off the mark. I was worried that I would have lost some of my edge or sharpness. "I kept forgetting names, which started during pregnancy. It's a thing that everyone talks about. You don't think you're going to get it. "You get a bit of 'baby brain' and it's hard when you're presenting because a lot of the time stuff is thrown at you and you don't see it before it goes live. "It's live TV, so you have to react. You have to be sharp... I was nervous about getting little kind of brain drop-outs. But I surprised myself. I wasn't awful!" Women who work in television are often judged by how they look, but fortunately Woods says that when she came back she had found a new "level of acceptance of myself" after rearranging her list of priorities. She continued: "I was nervous about how I looked. You put on a lot of weight in pregnancy and you feel a little bit different. Laura Woods gives birth to first child with Adam Collard as couple reveal sweet name in adorable post "Of the things I used to worry about, my appearance probably would have been top of that list. But funnily enough that's sort of taken a bit of a back step... "When I came back I felt quite a level of acceptance of myself I don't think I had before I had a baby. "However you have your baby, however tricky or easy your pregnancy is, your body will change and you just accept it because you think there's something much bigger going on. My body has done an amazing thing." The former TalkSPORT radio presenter was always open about her journey to motherhood, supported by fiance and former Love Island star, Adam Collard, who is Leo's father. Her "wonderful" colleagues at ITV have also been a great source of support for her following the major life milestone. While the sports broadcasting industry can be brutal and unforgiving, becoming a mother opened Woods up to a completely new world of scrutiny, which naturally came with its own fears of judgement. Woods added: "I remember putting a picture of Leo up on social media and thinking, 'What if people pull me up on something? Am I holding the baby wrong? Is he wearing too many clothes? Is he not wearing enough clothes?' "I had my phone in the background and someone messaged me and said, 'Get your phone away from that baby!' I just thought, 'Give me a break'. "I thought it was bad enough when you work in telly and football. I just don't really bother with social media like I used to and that's great. It makes me feel a lot better to be honest.' After initially returning to TNT Sports for their coverage of the Champions League semi-final between Barcelona and Inter Milan, Woods is now leading ITV's coverage of the Women's Euros this summer. The Lionesses are in action against Wales for their final game of Group D, with England being fully fit going into the critical home nations clash.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store