logo
Defence's Waiouru Housing Project Fails To Break Ground After Deal With Ngāti Rangi Falls Over, Sources Say

Defence's Waiouru Housing Project Fails To Break Ground After Deal With Ngāti Rangi Falls Over, Sources Say

Scoop12-06-2025
Article – RNZ
RNZ understands a deal with Ngti Rangi that underpinned the project fell over at the last minute.
The Defence Force's flagship project to fix up poor housing that is bad for soldiers' health has failed to break ground two years after it was funded, according to sources in Waiouru.
None of the 50 houses promised for Waiouru have been started, according to feedback from the town, which the NZDF has not disputed.
Budget 2023 earmarked the thick end of $75 million for the new houses.
A Defence tender to find a builder went out a year ago.
But on Wednesday the government said, 'Discussions regarding Waiouru are ongoing and progressing well, as part of a wider Treaty Settlement.'
Asked what the talks were about, Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk's office said, 'We don't have anything further to add outside of our existing statements currently.'
NZDF did not address what the new discussions were about either. It did not respond when asked what had happened to the project and any contract.
RNZ understands its deal with Ngāti Rangi that underpinned the housing project fell over at the last minute.
Ngāti Rangi is hosting the National Hautapu Ceremony for Matariki next week at Tirorangi Marae.
The iwi referred RNZ's questions to the NZDF.
A spokesperson for Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk, in a statement sent after the publication of this article, said the Government did not accept the suggestion any deal had fallen over.
It said in 2021 that, 'Housing is on the top of our priority list. As part of our settlement we have an arrangement with the New Zealand Defence Force out at Waiouru to build 50 homes. That project we're still working on with NZDF.'
Penk told Cabinet colleagues last year that NZDF's widespread 'dilapidated' housing was harming military output.
Defence has vacancy rates of about 30 percent and 'ten percent of personnel leave the NZDF predominantly due to the unsatisfactory working, training and living environments', he said.
Budget 2025 signalled the start of $9 billion in promised new defence spending by 2029, containing about $3 billion for 15 projects, mostly to do with weapons or IT systems.
However, the Budget provided just a fraction over the next four years to address the billion-dollar backlog in maintenance and renewals that is outstanding; past Cabinet papers gave this figure, and NZDF confirmed on Tuesday that its spending on defence regeneration was half a billion dollars behind what the 2019 plan demanded.
In August 2024, Penk expressed shock after seeing photos of black mould in Waiouru families' homes.
'No family should have to live like that, let alone the families of those who sacrifice so much to serve their country,' he said.
The temperature low in Waiouru over the last 30 days has been under one degree on 17 days.
Some housing 'poses potential health risks and can cause housing-related stress to … personnel and their families', and was linked to health conditions like asthma, a Cabinet minute in 2023 said.
The 50-house project was announced as settled a year ago, under the Te Tiriti settlement with Ngāti Rangi seven years ago.
Ruapehu district mayor Weston Kirton and his council celebrated the deal 11 months ago.
'I don't have any detail, only to say that it seems to be stalled in some shape or form,' Kirton told RNZ on Wednesday.
No building appeared to have taken place – a playground and community park were in the tender, too – and the council was not privy to why, or to Defence talks with iwi.
'The minister should give us an update on what progress there is on the Defence presence in the Waiouru community,' Kirton said.
NZDF had earlier threatened to shut up shop entirely at the central North Island settlement and head south, so he had been delighted when the settlement secured the army's training area and the housing deal began to firm up.
'It was all go,' Kirton told RNZ.
'They were very excited, they wanted to retain the training area at Waiouru.
'We were excited, the fact that they were going to put resouces back into Waiouru.'
On Wednesday, Penk initially made no comment at all about Waiouru, then, when prompted again by RNZ, provided a single line about the 'discussions'.
Shortly before that, in a longer statement, he had said, 'The government is improving accommodation for our sailors, soldiers and aviators by addressing decades of underinvestment, which has left Defence housing stock in poor condition.'
Penk referred in that statement to projects in Devonport, Trentham and Manawatū, but not Waiouru, even though Waiouru had the lion's share of Budget 2023's tranche one funding for housing upgrades.
'The Waiouru New Build Housing is one of the first projects implemented under the Homes for Families Programme,' said its tender.
Two months ago on Facebook, Penk posted – next to a headline '$12 billion for a stronger NZ' cheering the defence capability plan released in April – that: 'This Government is rebuilding the Defence Force after decades of underfunding.'
'Defence housing, messing and dining spaces are going to benefit from fresh investment.
'Our military personnel deserve healthy and modern spaces to live and rest in while they serve our country.'
The 50-house Waiouru deal was designed to signal the starter's gun on a half-billion-dollar upgrade of the army camp over the next 25 years, and of an overall $3 billion overhaul of 1600 defence houses countrywide.
Most of those required 'upgrading urgently', past Cabinet papers said.
Penk a year ago told a Cabinet committee the estate was a 'critical enabler of military effect; providing the working, training and living environments required for generating and maintaining defence outputs'.
'The dilapidated condition of the NZDF estate is evident everywhere, but mainly in the living and training environments, and with utilities such as power, water supply and sanitation.'
A 2024 estimate put deferred maintenance at $480m across the estate, which includes not just houses but other facilities.
Some 'critical' defence assets were so poor in some places that a 'wholesale shutdown of operations at that location may be needed', Penk stated.
The NZDF's annual report a year earlier had said 99 percent of its houses met Healthy Homes standards.
Asked how that was possible given what Cabinet had been told, NZDF told RNZ: 'Healthy Homes compliance does not address the state of NZDF's barracks or working accommodation and does not necessarily address whether a home is aged, fit for purpose and or in an accelerated state of deterioration.'
Penk had said in August 2024 that funding was constrained but the government was looking at options for improving the housing.
Earlier, Budget 2024 funded 35 leased homes at Devonport Naval Base.
New initiatives in Budget 2025 funded just $4m of capital and $16m for housing over four years. More would be added 'once the business case is approved by Cabinet', NZDF said.
The business case related to a revision of its 2019 estate regeneration plan to fit a 2024-2040 timeline.
This had to be revised, in part, to 'address consequences of insufficient funding since the 2019 business case', official papers said.
'The business case is still being drafted and Cabinet's decision on it will be released when that occurs in the next couple of months,' it told RNZ.
NZDF mentioned about $30m for upgrades at Devonport Naval base, but this does not appear to be for housing.
Budget 2025 also had $120m for depreciated funding of estate assets. It put $26m into deferred maintenance this year, and $104m over four years, against the $480m backlog.
Penk said in his statement that three construction contracts and a future lease agreement had been signed for 61 new homes with Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei on Auckland's North Shore, and to lease additional houses in Sunnybrae.
A new tender signalled 'more housing solutions will be sought this year, including at Trentham and in the Manawatū', he said.
Budgets 2023 and 2024 provided $75.4m capital and a total $17.1m over four years, Defence said. This included a renovation pilot for 13 properties at Burnham, Linton and Ohakea.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Auckland councillors agree on desired helicopter saga outcome - but not how to get there
Auckland councillors agree on desired helicopter saga outcome - but not how to get there

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Auckland councillors agree on desired helicopter saga outcome - but not how to get there

Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee has filed two motions of notice calling for the prohibition of private helicopters in residential neighbourhoods. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly A motion to block helicopters from Auckland's residential areas has become ensnared in a web of bureaucracy. Councillors gathered on Thursday to discuss Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee's two motions of notice calling for the prohibition of private helicopters in residential neighbourhoods. It comes after Auckland rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams were approved to build a helipad at their Westmere home , a decision now being challenged in the Environment Court . Councillor Lee's first motion urged the council to change the city's Unitary Plan to make private helipads in residential areas a prohibited activity city-wide. The second motion called for the same change, but only for the Hauraki Gulf Islands section of the council's District Plan. The second motion was passed by the council, though it would still need to be approved by the central government. However, the motion to change Auckland's Unitary Plan proved to be much more complicated. Council advisory staff said a city-wide ban would be too difficult to implement. It would require the council to seek permission from the Minister Responsible for RMA Reform Chris Bishop, a request many councillors believed he would decline. Councillor Richard Hills, chairing the meeting, instead proposed an amendment to Lee's motion requesting the council seek a declaration from the Environment Court to strengthen its case before approaching the Minister. "What I'm trying to do here is give us a chance," he told councillors. "You can bet when we have to go and beg to the minister to put through a plan change ... If we said we don't have staff backing and we don't think we have experts, there is no way the minister would say yes to that." Councillor Richard Hills proposed an amendment to one of the motions. Photo: Alexia Russell Councillor Lee described the amendment as an ambush. "There have been ample breaks in this meeting today and this obviously didn't fall out of the air, I would have appreciated the courtesy of some consultation," Lee said. "This outcome-by-ambush approach with no forewarning whatsoever is not going to help the reputation of the council." Speaking after the meeting, Hills said he felt proceeding without the amendment would have only led to disappointment. "We would be giving false hope to people if we went ahead, against advice, over a two year period and spent millions of dollars for an outcome that everything points to we wouldn't have had," he said. "It might make us feel good in the moment, but actually we have to try and get the best, clearest, strongest [outcome] as quick as possible." Councillor Shane Henderson said he voted in favour of the amendment because it was more likely to be approved by the minister. "We were kind of worried it would fail at the end of the day and we would be in a very difficult position," he said. "So we wanted to get something that was more practical and workable over the line." Lee disagreed with the others councillors' assertion that the minister would block the change. "The minister's intention is to stop councils spending a fortune on 10-year reviews of their district and regional plans, I don't think the minister would attempt to block plan changes which correct or modify the existing plan." He believed prohibiting helipads in residential areas was an obvious move and would bring Auckland more in line with its international counterparts. "Internationally, Auckland is an outlier. Just about all the major international cities strictly control or prohibit private use of helipads in residential areas." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

US commander visits as military integration with 'kill chains' advances
US commander visits as military integration with 'kill chains' advances

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

US commander visits as military integration with 'kill chains' advances

The 805th Combat Training Squadron's Shadow Operations Centre - Nellis, or ShOC-N, is the US Air Force's premier battle lab supporting key technologies and capabilities designed to compress the kill-chain for joint and coalition warfighters. Photo: US Air Force / Keith Keel An American army commander visiting New Zealand has praised how the United States and New Zealand Defence Force are developing an integrated network, at the same time as the latest example of this integration comes to light. The latest example is a project to connect this country's so-called "battle lab" into a combined command-and-control system, including experiments in what US strategic command called "dynamic targeting kill-chain automation" . The visit of General Ronald Clark this week with the head of the NZ army, Major General Rose King, focused on the strengthening of the two armies' strategic partnership. Clark said the legacy of standing side-by-side in conflicts continued as the two forces built an "integrated landpower network" to preserve peace in the Indo-Pacific. "Discussions focused on building further interoperability, advancing combined readiness initiatives, and the US Army's recent transformation efforts," NZDF said in a media release. General Ronald Clark, Commanding General of United States Army Pacific and Major General Rose King, Chief of the New Zealand Army. Photo: NZDF One "key" to the army networking was a joint US-led command-and-control system, called CJADC2, said documents newly released under the Official Information Act. They show King has what is called a "capstone" (top priority) order to advance Interoperability with the US and other partners like Australia (this is one among six capstone orders). The King-Clark meeting came during the 30,000-strong army exercise Talisman Sabre in Australia. Talisman Sabre had "demonstrated growing interoperability across air, land, maritime, cyber, and space domains", NZDF said. The battle-lab integration comes under the US Air Force, which this week ordered another half billion dollars of new technology to advance the project. The NZDF said in response to RNZ inquiries, that it began participating in the Combined Federated Battle Lab network ( CFBLNet) this year. However, official US reports state New Zealand personnel took part in targeting experiments for it last year. They also began last year taking part in the US army's main integration initiative, Project Convergence, where experiments have linked New Zealand sensor and firing systems into a wider network. The multinational forces, particularly those of the Five Eyes partners - the US, Australia, UK, Canada and New Zealand - have have been working in earnest since last year to set up a mega-network, the Combined Joint All-Domain Command-and-Control (CJADC2) network. This is essentially to develop technologies to find targets and shoot them more quickly and accurately. The mega-network is being built to overlap with nuclear command-control-and-communications, Pentagon documents show. An F/A-18E Super Hornet, attached to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 195, taxis on the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) while underway in the Timor Sea, 16 July 2025, in support of Talisman Sabre. Photo: US Navy / Seaman Apprentice Nicolas Quezad "The NZDF involvement in these initiatives is a function of the need to be able to work alongside our military partners," the force told RNZ in an OIA response. "The NZDF is not a driver of the initiatives, and no NZDF project matches or mirrors the scale or nature of the United States' projects." Green Party defence spokesperson Teanau Toiono said pursuing interoperability with the US was too costly. "We're opposed to this US-led military regime but even if you look at it from an economic perspective, it's also expensive," Toiono said on Thursday. The growing integration was negative; "because what's good for the US, I don't think is good for us and I don't think it's good for the Pacific region". The Defence Force rejected RNZ's request for details about all recent integration moves, saying this required too much work. Even if it did that work, a lot of this was about combat capabilities and interoperability so was "classified information and would not be made public". King said in a release about Clark's visit that this country could not contribute mass and scale, but had soldiering quality to offer. "To that end, it's been great to be able to share some insight with General Clark and his team around how we go about training our people." She offered as an example a years-old, oft-delayed project to build a "Network Enabled Army" to improve digital communications and command-and-control interoperability, that would advance under the government's new defence capability plan. The USS America (LHA 6), steams alongside US Navy ships from the America Strike Group, Royal Australian Navy, Republic of Korea Navy, Royal New Zealand Navy, French Navy and Japan Maritime Self-Defence Force as part of Talisman Sabre 25, on 20 July. Photo: US Navy / Petty Officer 2nd Class Cole Pursley The US air force's main contribution to the mega-network is called the Advanced Battle Management System; the army's is Project Convergence; the navy's is Project Overmatch, which New Zealand joined in February. The US Air Force battle-labs experiments have involved New Zealand personnel in testing if new human-machine approaches are faster and better. A US unit "pitted current warfighter systems and procedures against new technologies to gather insights and streamline operational and tactical C2 [command and control] processes to speed up the kill-chain and decision-making timeline", a US Air Force report said. The Pentagon's "CJADC2 concept has challenged US joint and combined forces to prioritise achieving decision advantage over potential adversaries, to retain our warfighting advantage and enhance the deterrent effect of a powerful military". The US team leading this was "currently working with Australia and New Zealand to connect their Battle Labs", the air force said last year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

'A ray of sunshine': NZ litigants spurred on by international climate ruling
'A ray of sunshine': NZ litigants spurred on by international climate ruling

RNZ News

time12 hours ago

  • RNZ News

'A ray of sunshine': NZ litigants spurred on by international climate ruling

Climate Change Minister Simon Watts. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A landmark ruling by the United Nations' highest court puts further pressure on the New Zealand government over a large hole in its climate plans, a group of climate lawyers say. Another litigant taking on big polluters calls it a "a ray of sunshine" - while the climate minister will only say it's "long and complicated". The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found overnight that countries can be responsible for paying reparations for damage caused by their greenhouse gases. It also said governments are legally obliged to set climate targets that are consistent with keeping temperatures within 1.5C (not 2C) and that they must "pursue measures capable of achieving" those goals. The decision said states could be in breach of international law for failing to address fossil fuel consumption, granting fossil fuel exploration licenses, and providing fossil fuel subsidies, something the New Zealand government is doing with its $200 million fund for drilling . New Zealand is currently on track to be over 80 million tonnes of emissions short of meeting its 2030 climate target, because the coalition government has broken with plans by previous governments to meet the target largely by buying carbon credits from overseas. The coalition has been told there is no feasible way to meet the target purely inside this country, without some kind of offshore deal. While Climate Change Minister Simon Watts has acknowledged that this is true, he has so far ducked making any public commitment to closing any of the necessary deals beyond "exploring options". At times, ministers have explicitly said the government wouldn't spend money offshore to meet the target, despite officials warning them that their inability to explain how New Zealand would close the gap would lead to overseas scrutiny. Jessica Palairet, executive director of Lawyers for Climate Action, said the international ruling confirmed that paying lip service to international climate targets wasn't enough. Under the Paris Agreement, countries' targets are known as NDCs, or Nationally Determined Contributions. The first ones run from 2021-2030, and the second set from 2031-2035. "The judgment confirms that New Zealand can't just say it hopes it will meet the NDC and that it's committed to our targets, it has to take real and demonstrable steps towards meeting it, it has to demonstrate that intent to meet it. The judgment clarifies that, and I think in the face of an 89 million tonne hole, there are real questions about whether or not we're doing that," she said. "When we made the NDC commitment in the first place, we had a plan for how we were going to meet the gap, but the government is changing course and the ICJ starkly brings into focus whether that is lawful." Palairet said the ruling also sharpened questions over whether New Zealand's second Paris Agreement target , out to 2035 was aligned with curtailing heating within 1.5C. Watts has defended the new target of 51-55 percent reductions by 2035, saying the cuts were difficult to achieve and met the definition of ambition, but several experts - and independent advice - disagreed. "There have been real questions raised about whether our second NDC is 1.5 degrees aligned," Palairet said. "Put it this way, Simon Watts specially asked officials for the second NDC to align with domestic emissions budgets, to avoid having to pay offshore mitigation." "The problem is that our domestic emissions budgets are set according to a test that's different to the where that leaves us is we have an NDC that likely isn't 1.5 degrees-aligned likely doesn't reflect highest possible ambition and likely doesn't reflect our fair share," she said. "The ICJ opinion really draws into sharp focus whether that is lawful." Palairet said court's opinion that 1.5C was a binding target could also have implications for the government's plans to lower the country's methane target. The coalition has been considering lowering the goal for methane reductions from between a 24 and 47 per cent by 2050 to between 14 and 24 percent. "The ICJ opinion has crystalised 1.5C as the target states have to work towards," Palairet said. "The government is considering reducing our methane target to 14 percent," she said. "The problem is that government's own independent expert advisory panel said that a 14 percent target was consistent with 2C, so I think there's a real question if New Zealand reduces its methane target to 14 percent, whether that's consistent with international law." Palairet said the government's gas and oil exploration subsidies and backtracking on the ban on new offshore exploration might also be incompatible the court's statements. "The ICJ had really strong statements on those kind of subsidies and decisions being in breach of international legal obligations." "It's advisory only, it's non-binding but it is really authoritative and it holds significant legal and moral authority and it's very likely going to be used in court cases all around the world, including New Zealand court cases." That might include Lawyers' for Climate Action's existing judicial review against Watts, which argues there are glaring holes in the country's emissions reduction plans. The world's top greenhouse gas emitters denied they had any obligations beyond the UN framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) and the 2015 Paris agreement. The court rejected that argument, saying a range of other treaties applied, including the UN convention on the law of the sea, the Vienna convention for the protection of the ozone layer, the Montreal protocol, the convention on biological diversity and the UN convention to combat desertification. It also said states were obliged to cooperate to solve climate change. Asked to comment on the ruling, Watts sent a written statement noting the advisory opinion had been issued. "Climate change is an important issue in our region, and we know our Pacific Island neighbours are following this development closely," it said. "This is a long, complicated opinion, and New Zealand will study it carefully before commenting on the substance." Iwi climate leader Mike Smith said environmental lawyers were already discussing how to use the landmark ruling in New Zealand. Smith won the right in the Supreme Court last year to sue seven companies - including Z Energy, Genesis Energy, NZ Steel and Fonterra - for their role in causing climate change. He said the findings by the international court overnight offered hope in a time of worsening climate damage. "In all of that darkness this is a ray of sunshine, this is a beacon, it gives us hope that we can leverage these decisions and effect change," he said. "It strengthens [my case] in the sense that the decision confirmed that states are legally obligated to prevent climate harm and they must not support or subsidise emissions-intensive activities." "I've been talking to the lawyers from ELI, the Environmental Law Initiative, and they are all putting their minds to what falls out the bottom of this opinion and what opportunities are there now to bring further proceedings against the government."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store