HC directs for clearance certificate to stalking accused for passport renewal
The police ought to have issued the certificate when the man has been permitted to travel abroad by the court, a division bench of Justices G S Kulkarni and Advait Sethna said in an order passed last month.
In the present case, the Malad police here in April this year issued a negative report on the ground that a criminal case was pending against the man.
The man moved the HC, challenging the negative certificate issued by the police to the passport authorities and seeking a direction to the passport office to issue him a clearance certificate so that his passport could be renewed.
In his plea, the man said a magistrate's court, before which his trial is pending, has granted permission for his passport to be renewed.
A single bench of the HC in April permitted the man to travel abroad for the time period of the course he has secured admission in, the petition added.
The high court in its order said when a directive has been issued by the magistrate permitting renewal of the passport in November 2024, then the police could not have issued a negative report.
It was not the case of any of the authorities that the man was not authorised and/or entitled to travel abroad, the bench said.
"If this be the case then certainly such travel cannot remain a paper formality," the HC said.
The court noted the man's present passport is valid till 2026 and he has already been granted a visa by the Canadian government.
"We are of the opinion that the officer in-charge of the Malad police station needs to grant a 'Clear Police Verification Report' to the passport department forthwith," the HC bench said.
It quashed the negative report submitted by the police in April and directed it to issue a 'Clear Police Verification Report' in favour of the man.
This verification report shall then be submitted to the passport authorities for issuance of a final police clearance certificate, the bench ordered.
In 2017, an FIR was lodged against the man in Malad on charges of stalking, criminal intimidation and using words or gestures outraging the modesty of a woman. The case is pending before the magistrate's court.
The man in his plea said he is desirous of pursuing a Chartered Accountant course in Canada and has secured admission for the same.
Last year, the man filed an application before the magistrate's court seeking permission for the renewal of his passport and for a direction to the police to issue him a clearance certificate.
Advocate D P Singh, appearing for the passport authority, submitted to the court that the department would grant a clearance certificate only after receiving a positive report from the police station concerned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
30 yrs on, man acquitted of abetting his wife's suicide
Mumbai: Nearly three decades after being convicted of abetting his wife's suicide by being cruel and harassing her about her complexion, among other things, a shepherd, then 23, was acquitted by Bombay high court. Domestic quarrels, including remarks about complexion and threats of a second marriage, do not constitute criminal harassment under the law, observed Justice S M Modak, who on July 11 set the man free. Quashing the man's conviction and five-year rigorous imprisonment for suicide abetment under section 306 of erstwhile Indian Penal Code (IPC) and one-year rigorous imprisonment for cruelty to his wife under section 498A, IPC, Justice Modak, sitting singly, said, "The legislature contemplates that every dispute, quarrel, or altercation arising from matrimonial life are not criminal offences. It will take the colour of criminal law only when there are no alternatives for the wife but to put an end to her life because of the harassment. " You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai In 1998, following his conviction, the man appealed before HC. He was in Satara jail at the time and later out on bail. The conviction was unsupported by evidence, HC said and criticised the trial court for having "forgotten basic principles and ingredients of section 306 of IPC (suicide abetment)". Abetment needs to be proved for suicide, HC said. On record, though wife "was being taunted on account of her complexion, I do not think that it will fall within the explanation to section 498-A..." said Justice Modak. The prosecution also failed to prove the wife's suicide was due to harassment. The shepherd's father, also a co-accused, complained of her cooking, it was alleged. The marriage was in 1993, and the wife died in Jan 1998. Both sides shared the wedding expenses, HC noted, and there was no dowry demand. As a goatherd, he was away from home, "for a long time" and she would go to her mother's house, complain about harassment, and ended her life one day, HC noted. There seemed to be quarrels arising out of matrimonial life. "They are domestic quarrels," HC said and offence of cruelty requires husband's wilful conduct to be "of a high degree," which HC said in the case could not be considered so high as to compel the suicide. "...the judgment of the trial court cannot be sustained in the eyes of the law," HC held and acquitted the husband.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why no probe if a petition filed, HC asks joint CP
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has directed the joint commissioner of police (law and order) to show provisions of law that prohibit investigating officers from conducting investigations only because of petitions filed by accused persons. "It clearly gives an impression that investigating officers are either not serious in investigating the crimes or, with a view to shrug off the lawful responsibility, are adopting such sham and/or moonlight pleas before the courts," said Justices Ajey Gadkari and Rajesh Patil in an order passed on Wednesday. They were hearing petitions by two persons to quash an Oct 23, 2023 FIR registered against them by Goregaon police station under IPC sections, including for criminal breach of trust and cheating. The judges said the "record of the present case shocks the conscience of this court." To their query, the prosecutor, after taking instructions from the investigating officer, police inspector Satish Umare, submitted that the investigation is being conducted. However, he said due to the pendency of the present petitions, it is not concluded, and as a consequence, the chargesheet is not filed. "The aforesaid submission on behalf of the state is contrary to all fundamental principles of investigation and law of the land," the judges said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Oldest Actors in the World. Reportingly Undo You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai They noted that both the petitions were filed in Nov 2023, and the HC had not granted interim relief of any nature in favour of the petitioners. "We are regularly coming across such sorts of pleas by the prosecution," they said. The judges mentioned examples of the police not conducting investigations; "petition is filed" and "consent terms are filed before the trial court in anticipatory bail applications" and "other palpably specious pleas. " Therefore, they deemed it appropriate to direct the joint CP to file his detailed reply to the petitions within a week. If he "comes to a conclusion that the investigating officer(s) have deliberately not conducted the investigation only with a view to help the accused, then what necessary action he will adopt against the concerned shall be stated in the affidavit," the judges directed. Adjourning the hearing to Aug 6, they also directed him "not to delegate his powers to any subordinate officer while filing the reply. "
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Dhirios banned in Goa, but still held: Petitioner to HC
Panaji: Govt has assured the high court that it would look into the issue of bullfights, known as 'dhirios' in Goa. Advocate general Devidas Pangam gave this assurance after the HC was informed that dhirios were occurring rampantly in the state. Radhakrishna Salgaonkar has filed a contempt petition in the HC, alleging that despite the court's directions and a ban on bullfights in Goa, the activity has continued unabated. As proof, he presented an Instagram post promoting bullfights. He also drew the court's attention to a detailed complaint he had made to authorities, including the chief secretary, the DGP, the Animal Welfare Board, the director of animal husbandry and veterinary services, and the cybercrime police station. He alleged that none of the authorities took any cognisance of his complaint. The HC told the advocate general to obtain instructions regarding Salgaonkar's contention that some social media profiles were now deleted, but information about bullfights, and the sale of bulls for these fights, remained on social media. The division bench of the HC said that before issuing a notice to govt under the Contempt of Courts Act, the advocate general has assured the court that he would look into the matter. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read More Undo The court asked Salgaonkar to provide any information on dhirios to the advocate general and directed that the petition be listed on Aug 18. In 2023, the HC directed the DGP to prepare an action plan to prevent bullfights in Goa. The court directed the DGP to identify the organisers and suggest mechanisms with which police officers would be granted authority to prevent bullfights. People for Animals filed a contempt petition attaching several news reports, including six by TOI between Jan and Aug 2021, on bullfights taking place in Goa and bulls dying as a result. TOI reported at the time that bullfights were occurring almost every day between 3pm and 4pm, when there was less movement on roads, in the jurisdiction of the Colva police station. Statistics at the time indicated that South Goa accounted for double the illegal bullfight cases compared to North Goa, with the HC informed that most of these took place in the jurisdiction of the Colva police station. In Jan this year, TOI reported that one of the attendees of a bullfight near Benaulim beach was gored to death. Last month, the South Goa collector held a high-level law and order coordination meeting to prevent such events. The collector issued directions to police to maintain round-the-clock surveillance and take immediate action to prevent dhirios. She directed the deployment of various intelligence-gathering methods to identify locations where the illegal activities were being planned and to ensure swift intervention.
