logo
Shocking moment cyclist smashes into bus & flips over handlebars… but viewers can't work out who's to blame

Shocking moment cyclist smashes into bus & flips over handlebars… but viewers can't work out who's to blame

Business Mayor03-05-2025
SHOCKING footage shows the moment a cyclist smashed into a bus before flipping over the handlebars of her bike.
The Lime bike rider, who appears to be a woman, was racing south down Shoreditch High Street in London at 7.45pm on Tuesday.
4 Shocking footage shows a cyclist smashing into a bus and flipping over the handlebars Credit: Twitter/@BrixtonHatter
4 The Lime bike rider was travelling at speed before crashing Credit: Twitter/@BrixtonHatter
4 She then appeared to 'face plant' the pavement Credit: Twitter/@BrixtonHatter
Just before she moves alongside the stationary vehicle, the cyclist's attention diverts from the road as she waves at a pedestrian.
Footage shows her travelling at speed before she clipped the side of a red double-decker bus with the number 47.
Just moments later, she was sent flying over the handlebars after colliding with a piece of metal panelling protruding from the side of the bus.
Shocked onlookers watched on as the woman, who was riding without wearing a helmet, crashed down.
The heavy bike appears to land on top of the woman's back and her bag is sent flying out of the front basket.
However, despite the painful looking fall, the London Ambulance Service said that they had no record of sending crews to treat the cyclist at the time and location.
The footage has been viewed millions of time after going viral on social media.
Viewers were left divided over who was at fault in the incident.
One said on X, formerly Twitter: 'No cycle lane. No bus stop bypass. Rider forced close to the bus by an overtaking vehicle.
Read More Gun ad on 3rd-party Metro app grabs attention - NBC Washington
'There may be a miscalculation by the rider here but she wouldn't have been put in this position if there were proper cycling facilities.
'Hope she's ok.'
Watch cyclist veer into road to overtake bike before CRASHING when driver honks horn… but who's REALLY in the wrong
But another user responded: 'She's crashed straight into a bus and it's everyone's fault ? No. Just no. She crashed into it, very simple.'
A third tweeted: 'I pedal-cycled a lot as a child and youth. I never had the benefit of any cycling infrastructure.
'I never cycled into a stationary motor vehicle.'
All cyclists are advised to wear a helmet by the Highway Code, as 'evidence suggests that a correctly fitted helmet will reduce your risk of sustaining a head injury in certain circumstances'.
But it is not a legal requirement and no helmets are provided to people hiring Lime bikes or other dockless bikes in the city.
The 47 bus runs between Newquay Road in Lewisham and Shoreditch.
It is operated under contract to TfL by Stagecoach London.
A Transport for London spokesperson confirmed to The Sun that the cyclist had collided with a stationary bus and there were 'no serious injuries reported'.
Simon Munk, from the London Cycling Campaign, told the outlet: 'Everyone getting around in London needs to behave sensibly – that counts for drivers, pedestrians and obviously cyclists too.
'Pay attention to your surroundings, cycle within your capabilities, look after yourself and others.
'And remember, lots of organisations including LCC offer free third party insurance with membership.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Internet Loves Getting 'Cheaters' Fired – But I Worry We're Missing The Point
The Internet Loves Getting 'Cheaters' Fired – But I Worry We're Missing The Point

Buzz Feed

time2 days ago

  • Buzz Feed

The Internet Loves Getting 'Cheaters' Fired – But I Worry We're Missing The Point

I still remember the backlash when it turned out that Ned Fulmer, the ex-BuzzFeeder who had been dubbed the 'wife guy' of online group Try Guys, had cheated on his partner with a colleague. He was let go from his Try Guys role amidst public outrage. And now, Astronomer's CEO Andy Bryon has stepped down from his role following a TikTok clip which some online sleuths say shows him cheating with his HR lead at a Coldplay concert. Though the company have not confirmed Andy was the person in the viral video, they have written in a statement that 'Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met.' I have already shared that I'm not the biggest fan of how some people are engaging with the 'Coldplay affair.' Nor do I think that public reaction should influence a person's professional status before an official investigation. For instance, the company's Senior Director of People, 'identified' by TikTok detectives, has had her LinkedIn profile bombarded by commenters who think she got her promotion by hiding her boss' romance. The comments came through, despite there being absolutely no evidence that this was the case (the company has since revealed she 'was not there. This is a rumour started on Twitter'). This is wrong. A likely innocent woman's professional page is now littered with potentially career-disrupting claims due to almost certainly baseless delusions of online 'accountability.' That's the sort of perversely gleeful dogpiling I'm sure Jon Ronson's So You've Been Publicly Shamed would have a field day with. Lawyer Eric Kingsley, firm partner at Kingsley Szamet Employment Lawyers, told us: 'Legally, the private life of an individual usually will not be cause for termination unless the private life somehow overlaps the professional environment or threatens the organisation.' But in the case of both Fulmer and, if true, Bryon, there's more to the story than just 'bad vibes.' 'If the conduct in question involves other staff members or directly affects the workplace environment, the rationale for termination greatly changes,' the lawyer said. Fulmer's relationship was with a relatively junior employee, while Bryon's suspected 'affair' was alleged to be with his HR lead. 'A Chief Executive Officer being involved in a romantic relationship with an employee, even more so if there exists a position of power, creates huge potential for problems of favouritism, coercion, and the risk of legal action based upon harassment or retribution,' Kingsley added. 'Even if the relationship remains voluntary, the potential can damage the morale of employees, cause intra-company disputes, or violate stated policies of the company. Some companies place explicit policies regarding intra-company relations in place in order to avoid complications.' Meanwhile, Thomas Roulet, a fellow and director of studies in psychology and behavioural science at King's College, Cambridge, says that 'If someone's personal life affects their professional performance and engagement, yes, we could definitely consider HR interventions (it could be a warning, or go as far as getting fired).' The same goes if their performance and judgement are affected by the relationship, he added. But I don't think unfairly prying and overly moralistic internet commenters keep those rules in mind in their hunt for a perceived 'bad guy' – Astronomer's Senior Director of People is proof that many of us make the court of public opinion far too punishing, despite using inconsistent 'laws.' That misses the point; it's all about power dynamics. As it happens, piling on an (again, likely innocent) woman who you believe to have gotten her promotion based solely on hiding an affair without any evidence whatsoever is not exactly the best use of our collective power. I fear the 'reward' of firing a person armchair warriors believe to have cheated has left some to believe that their beliefs about adultery, whether grounded or not, ought to result in indiscriminate real-life action. Personally, I don't think that unkind quest has anything to do with accountability; we are confusing our own amateur sleuthing for genuine, professional investigation. Just because the two might sometimes have the same result, though, does not mean it's fair to equate them.

X declines to hand over data in French data tempering investigation
X declines to hand over data in French data tempering investigation

UPI

time2 days ago

  • UPI

X declines to hand over data in French data tempering investigation

A photo shows the new Twitter logo on July 24, 2023, following Elon Musk's announcement of a rebrand that replaces the iconic blue bird with the letter "X.". Photo by Ismael Mohamad/ UPI | License Photo July 21 (UPI) -- X declined to hand over data in allegations made by French authorities concerning a data tampering investigation on Monday. "French authorities have launched a politically-motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged 'fraudulent data extraction," X posted on social media. "X categorically denies these allegations." Prosecutors initiated an investigation in January following allegations that X's algorithm was being exploited for foreign interference. This month, the investigation was moved over to France's national police. "French authorities have requested access to X's recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform in order for several 'experts' to analyze the data and purportedly 'uncover the truth' about the operation of the X platform," X said. X said the investigation is meant "to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech." "X has not acceded to the French authorities' demands, as we have a legal right to do. This is not a decision that X takes lightly. However, in this case, the facts speak for themselves," X said.

Jon Jones 'a little disappointed' with Dana White's concerns of UFC White House booking
Jon Jones 'a little disappointed' with Dana White's concerns of UFC White House booking

USA Today

time3 days ago

  • USA Today

Jon Jones 'a little disappointed' with Dana White's concerns of UFC White House booking

Jon Jones was disappointed to hear Dana White show concern over booking him for the proposed UFC White House card. The UFC CEO made it known that he isn't sure he can trust the former heavyweight champion with headlining such a major event that could take place on the White House grounds on Independence Day in 2026. At the UFC 318 post-event news conference, White said he isn't sure Jones can be trusted not to get in trouble leading up to the event. "It's not even about him winning the belt," White told MMA Junkie and other reporters. "You know how I felt about him. You know I can't risk putting him in big positions in a big spot and have something go wrong – especially the White House card." Jones has given the promotion multiple headaches throughout his career. "Bones" refused to fight Chael Sonnen on short notice after Dan Henderson got injured, which prompted the cancellation of the entire UFC 151 card. Jones was stripped of the light heavyweight title ahead of UFC 187 after a hit-and-run accident. In the days ahead of UFC 200, Jones failed a pre-fight drug test, leading to his removal from the main event against Daniel Cormier on fight week. A year later, he made it to the cage to face Cormier, but later failed another drug test, causing his third-round stoppage to be overturned to a no contest. White announced Jones' intention to retire during a post-fight news conference in Baku, Azerbaijan. Jones would confirm the news shortly after, but more headlines soon followed. Jones was allegedly involved in another hit-and-run accident, one in which he was suspected of driving under the influence, and fled the scene after a car crash, leaving a woman behind in the passenger seat. He also allegedly threatened the life of a responding officer over the phone. The timing of everything has led many, including White, to publicly wonder if Jones' latest legal issue is why he decided to retire and relinquish the heavyweight title to interim champion Tom Aspinall. However, once president Donald Trump announced the idea of hosting a UFC event at the White House, Jones quickly changed his tune on fighting, stating his intention to return on that card. Initially, White seemed on board, stating his dream headliner for the event would be Jones vs. Aspinall. White's latest comments indicate hesitation to place Jones in such an important potential spot given his history, which prompted a reply on social media. "I heard the comments made at last night's press conference," Jones wrote on X (formerly Twitter). "While I was a little disappointed, I'm still in the UFC's drug testing pool, staying sharp, and continuing to train like a professional. I'll be ready for whatever comes next. "In a recent interview, I shared that the opportunity to fight at the White House gave me something deeper to fight for, a 'why' that goes beyond paychecks or belts. Fighting for my country gives me a greater purpose!" Jones continued, playing up how important it would be for him to further his legacy, despite seeming content with retirement before the idea of a White House event. "The silver lining in all this is knowing the fans see my heart," Jones wrote. "They see, I am ready and willing to take on anyone, to represent my country on a historic stage. For me, it's never been just about the opponent. I'm chasing legacy, something timeless, something bigger than the moment. "So for now, I'll keep grinding, stay patient, and stay faithful. I'm ready to fight on July 4th. #IndependenceDay"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store