
Major retailer with 106 branches to shut store in days as up to 40% closing down sale launched
Smiggle will close its branch in Coney Street in York come June 15.
1
The brightly coloured stationary store first opened in the city centre nine years ago.
It was reported in YorkshireLive that the decision to close the children's store came after the landlord decided not to renew the lease.
A 50% discount sale has been launched to help shift stock before the store closes for good.
The branch will close this Sunday, June 15 giving customers just a few days to say their goodbyes.
However it is not all bad news as a new Smiggle branch is set to open in York Designer Outlet this July.
The Sun has contacted Smiggle for comment.
It comes as the Australian-born business has announced plans to close a number of other stores across the UK.
A Cwmbran Shopping Centre will pull down its shutters for the final time in August.
Meanwhile two other branches closed in back in May.
A store in the Eastgate Shopping Centre, Inverness, shut its doors on May 21.
While a store in the Darwin Centre, Shrewsbury, closed on May 25.
In January 2024, the brand also closed a site in Dundee, Scotland.
And Smiggle is not the only brand closing stores across the UK.
River Island will shutter a branch in Banbury on June 28, giving customers just a few days to say their goodbyes.
The fashion brand, which has been sported by Paris Fury and Cat Deeley, has quietly closed a number of stores in the past few months.
A branch in Willows Place, Corby closed in April and a separate site in Vicar Lane Shopping Centre in Chesterfield closed in the same month.
The Sun has contacted River Island for a comment.
News of the closure comes days after it was revealed that up to 230 of the retailer's stores are at risk.
Hobbycraft also has plans to close up to nine stores by June 21.
RETAIL PAIN IN 2025
The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs will cost the retail sector £2.3billion.
Research by the British Chambers of Commerce shows that more than half of companies plan to raise prices by early April.
A survey of more than 4,800 firms found that 55% expect prices to increase in the next three months, up from 39% in a similar poll conducted in the latter half of 2024.
Three-quarters of companies cited the cost of employing people as their primary financial pressure.
The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.
It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year.
Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025."
Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector.
"By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Africa to be hit hard as foreign aid cuts revealed
The government has revealed details of its plans to cut foreign aid, with support for children's education and women's health in Africa facing the biggest government said in February it would slash foreign aid spending by 40% - from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% - to increase defence spending to 2.5% after pressure from the US. A Foreign Office report and impact assessment show the biggest cuts this year will come in Africa, with less spent on women's health and water sanitation with increased risks, it says, of disease and death. Bond, a UK network of aid organisations, said women and children in the most marginalised communities would pay the highest price. As well as less support for Africa, including big cuts in children's education, funding for the Occupied Palestinian Territories will fall by 21% despite promises to the the government said spending on multilateral aid bodies - money given to international organisations like the World Bank - would be protected, including the Gavi vaccine alliance, and it said the UK would also continue to play a key humanitarian role in hotspots such as Gaza, Ukraine and Sudan. Baroness Chapman, minister for development, said: "Every pound must work harder for UK taxpayers and the people we help around the world and these figures show how we are starting to do just that through having a clear focus and priorities."The government said the cuts follow "a line-by-line strategic review of aid" by the minister, which focused on "prioritisation, efficiency, protecting planned humanitarian support and live contracts while ensuring responsible exit from programming where necessary".The Foreign Office said bilateral support - aid going directly to the recipient country - for some countries would decrease and multilateral organisations deemed to be underperforming would face future funding cuts. It has not yet announced which countries will be said it was clear the government was "deprioritising" funding "for education, gender and countries experiencing humanitarian crises such as South Sudan, Ethiopia and Somalia, and surprisingly the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Sudan, which the government said would be protected"."It is concerning that bilateral funding for Africa, gender, education and health programmes will drop," Bond policy director Gideon Rabinowitz said."The world's most marginalised communities, particularly those experiencing conflict and women and girls, will pay the highest price for these political choices."At a time when the US has gutted all gender programming, the UK should be stepping up, not stepping back."Foreign aid has come under intense scrutiny in recent years, with the one cabinet minister admitting the public no longer supports spending on it. One organisation that escaped the cuts was the World Bank. The Foreign Office confirmed that the International Development Association (IDA), the World Bank's fund for the world's lowest income countries, would receive £1.98bn in funding from the UK over the next three years, helping the organisation benefit 1.9 billion Labour governments under Sir Tony Blair and Gordon Brown committed to increasing the overseas aid budget to 0.7% of national target was reached in 2013 under David Cameron's Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government, before being enshrined in law in aid spending was cut to 0.5% of national income in 2021 under the Conservatives, blaming the economic pressures of Covid.


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Should investors take another look at a rebounding property sector? The INVESTING ANALYST
So far in 2025, the REIT space has been characterized by a flurry of M&A activity, as buyers look for bargains in a sector languishing at discounts across the board. In this column, Alan Ray, investment trust research analyst at Kepler Partners, looks at why real estate investment trusts could offer an opportunity to shrewd investors. The last few years have been full of contradictions for the listed property sector. First, the pandemic accelerated and cemented positive trends in areas such as logistics that had been underway for several years. Share prices of REITs surged, seemingly in response. But then, in 2022, share prices came crashing down and wide discounts to net asset value became normal. Property, as an income-generating asset class that is usually geared with debt, is naturally interest-rate sensitive and those surges and declines in share prices were really determined by the interest rate cycle, which is an enduring truth that it pays to keep in mind. Behind the scenes though, it has been a very different picture. I'd point to two key trends that the pandemic accelerated. First, the re-wiring of the UK economy to embrace online commerce - requiring highly efficient and well-located logistics and industrial buildings - gathered pace, with countless anonymous square boxes humming with activity. In our daily lives this manifests itself in the extraordinarily short space of time between ordering a £2 roll of masking tape and its appearance in the 'safe space' behind the wheelie bin, but this re-wiring has also profoundly changed interactions between businesses and how supply chains work. Today, businesses are painfully aware of the fragility of 'just in time' international supply chains and are much more focused on local production and supply. And, in a much longer essay, we could also discuss the apparent reversal of globalisation that may push this trend even further. Second, the changing nature of offices and how we use them. While some of the wilder pandemic fantasies about office life have proved to be exactly that, there have been profound changes to the way many of us work even when we are in an office. Again, this trend may be accelerating post-pandemic as we grapple with the implications of AI on the nature of the work that humans do. Office buildings as an overall group have been harder to manage than industrial and logistics buildings, but there are clear positive trends for the right offices in the right locations. There are many other trends to talk about, but these two sectors respectively form over half and a quarter of the value of UK commercial property. And in fact, many retail assets these days are hard to distinguish from a logistics hub so many of the same trends apply here. But there are always going to be buildings in the wrong place at the wrong time, and I'm sure all of us can think of a 'stranded asset' - perhaps a dilapidated office with no hope of renovation or repurposing, with a 'space to let' sign outside. Encounters like that can have an outsized influence on the way we think about property. The reality for many property fund managers over the last few years has been a fight against big declines in share prices and a struggle to repay debt but in stark contrast tenants demanding more and better space, resulting in growing rental income. The right buildings in the right places have, from an income perspective, kept delivering. So, did the stock market get things wrong in 2022 and were those share price falls unjustified? Bluntly, no. The stock market called it about right and property valuations have fallen by 20 per cent or more since then. Zero interest rates had pushed property values too high, and things are back down to more sensible levels, with yields on many REITs now as high or higher than UK gilts. Falling share prices did, however, catalyse a dizzying number of mergers and acquisitions. In some cases, private equity simply bought a REIT at a discount and took it private to harvest the growing income. But very often mergers have occurred between REITs. LondonMetric (LMP), arguably the leading diversified REIT listed in the UK, has absorbed five others since 2019, building a £6bn portfolio focused on industrial and logistics, leisure and entertainment, healthcare and convenience retail. In many cases with long leases and contractual rental uplifts, giving good visibility for income growth over many years. Similarly, Tritax Big Box (BBOX) has built a £6.5bn portfolio partly through acquisitions, focused on large regional logistics hubs and smaller urban logistics assets, leading to rental growth and a rising dividend. While it's easy to dismiss such mergers as 'empire building', management teams need to get their share prices higher to get fully rewarded, so there's little point in buying another REIT unless you are confident that the assets can deliver. Picton Property Income (PCTN) provides an interesting case study of self-help over the last few years. It owns a diversified portfolio, with over 60 per cent in the key industrial and logistics sectors. To help reduce its exposure to offices, management has taken several of these through planning permission to repurpose to much higher value residential assets, with one recent example having views towards St Paul's Cathedral. This just goes to show that location can play an incredibly important role, and PCTN's selection of offices in the right locations has given it more options than would be true for our 'stranded asset' mentioned above. While REITs themselves therefore present attractive opportunities for investors, one stalwart of the investment trust sector is TR Property (TRY), which owns a broadly diversified portfolio of REITs across the UK and Europe, together with a small portfolio of physical property in the UK. Owning a portfolio of REITs rather than buildings directly allows the management team to adapt more quickly, buying or selling shares in different REITs in a day rather than the weeks or months a property transaction might take. TRY has a long history of dividend growth and might just be the right choice for the investor seeking the 'one and done' solution to commercial property in a portfolio. I'd point to one last trend worth thinking about. While 'ESG' in wider investing remains a polarising subject, in property it is much less so. Here, the main elements - energy efficiency and simply put, decent air conditioning - are tangible, measurable and cost-saving. Efficient buildings are very likely to command higher rents. Almost every property fund manager is paying attention to this, but Schroder Real Estate (SREI) has gone one step further, building sustainability goals into its investment strategy, and there is a strong correlation between higher rents and the manager's work to upgrade its buildings. So to conclude, yes, the stock market called it right in 2022, sending share prices of REITs lower. But it's easy to see why property fund managers might have been perplexed, with many of their assets performing well. With interest rates now at more normal levels, and a positive outlook for rental income in the right assets, this is a good time to take a fresh look at the UK's dynamic REIT sector.


Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The great British public keeps being forced to bail out our incompetent political class
To the surprise of nobody, our water industry has been found wanting. An ineffective regulator allowed self-serving companies to enrich shareholders and directors at the expense of the public interest for decades. Instead of investing in our creaking Victorian infrastructure, water companies were saddled with debt by their private owners to pay out dividends. Billions of pounds were funnelled from Thames Water alone, funded largely through then-owner, Macquarie, which more than tripled the utility provider's debt burden to £10.8bn in just 11 years. Most recently, the firm paid 21 senior staff £2.5m in bonuses in April as a reward for taking on an eye-watering loan, partly to plug the gaps of said wealth extraction. Thames Water is not alone in this. Over the past decade, more than £112m has been paid in bonuses to senior staff at water utility firms, despite their consistent failures as either public good or private enterprise. These businesses dumped raw sewage into the nation's waterways for 3.6 million hours in 2024 because their ancient systems, left unimproved for decades, are overwhelmed by modern requirements. But of course it is we, the British public, who are being charged for cleaning up someone else's mess yet again. The eternal mugs, and doormats for the incompetent, we will be saddled with a hefty increase in our water bills to fund the ever-worsening services we enjoy. Don't forget, this comes on the back of a roughly 30-50pc rise three months ago, depending on your provider. But we can't be surprised they've taken us for fools again. This is just the latest kick in the teeth in a dense history of tooth-kicking. If there's one thing the British public can rely upon, it's paying for the privilege of decline. Draw an infrastructure project out of the hat, and you'll find a spiralling bill and a bumbling bunch of executives soon to be called in front of a committee hearing explaining why there's no sign of what was promised – and why they couldn't possibly return their fee. Promised to open in 2026 for a cost of £31bn, HS2 was set to connect London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds on high speed rail. Now, it will open no earlier than 2036 for a cost of more than £100bn, and will only run from London to Birmingham. If we're lucky. For more than triple the cost, we're set for a third of the railway to be delivered in double the time. And who'll be footing the bill? You guessed it. Even on our current tracks, we're being taken for a ride. Rail fares rose yet again this year, but only 68pc of services depart on time. We're finally set for a new nuclear power plant a decade from now in the form of Sizewell C at a bargain cost of just £38bn. Excellent news, but nobody mention the fact it was supposed to be operational by now for a total cost of £20bn. Don't forget our crumbling services. Councils continue to raise taxes while they shift our bin collections to once every three weeks. Yes, the burden of funding care costs leaves a large dent in local authority finances, but pouring £665m into an (alleged) sham can't help. It's not just the failed investments and obscene borrowing that our local councillors are learning from the water sector. They also enjoy golden parachutes for bankrupting their organisations, and saddling us with the bill. Not to mention how difficult it is to get a GP appointment (no wonder record numbers now use private healthcare) or an NHS dentist, find a local school or have the police investigate a burglary. At some point, the gravy train of incompetence will come to a juddering halt. Whether that's because we start to hold those responsible to account or simply run out of money to burn in its engines is anybody's guess.