
Air India flight AI171 engines moved from CUTOFF to RUN, but…: What AAIB report said
According to the AAIB preliminary report, while both Boeing 787-8 engines were successfully commanded to restart, one of them—Engine 2—failed to recover 'core speed deceleration' and continued to lose thrust, ultimately contributing to the fatal Air India crash.
The 15-page report, published exactly one month after the June 12 flight crash, provides critical technical details surrounding India's worst aviation disaster in decades. The Air India flight crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport.
Fuel cutoff initiated mid-flight
According to the AAIB report, the Boeing 787-8 reached a maximum indicated airspeed of 180 knots at 13:38:42 IST (08:08:42 UTC). Immediately after this, both engines' fuel cutoff switches moved from the 'RUN' position to 'CUTOFF', effectively stopping fuel supply to both engines and initiating a dangerous drop in thrust.
Also Read | Air India plane crash report: What happens when fuel switches flip from 'run' to 'cutoff' during takeoff
'The aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 Knots IAS at about 08:08:42 UTC, and immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec,' the preliminary report states.
'The Engine N1 and N2 began to decrease from their take-off values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off.'
Also Read | Air India crash probe report: 10 points on fuel cut, what pilots told each other
In a chilling exchange captured on the cockpit voice recorder, one pilot is heard asking, 'Why did you cut off?' The other responds, 'I did not do so.'
Both engines attempted relight
Within seconds, both engines were commanded back to 'RUN'. 'As per the EAFR, the Engine 1 fuel cutoff switch transitioned from CUTOFF to RUN at about 08:08:52 UTC…Thereafter, at 08:08:56 UTC, the Engine 2 fuel cutoff switch transitions from CUTOFF to RUN,' AAIB report notes.
'The EGT was observed to be rising for both engines, indicating relight. Engine 1's core deceleration stopped, reversed and started to progress to recovery," the preliminary report added.
Also Read | Air India flight 171 crash: What AAIB preliminary report reveals – and doesn't
However, things did not pan out same for the second one, as the report says, 'Engine 2 was able to relight but could not arrest core speed deceleration and re-introduced fuel repeatedly to increase core speed acceleration and recovery.'
Distress call and crash
At 08:09:05 UTC, moments after the engines failed to stabilise, one of the pilots issued a 'MAYDAY' call to Air Traffic Control.
According to the AAIB: 'The ATCO enquired about the call sign. ATCO did not get any response but observed the aircraft crashing outside the airport boundary and activated the emergency response.'
The EAFR recording ended at 08:09:11 UTC. Crash Fire Tenders left the airport at 08:14:44 UTC to begin firefighting and rescue operations. They were joined by the local administration's fire and rescue services, but by then, the aircraft had already been engulfed in flames.
The preliminary report did not place blame on either Boeing or General Electric.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Aviation safety: Key findings from India's last three major air crashes
The last three major air crashes in India-Patna (2000), Mangaluru (2010), and Kozhikode (2020)-offer critical safety insights, with recommendations for improving aviation safety Deepak Patel New Delhi Listen to This Article The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has submitted its preliminary report on the AI171 crash that occurred near Ahmedabad airport on 12 June. Investigators will now focus on determining why the flight's fuel switches moved to cutoff mode, leading to a loss of thrust and the subsequent crash. Meanwhile, India's last three major commercial aviation accidents—Patna (2000), Mangaluru (2010), and Kozhikode (2020)—could offer critical safety lessons for the ongoing investigation. Patna Crash (2000) The crash of Alliance Air Flight CD-7412 in Patna on 17 July 2000, which killed 60 people, was the result of pilot error, according to


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India crash: Too early to draw conclusions on pilots' role from initial report, says former AAIB chief
It will be too premature to draw conclusions on the role of pilots from the preliminary investigation report into the fatal crash of Air India plane last month and the final report will mention about the most probable cause for the accident, former AAIB chief Aurobindo Handa said on Sunday. A day after the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released its preliminary report into the crash that killed 260 people, he said, "We should allow AAIB to complete the investigation in a fair, unbiased and transparent manner." Handa has investigated more than 100 aircraft accidents, including the Air India Express plane crash in Kozhikode in 2020. "AAIB has done a good job. Going forward, they will now focus to find out as to why and how these fuel switches moved and whether there could have been any mechanical and/or electrical failures/malfunction," he told PTI. The report, released on Saturday, said the fuel switches of the crashed Boeing 787-8 plane's engines were cut off within a gap of one second, and later switched on. Live Events From the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he did cut off the switch and the other pilot saying he did not do so. The report did not mention which pilot asked the question and which pilot responded. The co-pilot was Pilot Flying (PF), and the Pilot In Command (PIC) was Pilot Monitoring (PM) for the flight. "It will be too premature to draw any conclusions, including the role of one of the pilots from the AAIB's preliminary investigation report on Air India flight 171... we should allow AAIB to complete the investigation in a fair, unbiased and transparent manner," Handa said. The Pilot In Command (PIC) was 56-year-old Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and the First Officer was 32-year-old Clive Kundar. Sabharwal's flying experience with 787 was more than 8,596 hours, including 8,260 hours as PIC, while Kundar's flying experience with this type of aircraft was 1,128 hours. Kundar was pilot flying while Sabharwal was pilot monitoring for the AI 171 flight operated with the nearly 12-year-old Boeing 787-8 aircraft. According to the preliminary report, both pilots had adequate rest period prior to operating the flight. "In some quarters, especially in foreign media, there are endeavours to indicate that one of the pilots could have been at fault. Yet again, I would like to request our veteran aviators to refrain from any sort of speculation," Handa said. The AI 171, operated with a nearly 12-year-old Boeing 787-8 aircraft, flying from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick crashed into a building soon after takeoff and 260 people died. Out of the 242 people onboard the plane, only one survived. On Saturday, Civil Aviation Minister K Rammohan Naidu said one should not jump into any conclusions on the role of pilots in the Air India plane crash and there are multiple things that need to be looked into before preparing the final investigation report.

New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Too premature to draw conclusions on pilots' role from AI plane crash initial report: Former AAIB chief
NEW DELHI: It will be too premature to draw conclusions on the role of pilots from the preliminary investigation report into the fatal crash of Air India plane last month and the final report will mention about the most probable cause for the accident, former AAIB chief Aurobindo Handa said on Sunday. A day after the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released its preliminary report into the crash that killed 260 people, he said, "We should allow AAIB to complete the investigation in a fair, unbiased and transparent manner." Handa has investigated more than 100 aircraft accidents, including the Air India Express plane crash in Kozhikode in 2020. "AAIB has done a good job. Going forward, they will now focus to find out as to why and how these fuel switches moved and whether there could have been any mechanical and/or electrical failures/malfunction," he told PTI. The report, released on Saturday, said the fuel switches of the crashed Boeing 787-8 plane's engines were cut off within a gap of one second, and later switched on. From the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he did cut off the switch and the other pilot saying he did not do so. The report did not mention which pilot asked the question and which pilot responded. The co-pilot was Pilot Flying (PF), and the Pilot In Command (PIC) was Pilot Monitoring (PM) for the flight. "It will be too premature to draw any conclusions, including the role of one of the pilots from the AAIB's preliminary investigation report on Air India flight 171... we should allow AAIB to complete the investigation in a fair, unbiased and transparent manner," Handa said. The Pilot In Command (PIC) was 56-year-old Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and the First Officer was 32-year-old Clive Kundar. Sabharwal's flying experience with 787 was more than 8,596 hours, including 8,260 hours as PIC, while Kundar's flying experience with this type of aircraft was 1,128 hours.