Bharat Bandh evokes mixed response
All the nationalised banks and insurance major LIC remained closed while contract workers working in government departments, universities and TTD have attended their duties. The farmers and rural workers in all the mandals in the district held rallies in support of general strike. The members of trade unions AITUC, IFTU and activists of Left parties CPI and CPM took out rallies in the streets which culminated into a meeting at Nalugukalla Mandapam in the city. Shops also remained closed in the morning.
However train services, RTC services and private transport including buses to Tirumala functioned normally. Anganwadi centres and PHCs in most areas did not function with the employees joining the strike.
Leaders of Left parties CPI and CPM K Narayana and Kandarapu Murali addressed the meeting at Nalugukalla Mandapam and lambasted the Central government for suppressing labour rights which were achieved after a prolonged struggle by the employees and workers in the country.
The leaders vowed that the fight will continue till the Modi government bows down and restores labour rights including the right to strike to form associations by employees. The leaders alleged that the Modi government was more interested to protect the interest of corporates and not the people at large.
In the meanwhile, CITU general secretary Kandarapu Murali in a statement claimed the general strike was a success in Tirupati district. He saud a large number of employees, workers and farmers took to streets in support of the general strike demanding the Centre to take concrete measures to check rising prices and stop pro-corporate policies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
View: India has negotiated well with Trumpian policy, but it may have to take a stand soon
Dealing with a Disney India has done well to successfully dodge most of the things Trump has thrown at it. In part, this is because New Delhi decided it will proactively accommodate him on his two key grouses: immigration and tariffs. But, now, we may be headed for more interesting times as India takes over the rotating presidency of BRICS. Trump's already announced in January that any effort by the grouping towards de-dollarisation could result in 100% tariffs. This month, he said that alleged 'anti-American policies' by BRICS could attract an additional 10% tariff. As on other issues, GoI has no intention of challenging the US either on de-dollarisation or any anti-American move, and the PM has said so repeatedly. But holding BRICS presidency, India might find itself as collateral casualty. As it is, individually three principal BRICS countries - Russia, China, South Africa - are the target of Trump's ire. India has, along with other countries, so far escaped 'Liberation Day' reciprocal tariffs. But it ran square into Trump in the wake of Operation Sindoor. Countering the Indian narrative, Trump has insistently claimed he worked out the ceasefire and is ready to mediate on the Kashmir issue. The only weapon New Delhi has had is to politely ignore the issue, even as Pakistan has rubbed it in by supporting Trump's candidature for the Nobel Peace not just luck but a lot of hard work that has kept India on the right side of Trump. Recall that in the run-up to Trump's inaugural, S Jaishankar was in Washington for nearly a week at the end of December last year, working the US Congress, MAGA-leaning officials and prospective cabinet officials. He was aided by foreign secretary Vikram Misri and Indian ambassador V M agenda was to connect early with the incoming administration and see if the president could be persuaded to come to India for the Quad Summit to be hosted by India later this year. There was some talk about a potential Modi invite for the inaugural. But, in the end, it was Jaishankar who bagged a privileged front-row seat on January 20. Subsequently, there was an effort to get a Modi visit to Washington in February. But that, too, did not pan soon as it became clear that Trump was winning the elections, trade officials in India began to prepare for the incoming administration. Bilateral trade between India and the US exceeded $118 bn in 2023-24, where India enjoyed a $32 bn trade were shaped to offer tax cuts on farm products and key imports, high-end medical devices, motorcycles, as well as enhance the purchase of LNG and defence equipment. Indian officials pitched the idea that the country could replace China as an alternative manufacturing base. New Delhi saw a niche for India as a supplier of low-end products as part of the supply chain of the 'Make in America' January, India also aligned itself with another element of the Trump programme. It agreed to take back 18,000 India nationals who were set to be deported by the US. New Delhi made it clear that it would cooperate in any action against illegal soon, it became clear that the Trump regime was not differentiating between friends and enemies. 'Liberation day' reciprocal tariffs hit India at 26%. The regime soon walked back on them on account of the market crash and said they would be paused for 90 days as of April 9 at 10%, which has been now extended till August the tariff clock is ticking, as the US and India race to complete their trade deal. Wild cards are scattered all around. There is the issue of 50% tariffs on copper, and a threatened 200% on pharma products that could be devastating for - and since this is germane to India's hopes - the US seems to have arrived at a framework agreement with China. Details are scarce, but China seems to have made it easier for the US to acquire Chinese rare earths and rare minerals magnets - though average US tariffs remain at 51.1% and China's at 32.6%.The Brazil BRICS summit was, despite all the hoopla and tough language on trade, a bit of a letdown. Two of its leading lights - R and C - Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, stayed away. As it is, expansion of the bloc to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the UAE and Indonesia has diluted even the limited coherence it week at the summit, Modi declared that 'under India's BRICS presidency, we will work to define BRICS in a new form'. In his characteristic 'acronymous' style, he said BRICS would stand for 'Building Resiliency and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability', an agenda that would give priority to 'global south' issues, rather than challenging the developed world on issues relating to trade and global governance, let alone India has no intention of straying into the crosshairs of Trump's sights. But the problem is that US policies - whether on trade, stability of the dollar or Pakistan - could leave it with no options but to react and face the Trump bullets head-on. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Markets need to see more than profits from Oyo As GenAI puts traditional BPO on life support, survival demands a makeover Is gold always the best bet? Think again Why this one from 'Dirty Dozen', now in Vedanta fold, is again in a mess Can Indian IT protect its high valuation as AI takes centre stage? F&O Radar| Deploy Bull Call Spread in Nifty for gains from volatility amid uptrend Aggressive? Yes, but better for investors with a risk appetite: 6 small private bank stocks with upside potential up to 36% in 1 year In mid-caps, 'just hold' often creates wealth: 10 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential up to 44%
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
PM Modi Asked Me If He Should Speak In Marathi Or Hindi: Ujjwal Nikam
Mumbai: Noted lawyer Ujjwal Nikam, who is among four persons nominated to Rajya Sabha by President Droupadi Murmu, on Sunday said PM Modi called him to inform the news. "Modi ji speaks excellent Marathi. He begins some of his speeches in Maharashtra in Marathi and then switches to Hindi," Ujjwal Nikam told reporters. "When I received his call and the operator connected me to him, the PM said, 'Ujjwal ji mi Marathit bolu ka Hindi bolu (should I speak in Marathi or Hindi)',"Ujjwal Nikam said. "I told him that he has command over both languages. He told me that the President wants to hand over some responsibility to me and if I would be willing to accept it," he said. Ujjwal Nikam, who lost the Lok Sabha election last year, said that when he asked the PM about the nature of the responsibility, he was told that it would be a Rajya Sabha membership. In a notification issued late Saturday night, the Union Home Ministry said the President has nominated former foreign secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, Special Public Prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case Ujjwal Nikam, Kerala BJP leader C Sadanandan Master and Delhi-based historian Meenakshi Jain to the Rajya Sabha.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
India's foreign policy transformed in last 10 Years: Harsh Vardhan Shringla
New Delhi: Former Foreign Secretary and India's Ambassador to the US, Harsh Vardhan Shringla, who has been nominated to the Rajya Sabha, spoke to IANS in an exclusive interview on Sunday. He reflected on his transition from diplomacy to politics, expressing gratitude to Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the nomination. Shringla shared his views on India's evolving global stature under the Modi government. IANS: You've been nominated to the Rajya Sabha. What would you like to say about Prime Minister Modi? Harsh Vardhan Shringla: I express my heartfelt gratitude to him for entrusting me with such a huge responsibility. I have had a 40-year-long career in diplomacy, and now I look forward to serving the people of this country through Parliament. I am deeply thankful to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi for this honour. IANS: How did you come to know about your nomination? Harsh Vardhan Shringla: The official gazette notification had come out. But before that, Prime Minister Modi personally called me. He didn't mention what exactly it would be—just that something significant was going to happen and that I would get an opportunity to serve the nation. I never imagined that he would call me himself. During my time as Foreign Secretary and Ambassador to the US, I had the opportunity to work closely under his leadership. But it felt special and humbling that he took the time to make that personal call. IANS: What's your view on India's foreign policy under Prime Minister Modi? Harsh Vardhan Shringla: If you look at how the world perceives India today compared to 10 years ago, the difference is massive. Today, India is seen with great respect. People around the globe recognise India's leadership in technology, innovation, and digital public infrastructure. Our contributions at the global level are now widely acknowledged. During the COVID-19 crisis, Prime Minister Modi initiated Vaccine Maitri, through which India supplied vaccines to many developing nations. There were countries that had their own vaccines but didn't share them due to domestic needs or financial concerns. India, on the other hand, rose above that and helped when the world needed it the most. Everywhere PM Modi goes, he is conferred with international honours. That in itself reflects India's growing stature. I recently visited countries like Kuwait, Algeria, and Bahrain as part of an all-party delegation after Operation Sindoor, and leaders in all these countries praised Prime Minister Modi and appreciated how strong our relationships with Gulf nations have become under his leadership. IANS: Rahul Gandhi is the Leader of Opposition, but he frequently travels abroad. He is abroad even now. Your comments? Harsh Vardhan Shringla: Going abroad is one thing, but going abroad and making negative remarks about your own country is quite another. The people of India do not appreciate such behaviour. Criticising the country on foreign soil is deeply unfortunate. During our recent delegations, even opposition leaders accompanied us and stood united for the country. But to raise doubts and speak against the nation—especially at such sensitive times—is not acceptable. After Operation Sindoor, multiple delegations went abroad and sent out a strong message: India stands united. IANS: Rahul Gandhi has been demanding a debate on Operation Sindoor in Parliament and is calling it 'Narendra Surrender.' Your reaction? Harsh Vardhan Shringla: Such statements are completely baseless. The world has seen how India asserted its strength. Within four days, our military conducted a successful operation with pinpoint accuracy—our BrahMos missiles struck nine terror bases with precision. Pakistan suffered heavy losses. In fact, it was Pakistan that reached out for a ceasefire. NSA Ajit Doval recently made a public statement confirming that there was no damage to Indian assets. Not even a single military installation was harmed. Satellite images clearly show how much damage was inflicted on Pakistani military sites. It was a decisive operation and an unquestionable victory for India. IANS: The Opposition is targeting India's foreign policy while glorifying the Gandhi family's past diplomacy. What do you have to say? Harsh Vardhan Shringla: When you have no substance, you resort to slogans and distractions. Speaking against your own country on international platforms is not only immature but also harmful. The public is watching. They can clearly see the kind of spectacle being created by the Congress. Under this government, the kind of national security challenges we used to face earlier no longer exist. There's a sense of confidence and respect that India commands globally now, and that's the result of strong and visionary leadership.
