Delhi HC upholds conviction of Patkar in two-decade-old defamation case
Justice Shalinder Kaur ruled that there was no error in the trial court and appellate court decisions that found Patkar guilty. The court also agreed with the earlier decision to release Patkar on probation rather than jail her.
However, the High Court gave her some relief by modifying the probation condition that required her to appear before the trial court every three months. Now, she can either appear virtually or be represented by a lawyer.
The case dates back to the year 2000, when Saxena, then President of an organisation called National Council of Civil Liberties, had published an advertisement criticising Patkar's Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), a movement against dam construction on river Narmada.
In response, Patkar issued a press note alleging that Saxena had earlier supported the NBA and had even donated Rs 40,000 through a cheque from the Lalbhai Group, which later bounced. The press note also questioned Saxena's patriotism and claimed he was acting as an agent for the Gujarat government.
Saxena filed a defamation case against Patkar in Ahmedabad in 2001. The Supreme Court later transferred the case to Delhi in 2003. In 2024, Patkar was found guilty by a magistrate court, sentenced to five months in jail, and asked to pay Rs 10 lakh in compensation. The court said her statements were made with clear intention to harm Saxena's reputation.
On April 2, 2024, a Sessions Court upheld her conviction but reduced the punishment. Patkar was released on probation for one year and asked to pay Rs 1 lakh in compensation instead of Rs 10 lakh. She challenged the conviction in the High Court, which has now upheld it.
What led to the Saxena- Patkar spat
After Vinai Saxena published an ad criticizing Patkar's NBA, she issued a press note alleging that Saxena had earlier supported the NBA and had even donated Rs 40,000 through a cheque from the Lalbhai Group, which later bounced. The press note also questioned Saxena's patriotism, which led to the defamation case filed by Saxena.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
13 minutes ago
- India.com
Coward Pakistan resorts to new terror tactics after Operation Sindoor, it's now building highly..., threat level to India has...
New Delhi: India has waged a different kind of war against terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir, while Pakistan continues to step up its terrorist activities. According to recent intelligence reports, Pakistan is rebuilding 15 terrorist camps and launch pads which were destroyed during Operation Sindoor. This development could become a big challenge for India. What happened after Operation Sindoor? In response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22 April 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor on 7 May 2025. In this operation, the Indian Army targeted 9 terrorist camps in Pakistan and PoK, which were hideouts of terrorist organisations like Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Hizbul Mujahideen. More than 100 terrorists were killed in this attack, and the Jaish headquarters in Bahawalpur and the Lashkar camp in Muridke were destroyed. But now, Pakistan has started rebuilding these camps. What is going on inside Pakistani territory? According to the report of intelligence agencies, in the last three months, Pakistan has started building 15 new terrorist camps and launch pads in PoK at Kel, Shardi, Dudniyal, Athmuqam, Jura, Lipa Valley, Tandapani, Nayali, Jankot and Chakothi. A drone center is also being restarted in Masur, Chaprar and Shakargarh near the international border in the Jammu region. Pakistan's intelligence agency, ISI, and other government agencies are giving full support to the terrorists. According to reports, ISI has funded these camps with more than Rs 100 crore. What is Pakistan's new strategy? Pakistan has now learned from its old mistakes and is adopting new tactics. It is building small terror camps. Earlier, there used to be 100-150 terrorists in a camp, but now only 20-25 terrorists are being kept in each camp, so that a major attack by the Indian Army can be avoided. Camps are being built in the forests and are kept hidden to evade Indian surveillance. They are also using advanced technologies like drones, radar camouflage and satellite masking. Women and children are also kept with the terrorists as shields while terrorists are being taught new methods like the use of drones and surveillance equipment. What are ISI and terrorist organisations planning? After Operation Sindoor, ISI has held several meetings with senior commanders of Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Hizbul Mujahideen and The Resistance Front (TRF), where they were given new weapons. The operational leadership is being reorganised, and planning is going on to start recruiting new terrorists in Pakistan and Jammu and Kashmir. However, due to the strictness of the Indian Army in Jammu and Kashmir, new recruitment has been very low. Local people are also now shying away from joining the terrorists. What is the threat to India? India faces a threat of new attacks as these camps can again plan terrorist infiltration and attacks in Jammu and Kashmir. India has to counter the technical challenge, viz, drone and radar camouflage, which may cause problems for the Indian Army in surveillance. In case of another attack and India's retaliation, the situation will get worse, and tension between India and Pakistan will increase further.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
31 years after attack in which RSS worker — now Kerala BJP vice president — lost both legs, 8 CPM workers surrender
Thirty-one years after a brutal attack on an RSS worker in Kerala, eight convicted CPI(M) workers surrendered before a court in Kannur on Monday. The RSS worker, who lost both his legs in the attack on January 25, 1994, is now BJP state vice-president Sadanadan Master, who was also made a Rajya Sabha member last month. Sadanandan, a retired school teacher, was serving as the RSS saha karyavah in Kannur district when he was attacked at his hometown of Mattannur. The accused CPI(M) workers surrendered before the sessions court in Thalassery after their appeal against the conviction was rejected by the High Court early this year. They had been sentenced to seven years' imprisonment and will be moved to the Kannur Central Prison. After a trial court in Kannur convicted and sentenced them in 1997, the accused moved the High Court, which in January this year upheld the conviction. The High Court had said the accused do not deserve 'any sort of leniency in the light of the overt acts committed by them'. 'The incident did not happen in a fit of rage/anger or on a sudden provocation. The attack seems to have been premeditated,' the High Court had said in the order upholding their conviction. The court also enhanced the compensation amount, with each of them being asked to pay Rs 50,000 each. Later, the accused moved the Supreme Court, which declined to admit the plea. Subsequently, the High Court cancelled their bail and told them to surrender before the trial court not later than August 4. There were 12 accused in the case, but the trial court had convicted only eight, as the charge of conspiracy against the four others could not be proved. This was one of the few cases pertaining to political violence in Kannur in which police had slapped various sections of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act (TADA) 1987. Later, the charges under TADA were dropped. Meanwhile, CPI(M) leaders arranged a farewell for the accused persons before they left for the court to surrender.
India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Court junks corruption charges against Shinde Sena MLA over 2024 Maharashtra polls
The Bombay High Court has rejected an election petition filed against Shiv Sena MLA Prakash Rajaram Surve, who was elected from the Magathane Assembly constituency, on the ground that the petition lacked material facts and failed to disclose a valid cause of petition, filed by Udesh Shantaram Patekar of the Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray faction), alleged corrupt practices by Surve, including bribery, distribution of pamphlets, violation of the Model Code of Conduct and inducement of voters through the promise of a community hall construction worth Rs 1 rejecting the petition, the bench of Justice Sandeep V Marne said, "Election Petition is not a remedy in common law or an action in equity. Being a statutory remedy, strict compliance with the provisions of the act is mandatory. The allegation of corrupt practice is not only serious but constitutes a punishable offence under the act. Therefore, levelling of allegations of corrupt practice cannot be done in a casual manner." The bench observed that although the petition averred production of four video recordings to support two allegations of corrupt practices, what was actually produced before the court was multiple files in MP4 and JPEG format by copying them into a single Marne said, "This casual approach on the part of the petitioner does not meet the strict requirements of pleadings. The Petitioner cannot dump multiple materials on a copiable electronic device and leave it for the returned candidate to identify the files copied therein. In my view, the election petitioner has failed to make correct and necessary averments relating to the video recordings and has also failed to supply to the returned candidate all the attachments with sufficient material particulars and identity, making the petition liable for rejection."The bench noted that the allegations in the petition were vague and lacked connection to Surve. The petition had failed to specify how the alleged acts materially affected the election result, said the bench. Mere usage of terms like "consent" and "conspiracy" without supporting facts did not meet the legal threshold required to substantiate corrupt practices under Section 123 of the RP act, said the won the November 2024 election with over 1.05 lakh votes, while the petitioner was the runner-up with about 47,000 votes.- EndsMust Watch
