logo
NZ's infrastructure challenge: From planning to delivery

NZ's infrastructure challenge: From planning to delivery

NZ Herald9 hours ago
The suite of policies, legislative reforms and delivery agencies now in place or emerging has laid the groundwork for a more strategic and responsive approach to our infrastructure needs. But policy is only the beginning.
The Government – in fact both sides of the House – have heard the cry for a credible infrastructure pipeline and there have been lots of announcements. New Zealand's first Health Infrastructure Plan was released in April. The Draft National Infrastructure Plan, released for consultation last month, provides a long-term roadmap for investment, identifying priority areas and systemic gaps. City and Regional Deal discussions are underway with Auckland, Western Bay of Plenty and Otago Central Lakes, with the first deal to be agreed by the end of this year. The Government has also announced plans for major infrastructure projects, including 17 Roads of National Significance.
There is also – rightly – a growing recognition of the need to make the most of what we have got and to invest in asset maintenance and renewal. Government is now talking about the need for asset management plans – and we should all be loudly supporting this. We need to make asset maintenance as sexy – if not sexier – than the big new projects. We must prioritise our infrastructure spend on looking after what we already have so that each of us can drop our kids off to warm, dry classrooms, driving on pothole-free roads (not flooded by water from leaky pipes) and have access to well-maintained hospitals. This is just as important as the big new projects and political announcements on long-term programmes to look after our assets should be celebrated.
Sarah Sinclair. Photo / Supplied
Government is now talking about the need for asset management plans – and we should all be loudly supporting this. We need to make asset maintenance as sexy – if not sexier – than the big new projects. Sarah Sinclair
These developments mark a significant shift toward a more co-ordinated and proactive infrastructure system. But they are not, in themselves, sufficient to guarantee delivery.
In June, MinterEllisonRuddWatts hosted Adrian Dwyer, chief executive of Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, along with other representatives from the construction and infrastructure sector in Australia. We heard that there is an opportunity right now to capitalise on the outgoing tide of infrastructure investment in the Australian transport sector to redirect skill and delivery capability to New Zealand. We have a window of opportunity to attract the capability and capacity of the Australian market but we need to move fast.
So, what's required to move from planning to delivery? The focus must be on translating our project pipeline into execution getting projects off the drawing board and into the ground and on locking in asset maintenance and renewal programmes that make the most of what we already have - and both need to happen quickly.
To achieve delivery momentum on infrastructure projects we need to focus on certainty and collaboration:
Certainty to give the necessary confidence ...
Of pipeline: There is no doubt that the sector needs a stable. long-term reliable pipeline with political consensus. We have heard from Australian sector participants that it is pipeline and political credibility that enables the market to plan and resource. Investors just need to know what is coming in the next five years and that they are 'real' projects. This should include the new capital projects as well as long-term asset maintenance and renewal programmes – so the whole supply chain can confidently invest in people, equipment, technology and other resources.
Of funding: the credibility of the pipeline relies heavily on funding certainty - longer-term funding certainty is needed for projects and long-term maintenance programmes so businesses can invest in capability, technology and resources. And if we are serious about encouraging the private sector to bring ideas, then showing the pathway to how market-led proposals (previously known as unsolicited bids) are able to be funded – and how new funding tools will be used - would really show a commitment to encouraging innovative solutions.
This requires a frank discussion of how, as a nation, we are prepared to pay. We can't announce projects without being clear as to how we are going to pay for them. There's no particular magic to this: we have to pay for the infrastructure we need, so what is the best and fairest way to do this? Is it through user charges, tolls, land sales, asset sales, targeted rates, levies, normal rates or national taxes? The chances are it will be a mix of these in a way that reflects the value to our communities and the benefits that infrastructure brings both directly and indirectly.
Of regulation: For infrastructure delivery, regulatory certainty is essential. Investors and developers need to know what rules apply, how long approvals will take, and what conditions will be imposed. This circles back to bipartisan support as we need to achieve a degree of certainty that legislation will not be overturned every three years.
Of risk: Projects can falter because of complex, risk-heavy procurements. One key lesson from Australia is that sustainable contractual frameworks and appropriate risk allocation attracts the market. Similarly, de-risking early has contributed to Canada's success.
Collaboration
Between political parties: Industry participants have long been calling for a bipartisan approach to infrastructure delivery. There are encouraging green shoots from both sides of the House as politicians appear to recognise this as a roadblock to attracting private investment (with their experience and resources), but more concrete agreement is required in the form of a finalised long-term infrastructure plans and announcements.
Between central and local government: We also need better collaboration between central and local government. Regional deals are an opportunity to achieve consensus on infrastructure priorities and funding tools that will provide local benefits. Transparent criteria and public engagement will be key to building trust in these decisions.
With the private sector and iwi: Attracting private capital (and most notably the experience and capability it brings) is simply essential to addressing New Zealand's infrastructure deficit. We need a fundamental mind shift towards embracing private capital, whether it be international or local. And let's think about how private capital can play a part in bundled long-term maintenance programmes as well as the big new projects. We need to leverage the capabilities and resources required to fulfil our infrastructure vision. In many cases, those will come from overseas (and that's okay).
We must also build on the growing recognition of iwi as sophisticated investment partners who offer a strategic advantage and a quadruple bottom-line approach that has the long-term health and wellbeing of our country and communities at the heart of their investment decisions.
With communities: Infrastructure projects do not exist in a vacuum. They are there to serve communities. Public engagement is not just a legal requirement — it's a strategic necessity. Community engagement and education will help accelerate our infrastructure build. We need to get the public on board with infrastructure spend and the need to invest in asset maintenance, moving from a fixation on upfront cost to a focus on long-term gain. Articulating and quantifying the social return of infrastructure will help with this.
In procurement: New Zealand needs to be open to more collaborative procurement models. A more interactive and flexible procurement process has been a key enabler in maximising value and delivering outcomes in both Australia and Canada.
From vision to reality
New Zealand has made impressive strides in reforming its infrastructure system. The policy settings are sound, the institutions are evolving, and the appetite for delivery is strong. But the journey from vision to reality requires more than good intentions. We need to act now, with certainty and collaboration, to enable New Zealanders to live, work, and thrive. If we get the delivery right, the benefits will be felt for generations.
MinterEllisonRuddWatts is an advertising sponsor of the Herald's Infrastructure report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch live: Erica Stanford faces questions over plan to replace NCEA
Watch live: Erica Stanford faces questions over plan to replace NCEA

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Watch live: Erica Stanford faces questions over plan to replace NCEA

Education Minister Erica Stanford is set to face questions after the government proposed to replace all levels of NCEA . Standford will be speaking shortly and will be livestreamed at the top of this page. Under the proposal, NCEA level 1 would be replaced with foundation literacy and numeracy tests . Levels 2 and 3 would be replaced with a New Zealand Certificate of Education and an Advanced Certificate. Students would be required to take five subjects and pass at least four to get each certificate. Marking would be out of 100 and grades would and range from A to E. Teachers' unions are cautiously optimistic the changes will work, provided they are implemented and resourced well. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Watch live: Education Minister Erica Stanford fronts press conference after mammoth NCEA announcement
Watch live: Education Minister Erica Stanford fronts press conference after mammoth NCEA announcement

NZ Herald

time3 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Watch live: Education Minister Erica Stanford fronts press conference after mammoth NCEA announcement

Education Minister Erica Stanford will field questions from the site of her old high school following the Government's decision to radically overhaul New Zealand's main secondary school qualification. The press conference at Auckland's Rangitoto College will be live-streamed from the top of this article around 11.30am. Yesterday, the Government announced the decades-old NCEA scheme would be abolished completely and replaced with two new qualifications at Year 12 and 13. Under the new system, Year 11 students will face what is being called a 'Foundational Skills Award' with a focus on literacy and numeracy. English and mathematics will be required subjects for students at this year level. Year 12 and 13 students will seek to attain the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE) respectively. Under the proposal, students currently doing NCEA continue. Students who are Year 8 today will be the first affected by the changes which begin in 2028. Students would do a mix of internal and external exams that add up to a mark out of 100, replacing the current achieved, merit and excellence rankings. That figure aligns to a letter grade such as A, B or C. For example, a student who received 85/100 in English would get an A while 50/100 in History would get them a C. Opposing political parties have been critical, saying the Government is rushing through the radical changes. Labour's education spokeswoman, Willow-Jean Prime, said 'rushing changes through now for political expediency isn't the answer'. She said schools and parents told her they were concerned about 'how hasty' the proposed changes were. 'Previous rushed overhauls have led to students being the guinea pigs for failed change – like national standards – so we must get this right." The Green Party's education spokesman, Lawrence Xu-Nan, said NCEA was not perfect but it recognised learning took place in different ways. 'Today's announcement is another classic case of the Government favouring one-size-fits-all approaches. Our education system is too important to be reduced to a single, rigid framework that will leave many behind. 'We haven't seen any clear case for the scrapping of NCEA - the Government has not made it. We remain entirely unconvinced this is what our school system needs. In fact, it risks throwing the baby out with the bathwater.'

Australia picks Japan to build $10b frigates after fierce contest
Australia picks Japan to build $10b frigates after fierce contest

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Australia picks Japan to build $10b frigates after fierce contest

By Stephen Dziedzic , ABC foreign affairs correspondent Cabinet has picked the Japanese Mogami-class frigate. Photo: ABC News / Oliver Chaseling Japanese shipbuilder Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has won a tight contest to build the Australian navy's new $10 billion fleet of warships, beating a bid from German rival Thyssen-Krupp Marine Systems. The ABC has confirmed that cabinet on Monday night selected Japan's upgraded Mogami frigate over the German MEKO A-200. The first three of the frigates are expected to be built in Japan, with the remaining eight to be built in Western Australia. It is a major victory for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and for Japan, which has thrown substantial political resources into securing the bid. The decision is also a vote of confidence in MHI, which has never built warships overseas before. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the frigates would replace Australia's ANZAC-class ships, the oldest surface combatant fleet the navy has been operating since the end of World War II. "This does represent a very significant moment in the bilateral relationship between Australia and Japan," Marles said. "This is clearly the biggest defence industry agreement that will ever have been struck between Japan and Australia. In fact, it's really one of the biggest defence exports that Japan has ever engaged in." Marles said the first would come into service by the end of this decade, closing a gap that would have otherwise meant Australia would not receive a new surface combatant until 2034, when the first of the Hunter Class vessels would arrive. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the announcement was a significant moment in the history of the Royal Australian Navy. Photo: ABC News / Courtney Withers/File Close observers of the contest say that while Japan's bid was more expensive, the Mogami frigate boasts more firepower and requires a smaller crew. Japan has also said that Australia could receive the first of the upgraded warships ahead of its own navy - which the ABC has been told helped to tip the contest in its favour. While the government insists it was making the decision on capability alone, Japan has leaned heavily on the blossoming strategic and defence relationship between the two countries as it lobbied for the contract. The United States is also believed to have backed Japan's bid. The government and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries will now begin negotiations on the contract, and will aim to finalise it this year. - ABC

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store