logo
Zero sum recorded for services traded between Ireland and illegal Israeli settlements in 2023

Zero sum recorded for services traded between Ireland and illegal Israeli settlements in 2023

Irish Times02-07-2025
A sum of 'zero' was recorded for services between Ireland and illegal Israeli settlements in 2023, the Oireachtas committee scrutinising the draft legislation to ban trade from them has heard.
The total figure for goods imported into Ireland from the settlements in the occupied territories in 2024 was €214,000, senior officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs told the committee.
However, when it came to services, the department's political director, Gerard Keown said there were no reliable figures and the latest available, for 2023, was zero.
He and his colleague, Declan Smyth, the department's legal adviser, said that services could be traded on the internet and by email and were very difficult to monitor and quantify.
READ MORE
In contrast, any goods from the
occupied territories
had to be presented to Irish customs before entry. Most imports from the settlements into Ireland are fruit and vegetables.
The officials were attending a meeting of the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee which is carrying out pre-legislative scrutiny of the Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025.
The draft legislation proposes to ban goods imported from the region but not services. Chairman John Lahart said there was broad agreement across all parties that services should be included in the Bill.
[
Despite the politics, Ireland is Israel's second-biggest export market for goods
Opens in new window
]
Mr Smyth outlined several times that while services are not included in the Bill at present, the Attorney General Rossa Fanning has been asked to give legal advice to the Government on incorporating this category into the Bill.
Asked when that decision would be made, both officials said the Attorney General and Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris were both very aware the issue was now before the committee. Mr Keown said the Tánaiste would act 'expeditiously' on the matter once the advice was received.
Seán Ó Fearghaíl (Fianna Fáil) said the volume of goods and services being traded was not the important issue.
'If the value was only €10, the symbolic value of the legislation is still enormous,' he said.
It was 'frustrating' that the committee was discussing the Bill without having the opinion of the Attorney General on services, he added.
Sinéad Gibney (Social Democrats) said she was surprised at the zero sum for services given that properties in the illegal settlements are let on Airbnb.
Mr Keown said they were difficult to quantify. 'Services are intangible. We do not have an accurate picture,' he said.
Mr Smyth told the committee that external trade with territories outside the EU was the exclusive competence of the union and not of member states.
He said that there were some 'public policy exceptions' in EU regulation on the imports of goods that did give member states leeway to prohibit the import of goods. A country like Ireland could do so on public policy grounds. However, he said there was no such specific EU legislation that the department's legal advisers could find that would allow Ireland act in a similar fashion with services.
The Bill is influenced by a judgment by the International Court of Justice on trade from illegal settlements. Mr Smyth agreed with Senator Patricia Stephenson (Social Democrats), Senator Alice Mary Higgins (Ind) and TD Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire (Sinn Féin) that the judgment referred to both goods and services. However, when asked whether international law trumps EU law, Mr Smyth replied that both had to be reconciled.
The committee was told that several countries have contacted the department to inquire about the Bill. Shay Brennan of Fianna Fáil, asked Mr Keown had any countries 'pushed back' against it.
'There has been contact at official level from the United States around this, under the previous (Biden) administration to inquire about the intentions around this legislation', Mr Keown said.
Michael McDowell said the EU laws were 'devoid of common sense'. He said a state can block goods or services from another EU state but cannot block goods or services from a state outside the EU.
Senator Frances Black, who drafted the original Bill, said she was confident services could be included.
'I am 100 per cent certain that we can get the wording right. I believe there are no legal barriers to it,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

OpenAI disables ChatGPT ‘experiment' that allowed users make exchanges available on search engines
OpenAI disables ChatGPT ‘experiment' that allowed users make exchanges available on search engines

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

OpenAI disables ChatGPT ‘experiment' that allowed users make exchanges available on search engines

OpenAI has pulled the plug on a short-lived change to the configuration of the ChatGPT app that allowed users to make their conversations accessible to search engines after it became apparent that some private or commercially sensitive material was inadvertently being made accessible on the internet. Barry Scannell, an AI law and policy partner at William Fry and a member of the Government appointed AI Advisory Council, said his 'jaw hit the floor' when he saw some of the material made accessible to routine Google searches on Thursday. Open AI's chief information security officer later said the feature that allowed users to make their conversations accessible for indexing by search engines would be disabled by Friday, with Dane Stuckey describing the original move as 'a short-lived experiment'. He said the company was working to ensure that all information that had been indexed was entirely removed. READ MORE Mr Scannell said there had been widespread confusion initially as to how the information was becoming publicly accessible and whether all prompts to ChatGPT were impacted. It appears users were clicking a check-box that had the effect of making shared chats discoverable by search engines without them realising the consequences. He said it was clear from much of the information that became accessible from the user prompts that this was being done unintentionally. 'Based on what I've seen, some of the stuff was so personally sensitive and commercially sensitive that people clearly didn't realise a random person could come along and do a simple search on Google and be able to find the chats.' He said the issue did not appear to be a technical issue but rather highlighted the need for greater AI literacy on the part of users to better understand the tech they are using. 'People seem to have clicked a box to make their chats discoverable on a search engine, or make them indexable, apparently without understanding what that meant. It's just people doing this without realising it. 'What this shows, I think, is just how important it is to have critical thinking and AI literacy as a really key component of any national strategy dealing with it.' He said the incident should also serve as a warning to those working business about the potential risks involved in using AI as there was the potential to expose commercially sensitive material. An extension of legal confidentiality protections might also be required, he suggested. Online, there was considerable discussion too of the potential for deeply personal information to be made available, including the contents of chats in which individuals were using ChatGPT for the purposes of therapy.

The Irish Times view on the August bank holiday: a weekend to rest easy
The Irish Times view on the August bank holiday: a weekend to rest easy

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on the August bank holiday: a weekend to rest easy

In 1924, the leader of the Irish Labour Party, Thomas Johnson, told the Dáil 'a man is easier in his mind when he is getting a holiday if he is getting his pay for the same day'. His remarks came during a debate on the Public Holidays Bill, repealing nineteenth century British legislation which also covered Ireland, relating to four bank holidays: 26th December, Easter Monday, Whit Monday and the first Monday in August. St Patrick's Day had been designated a bank holiday in 1903 by the Westminster parliament. The 1924 Act gave power to the government of the new Irish Free State 'to appoint any particular day to be observed as a bank holiday.' Johnson's plea was that 'workmen who are given a holiday by statute… shall have their day's pay for that holiday.' While that request was not acceded to then, further legislation in 1939 established workers' entitlement to paid leave, with six bank holidays legally established: Christmas Day, St Stephen's Day, St Patrick's Day, Easter Monday, Whit Monday and the first Monday in August. New Year's Day and the October holiday were added in the 1970s, while in 1993 the May holiday was introduced. The most recent public holiday was established in 2022, St Brigid's Day, which also marked the Celtic festival of Imbolc, traditionally acknowledging the commencement of Spring. It was the first Irish public holiday named after a woman. We use the terms bank holiday and public holiday interchangeably, but our laws refer only to public holidays. Collectively, these days arise from inheritance, independent statehood and our distinctive traditions; historically, there were rest and feast days, and celebrations marking seasons, harvests and saints. READ MORE Some may regard the plethora of public holidays, including this weekends August Bank Holiday, as indulgent. But with ten public holidays, Ireland falls below the EU annual average of twelve, and the Irish, working an average 39 hours a week, toil at a higher rate than the EU average of 37.8 hours, allowing workers benefiting from this weekend to be easy in their minds.

Trump orders nuclear submarines moved near Russia
Trump orders nuclear submarines moved near Russia

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Trump orders nuclear submarines moved near Russia

US president Donald Trump on Friday said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in regions near Russia in response to threats from former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. 'I have ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump said in a social media post that called Medvedev's statements highly provocative. Trump said he ordered the submarines moved 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' [ Frustration about regulation could lead tech companies to pull back from Europe, US warns Opens in new window ] Trump and Medvedev, who is deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, traded taunts in recent days after Trump on Tuesday said Russia had '10 days from today' to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil buyers, with tariffs. Moscow, which has set out its own terms for peace in Ukraine, has shown no sign that it will comply with Trump's deadline. Medvedev on Monday accused Trump of engaging in a 'game of ultimatums' and reminded him that Russia possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort after Trump told Medvedev to 'watch his words.' Medvedev has emerged as one of the Kremlin's most outspoken anti-Western hawks since Russia sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine in 2022. Kremlin critics deride him as an irresponsible loose cannon, though some Western diplomats say his statements illustrate the thinking in senior Kremlin policy-making circles. - Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store