Rex White, who was NASCAR's oldest living champion and a Hall of Famer, dies at 95
NASCAR and the NASCAR Hall of Fame confirmed White's death on Friday. No additional details were provided.
'Rex epitomized the formative days of NASCAR — a true pioneer whose contributions helped shape the foundation of our sport," NASCAR chairman Jim France said. "His hard work, dedication and talent allowed him to make a living doing what he loved most – racing cars. He was the model of consistency – finishing in the top five in nearly half of his races – and dominated the short tracks.
"On behalf of NASCAR and the France family, I want to offer our condolences to the friends and family of Rex White.'
White won the 1960 Cup Series title and 28 Cup races in a career that spanned 233 starts across nine seasons. He led the final five laps of the 1958 season opener at Champion Speedway in Fayetteville, North Carolina, to earn his first career victory and scored 13 top-five finishes in 22 starts.
White won five more races the next season, but didn't earn his only championship until 1960, when he won six times in 44 starts. He won seven times the next year, when he was runner-up to fellow Hall of Famer Ned Jarrett in the championship standings.
White then won eight times in 1962, but finished fifth in the standings as he competed in only 37 of the 53 races that year. White never contested a complete season at a time when NASCAR ran as many as 62 times a year.
White notched a career-high six victories at Bowman Gray Stadium in Winston-Salem, where NASCAR this year returned after a lengthy absence. He also won three times at North Wilkesboro Speedway and two times at Martinsville Speedway in Virginia.
Born during the Great Depression and raised in Taylorsville, North Carolina, White suffered from polio as a child and that altered his gait for most of his life. He had an early interest in cars and was working on the family Model T by the time he was 8. He had learned how to drive two years earlier using a neighbors truck.
'I was unaware the car on which I labored represented hope to people around me, frustration to those trying to stop illegal moonshine," he said. "I saw automobiles as transportation, not the symbol of an upcoming billion-dollar sport.'
White purchased his first car in 1954 when a relative of his wife helped him with the $600 needed to buy a 1937 Ford. He immediately began racing as a means to earn a living.
White ran his first race in the Sportsman division at West Lanham Speedway in Maryland. He went on to win the championship in his rookie season of the Sportsman division.
He moved up to NASCAR two years later and by the time he won the championship five seasons later, he was named both NASCAR's most popular driver and driver of the year.
'Growing up on a North Carolina farm, Rex familiarized himself with all things mechanical and enjoyed driving anything with wheels," said Winston Kelly, executive director for the NASCAR Hall of Fame. "Rex was among NASCAR's pioneers who remained very visible at tracks and industry events for years. He was a dedicated ambassador who enjoyed supporting any event or activity he was requested to participate in.
'NASCAR has lost one of its true pioneers.'
___
AP auto racing: https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Letters to Sports: Whatever happened to tradition in baseball?
As an old baseball traditionalist please give me home runs, RBIs and batting average; save me the slash line, WHIP instead of ERA and give me an extra innings game without a runner at second, or for heaven's sake, a Home Run Derby to settle a tie game. It left me to wonder if being a baseball traditionalist makes me the equivalent of a Supreme Court Justice originalist, or just old and cranky? Ron YukelsonSan Luis Obispo So, after going 4-19 in the All-Star Game since 2000, the National League finally gets the American League monkey off their backs and 'wins' the 2025 event. Of course, they still can't do it in the traditional sense and must pull out the victory in some newly concocted home run swing-off. Not to discredit Kyle Schwarber's heroics. But, he went O for 2 with a walk against 'real' pitching and then is awarded the MVP? Something is very wrong here! Rick SolomonLake Balboa I'm probably in the minority, but the swing-off following the All-Star Game … really? What a joke! Is this the best solution MLB could come up with to break a tie? These best-of-the-best players are making millions of dollars and they can't go into extra innings to break a tied game? Robert ParraRowland Heights Fair share Bill Shaikin's column on the upcoming Major League Baseball player-owner negotiations was an eye opener. Salary caps have helped the NFL, NBA, and NHL maintain good levels of competition and give the fans of the smallest market franchises hope that their teams can compete regularly. Baseball owners should make it clear to the players' union that they will not consider sharing income outside of direct baseball operations without an agreement from the players to a salary cap. Bill FrancisPasadena Flip on out of here Was Bill Shaikin serious when he suggested bat flips as a way to get the attention of fans? I can only imagine what would have happened had a batter flipped his bat after hitting a home run off Bob Gibson. Probably the same reaction that Vince Lombardi would have had if his players had dumped Gatorade on him. Now that would attract fans. Evan PuzissMar Vista Don't call it baseball Concerning the Home Run Derby, I like Dylan Hernández's own words: 'barely-watchable made-for-television event.' I might change 'barely' to 'not!' It just doesn't come close to all the hype. It's more like a county fair arm-wrestling contest. It's not baseball and it's not going to save baseball, whatever the changes. Baseball's problem is a seemingly interminable, almost inconsequential, 162-game season, followed by an anyone-can-win postseason tournament. That's not a formula for year-long excitement. Perhaps they could cut the season into halves or quarters and add some more tournaments. Whatever they do, keep it baseball, not 'derbies'! Bill WeberLa Cañada Flintridge Flashbacks It looks like Tanner Scott is the new Pedro Baéz. I shudder when I remember those days when we saw him walking in from the bullpen. I hope the poor guy finds his mojo. Richard McCurdyBurbank Don't forget Bill Plaschke goes out of his way in his column about LeBron James and Kobe Bryant to depict the latter as truly beloved by all. He seems to forget Bryant's regrettable experience in Denver in which he was accused of a serious crime. The case was ultimately dropped after he settled with his accuser in a civil case. He was far from perfect so why depict him as such? Bert BergenLa Cañada Too much Bronny Seemingly all Times Lakers' coverage is Bronny this and Bronny that. If the younger James did not have a famous father, there would be a minimum mention of this player, who has never proven himself as anything better than average at best in college and in the pros. End of story! Jack WolfWestwood And furthermore As a follow-up to letters letting The Times know your readers are not desperate for your articles on Bronny James' summer league performances, here's another. I think no one is particularly interested in reports on the LIV tour results. Of the 50 or so players on that tour, there are about five who could still compete on the PGA Tour. The rest are has-beens or never-weres. They are all in it for the (blood) money. Who cares whether Dustin Johnson's or Sergio Garcia's team wins or not? No golf fan that I know. Jack NelsonLos Angeles The Los Angeles Times welcomes expressions of all views. Letters should be brief and become the property of The Times. They may be edited and republished in any format. Each must include a valid mailing address and telephone number. Pseudonyms will not be used. Email: sports@ Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chicago Bears rookie outlook: What to know about the 8 draft picks before training camp
Here's what Chicago Bears fans need to know about the team's eight draft picks before rookies report for training camp. Sign up for Bears Insider for everything you need to know Bears training camp includes 11 practices open to public — and Family Fest is back at Soldier Field Who did the Bears select in the 2025 NFL draft? Meet the 8-player class. The Bears raised some eyebrows when they selected Michigan tight end Colston Loveland with the No. 10 pick. It wasn't that Loveland wasn't deserving of being a top-10 pick but more so the notion that the team had bigger needs at offensive tackle or on the defensive line. But the Bears are doing things differently under coach Ben Johnson. The tight end position is a priority. Read more here. Four wide receivers were selected in the first round of the NFL draft in April. Luther Burden III was not among them. In the second round, when the 39th pick came around and Burden was still available, coach Ben Johnson and the Bears were happy to swoop in. The move came as somewhat of a surprise, given that the Bears already had DJ Moore and Rome Odunze on the roster. Johnson saw a chance to add a playmaker. Read more here. The battle is on at left tackle. GM Ryan Poles promised competition at the position in February, and he provided it in the form of 6-foot-8 Boston College tackle Ozzy Trapilo. The Bears drafted Trapilo in the second round at No. 56. Trapilo, who agreed to a contract Thursday, spent the spring competing with second-year pro Kiran Amegadjie for reps at left tackle. Incumbent starter Braxton Jones will join the competition when he returns from an ankle injury. Those three should provide the most intriguing position battle during training camp. Read more here. The Bears continued their offseason focus on the trenches when they drafted Texas A&M defensive tackle Shemar Turner with a second-round pick (No. 62) in April. The Bears already had signed defensive tackle Grady Jarrett and defensive end Dayo Odeyingbo during free agency. But in Turner, general manager Ryan Poles and coach Ben Johnson saw a defensive tackle who plays with a fire they like. Read more here. Chances are, many Bears fans had never heard of Ruben Hyppolite II. When the Bears drafted Hyppolite at No. 132 in the fourth round in April, his name was relatively unknown. The Maryland linebacker wasn't among the 329 players invited to the NFL scouting combine in February. But his name certainly was one Bears coach Ben Johnson and general manager Ryan Poles were interested in. Read more here. Length comes up a lot when talking about offensive and defensive linemen. NFL teams want tackles with long arms. The same is true for edge rushers, who have to battle with those long-armed offensive tackles. Bears general manager Ryan Poles has shown an affinity for drafting long-armed players at another position group: defensive back. He found another one when he selected Zah Frazier out of Texas-San Antonio in April in the fifth round (No. 169). Frazier's 32⅞-inch arms were the second-longest of any cornerback measured at the NFL scouting combine in February. Length alone won't land Frazier a spot on the team, but the Bears are optimistic he has the physical tools to develop into a quality NFL cornerback. Read more here. Even after investing heavily in veteran offensive linemen in March, the Bears weren't done bolstering the protection in front of quarterback Caleb Williams. NFL offensive lines always can use extra help. Coach Ben Johnson has said it several times since he was hired — it's not only about having five great starters but being able to go seven, eight or nine deep. Injuries often make that a necessity. The Bears found additional help in the draft when they selected Luke Newman out of Michigan State with a sixth-round pick (No. 195). . Twenty-one running backs were selected in the 2025 NFL draft ahead of Kyle Monangai. Bears general manager Ryan Poles selected Monangai in the seventh round (No. 233) with the team's final pick. Monangai comes to Chicago after back-to-back 1,200-yard seasons at Rutgers. He joins a backfield that returns starter D'Andre Swift and last year's No. 2 option, Roschon Johnson. Read more here.
USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports vs. NASCAR lawsuit: Status ahead of Dover race
Sunday marks the 21st race of the 2025 NASCAR Cup Series season. Hendrick Motorsports drivers William Byron and Chase Elliott lead the championship standings as the drivers prepare for the Monster Mile in Dover. Sunday's race is also the penultimate round of the NASCAR in-season challenge with four drivers still in contention for the prize: Ty Gibbs, Ty Dillon, John Hunter Nemechek and Tyler Reddick. This season's seen plenty of intrigue on-track, most recently with Shane van Gisbergen's dominant run on non-ovals with wins in Chicago and Sonoma. But there's been a recent development in the sports' biggest off-track storyline: 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports' lawsuit against NASCAR. Basketball Hall of Famer Michael Jordan and Joe Gibbs Racing driver Denny Hamlin co-own 23XI Racing, while Tennessee-based businessman Bob Jenkins owns Front Row Motorsports. Jenkins also owns a number of restaurant franchises belonging to Yum! Brands, including many KFC and Taco Bell locations. It's been nine months since the two teams initially filed a lawsuit accusing NASCAR of restraining fair competition and violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. The two teams and their six drivers – 23XI Racings' Reddick, Bubba Wallace and Riley Herbst as well as Front Row Motorsports' Noah Gragson, Todd Gilliland and Zane Smith – will be racing as open teams for the first time after a recent ruling and the loss of their charter status. There's been a lot of motions, counterclaims, denials, appeals and rehearings since the start of the 2025 Cup Series season. Here's a recap and timeline of all the developements: NASCAR lawsuit latest 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports will be racing as open teams because they were denied a temporary restraining order which would've kept NASCAR from revoking their chartered status. As open entries, the teams are not guaranteed spots on the starting grid because they do not have charter status. Open teams must qualify on time to make each race, unlike charter teams, who still participate in qualifying to earn the best starting position for each race but would take the green flag on race day regardless even if they failed to qualify. Open entries also make less than a third as much money per race than chartered teams. That won't be a concern this weekend at Dover Motor Speedway, however, as less than 40 cars are entered. But it could become a problem later in the season should 41 cars show up. U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Bell said in his ruling there was no threat of the two teams' drivers not making races in Dover and Indianapolis (the next race on the 2025 calendar), so there was no irreparable harm. So far this season, only two races have had more than four open cars enter. 'We are disappointed that the court declined to grant 23XI and Front Row Motorsports a temporary restraining order to allow the teams to continue racing as chartered teams,' the teams' attorney Jeffrey Kessler said in a statement. 'We remain confident that our motion for a preliminary injunction is legally warranted and necessary, and we look forward to the court's full review.' 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports are seeking another injunction to remain chartered through the end of the season. NASCAR has agreed not to sell their charters until a ruling on that injunction, per Bell's ruling. NASCAR lawsuit timeline Here's what's happened since the start of the Cup Series regular season in February. To see a timeline of events prior to the 2025 Daytona 500, click here. NASCAR claims that 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports violated antitrust laws during negotiations for a new charter agreement. These claims include that the teams colluded to get better terms, and 23XI Racing's co-owner Curtis Polk tried to boycott a qualifying event. Chris Yates, lead attorney for NASCAR in this case, stated that they believe the two teams misused antitrust laws to force a renegotiation. "NASCAR has no intent and no interest in renegotiating the terms of the 2025 charter," Yates said. "We're not going to let 23XI and Front Row misuse the antitrust laws to try to renegotiate the terms of the charter. That's not going to happen. So I don't see a great path to settlement, but we will participate in the court-ordered mediation process." This response is to NASCAR's appeal to a prior ruling requiring the sanctioning body to allow 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports to race as chartered teams in 2025. NASCAR's appeal centers on the judge's reasoning that the Cup Series is its own market rather than a part of the wider motorsports landscape. The teams argue that NASCAR creates an environment that doesn't allow them to make as much money as they could. The two teams argue that there's no evidence of an attempted boycott and that teams work together in negotiations, just like in other sports, seeing as they are all entered in the same sport. "NASCAR's retaliatory counterclaim is an act of desperation that cannot withstand a motion to dismiss," 23XI Racing said in a statement. 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports subpoenaed Formula 1 as well as the NFL, NBA and NHL teams to provide evidence on how other sporting bodies and their teams operate. NASCAR makes this request claiming it has more evidence that will prove teams colluded during charter negotiations. A three-judge panel heard the appeal by NASCAR to an injunction ruling on Dec. 18, 2024 allowing 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports to race as chartered teams in 2025 while this legal battle plays out. Judge Kenneth Bell's Dec. 18 ruling was based largely on NASCAR's charter agreement including a clause that teams can't sue NASCAR. His reasoning was the teams felt like they couldn't both sign the agreement and pursue the lawsuit, hence why the injunction was necessary. Judge Paul Niemeyer pushes back in questioning Kessler, specifically that the teams cannot "have [their] cake and eat it too," referring to 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports both suing NASCAR and being chartered competitors at the same time. 'If you don't want the contract, you don't enter into it, and you sue," Niemeyer said. "Or if you want the contract, you enter into it, and you've given up past releases." He and other judges reasoned that the teams could sue and race as open teams, not chartered ones. The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of NASCAR and revoked the Dec. 18 injunction. The judges note in their ruling that there is no precedent for this case and Kessler's antitrust argument "is not supported by any case of which we are aware." They also reason that there's no indication that the teams will likely be successful in their lawsuit. This gave the teams 14 days to ask for a rehearing and the ruling took effect a further seven days after that. Up until this point, the two teams haven't clearly stated what they're looking for if they win this lawsuit against NASCAR. A hearing gave some general ideas. In a hearing for a motion to throw out NASCAR's counterclaim of collusion, Kessler outlines the teams are looking for: In a new filing for NASCAR's March 5 counterclaim, NASCAR asks for chartered teams in the Cup Series grid to turn over financial documents, calling some of these "critical to NASCAR's defense." As expected, 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports asked for a rehearing following the June 5 ruling overturning the injunction which allowed them to compete as chartered teams during the 2025 season. This request delays when the two teams would lose their charters. "If upheld, the ruling would set a dangerous precedent, allowing monopolists to shield themselves from legal challenges simply by requiring release language as a condition of doing business with the monopoly," Kessler said in a statement. Judge Bell denied 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports' motion to dismiss NASCAR's counterclaim, stating that the sport had done enough to continue its counterclaim. But he also narrowed the amount of financial information other chartered teams had to provide NASCAR. Chartered teams only had to provide anonymized top-line financial data (total costs, revenue, net profits/loss) dating back to 2014. NASCAR was looking for more detailed information, including driver salaries and sponsorship revenue. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard the two teams' argument for reversing the June 5 decision which would revoke their charters during the 2025 season and denied their request. This makes it very difficult for the teams to race as chartered outfits for the rest of the 2025 season. "We are disappointed by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision to deny our request for a full rehearing," Kessler said in a statement. "We are committed to racing this season as we continue to fight for more competitive and fair terms for all teams to ensure the future of the sport and remain fully confident in our case." Ahead of this weekend's race in Dover, the two teams looked for a potential way to remain chartered and decided on filing for a restraining order and new preliminary injunction. "New information surfaced through the discovery process that overwhelmingly supports our position that a preliminary injunction is legally warranted and necessary," Kessler said in a statement. The teams argued NASCAR informed them they'd "immediately move to sell or issue Plaintiffs' charters to other entities," which could keep the teams from getting their charters back. NASCAR said in a statement that they have attempted to end this legal battle before trial but the two teams haven't been willing to work with them. 'It is unfortunate that instead of respecting the clear rulings of the Fourth Circuit, 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports are now burdening the District Court with a third motion for another unnecessary and inappropriate preliminary injunction," NASCAR said in a statement. "We have yet to receive a proposal from 23XI or Front Row, as they have instead preferred to continue their damaging and distracting lawsuit," the statement continued. "We will defend NASCAR's integrity from this baseless lawsuit forced upon the sport that threatens to divide the stakeholders committed to serving race fans everywhere. We remain focused on collaborating with the 13 race teams that signed the 2025 charter agreements and share our mutual goal of delivering the best racing in the world each week, including this weekend in Dover.' The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.
