Crypto Founder Found Alive After Faking Death To Pump A Memecoin
Zerebro developer Jeffy Yu has been found alive and well.
On-chain transactions had first cast doubt on Yu's suicide.
The stunt pulled by Yu is not new in the world of memecoins.
'A Martyr of Imagination and Creativity,' those were the words used to describe Jeffy Yu, the 22-year-old creator of a little-known, supposedly AI-related cryptocurrency project called Zerebro, in an obituary that made the rounds on X and sparked condolence messages last week.
Before this, many users had reported seeing a video of Yu taking his own life on a livestream, seemingly in response to online harassment. A supposedly automated message announcing a final act in the form of a legacy memecoin, LLJEFFY, followed.
Don't Miss:
— no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies.
Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – .
There is just one problem: Yu appears to be alive and well in San Francisco.
Yu was found at his parents' home in the Crocker-Amazon neighborhood by a reporter from The San Francisco Standard, the outlet reported on May 8.
'I've been doxxed. I've been harassed. If you can find me, other people can find me,' a visibly shocked and agitated Yu reportedly told the Standard. 'Now I have to move my parents out of here this week.'
Doubts about Yu's death first arose when on-chain sleuths flagged transactions tied to him from Zerebro and his 'legacoin.'
'Despite rumors of suicide, addresses linked to Jeffy Yu sold over $100k of ZEREBRO and traded LLJEFFY days after his alleged passing,' prominent crypto data provider Bubblemaps wrote on May 6.
On May 7, Bubblemaps reported that another $1.4 million in ZEREBRO tokens had been sold.
Around the same time, disgraced DeFi founder Daniele Sestagalli also claimed that Yu had faked his suicide. He cited a supposed letter from Yu to an early Zerebro investor.
Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase.
The letter describes Yu's actions as his 'only viable exit from persistent harassment, blackmail, and threats.'
'Crypto just witnessed its first pseudocide exit strategy,' Sestagalli wrote in the thread containing the letter. 'Meanwhile, real developers in this space are getting doxxed, harassed, targeted nonstop...yet they keep showing up. They keep building. They don't fake death to dodge red candles.'
Yu refused to comment on the reports of his suicide and how he may have financially benefited from it, according to The Standard.
'You can see the PTSD in my eyes, right?' he reportedly said before urging the reporter to leave.
The stunt pulled by Yu is not new in the world of memecoins. The space took a dark turn in May 2024 when Solana memecoin generator Pump.fun launched a streaming feature to allow creators to promote their tokens. One developer set himself on fire, one sexually exploited his mother and another faked an overdose. The platform was forced to deprecate the feature after one particular creator faked his hanging, or at least it did till April.
'Pump fun livestreaming has been rolled out to 5% of users with industry standard moderation systems in place and transparent guidelines,' Pump.fun co-founder Alon Cohen wrote on April 4.
Bubblemaps claimed that Yu's faked suicide occurred on Pump.fun's livestream, but the firm has vehemently denied it in a statement to The San Francisco Standard.
Benzinga reached out to Yu for comment but has yet to receive feedback. He has since deleted his personal X account and that of Zerebro.
Despite recent events, ZEREBRO is trading 1.4% higher on the day at the time of writing. Yu's legacy coin, however, has not fared so favorably. As of last look, LLJEFFY's market capitalization sits at $4 million, a 90% decline from a peak of over $100 million.
Read Next:
A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: .
'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones.
Image: Shutterstock
Send To MSN: 0
This article Crypto Founder Found Alive After Faking Death To Pump A Memecoin originally appeared on Benzinga.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
8 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's AI plan calls for massive data centers. Here's how it may affect energy in the US
President Donald Trump's plan to boost artificial intelligence and build data centers across the U.S. could speed up a building boom that was already expected to strain the nation's ability to power it. The White House released the 'AI Action Plan' Wednesday, vowing to expedite permitting for construction of energy-intensive data centers as it looks to make the country a leader in a business that tech companies and others are pouring billions of dollars into. Nuclear plant deal sets stage for AI billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg to reshape Illinois energy policyThe plan says to combat 'radical climate dogma,' a number of restrictions — including clean air and water laws — could be lifted, aligning with Trump's 'American energy dominance' agenda and his efforts to undercut clean energy. Here's what you need to know. Massive amounts of electricity are needed to support the complex servers, equipment and more for AI. Electricity demand from data centers worldwide is set to more than double by 2030, to slightly more than the entire electricity consumption of Japan today, the International Energy Agency said earlier this year. In many cases, that electricity may come from burning coal or natural gas. These fossil fuels emit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide and methane. This in turn is tied to extreme weather events that are becoming more severe, frequent and costly. The data centers used to fuel AI also need a tremendous amount of water to keep cool. That means they can strain water sources in areas that may have little to spare. Typically, tech giants, up-and-comers and other developers try to keep an existing power plant online to meet demand, experts say, and most existing power plants in the U.S. are still producing electricity using fossil fuels — most often natural gas. Landing a data center is worth the environmental tradeoffs, Illinois towns sayIn certain areas of the U.S., a combination of renewables and energy storage in the form of batteries are coming online. But tapping into nuclear power is especially of interest as a way to reduce data center-induced emissions while still meeting demand and staying competitive. Amazon said last month it would spend $20 billion on data center sites in Pennsylvania, including one alongside a nuclear power plant. The investment allows Amazon to plug right into the plant, a scrutinized but faster approach for the company's development timeline. Meta recently signed a deal to secure nuclear power to meet its computing needs. Microsoft plans to buy energy from the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, and Google previously signed a contract to purchase it from multiple small modular reactors in the works. Data centers are often built where electricity is cheapest, and often, that's not from renewables. And sometimes data centers are cited as a reason to extend the lives of traditional, fossil-fuel-burning power plants. But just this week, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called on the world's largest tech players to fuel their data center needs entirely with renewables by 2030. It's necessary to use fewer fossil fuels, he said. Experts say it's possible for developers, investors and the tech industry to decarbonize. However, though industry can do a lot with clean energy, the emerging demands are so big that it can't be clean energy alone, said University of Pennsylvania engineering professor Benjamin Lee. More generative AI, ChatGPT and massive data centers means 'relying on wind and solar alone with batteries becomes really, really expensive,' Lee added, hence the attention on natural gas, but also nuclear. Regardless of what powers AI, the simple law of supply and demand makes it all but certain that costs for consumers will rise. New data center projects might require both new energy generation and existing generation. Developers might also invest in batteries or other infrastructure like transmission lines. All of this costs money, and it needs to be paid for from somewhere. 'In a lot of places in the U.S., they are seeing that rates are going up because utilities are making these moves to try to plan,' said Amanda Smith, a senior scientist at research organization Project Drawdown. 'They're planning transmission infrastructure, new power plants for the growth and the load that's projected, which is what we want them to do,' she added. 'But we as ratepayers will wind up seeing rates go up to cover that.'
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump's AI Race Vs. China's Leaks: Why Containment Could Backfire
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 23: Michael Kratsios, U.S. President Donald Trump and David O. Sacks speak ... More onstage at the All-In and Hill & Valley Forum "Winning The AI Race" at Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on July 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo byfor Hill & Valley Forum) "AI is the new geopolitical lever"—this was the framing used in recent Washington briefings, where insiders described America's AI strategy as doing "two things fast, one thing slow—deliberately." The fast elements include granting FAST-41 fast-track permitting status to every data center above 100 MW, slashing timelines from years to months, and imposing stepped-up disclosure rules on shipments of advanced chips like the B200, H100, and H200 to list end-users in detail. The slow part is a deliberate study on "compute choke-points," due in December 2025, to determine whether to cap Chinese access to American cloud capacity. As these insiders noted, "We have the best technology, and we want to share it"—but only under an America First approach of techno-nationalism that ensures global infrastructure depends on U.S. foundations while restricting adversaries. On January 20, 2025—while inaugural crowds were still finding their seats—DeepSeek released R1. No Silicon Valley fanfare, just a GitHub drop and iOS icon that became America's most-downloaded free app within 48 hours. Five months later, as the White House unveiled its AI Action Plan on July 23, Alibaba-backed Moonshot dropped Kimi K2 days before, claiming 100x cost advantages over Western models. Coincidence? Hardly. It's Beijing projecting parity, if not superiority, precisely when Washington asserts dominance. The message: We can build frontier AI with whatever silicon you fail to contain. At its heart, the U.S. strategy stands on three legs: Promote American technology globally, Protect it from adversaries, and pursue Techno-Nationalism. The revelation of over $1 billion in Nvidia B200/H100 chips reaching China through Singapore-Ho Chi Minh City shell networks exposes this as wishful thinking. Here's the paradox: Failed containment doesn't just weaken "Protect"—it actively accelerates Chinese capabilities. Export controls create what analysts call "innovation incentives in captivity"—spurring Beijing to develop cheaper, more energy-efficient alternatives. DeepSeek's claim of training R1 for $6 million versus GPT-4's $100 million isn't just cost efficiency—it's containment blowback. U.S. insiders emphasize that what has historically slowed China wasn't lack of technology but the Chinese Communist Party's ideological conformity, requiring models to pass rigorous alignment with official doctrine. Yet even with these self-imposed limits, Beijing's efficiency gains show how U.S. restrictions can backfire, pushing adversaries to innovate around ideological and technical barriers. AI policy is energy policy. While Western democracies debate environmental reviews and grid reliability, authoritarian systems can rapidly direct energy flows to computing infrastructure. Wood Mackenzie's projection of 15-20% annual U.S. electricity demand growth from AI through 2030 isn't just a technical constraint—it's a strategic vulnerability. The U.S. response—expedited FAST-41 permitting for >100 MW data centers—assumes regulatory streamlining can match centralized resource allocation. It can't. Regulation isn't necessarily the enemy here; it's the necessary guardrail against social, political and industrial infrastructure that could collapse under its own power demands. Recent Washington briefings highlight growing concerns about Gulf-based corporate partnerships with U.S. AI projects serving as potential infiltration vectors. While specifics remain under wraps, the pattern involves sophisticated state actors using third-party relationships to access American technological developments—extending beyond chip smuggling to strategic information gathering. The Biden-era export controls and AI safeguards, such as Executive Order 14110, faltered due to structural bottlenecks that delayed infrastructure buildouts and allowed adversaries like China to gain ground through persistent evasion. This erosion is accelerating under Trump's deregulatory push, which has revoked those "burdensome government requirements" to prioritize speed. The result creates a feedback loop: domestic acceleration exposes enforcement gaps, which in turn necessitate more aggressive deregulation to maintain competitive advantages. Trump's approach represents the essential path forward to contain China, even if imperfect, as it addresses these foundational weaknesses head-on. We're witnessing the emergence of parallel AI ecosystems: U.S. resource-intensive models versus Chinese efficiency-driven alternatives. Rather than a single dominant technological stack, we may see competing approaches based on cost, performance, and regulatory philosophy. The question facing American strategists transcends tactical adjustments: Should U.S. strategy be defined by speed or security? Every month shaved off U.S. permitting may be offset by continued Chinese access to cutting-edge silicon through gray markets. Every export control may be accelerating the very multipolarity Washington seeks to prevent. In the end, the AI race isn't static—the course shifts quicker than anyone can sprint.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer on Adobe: 'Might Get This Thing at a Cheaper Price'
Adobe Inc. (NASDAQ:ADBE) is one of the stocks that Jim Cramer shared thoughts on. A caller asked if Cramer thinks the stock is a buy, sell, or hold, and he replied: 'Boy… I gotta tell you, this is a tough one. One, it keeps going down, but two, Figma is about to come, and you know a lot of people have switched from Adobe to Figma because it's much cheaper. Let's let the Figma deal come and then see what happens. Might get this thing at a cheaper price.' onur-binay-O2-EZNGZIyk-unsplash Adobe (NASDAQ:ADBE) develops software and cloud-based platforms for content creation, digital experiences, and document management. The company provides subscription-based tools, analytics solutions, and services for publishing, advertising, and customer engagement. During an April episode, Cramer called it 'a great company.' He said: 'Adobe, what a great company. Its stock is down almost 35% from its high set last year […] Adobe has come up with a few AI tools of its own headlined by Adobe Firefly – it's a Lamborghini, wow! It's a really impressive technology. But the problem is OpenAI can also do these things too. So is Adobe being hurt or helped by AI? It's really hard to say. […] I'm not sure I'd stick my neck out for Adobe with its generative AI threats.' While we acknowledge the potential of ADBE as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
