EXCLUSIVE SNP's debt mountain as cost of Holyrood borrowing soars to record £500m a year!
Plans to borrow a record amount of money to pay for infrastructure and building projects have led to claims that the SNP is 'mismanaging the nation's finances'.
Finance Secretary Shona Robison has promised 'efficient public spending' and also threatened tax rises including a possible wealth tax.
But her Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) also revealed plans to borrow millions of pounds, leaving the bill for repayments and interest soaring to an astonishing £499 million a year by 2030/31.
The jump in borrowing has sparked accusations that the Finance Secretary is using debt to fund a pre-election spending spree before next year's Holyrood poll.
Figures buried in the appendices of the MTFS reveal the ever-rising cost to the public purse of servicing Scotland's growing mountain of debt.
This year, the public will have to stump up a record £302 million for repayments and interest on the debt run up by the SNP since 2017, when the Scottish Government was first given borrowing powers.
But costs to the taxpayer are set to soar even higher.
According to the government's own forecasts, by 2030/31 the bill for repayments and interest will have rocketed to £499 million a year.
Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Craig Hoy said: 'The plans for record borrowing tucked away in the small print suggest that the SNP hopes to hand out some sweeties before next year's election.
'It fits in with their abysmally irresponsible record of failing to live within their means.
'We're already paying hundreds of millions just servicing the debts the Nats have run up. Instead of trying to find last minute bribes to keep themselves in office, they should be tackling bloated and wasteful spending, and cutting the tax bill for hard-pressed Scots.'
The UK Government last week published an analysis showing that the recent spending review by Chancellor Rachel Reeves would mean an additional £9billion for Scotland, including almost £6 billion extra for Holyrood thanks to higher UK spending on health, as well as £2 billion for education.
And Labour's finance spokesman Michael Marra said: 'The SNP is borrowing more and receiving record sums from the Labour government but it's hard to see what we're getting in return.
'Public infrastructure is crumbling and flagship projects are in chaos as a result of the SNP's mismanagement and waste. The truth is the SNP cannot be trusted with public money.'
Ms Robison unveiled the MTFS at the end of last month, telling Holyrood: 'Growing the economy is a top priority.' She also pledged reforms 'to increase value for the public purse', with efficiencies and improved productivity in the NHS and across the public sector.
Ms Robison also warned of future tax rises, saying: 'We will also take forward work on considering future reform to the tax system, including developing our thinking on longer term issues such as wealth taxation.'
Wealth taxes – which are also being discussed at a UK level – are intended to reduce economic inequality by targeting the wealthiest in society.
The idea is to tax all, or most of, an individual or household's total net wealth, including assets such as savings, investments and property, rather than just income.
Although no specific proposals have been drawn up, such a tax could involve an annual charge levied on the richest based on the value of assets owned.
However, Ms Robison's speech to MSPs failed to mention her plans for plunging Scotland further into debt.
The scale and cost of the SNP's borrowing is only revealed in the appendices of documents published alongside the minister's statement.
Figures show that this financial year Ms Robison is borrowing a record £472 million extra to fund capital projects – taking Scotland's accumulated debt to a total of £2.8 billion.
Forecasts show that the country's overall debt will soar to £3.6 billion within five years.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'By following a fiscally sustainable approach to borrowing, the Scottish Government has been able to maximise capital funding this year, helping deliver new infrastructure and supporting economic growth.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
An institutional intifada is coming to crush a Reform government
In England's fractured five-party system – featuring Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, Reform and the Green/Islamist/far-Left movement – a hung Parliament is certain sooner or later, in any event. Especially once Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are factored in, with their nationalists and unionists. This explains why Labour is likely to form a new government after the next election – even if it exhausts its stupendous parliamentary majority, the second largest since World War Two, in much the same way that it is exhausting the nation's finances. For in a hung Parliament, one must have allies. And Labour has more potential partners than anyone else: the Liberal Democrats, the Scottish Nationalists, Plaid Cymru, Northern Ireland nationalists, Greens and Islamists. None of these may want to join a coalition government with Labour if one is offered. But they will surely be even more unwilling to form one with parties of the Right. Meanwhile, the Conservatives and Reform would have only – a few Ulster unionists apart – each other as potential partners, if one assumes that the Liberal Democrats won't work with either. Which would be bigger? Perhaps by the next election the party of which I'm a member, the Conservatives, will once again be the main party of the Right – especially in the event of a crash in the markets that leaves other parties, with their promises of higher spending and lower taxes, over-promised and under-prepared. But as I write, it looks unlikely. It is no longer absurd to imagine Reform as the larger of the two Right-wing parties in parliament. What would happen next? Perhaps Nigel Farage would offer the disorientated Tories a coalition, and so swallow up whatever was left of them. For what it's worth, I would prefer a confidence and supply arrangement – partly because I'm a convinced Conservative, even in these unpromising circumstances, and partly because I'm not convinced by Reform. But regardless of our party political preferences, we should want a future Reform administration to succeed: all of us, because it is in our interest for government to work, and Conservatives in particular, because – as conservatives with a small C as well as a large one – a legitimate Right-wing party should be preferable to a legitimate Left-wing one. But if parties with experience, like the Conservatives and Labour, find it hard to govern, one without it, like Reform, would find it next to impossible. Here are three illustrations. On day one, the new Reform administration instructs the Royal Navy to return small boats containing illegal migrants to France as they cross the Channel. Naval officers refuse, asserting that the French will refuse to accept the returns, that there is a risk that migrants will scupper their boats, and that in these circumstances refusing to take them to Britain would breach international law. On day five, Reform's new Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, a businessman with no political experience, is accused of bullying civil servants. Downing Street's Propriety and Ethics unit steps in. Staffed by civil servants and based in the Cabinet Office, the unit has a formidable reputation. It helped to investigate Nadhim Zahawi, Priti Patel, Dominic Raab and Chris Pincher under the last government. All were forced out, rightly or wrongly. On day 10, the new Reform home secretary, like Suella Braverman, demands that the Progress flag, which represents the LGBTQ+ cause, no longer be flown above the Home Office. He has no more luck than Braverman, who said later: 'I couldn't even get the flag of a horrible political campaign I disagreed with taken down from the roof of the government department I was supposed to be in charge of.' There is a fashion on the Right for blaming a 'blob' of unaccountable quangocrats, activist judges, politicised civil servants and outdated international agreements for intensifying Britain's problems. Some Labour MPs, since their party took office, have overlapping complaints. Both underplay the main source of the problem: a House of Commons that is no longer providing enough effective, coherent legislation and efficient, commanding ministers. But regardless of one's view of the matter, there can be no doubt that a Reform government would be seen, in some corners of Westminster and Whitehall, as illegitimate. And would be met from day one by an institutional intifada. My impression is that those at the top of Reform think of themselves as Big Men with Strong Views. They certainly have the latter – hence the falling out of Farage and Rupert Lowe. And maybe, in government, they would prove themselves the former. Perhaps a Reform government would beat establishment resistance to a pulp (metaphorically, not literally). But as matters stand, it looks like Reform that's cruising for a bruising – if it ever makes government at all. Getting the system to work takes time even if it likes the look of you. Tony Blair complained of 'scars on my back' after trying to reform the public sector. The Civil Service came to terms with Margaret Thatcher only in her second term. Before she won her first election, John Hoskyns, a businessman, devised a plan for government to tackle the problems of the day: inflation, trade union militancy, decline. It was called Stepping Stones. If Farage is to follow in her footsteps, he needs a modern equivalent: a strategic plan for getting his most radical measures – leaving the ECHR, abandoning the net zero targets, scrapping the Equality Act – through Parliament (where they would meet particular resistance in the Lords) in order to ensure that they gain the democratic legitimacy to which the courts would bow. During the 1980s, the key question was what a new Right-wing government should do. Today, it's how to do it. Are the Big Men thinking big enough?
Auto Express
an hour ago
- Auto Express
Car Deal of the Day: best-selling Ford Puma ST-Line for only £190 per month
Great-handling small SUV Sportier look courtesy of ST-Line trim Only £190 per month The Ford Puma has been the UK's best-selling car since 2023, and there are no signs the recently refreshed small SUV will relinquish that title, because more than 26,000 examples have left showrooms in the past six months alone. It's easy to understand why, though, especially when the sporty-looking version is available from just £190 per month. This three-year lease deal for the Ford Puma ST-Line is being offered by Lease Car UK through the Auto Express Find A Car service. It requires a fairly reasonable initial payment of £2,639, followed by monthly payments of £190, and includes a standard annual mileage allowance of 5,000 miles per year. Advertisement - Article continues below Of course, plenty of people cover more miles than that in a year, but increasing the annual limit to 10,000 miles costs only £22 extra each month. Even with the allowance pushed all the way up to 12,000 miles, the same Puma ST-Line is available from £233 per month. Inside, the Puma features a 12.8-inch instrument panel, and a massive 12-inch central touchscreen that's running Ford's latest infotainment system, but also comes with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity. There's enough space for adults in the back, plus a 456-litre boot for all your stuff, including a 68-litre 'Megabox' beneath the boot floor that can be rinsed out, which is handy if you've got muddy walking boots. In ST-Line specification, the Puma comes with a bodykit and sports suspension, 17-inch rims, those large dual displays, LED headlights, reversing camera, keyless entry and start, cruise control and various safety systems. Meanwhile, under the bonnet is a 1.0-litre turbocharged three-cylinder engine that uses 48-volt mild-hybrid technology, and is paired with a six-speed manual gearbox. The 123bhp and 170Nm of torque are good for 0-62mph in 9.6 seconds, while Ford claims the powertrain can return up to 52.3mpg. The Car Deal of the Day selections we make are taken from our own Auto Express Find A Car deals service, which includes the best current offers from car retailers and leasing companies around the UK. Terms and conditions apply, while prices and offers are subject to change and limited availability. If this deal expires, you can find more top Ford Puma leasing offers from leading providers on our Ford Puma deals hub page… Check out the Ford Puma Deal of the Day or take a look at our previous Car Deal of the Day selection here… Find a car with the experts New MG IM5 has the Tesla Model 3 beaten on price and range New MG IM5 has the Tesla Model 3 beaten on price and range The all-electric IM5 brings new technology and design to the MG line-up New MG Cyberster Black is a dark sign of things to come for the brand New MG Cyberster Black is a dark sign of things to come for the brand MG boss thinks special editions like this might be the ticket to keeping up demand for the electric sports car New Mazda CX-5 revealed with fresh looks, more space and far fewer buttons New Mazda CX-5 revealed with fresh looks, more space and far fewer buttons The Mazda CX-5 has been revolutionised to take on the Nissan Qashqai, Kia Sportage and Hyundai Tucson
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Locals living in dead end ghost town say their high street is now a cruel joke with shuttered up shops and THREE bakeries
When a new shopping centre was built to 'put a heart into Swindon' more than 50 years ago, it seemed fitting to name it after the famous railway engineer who put the town on the map - Isambard Kingdom Brunel. Half a century on, the landmark building in the centre of the Witlshire town looks to have run out of steam. Almost half of the stores and units inside The Brunel Centre have closed and those that remain struggle to attract shoppers as they increasingly switch to online purchases and out-of-town retail parks. The next-door multi-storey car park is virtually empty and appears run-down and unmanned. Despite the frontages of several former showpiece Brunel Centre stores like House of Fraser and Marks & Spencer, which closed in 2021 and 2023 respectively, being emblazoned with trendy-looking '#The Best of Swindon' signage, the site is now more notable for having three Greggs outlets within a 100-metre radius. One of the Greggs premises is so popular it has a 40-seat eating area and all three footsteps had lengthy queues for most of the day. As one local, 69-year-old Jeff Barton put it: 'Swindon has become Greggs Central now. The town is fast filling up with their rubbish bakeries. I wouldn't go near them.' A retired Swindon council groundsman, Mr Barton remembered fondly his days spent working to enhance the town's sense of civic pride. He said: 'One of my responsibilities was to make the town centre look nice. There were plants and flowers everywhere back in my day - we had 84 hanging baskets full of them around The Brunel Centre and it looked wonderful. 'You go there now and everything's closing and it looks a mess outside. It is so sad.' His wife, Denise, 68, now also retired from her job working in admin, agreed. She said: 'It used to be such a pleasure coming into town, but nowadays we avoid it when we can because it's so depressing. 'I hate to say it, but I think it's all over for Swindon. The place we knew and loved has gone and it's not coming back. 'Shopping habits have changed because of the internet and that's partly to blame, but how can people buy clothes without trying them on first and having a feel of the fabric? 'All we'll have left in town soon will be streets full of coffee shops - mostly Greggs by the look of things.' With many areas of Swindon experiencing high levels of poverty - 10 per cent of its neighbourhoods are among the worst in England and it ranks 157th out of 326 local authorities in the Index of Multiple Deprivation - it was no surprise when pound shops moved into the town centre. But today, two of the three that set up have recently closed, prompting Mrs Barton to say: 'Even the pound shops are leaving Swindon now. That tells you everything about how the town is dying.' When Brunel and his plans for the Great Western Railway arrived in 1843, Swindon was little more than a sleepy market town on top of a hill. Brunel identified it as a site for GWR's locomotive repair and maintenance works because of its strategic location between London and Bristol, it quickly grew into a thriving railway hub that would become one of the largest railway engineering complexes in the world at its peak. Even the town's Poundland's store on the corner of Regent Street and Havelock Square shut last month, with the company unable to agree on lease terms to keep them trading at the site Architect Douglas Stephen, who designed The Brunel Centre, was an admirer of Brunel and included many railway-themed features in his creation, including a roof built to echo Paddington Station. But in recent years, shoppers have abandoned the once-thriving centre and the streets around it are near-deserted. A market hall next door ceased trading eight years ago and many adjacent shops are boarded up. James Steward, who runs a jewellery and watch-making shop set up by his father next to the now-derelict market hall, says Swindon's decline was 'accelerated' by the Covid lockdown. Mr Steward, 49, said: 'People's shopping habits changed dramatically during the pandemic and many of them haven't really come back. 'There are other factors too and I think the decline here is part of a global trend that we are seeing all over the world. 'A lot of people work from home now. Their offices in town have since closed so there's no reason for them to come here any more. 'They used to pop in at lunchtime and buy a watch or jewellery but I guess they're buying it online now, if at all. As a result, shops here are closing all the time. 'I've noticed a lot of my older, more affluent customers are now going to Bath or Cirencester and making a day of it, rather than coming here. 'I'm proud to be a Swindonian and I hate talking the town down, but in all honesty, it's difficult to defend it nowadays. 'If I've got a day off now, I won't come here either. I'll get the family in the car and we'll have a day out somewhere else instead. 'The council need to think harder about how to get people back into Swindon. I'd start by abolishing, or at least significantly reducing, car park charges. They've gone through the roof, and it puts people off coming because they can be a tenner down before they've even parked up. 'And they need to work with the police to crack down on the muggers and gangs who gather here at night so people feel safe in Swindon again.' Finance worker Ana Banca, 51, said she has 'had enough' of living in Swindon and wants to move. 'It's not safe walking around the town centre, especially at night. There's no way I'd be in the town centre in the evenings now. There have been loads of stabbings and robberies in the past year or two, and drugs are a massive problem. 'And during the day, it just feels dead. The decent shops have closed down and it's all Greggs and coffee shops. 'The town feels dirty and very sad.' In The Brunel Centre itself, we find retired NHS nurse Susan O'Neill, 76, who remembers the site's heyday with pride. 'I used to love coming here,' she said. 'The place was buzzing with people and there were some marvellous shops. But you look around now and half the shops have closed down and the other half are empty. 'It saddens me to say it but I think the town centre as we know it is finished. 'Not just here, mind - it's the same everywhere. 'I think it's time to reinvent town centres and do things differently. For Swindon, I'd love to see the town centre become a hub for the arts. We could accept that town centre shopping has had its day and replace retail with theatres, art galleries, music events and lovely places to eat and meet people.' Her friend, Martin Collison, 82 and a retired project manager, said: 'I agree with her. We need to find a way of bringing the vibrancy back to Swindon so people want to come into town again.' Retired fire and rescue service chaplain the Rev John Maxwell, 79, blames ever-rising rents and business rates for Swindon's economic decline, saying: 'It's no wonder all the shops are closing down - they just can't afford to be here any longer. 'The only brand that seems to be doing well is Greggs. Personally, I can't stand their food or coffee, but many people around here must like what they're doing because they've got three shops here and they're always busy.'
