India Women vs England Women, 1st T20I Live Streaming: When and where to watch IND W vs ENG W live on TV and online
Harmanpreet Kaur-led India is all set to take on Nat Sciver's England in a five-match T20I series, beginning Saturday, June 28. The five matches will serve as perfect preparation for the upcoming T20 World Cup, which is set to be played in the UK next year. For India, Shafali Verma is making a return while the likes of Kranti Goud, Sree Charani and Sayali Satghare are the new additions. Here are all the live streaming details for the 1st T20I between India and England Women.(PTI)
Sneh Rana is also returning to the T20I side for the first time since February 2023. The visitors are without Renuka Singh and Pooja Vastrakar, who are missing out on the contest due to injuries.
Speaking of England, Nat Sciver Brunt has taken over the reins from Heather Knight, after the latter stepped down as the captain following the debacle in the Ashes. Squads:
India Women: Harmanpreet Kaur (C), Smriti Mandhana (VC), Shafali Verma, Jemimah Rodrigues, Richa Ghosh (wk), Yastika Bhatia (wk), Harleen Deol, Deepti Sharma, Sneh Rana, Sree Charani, Shuchi Upadhyay, Amanjot Kaur, Arundhati Reddy, Kranti Gaud, Sayali Satghare.
England Women: Nat Sciver-Brunt (C), Em Arlott, Tammy Beaumont (wk), Lauren Bell, Alice Capsey, Charlie Dean, Sophia Dunkley, Sophie Ecclestone, Lauren Filer, Amy Jones (wk), Paige Scholfield, Linsey Smith, Danni Wyatt-Hodge, Issy Wong. Here are all the live streaming details for the 1st T20I between India and England Women When will the India Women vs England Women 1st T20I match be played?
The India Women vs England Women 1st T20I match will be played on Saturday, June 27. The match will begin at 7 PM IST with the toss scheduled for 6:30 PM IST. Where will the India Women vs England Women 1st T20I match be played?
The India Women vs England Women 1st T20I match will be played at Trent Bridge, Nottingham. Which channels will broadcast the India Women vs England Women 1st T20I match?
The India Women vs England Women 1st T20I match will be telecast live on the Sony Sports network. Where will live streaming be available for the India Women vs England Women 1st T20I match?
The India Women vs England Women 1st T20I match will be streamed live on the SonyLiv and Fancode app and website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
AUS thrash WI to go level with ENG in WTC 2025-27 points table; IND on 5th
The 2025–27 cycle of the ICC World Test Championship (WTC) is up and running in full steam, with the first four matches of the cycle all done and dusted. The 2023 WTC champions and 2025 runner-ups, Australia, in the early morning of Saturday, registered a huge comeback win over the West Indies in Barbados by 159 runs to go level with England at the top of the latest WTC points table. The two Ashes rivals are now tied with a 100 percent points percentage each at the top of the table with 12 points apiece after their first match. Meanwhile, Sri Lanka, who defeated Bangladesh in the second Test to win the two-match series 1–0, are in third spot with a 66.67 points percentage. Bangladesh, with one loss and one draw, are in fourth spot with a 16.67 points percentage, while 2021 and 2023 runner-ups India are fifth after losing to England in their only Test of the cycle so far at Headingley, Leeds. New Zealand, Pakistan, and South Africa are yet to start their journey in the ICC WTC 2025–27 cycle. The next match of this cycle will be played between India and England, starting Wednesday, 2 July, in Edgbaston. ICC WTC 2025–27 points table Position Team Played Won Lost Draw Points PCT 1 Australia 1 1 0 0 12 100 2 England 1 1 0 0 12 100 3 Sri Lanka 2 1 0 1 16 66.67 4 Bangladesh 2 0 1 1 4 16.67 5 India 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 West Indies 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 New Zealand 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Pakistan 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 South Africa 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hazlewood shines in Australia's dramatic win over West Indies Australia secured a dominant 159-run victory over West Indies inside three days in the first Test at Kensington Oval. After starting the day at 92/4, Australia piled on 310 in their second innings, thanks to gritty half-centuries from Travis Head (61), Beau Webster (63), and Alex Carey (65), setting a daunting target of 301. The West Indies' chase unravelled quickly, crumbling to 86/8 before being bowled out for 141 in just 33.4 overs. Josh Hazlewood led the bowling attack with a superb 5/43, while Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins also chipped in. Despite a late counterattack from Justin Greaves (38*) and Shamar Joseph (44), their 55-run stand only delayed the inevitable. Shamar Joseph also impressed with the ball, claiming 5/87 and finishing with a match haul of nine wickets. Australia's bowlers capitalised on a tough pitch and West Indies' fragile batting to take a 1–0 lead in the series.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
India need to start counting on the Kuldeep factor
Kolkata: Just over a year ago, 83 of 98 English wickets to fall were taken by Jasprit Bumrah, R Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja and Kuldeep Yadav during a five-match home series. Off-spinner Ashwin averaged 24.8 runs per wicket and struck every 36.1 balls, left-arm spinner Jadeja averaged 25.05 and 46.2. Left arm wrist spinner Yadav? 20.15 and 36, numbers that were only bettered by Bumrah. If playing on the psychological pivot of recency was a game, India certainly lost that one when they announced the team for the Leeds Test. India's left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav during practice at the Headingley ground. (Reuters) Take out the last two sessions and India were effectively playing with two proper bowlers in Bumrah and Mohammad Siraj, Prasidh Krishna struggling with his length all the while as Jadeja was repeatedly being given the 'reverse' treatment by Ben Duckett. Barring Ollie Pope, England's top-order has always been edgy against proper spin bowling. Jadeja, anyway, is generally reliant on the surface and even he didn't exploit the rough outside the popping crease for a long time, something that hasn't gone unnoticed. 'You talk about experience, and he (Jadeja) has all the experience in the world,' former England cricketer Mark Butcher was quoted as saying on the Wisden Cricket Weekly Podcast. 'Somehow, it didn't seem to click with him or Rishabh Pant, the keeper, that it might be a good idea not to keep missing the rough all day to the left-handers.' Maybe Jadeja wasn't on top of his game but India too weren't brave with their team selection. And that has been a recurring problem with India's overseas tours—bravery has somehow grown to be associated with taking the right call, as if there would be any less flak if they took the wrong one. It was the sort of 'dilemma' Rahul Dravid had faced in the fifth and final Test against England in Dharamsala last year, till he took the call anyway. 'It was the braver option (to pick Kuldeep) and yes, we had to take a call there, and I'm really glad we were brave,' he had said after the match. 'We went with the braver option when we decided to back the fact that we knew we needed 20 wickets to win the series, and trust our batsmen to do the job when required, and I think that's paid off.' A little context here. Like on this tour, in 2024 too Yadav hadn't started in the first Test at Hyderabad. England won it by 28 runs. He featured in each of the three subsequent Tests though, India winning all three handsomely. Since Dharamsala offers a pitch most favourable pitch to seamers, there is always the temptation to go with the one less spinner but India stuck to Siraj-Bumrah, alongwith Ashwin, Jadeja and Yadav. That game was won by an innings and 64 runs. Yadav returned seven wickets in that match, including 5/72 in the first innings when the pitch was doing nothing for the spinners. He bowled 15 overs non-stop from one end and kept chipping away at England, reducing them to 175/4 from 64/1 till they were 218 all out. He then followed it up with a 69-ball 30, stitched a 49-run ninth-wicket partnership with Bumrah and helped India garner a 250-run plus first innings lead. There was no coming back from there for England. Two valuable lessons should have been learnt that day. First, Yadav doesn't need any conditional advantage to be successful as a bowler. He has taken some facets of his white-ball bowling and incorporated it in accordance with the demands of the longest format. Stupendous control of his bowling trajectory is one of those things that he has mastered with time. He can be a bundle of nerves, but Yadav is also an extremely skillful bowler capable of squeezing out a wicket with the smallest of variations. When you pit all this against the monotony with which England try to play spin (reverse sweeping almost all the time), it's hard to justify not including Yadav. Secondly, Yadav is no muppet with the bat. For all the talk of sacrificing a bowler for the sake of adding depth to the batting, India know how that plan worked at Leeds. Even if Jadeja was trying to put together some runs in the second innings, he didn't get any support from the lower order. Adding Yadav could have bucked that trend, apart from obviously boosting India's wicket-taking ability against an England batting that was willing to be patient against good bowling. India are deep into a transition that doesn't only mean a change of personnel but also a change of outlook. For nearly a decade, India took for granted the batting returns of Ashwin and Jadeja at home while sacrificing Ashwin the allrounder away from home. Throughout this time, Yadav hovered on the fringes. He made his debut eight years ago, but has played just 13 Tests. Twice he has been the Man-of-the-Match, only to be dropped from the next Test. Ashwin has retired, Jadeja isn't as challenging a bowler in non-Asian countries, and Axar Patel is still considered only for home series. Any change of guard must involve giving Kuldeep Yadav a wide berth, for no other spinner deserves this more than him.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
FIFA Club World Cup 2025: Big teams and bigger surprises - recap of group stage
AP Photo As the 21st edition of the FIFA Club World Cup moves towards the Round of 16, the competition's facelift has provided multiple storylines. From the number of teams participating to a newly designed trophy, more venues and even a referee cam, the competition in the United States has gone closer to its namesake - the quadrennial World Cup. The organisers have called it "a celebration of hope, excellence and pride, embodying the journey of every club, player and fan united in their passion for the beautiful game." With several new debutants and the tournament now being a month-long event, the competition has changed in stature. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Now, teams from all six confederations - 12 teams from Europe, 6 from South America, 4 from Africa, 4 from Asia, 4 from North, Central America and Caribbean, 1 from Oceania, and 1 team from the host nation complete the 2025 line-up. With the group stage done and dusted and just 16 teams left in the running, it is fair to say that this edition of the Club World Cup has had its fair share of upsets, David vs Goliath matchups and some heated moments, literally and figuratively. Auckland City hold their ground in a historic result Ranked 4,971st in the Opta Power Rankings, Auckland City went in as the lowest ranked side in the Club World Cup. They were grouped alongside Bayern Munich, Benfica and Boca Juniors. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Emergency Generators in Pakigne: (Prices May Surprise You) Emergency Generator | Search Ads Search Now Undo To put things into context, Auckland City are made up of amateurs, play in the Northern League in New Zealand, comprising just 12 teams. Auckland suffered a brutal 0-10 loss against Bayern Munich to start with - the biggest defeat in this year's tournament - which was followed by a 0-6 thumping from Benfica. Already eliminated and with nothing to lose, Auckland faced Argentinian giants Boca Juniors in their last game. In what can only be described as a David-Goliath matchup, the underdogs denied Boca a spot in the Round of 16, who were in need of a win to progress. A difference of 4,819 ranking points and Boca's historical success made the 1-1 draw all the more sweet for the amateurs. Messi and Miami power through to the Round of 16 Grouped alongside giants Porto, Al Ahly and Palmeiras, Lionel Messi's Inter Miami were expected to be swept aside. Instead, the Argentine No 10, supported by Luis Suarez, Jordi Alba and Sergio Busquets, powered through to the Round of 16, after finishing second in Group A. While the Herons could only pick up one win, it was enough to qualify. After a stalemate against Al Ahly in the tournament opener, Miami were up against Portuguese giants Porto. In what seemed like a difficult task for Miami, Messi's timeless brilliance, exemplified by a stunning free kick, earned them a 2-1 win. Miami drew their final game 2-2 against Brazil's Palmeiras, and confirmed their berth in the last 16. A 'heated' Club World Cup Tensions boiled over on the final matchday in Group E, where River Plate needed a win to make it to the last 16. Inter, however, denied them that pleasure. At the full-time whistle, River's Marcos Acuna and Inter's Denzel Dumfries nearly came to blows, needing an entire team and support staff to intervene. The feud, which first began three years ago, saw Argentina's Acuna show Netherlands' Dumfries the 2022 World Cup trophy logo on his shin guard. At the tournament, Argentina had beaten Netherlands in a heated quarter-final which finished on penalties. Heated moments weren't restricted to the players, as heatwaves and extreme temperatures saw teams give their players ice baths and cold towels. Borussia Dortmund went a step further, making their substitutes watch the game against Mamelodi Sundowns from the locker room and not from the bench to protect them from the blistering heat. Their coach likened the playing conditions to that of a 'sauna'. Thunderstorms and lightning also resulted in at least five games being delayed. But it isn't just ice packs, but ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement) who have been a presence at the tournament, making it the first to do so. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will also be a part of the tournament's setup, with non-citizens needing proof of legal status to attend games. Concerns for the upcoming World Cup? With less than a year to go for the 2026 FIFA World Cup , set to be co-hosted by the United States, Mexico and Canada, its precursor has revealed several issues. From pitch quality, to heat and weather in general, the tournament hasn't been a smooth one to say the least. Real Madrid star Jude Bellingham called out the poor pitch conditions, saying "The pitches aren't great here. The pitches aren't great at all," said the 21-year-old after his side's match against Pachuca at the Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte. 'New' tournament, same old favourites Besides the underdog stories, major upsets and more teams, the tournament still remains a hunting ground for Europe's best. Giants like Real Madrid and Manchester City still remain favourites to win the prize. Five teams from the eight groups - Seattle Sounders, Urawa Reds, Ulsan, Wydad AC and Pachuca - were eliminated without a single point. List of qualified teams for Round of 16 Group A: Palmeiras, Inter Miami Group B: Paris Saint-Germain, Botafogo Group C: Bayern Munich, Benfica Group D: Flamengo, Chelsea Group E: Inter Milan, Monterrey Group F: Borussia Dortmund, Fluminense Group G: Manchester City, Juventus Group H: Real Madrid, Al Hilal Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
