Watches of Switzerland sales jump but shares slump amid margin pressure
But shares fell sharply on Thursday as Watches of Switzerland warned the imposition of US trade tariffs would put further pressure on margins in the year ahead.
The luxury retailer said sales increased by 8 per cent at constant currency rates to £1.65billion in the year ending 27 April.
Revenue only expanded by 4 per cent in the first half, due to its US business bumping up showroom stock levels of prominent brands before climbing by 12 per cent over the following six months.
Luxury jewellery purchases more than doubled from £102million to £211million thanks to the takeover of Italian firm Roberto Coin's US associate company.
By comparison, the group's luxury watch sales and combined revenues across the UK and Europe rose by only 2 per cent to £1.35billion and £866million, respectively.
Watches of Switzerland's trade in Britain continued to be affected by subdued tourist demand stemming from the removal of VAT-free shopping four years ago, which contributed to its online turnover falling by 5 per cent.
Yet the retailer's UK sales still returned to growth as the luxury watch and jewellery market stabilised following considerable pandemic-induced volatility.
Its adjusted earnings before interest and tax also grew by 12 per cent to £150million, surpassing analyst expectations of £148.8million.
However, pre-tax profits slumped by 18 per cent to £76million owing to product mix and greater promotional activity.
Watches of Switzerland's overhead costs also jumped by a quarter, largely due to the Roberto Coin takeover, as well as IT investment, salary hikes, and the opening of a new support centre in Florida.
The London-based company expects its profit margins to decline this year in the wake of US President Donald Trump's 10 per cent baseline tariff on imported goods.
Trump briefly slapped a 31 per cent 'reciprocal' levy on Swiss-made products in April before suspending the tax for 90 days.
Some of Watches of Switzerland's brand partners have responded to the tariffs by hiking prices in the US by a mid-single-digit percentage, thereby eroding margins.
It told investors: 'The outcome of US tariff developments remains uncertain. We are in regular dialogue with our brand partners, but it is too early to comment on the potential sector impact of further changes.
'We will provide a further update as to the potential impact on FY26 guidance once the situation becomes clearer.'
The Swiss Government has until 9 July to agree a trade deal with the US before the higher tariffs come back.
Watches of Switzerland Group shares were 7.1 per cent down at 391.6p on Thursday morning, taking their losses to around 28 per cent since the year started.
Equity research analyst at Shore Capital David Hughes said: 'The business has done an admirable job in driving margin recovery alongside revenue growth in FY25A.
'But in our view further margin recovery is needed before the market offers a more generous rating on the stock.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
British Grand Prix: Silverstone boss wants better transport links
The managing director of Silverstone said he was speaking to the government about how it could support the British Grand Prix, including improving transport to the Pringle was at a No.10 Downing Street reception on Wednesday to mark 75 years of Formula 1, along with the Formula One Group CEO Stefano said the race at Silverstone was one of the few on the F1 calendar which does not receive any public funds, but backing for the event was "not just a case of doling out money".At the event, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he wanted to hear "what more we as a government can do to support" Formula 1. The Northamptonshire circuit has a contract to host the British Grand Prix until hosted the first ever Formula 1 World Championship race 75 years ago and has hosted the UK leg exclusively since Pringle told BBC Radio Northampton's Annabel Amos: "We've never received public money to help pay the fee [for hosting the Grand Prix] and that is where most countries use their public money, although some have it put into infrastructure."I think we're going to have a conversation with government [about support]".But he said it was not just about money but rather boosting the motorsport industry and infrastructure around the circuit. Mr Pringle said: "The government recognises that the motorsport industry, the high-performance motorsport engineering sector, is extremely important to the United Kingdom."The contribution to gross domestic product from motorsport is growing and growing."So the sort of things I want to talk about are connectivity, about how we can have better public transport to this part of the country. Rail would be good if we could bring people closer to Silverstone by rail."He also said he want to look at how road journeys could be improved, which was also raised by the F1 CEO earlier in the prime minister said Formula 1 was "really important" to the said at Wednesday's reception he wanted to "talk about the future and to invite [Formula 1] to work with us". Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Just raise tax? No, there's only one way out of this mess
On Wednesday, fears that Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' would further swell America's towering public debt triggered a sharp sell-off in government bonds across the advanced world. As anxiety swept global markets, UK gilts were hit especially hard, with US jitters coinciding with Labour's failed welfare bill. Before reversing on Thursday, government borrowing costs in the UK increased by even more than in the US. You would be hard-pressed today to find a serious investor who believes that Rachel Reeves's fiscal arithmetic adds up. The only question ahead of the autumn Budget now seems to be not whether, but by how much, she will raise taxes to balance the books. This week's cover of the New Statesman captures the view from the Left. It reads 'Just raise tax'. Since our ageing population is adding to the demands on public healthcare systems and welfare, Left-of-centre analysts argue that Britain simply needs to face the facts and increase taxes to finance the necessary spending. The solution put forward by the Right is not to raise tax thresholds but to cut them. Have you not heard of the Laffer curve? They say that the way to increase tax receipts is to reduce tax rates. Both sides are wrong. Putting taxes up would not only be wildly unpopular, but it would further weaken Britain's already mediocre growth rate. Cutting taxes in a major way is also a non-starter – Liz Truss tried that already, and remember what happened. Across the whole spectrum of British politics, policymakers have become prisoners of their own economic ignorance when it comes to the causes and solutions of our present fiscal dilemma. Is this situation hopeless? Not at all. There is, in fact, a way to increase tax yields and hence finance higher public spending without raising tax rates. But the debate needs to refocus on the underlying causes of the fiscal gap and escape the siloed thinking about whether tax rates should go up or down, as if that is the only choice. The Government faces a serious constraint because of its promise not to raise rates on the big three taxes – on income, employee National Insurance and VAT. But this does not mean that policymakers have no options to increase the tax yields in these areas. Britain's persistent tax shortfall is a symptom of a persistent growth shortfall, caused by the excessive weight of misguided rules and regulations that arbitrarily slow and even prohibit all sorts of economic activities that would otherwise take place. Remove the economic straitjacket on our factors of production – land, labour, capital and entrepreneurship – and the fiscal problems will be solved. Needlessly restrictive and complex planning and zoning regulations prevent a much-needed increase in the stock of housing, transport infrastructure, factories and offices. We have left the EU only to discover that our Eurosclerosis is home-grown. The surest way to boost the revenues to the Exchequer from income tax and National Insurance would be to implement pro-employment policies that increase the number of people in jobs. Instead, with the Employment Rights Bill, minimum wage increases and the uplift in employers' National Insurance, Labour has delivered the most anti-employment policies in a generation. The unemployment rate has risen from 4.1pc to 4.6pc during Labour's first year in office and looks likely to rise further. Over the coming years, any rise in employment and incomes will be lower than it could have been. Economists have long known that increasing the ratio of capital to workers is the only way to increase productivity in the long run. But capital, which includes vehicles, machines and computers, needs power. The more cheap power is available, the greater the opportunities for capital to deepen and productivity growth. However, under our dogged decarbonisation push, we have reduced the availability of electricity to the economy by around a fifth since the peak in 2005. This decline has occurred due to the planned decommissioning of electricity production facilities powered by coal, oil, and even nuclear. Ahead of the election, Labour was making all the right noises. But the early promises to focus on growth with a pro-business message seem to have given way to a damaging and self-defeating cycle of growth disappointments and tax increases. Fears over higher taxes encourage saving and lacklustre spending and investment, which lowers tax yields across the board. Chronically fearful consumers are saving more than 10pc of their income, despite average annual real wage gains of nearly 2pc for over two years while businesses sit on near-record cash balances. Taxes, like public services, are a second derivative of the real economy. We depend on the profits and investment of British industry, as well as the incomes and spending of private sector workers, to finance our public sector. The UK does not need to raise taxes; it needs to raise supply. Cutting red tape to promote these activities is the path to fiscal sustainability.
BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fire and asbestos complicate old Norwich shoe factory demolition
Fire damage, asbestos, and the location of a derelict shoe factory have created "significant demolition challenges", experts from more than a dozen stations tackled January's blaze at the former Van-Dal shoe factory on Dibden Road in director of Anglian Demolition Lee Storer said there was "no rule book" about how to dismantle a site like praised local residents for their patience and confirmed the team remained on track to complete the demolition in two weeks' time. Norfolk Fire and Rescue Service said the blaze damaged up to 75% of the building and took between three and four hours to bring under of the site was under way, and Mr Storer said it was a challenging job due to the location being in a tight residential said local residents had been fantastic and appreciated "the complexities of the job". As well as the location, he said the job was challenging due to structural damage caused by the fire and the dangerous building materials used in its City Council said at the time of the fire, the site contained asbestos and it was arranging for tests to be carried out."You have got to try to predict what the building's going to do under those sorts of conditions," Mr Storer said."There is no rule book for it because the damage is quite extensive in the structure of the building."If you're pulling one part of the building down, you have to consider how it affects the next part." Norfolk Police has since dropped its investigation into the attended a blaze at the same location in site is owned by Flagship Homes. Managing director Tony Tann said he wanted to create affordable properties that Norwich "urgently needs"."This is about creating homes, communities and places where people can thrive," he closure of the facility, Norwich's last remaining shoe factory, was announced in 2018. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
