Student athlete disqualified from college admission for wearing cap with school emblem
The Seoul Administrative Court upheld the disqualification of a student athlete who was denied admission to a university in 2024 after wearing a swim cap bearing the emblem of one's high school during the practical entrance examination.
The applicant, a water polo player, challenged the decision, arguing that the university's admission guidelines ban only names or school affiliations on swimsuits — not on swim caps.
However, the court ruled that the swim cap could reasonably be interpreted as part of the swimsuit under conventional usage of the term. The Korean term "suyeongbok" literally translates as "swimming clothes."
"Regarding the swimming cap as part of the swimsuit is in keeping with the conventional interpretation of the word (swimsuit) ... Considering that the rule is to ensure a fair applications process by assessing each applicant's abilities in no regards to one's affiliations, there is no reason to treat swimsuit and swimming cap differently," the court said.
The plaintiff also argued that two other applicants were not disqualified despite wearing marked swimming caps, but the court pointed out that markings on the mentioned caps did not show their school affiliations.
Addressing the plaintiff's claim that no examiners warned them about the disqualifying attire during the test, the court stated that the absence of such an on-site warning could not be construed as assurance that the applicant would not face disqualification.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
9 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Ex-President Yoon, former first lady summoned for questioning
A special counsel team announced Monday that it has summoned both former President Yoon Suk Yeol and ex-first lady Kim Keon Hee for questioning scheduled to take place in the following weeks, over their alleged roles in election interference and other scandals. The team led by prosecutor Min Joong-ki team ordered Yoon and Kim to each appear as suspects for separate questioning sessions scheduled on the mornings of July 29 and Aug. 6, respectively, assistant special counsel Moon Hong-ju said to a press briefing. The team, one of the three special counsel teams launched last month, is focused on investigating several allegations surrounding Kim. Yoon and Kim were both summoned their alleged meddling in the People Power Party's candidate nomination process for the 2022 by-elections. Kim, in addition, is accused of interfering in the main opposition party's candidate selection process for the 2024 general election. Besides her alleged meddling in elections, Kim is projected to be questioned about her alleged roles in two separate stock manipulation scandals, as well as acceptance of luxury gifts from a shaman in return for favors for the Unification Church. But it is uncertain whether Kim and Yoon will comply with the summon. Yoon, who is currently held at Seoul Detention Center, has already refused summonses to appear for questioning over alleged insurrection and treason from a separate special counsel team. Meanwhile, the team led by prosecutor Min made search and seizure operations at the Finance Ministry and the Export-Import Bank of Korea headquarters in the morning, over suspicions of tampering with a loan aid program to benefit the Unification Church. A high-ranking Unification Church official surnamed Jeon is accused of gifting a diamond necklace and a luxury bag to Kim, through a shaman, in 2022 in exchange for several favors from the Yoon administration. The Yoon administration allegedly funneled money to a Unification Church-led project in Cambodia through the Economic Development Cooperation Fund. The fund was established by the Korean government in 1987 to support developing countries and is managed by the Eximbank.
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Renowned human rights lawyer urges Korea to adopt forced labor import ban
No company is free from forced labor in global supply chain, stresses Vandenberg, founder of Human Trafficking Legal Center American human rights lawyer Martina Vandenberg has called on South Korea, an important economy in the global supply chain, to enact an import ban on goods made with forced labor during her recent visit to Seoul, saying such a measure would benefit not only exploited workers abroad but Korean workers as well. "Forced labor is ubiquitous, and it is so frequently found in global supply chains" said Vandenberg, president of Washington-based Human Trafficking Legal Center, in an interview with The Korea Herald. It is 'a feature, not a bug' in the global economic system, and 'it's systematic.' She visited Seoul earlier this month to speak at a forum on the forced labor issue, co-hosted by the National Assembly Labor Forum, the National Human Rights Commission and the Korean Bar Association. The Human Trafficking Legal Center, founded by Vandenberg, is a nonprofit that trains pro bono lawyers to seek restitution for human trafficking victims. She has trained more than 4,000 pro bono attorneys. 'At this point in the global economy, if you want a job and you're coming from a poor country, you have to buy that job,' she said. 'You pay recruitment fees, fees for medical tests, fees to travel. And when workers arrive at the job site, they discover they're not being paid the rate they were promised. Their debt back home keeps growing. They may be victims of deception, violence or even sexual violence.' "When so many workers across the globe are experiencing forced labor, we have to ask how the system is so broken," she added. She explained that many firms build layers of subcontractors — "subcontractors, and subcontractors and subcontractors" — to distance themselves from legal responsibility. 'They're trying to avoid liability, both criminal and civil.' But the real pressure, she emphasized, comes from the top. 'It's the companies in developed economies putting enormous pressure on supply chains to lower prices.' 'No company is free from this,' Vandenberg said. 'American companies are not free from this. South Korean companies are not free from this.' US import ban model To address the issue, the United States has enforced Section 307 of the Tariff Act, which prohibits the import of goods made with forced labor. Although the law has existed since 1930, it became enforceable only after loopholes were closed in 2016. 'This enforceability has had an enormous impact,' she said. 'Before, companies operated with total impunity. No one would prosecute them. No one would stop them. But now they realize someone is watching. Someone is investigating. And if their supply chain is tainted with forced labor, they may not be able to sell their goods in the US, the EU, Canada or Mexico.' Vandenberg said, 'We hope someday they won't be able to bring their goods into South Korea — when South Korea has an import ban.' 'South Korea is a very important economy, a key player in the global economy,' she added. According to a 2023 report by international human rights group Walk Free, South Korea imports up to $20 billion worth of goods each year that are at risk of being linked to forced labor. Many of these products originate from regions where Uyghur workers and others are forced into labor in the lowest tiers of global supply chains. While Korea has not yet proposed such a bill, The Korea Herald has learned that Rep. Kim Tae-seon of the ruling Democratic Party is preparing to introduce legislation following a series of public discussions. Import bans, she noted, do more than protect workers abroad. 'They also protect workers at home. There's no way a Korean or American worker can compete with someone earning almost nothing. A US steelworker, who testified in a hearing before the Senate Finance Committee several years ago, said 'There's no way I can compete with someone held in slavery.' So US and South Korean workers can't compete when other workers aren't being paid." Vandenberg suggested that import bans can be incorporated into bilateral trade agreements. Canada and Mexico, for example, adopted import bans as part of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, negotiated under the Trump administration in 2020. 'It's a very good way for countries to negotiate with the US — agree to adopt import bans and reach mutually beneficial trade deals,' she said. Korean sea salt under scrutiny The US has already taken action against a Korean company. In April, US Customs and Border Protection issued a withhold release order against products from Taepyung Salt Farm, one of Korea's largest sea salt producers, citing evidence of forced labor. The action followed a 2022 petition from Korean civic groups urging a ban on Korean sea salt allegedly produced under forced labor conditions. According to Vandenberg, the action against the Korean company is highly unusual. 'It's one of only three issued this year -- alongside actions against frankincense from Somaliland and seafood from a Chinese fishing vessel, Zhen Fa 7, which had Indonesian fishers onboard.' 'We don't believe any withhold release order should be modified or revoked until there is proof that workers have been compensated and that conditions have changed,' she said. 'The whole point is not just to block goods — but to change the reality for workers on the ground.' She added, 'There's still a long way to go. It will take attention and effort from the company and Korean authorities before any modification or revocation would be justified.' shinjh@
Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
'Non-celebrity risk' shakes Korean dating reality TV
Authenticity and low overhead costs continue to make non-celeb shows appealing to producers despite off-screen scandals Dating reality shows featuring ordinary people have gripped South Korean audiences for years now, with hits like "I'm Solo" consistently dominating the country's television ratings. But there's a dark side to the trend: as these shows gain popularity, the term 'non-celebrity risk' has taken hold in the entertainment industry — referring to cases in which participants are later revealed to be involved in legal or ethical misconduct. The issue was thrust into the spotlight in late June when Seoul's Mapo Police Station confirmed the arrest of a man in his 30s, identified by the surname Park, on charges of quasi-rape, a crime distinguished in Korean law by the victim's state of unconsciousness. Park allegedly sexually assaulted a woman on June 21 in a parking lot in Seogyo-dong, Mapo-gu. Local media soon identified Park as part of the 25th cohort of participants in "I'm Solo," one of Korea's most popular dating reality programs, where he appeared under the nickname Young-chul. "I'm Solo" brings together ordinary men and women for one week to see if they can find love. What added to the controversy was that Park, at the time of his arrest, was still appearing on "I'm Solo, Love Forever" — a spinoff featuring the ongoing romantic arcs among former cast members of "I'm Solo." In a statement, the show's production team said, 'We learned of Park's criminal charges and the court's warrant for his arrest through media reports. Given the gravity of the situation, we will take appropriate measures to ensure viewers are not made uncomfortable during the broadcast.' Not only was footage of Park removed from the show, but so were scenes involving other cast members with ties to him. This incident followed another major scandal involving a former fan-favorite from the show's 10th cohort of daters. A cast member identified by her surname Choi — known to viewers by the nickname Jung-sook — was fined 7 million won ($5,026) in June for multiple offenses, including assault and defamation. According to prosecutors, Choi struck the victim in the face six times and destroyed their phone, while also publicly insulting them. "ToGetHer," Wavve's viral reality series featuring lesbian daters, also came under fire in May when allegations surfaced online against cast member Kim Ri-won. Anonymous posts accused Kim of previously working as an online adult content broadcaster and engaging in prostitution. In response, Kim admitted to having participated in six dinner meetings during her time as a BJ (broadcast jockey), but denied any physical involvement, saying, 'All of the gatherings were strictly dinners.' Following public backlash, the production team removed all of Kim's scenes and romantic storylines from the show. Unlike shows featuring celebrity performers -- who are represented by agencies and have received professional training in media conduct -- reality programs that rely on non-celebrities can be far more unpredictable off-screen. Still, producers say the format remains attractive for its authenticity and low overhead costs. 'Watching these reality shows, viewers can easily empathize (with the cast) and become immersed as they see their own experiences or emotions reflected in the honest and unfiltered appearances of the non-celebrity cast members,' said a local producer on the condition of anonymity. 'Plus, their appearance fees are significantly less than what celebrities command, making the productions highly cost-efficient.' But experts argue that the financial upside can no longer justify the reputational damage to broadcasters and the recurring cycle of scandals, rushed edits and public apologies, which undermine the authenticity of the programs and ultimately damage the credibility of Korean unscripted content as a whole. Lee Moon-haeng, a media and communications professor at Suwon University, emphasized that the core issue lies in the casting process. 'Broadcast media is inherently drawn to marketable individuals. Once a new person with public appeal is discovered, production teams often rush to cast them without conducting proper background checks.' Lee added, 'The focus is often on superficial traits — looks, education, social media presence — at the expense of character evaluation. That needs to change.' To tackle the issue, she suggested not only enhancing background checks but also implementing stricter legal safeguards for producers. 'Appearance contracts should include accountability clauses, such as the right to claim damages or pursue legal action if a cast member becomes embroiled in controversy," said Lee.
