NC Senate panel endorses van der Vaart for Utilities Commission slot
The North Carolina Senate Agriculture, Energy, and Environment Committee voted Wednesday morning to confirm Donald van der Vaart as a member of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, forwarding the resolution to the Senate Select Committee on Nominations.
Appointed by Republican Treasurer Brad Briner, van der Vaart previously served as North Carolina's environment secretary. He's a climate skeptic who was considered for EPA administrator during the first Trump administration.
Van der Vaart began his state government career with two decades in the state's Division of Air Quality. Republican Gov. Pat McCrory promoted him to secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality in 2015, NC Newsline previously reported.
His term on the Utilities Commission, if confirmed, would start July 1 of this year and expire on June 30, 2031.
The Utilities Commission is an agency responsible for regulating the rates and services of all investor-owned public utilities in North Carolina. It's the oldest regulatory body in state government, according to its website.
At Wednesday's meeting van der Vaart was asked a handful of mostly friendly questions.
'What specific strategies do you think you'll employ to ensure your decisions remain impartial, evidence-driven, and resistant to any undue influence from any of the stakeholder groups?' Sen. Buck Newton (R-Greene, Wayne, Wilson) asked.
Van der Vaart said he would rely on the structure that's currently in place, which includes a 'capable' staff that works independently.
'I'm very much interested in using the transparency to the public to provide a forum where free discussions can be not only had, but also viewed,' he said.
He's faced criticism in the past due to a potential conflict of interest with his wife's work.
Van der Vaart served as the chief administrative judge on a DEQ dispute over the regulation of a toxic chemical in September. His wife Sandra is chair of the North Carolina Chamber Legal Institute, a prominent lobbying group opposed to PFAS regulation, the Port City Daily reported.
Newton also asked Van der Vaart to share his thoughts on Senate Bill 261, which would eliminate the interim goal for Duke Energy to cut its carbon emissions by 2030.
'A lot of times, goals and mandates get conflated. Do you see this as a goal or some sort of a mandate?' asked Newton.
Van der Vaart said the interim goal does provide the state with 'offramps' if things don't go as planned.
'I think if you look back a little bit into this, you'll see that some of the load predictions and the requirements that were anticipated in the past turned out to be somewhat inaccurate. Now the 2050 goal appears to be a mandate,' Van der Vaart responded.
Critics of SB 261 have argued that not having an intermediate goal could make it harder to reach carbon neutrality by 2050. The bill was fast tracked through the Senate in March, but has yet to see action in the House this session.
Sen. Jay Chaudhuri (D-Wake) joked that van der Vaart may hold the most degrees out of all nominees in front of the legislature: a bachelor's in chemistry from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a Juris Doctor from North Carolina Central University, a master's in chemical engineering from North Carolina State University, and a doctorate in chemical engineering from the University of Cambridge.
Chaudhuri also asked what van der Vaart thought was the most important role for the utilities commission.
'The most important role, despite the fact that we regulate a number of utility functions, is to deliver reliable and affordable energy within the confines that are mandated,' van der Vaart said. 'We need to work very hard to maintain the affordability of our electricity… If we didn't have a consumer advocacy function in North Carolina, then we would be ill served.'
Asked about the rising demand for natural gas and pipeline capacity to meet industrial growth, Van der Vaart said this was an issue of critical importance in sustaining the electric grid.
'I think that one of my interests will be to determine and to convince myself that we have the kind of physical capacity and redundancy from a national security standpoint to be able to continue to deliver manufacturing support electricity and various other residential uses of natural gas reliably in the future.'
Environmental groups and clean energy advocates have raised concerns about the build out of natural gas pipelines, amid worries about the impacts on water, air and habitats, and greenhouse gas emissions.
Along with voting to confirm van der Vaart, the committee heard a resolution to approve Reid Wilson as the DEQ secretary, following appointment from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein. This portion was 'discussion only' and the panel did not take a vote.
Wilson formerly served as secretary for the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources from 2021 to 2024. Before that, he was DNCR's chief deputy secretary from 2017 to 2020. He's been serving as DEQ secretary on an interim basis while awaiting confirmation.
Clayton Henkel contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Are legislative districts in US states drawn fairly? Poll shows partisan divide
Americans are divided over the fairness of legislative districts, with Democrats being more likely than Republicans to say electoral maps are drawn unfairly, according to the latest YouGov poll. At the same time, most Americans agree that redistricting efforts should be conducted by a nonpartisan body, as opposed to one political party. The survey, conducted on Aug. 4, comes as several states have moved to reform their legislative districts — areas that determine congressional representation in the House of Representatives — ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In Texas, for example, the Republican-controlled legislature plans to vote on a newly proposed district map, which would add five new GOP districts. A group of Democratic lawmakers fled the state in an attempt to block the vote. In response, other states, like California, have proposed the possibility of redrawing their own legislative maps as a retaliatory measure, though many blue states face limitations since their redistricting processes are overseen by independent commissions. Here is a breakdown of the poll results. In the survey — which sampled 18,217 U.S. adults — respondents were asked: 'Do you think legislative districts are drawn fairly or unfairly in your state?' Thirty-four percent said they believe their districts are drawn very fairly (9%) or somewhat fairly (25%). A similar share, 35%, said they think their own legislative districts are designed somewhat unfairly (19%) or very unfairly (16%). An additional 31% said they were not sure. On this question, there was a noticeable partisan divide. Forty percent of Democrats said their district was designed in a biased fashion, while 36% of independents and 28% of Republicans said the same. Several studies in recent years have concluded that legislative district maps are often unfairly drawn. For example, a 2024 study from the University of Chicago found that gerrymandering, the process of manipulating electoral boundaries to favor one party, 'occurs in many states and municipalities, leading to less responsive legislatures.' A similar study from the University of Utah concluded that 'Americans are categorized and grouped differently during congressional redistricting depending on who is drawing the lines.' Some of the most gerrymandered states include: Texas, Louisiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Wisconsin, according to Newsweek, which compiled a report based on data from the World Population Review. In the poll — which has a margin of error of 1 percentage point — respondents were also asked whether they support requiring redistricting efforts to be handled by a 'nonpartisan redistricting commission.' A majority of respondents, 59%, said they strongly (38%) or somewhat support (21%) this. Meanwhile, just 11% said they somewhat (7%) or strongly oppose (4%) this measure. Thirty percent said they were not sure. On this question, there was a consensus across the political spectrum. Sixty-eight percent of Democrats, 56% of independents and 55% of Republicans said they're on board with restricting being conducted by nonpartisan commissions. Most state legislatures are responsible for redistricting, but 15 states have authorized commissions for the purpose of drawing legislative districts in an effort to reduce gerrymandering, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. These states include: California, Colorado, Hawaii and Michigan. Five other states, including New York, have advisory commissions that assist legislatures in the redistricting process. Redistricting is typically done every 10 years, following the decennial U.S. census, but some states conduct this process more often.
Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Can Greg Abbott Kick Out Fleeing Democrats? Experts Weigh In
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott warned on Sunday that Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to break quorum during a special legislative session could be removed from office for abandoning their duties. Abbott cited a 2021 opinion by Attorney General Ken Paxton as justification, asserting that it allows him to declare vacancies and replace absent members. However, a detailed review of Texas law and the attorney general's opinion indicates the governor lacks unilateral authority to take such action. Why It Matters Abbott's threat highlights a broader clash over executive power, legislative independence and due process in Texas politics. While Abbott cites Paxton's 2021 opinion to justify potential removals, the opinion indicates that only courts—not the governor—can determine whether a legislator has abandoned office. If a governor could unilaterally remove legislators for breaking quorum, it would drastically expand executive power and potentially override voters' choices. Texas House members during a hearing at the state Capitol in Austin on July 10, 2021. Texas House members during a hearing at the state Capitol in Austin on July 10, 2021. Tamir Kalifa/Getty What To Know Who Is Greg Abbott? Abbott has served as Texas' governor since January 20, 2015. A former lawyer and Texas Supreme Court Justice (1996-2001), he served as attorney general from 2002 to 2015. A Republican since his state Supreme Court appointment by Governor George W. Bush, Abbott is known for his conservative positions on immigration, gun rights and limiting federal oversight. Who Is Ken Paxton? Ken Paxton, a former state legislator, has been Texas' attorney general since 2015. As the state's top legal officer, he issues advisory opinions like his 2021 KP-0382 and represents Texas in court. In 2023, Paxton faced an impeachment attempt in the Texas House over allegations of corruption, abuse of office and bribery tied to his relationship with a political donor. The Texas Senate held a trial in September 2023 and acquitted him on all counts, allowing him to remain in office. Quorum Breaks Explained A quorum break occurs when enough lawmakers leave a legislative session to prevent official business. Legislative bodies like the Texas House require a minimum number of members present to pass laws—two-thirds in this case. In Texas, a quorum is the minimum number of legislators required for the House (100 of 150 members) or Senate (21 of 31 members) to conduct business. If enough members leave, they can deny a quorum and halt legislative proceedings. The tactic, which is used by Democrats and Republicans, is legal but controversial. What the Paxton Opinion Says Attorney General Opinion KP-0382 was issued during a 2021 quorum standoff. It addressed whether lawmakers could break quorum and whether such actions create a vacancy. The opinion concluded: A vacancy may occur if an official "abandons" office. Determining abandonment is a fact-specific question for a court. A quo warranto action (a legal proceeding used to challenge whether a person has the legal right to hold a public office) must be filed by the attorney general or a district attorney for a court to decide if a legislator forfeited office. The opinion did not rule breaking quorum unconstitutional, nor did it grant the governor power to declare vacancies unilaterally. Historical Context Texas governors have used legal and procedural tools to compel lawmakers back to the chamber but have never removed members for breaking quorum. 1870: Thirteen Texas senators left the Capitol to block a wartime powers bill, denying a quorum. They were arrested, and the bill later passed, establishing quorum-breaking as a tactic in Texas politics. Thirteen Texas senators left the Capitol to block a wartime powers bill, denying a quorum. They were arrested, and the bill later passed, establishing quorum-breaking as a tactic in Texas politics. 1979: Twelve Democratic state senators nicknamed the "Killer Bees" hid for four and a half days to block a vote on presidential primary election rules. Twelve Democratic state senators nicknamed the "Killer Bees" hid for four and a half days to block a vote on presidential primary election rules. 2003: More than 50 Democrats fled to Oklahoma to delay a Republican-backed redistricting plan. The plan ultimately passed after lawmakers returned. More than 50 Democrats fled to Oklahoma to delay a Republican-backed redistricting plan. The plan ultimately passed after lawmakers returned. 2021: More than 50 Democrats went to Washington to protest voting restrictions. Arrests were authorized to compel attendance, and the bill passed after members returned. What People Are Saying Chuck DeVore, chief national initiatives officer at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and a former California lawmaker, told Newsweek on Monday: "The governor has threatened to declare a vacancy, which he can do. This does not require any sort of judicial Article IV, Section 10 of the Texas governor can declare vacancies. "I really think that eventually there will be members that come are members that cannot withstand the financial potentially criminal action, because if it's found out that you took money from somebody in exchange for breaking illegal. "What happened the last time [2021]...the average Texan simply looks at this and says, you're not doing your job. And what ends up happening is the public begins to turn against them." Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, told the Texas Tribune: "It's a messaging a last resort for Democrats who have run out of options legislatively and even legally." Mark P. Jones, a political science professor at Rice University: "If we're going to follow our current primary schedule, we do need to have these districts approved by the Legislature before the opening of filing [for the 2026 midterms] in November." The Texas House Democratic Caucus, in a four-word statement in response to Abbott's threats: "Come and take it." Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, during a press conference on Sunday: "We're going to do everything we can to protect every single one of them." What Happens Next Abbott ordered Democratic lawmakers to return when the House reconvenes on August 4. While he has threatened to declare their seats vacant, any attempt would almost certainly lead to a court challenge. With no precedent for removal in Texas history, the standoff could prolong legislative gridlock, prompt additional special sessions and potentially set new legal precedent on gubernatorial authority (the legal powers and responsibilities granted to a state governor under a state's constitution and laws) and quorum-breaking tactics.
Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Lawmakers Face Heated Voters on Tax Bill, Economy
Wisconsin Republican Congressman Bryan Steil discusses the heated reaction from his constituents to the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' and US trade policy as he holds town halls in his district. (Source: Bloomberg)
