
These old industrial sites in Michigan are toxic—but they could become a solar gold mine
With a little effort, these spaces can be more than a permanent blight on the landscape. Kelly Thayer, senior policy advocate with the state's Environmental Law & Policy Center, envisions a future where Michigan's brownfields are transformed into sites for diverse solar energy projects.
The potential for new solar siting in Michigan aligns with growing nationwide support of the technology, according to a survey co-led by the University of Michigan. Among residents living within three miles of solar energy developments, positive opinions about the projects outnumbered negative ones by almost a 3-to-1 ratio.
For the study, a large-scale solar project was defined as a ground-mounted photovoltaic system that generates one megawatt or more of direct current. The majority of respondents lived near new greenfield solar sites—'disturbed' industrial locations or retiring coal plants were strongly preferred for solar development over forests or productive farmland.
Thayer, from Frankfort on the shores of Lake Michigan, said there is already precedent for solar on former industrial land in his home state. A 120-megawatt solar array on a long-vacant mining operation in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, for example, was met by residents with little controversy.
Yet, a Michigan Department of Natural Resources proposal to transition a former oil-and-gas plot in Gaylord to solar energy was met with substantial public backlash in January. Following resident protests against tree and grassland removal for the solar array, the agency extended the public comment period and halted state land leases for solar projects.
This limbo period gives Michigan a chance to readjust its solar siting approach, with an emphasis on distressed lands that would allow the technology to flourish, Thayer said.
'The work now is to chart the near-term future of how Michiganders get their energy,' said Thayer, whose advocacy group focuses on renewable energy and clean transportation solutions for the Midwest. 'This can be talked about through the lens of climate or the environment, but the public health ramifications are enormous as well.'
A Vital Asset
Last year, the state of Michigan won a $129 million grant from the EPA for utility-scale renewable energy projects, including those on brownfields. These 'orphan' industrial plots—landfills, auto plants and other properties left to molder by private industry—are vital assets for a state seeking to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels, noted Thayer.
Michigan aims to be a national climate action leader, driven by Governor Gretchen Whitmer's 2050 carbon neutrality goals. Among the tenets of the MI Healthy Climate Plan is streamlining the siting process for wind, solar and battery storage projects. State legislation like Senate Bill 277, meanwhile, includes solar facilities as a permitted use for farmers under the Farmland and Open Space Preservation Act.
Thayer's organization, the Environmental Law & Policy Center, also views retiring coal plants as potential solar energy hubs, considering that they are already connected to the energy grid. For instance, the organization helped develop a blueprint for the Dan E. Karn coal plant site, slated as the future home for an 85-megawatt solar energy site expected to be operational in 2026.
'These are flat, highly-disturbed sites that also have a substation in place that's hard-wired to the grid,' Thayer said. 'Having that infrastructure saves millions in development, and saves time because it takes four or five years to add new energy resources to the grid.'
Some Michigan clean energy projects are hindered by years-long grid connection delays as well as restrictive zoning ordinances that impede their development. In addition, Michigan lacks a comprehensive database of brownfields that detail key characteristics sought by solar developers, said Julie Lowe, brownfield coordinator for the remediation and redevelopment division of the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE).
'Developers will have to use multiple resources to site projects on known sites of contamination,' said Lowe. 'They need databases for tree canopy cover, or have to do site reconnaissance to eyeball the slope and see if it fits their needs.'
An Array of Solar Options
EGLE does offer a list of guidelines for anyone asking to purchase a contaminated property for renewable energy development. Prospective buyers must conduct a two-phase Baseline Environmental Assessment before moving ahead with a project. Due diligence may encompass a deep dive into a site's former use, as well as comprehensive testing of soil or groundwater samples.
'You may have to go back to the 19th century to determine what the property was used for,' Lowe said. 'And there might be drilling or radar work needed to see if there's something in the ground. For brownfields, we see solvents [in the soil] for dry cleaning or auto repair, because those were chemicals used in those activities.'
Various brownfield incentives and programs may subsidize environmental remediation or any additional assessment a site requires, added Lowe. EGLE's Brownfield Tax Increment Financing utilizes the rise in tax revenue from a revitalized site to reimburse developers for the cleanup and demolition work that generated that increase.
That is not to say developers should always foot the bill, said Thayer. A series of 'polluter pay' laws—which force parties responsible for contamination to pay for site cleanup and remediation costs—are currently being proposed by Michigan lawmakers. Thayer also advocates for virtual power plant programs, enabling utilities to pay homeowners with solar and battery storage to contribute stored power during peak demand.
Community solar, which involves installing arrays on vacant lots or working farmlands, can be another multibillion-dollar boon for Michigan, said Thayer. According to a 2021 study by Michigan State University, community solar could deliver a nearly $1.5 billion boost to the state's economy over the next 30 years.
For now, Michigan officials should prioritize cleaning up and advancing solar energy projects on the state's innumerable polluted brownfields, said Sarah Mills, a University of Michigan researcher who directs the Center for EmPowering Communities at the Graham Sustainability Institute.
'I go to meetings about large renewables projects, and it's mostly for farmland,' said Mills. 'People will say, 'Why here, why not a brownfield?' From a community acceptance perspective, this is what most people consider a no-brainer.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
An Ancient Law Could Shape the Modern Future of America's Beaches. Here's How.
If you go to a beach this summer, you might end up sunbathing in disputed territory. That's partly because of climate change and partly because of a legal principle from the Roman Empire. Most beaches have a natural defense against rising seas: The sandy area simply moves landward. But when property owners install sea walls or other barriers to protect beachfront homes and other buildings, the beach has nowhere to go. So it vanishes underwater. Geologists call it coastal squeeze. It's not a new problem, but it's been accelerating recently as climate change causes sea levels to rise. And that's prompting urgent questions about how coastal landscapes should be managed. Richard K. Norton, a professor at the University of Michigan School of Law, described the situation with a question: 'Are you going to save the beach house, or do you want to save the beach?' he said at a recent conference in New York City organized by Columbia University. 'Because you cannot save them both.' At issue is a legal concept from the sixth century A.D., when Emperor Justinian ordered the codification of Roman laws. The resulting code declared that features of nature like the air, running water, the sea and 'the shores of the sea' must be held in trust for the use of the public. That idea passed into English common law, and then to the United States. Today, most states define the beach below the high-tide line as public trust property, meaning members of the public have free access. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Michigan civil rights and health advocates condemn deal to share Medicaid data with ICE
An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer's badge is seen as federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court in New York City on June 10, 2025. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images) A plan to give Immigration and Customs Enforcement access to the personal data of all 79 million Medicaid enrollees – including more than 2.6 million Michiganders – is being condemned by both the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan and the Michigan League for Public Policy. The Associated Press reports the agreement between the Trump administration's Department of Homeland Security and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services would include the home addresses and ethnicities of enrollees in an effort to track down immigrants who may not be living legally in the United States. The AP obtained a copy of an agreement between the two agencies, which has not been publicly announced. Ramis Wadood, an ACLU of Michigan staff attorney, noted the policy change comes on the heels of Congress, at the behest of President Donald Trump, approving nearly $1 trillion in cuts from Medicaid. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'Now, this wicked administration intends to terrorize Medicaid enrollees by sending ICE agents to their doors to possibly drag them away from their families in the name of rounding up people believed to be in the country illegally,' Wadood said. According to a joint press release by the ACLU and the Michigan League for Public Policy, the agreement is believed to be the first time in Medicaid's history that comprehensive health data, including names, birthdates, addresses, Social Security numbers, and racial and ethnic information, has been turned over for immigration enforcement. 'Sending ICE the personal data of 79 million people will put them in the crosshairs of the Trump administration's senseless and dehumanizing mass deportation machine. The attacks on our immigrant friends and neighbors, as well as the millions on Medicaid, are an affront to all of us – our rights and our freedom – and together, we must fight back,' Wadood said. Monique Stanton, president and CEO of the Michigan League for Public Policy, called the policy a 'direct attack' on public health and civil liberties. She also warned that it will deter families — including those legally eligible — from seeking even emergency treatment out of fear that their enrollment could result in detention or deportation. 'When a parent brings their child to the ER, they shouldn't have to weigh whether saving their child's life will put their entire family at risk of deportation. Weaponizing Medicaid data for immigration enforcement will create a dangerous chilling effect, deterring immigrants and their families from seeking the care they need, while putting entire communities at risk,' Stanton said. According to the joint press release, Michigan is home to over 157,000 residents living in mixed-status families, including more than 71,000 U.S. citizens. 'These families already face elevated rates of uninsurance — 10.6% of immigrants in Michigan are uninsured, compared to just 5% of native-born residents. Policies that increase barriers to care will only worsen health disparities and strain emergency services,' the release stated. Both agencies also say the data-sharing arrangement raises serious legal and ethical concerns, and appears to violate federal medical privacy protections, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, known as HIPAA. The AP reported that Medicaid officials had fought to prevent the data sharing even as late as Monday. 'They are trying to turn us into immigration agents,' a CMS official, who did not have permission to speak to the media and insisted on anonymity, told the AP. Stanton said the implications of sharing the data go beyond immigration policy. 'Delays in prenatal and pediatric care could lead to preventable birth complications and childhood illnesses. Avoiding preventive treatment will drive up emergency costs for hospitals and taxpayers. And the mental health toll from fear, trauma and family separation will ripple across generations,' Stanton said. 'We cannot allow this betrayal of trust to stand.' Solve the daily Crossword


Black America Web
3 days ago
- Black America Web
Black Woman Sues University Of Michigan For ‘Racist' Firing
Source: Nic Antaya / Getty A Black woman who was the former head of the University of Michigan's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) office is suing the school, alleging she was discriminated against when the school fired her for antisemitic remarks she said she never made. According to the Detroit Free Press, Rachel Dawson attended an academic conference in March 2024 when she was approached by two women asking her how the school was planning to address antisemitism. The women allege Dawson, who then ran University of Michigan's Office of Academic Multicultural Initiatives, responded by saying 'The university is controlled by wealthy Jews' and 'We don't work with Jews.' Dawson has a different recollection of the events and denies ever making remarks of the sort. From Detroit Free Press: Dawson said she remembered talking with the two women who accused her, but her recollection of the conversation was far different. She said that when the two women heard she was from U-M, they approached her to discuss rumors of antisemitism on campus. Dawson said she told them that the school was doing its best to combat antisemitism and all forms of discrimination. She noted that the school had recently opened the Raoul Wallenberg Institute to promote tolerance and that Jewish students had access to support groups like Hillel . Dawson's suit said the women became hostile, began berating her and even followed her out of the room when she tried to end the conversation. Days later, back at U-M, Dawson said she learned that the women had contacted the Anti-Defamation League, which filed a complaint about her with then-President Santa Ono. 'I am aware of several non-Black employees of the university who have been the subject of similar complaints about their behavior, and none have been terminated,' Dawson wrote in a statement to the school before her disciplinary hearing. 'The allegations against me illustrate how racial and gender biases can shape the interpretation of events and statements, especially for Black women in positions of authority.' Call me racist, but I'm much more inclined to believe that a group of white women got offended that a Black woman didn't say exactly what they wanted to hear, instead of a Black woman, in a position of power, willfully throwing that out the window to say something heinously antisemitic in a professional setting. Just saying, we didn't coin the term 'Karen' because entitled white women don't exist. Moving on, Dawson alleges the University of Michigan didn't follow its usual disciplinary steps when it comes to investigating incidents like these. The school hired an outside law firm, Covington & Burling LLP, to investigate instead of doing it in-house. Covington & Burling also represented the ADL in this case, which Dawson's lawyers allege to be a conflict of interest. The law firm's report acknowledged that Dawson and the women had differing accounts of the incident but found 'the weight of the available evidence supports the conclusion that Ms. Dawson made the statements attributed to her in the ADL Michigan letter.' Tabbye Chavous, Dawson's supervisor, was skeptical of how the investigation was being conducted and the findings in the final report. Chavous wrote a letter to the University of Michigan's then-President Santa Ono saying that 'Based on all information available to me, I would respectfully disagree with the conclusion drawn from the report.' 'It is obvious that this is not consistent with our normal processes for investigating alleged similar conduct of employees in a similar position as Ms. Dawson at an off-campus conference,' Chavous wrote. 'Why is the process for this situation and employee seemingly different from similar kinds of allegations and issues with others and how they are dealt with normally?' After the investigation, Chavous issued Dawson a warning and ordered her to complete anti-bias training. Usually, this would be where the story ends, but not in the case of Dawson. When word of the disciplinary action reached the University of Michigan's Board of Regents, Regent Mark Bernstein wrote, 'that the only acceptable outcome would be for Ms. Dawson to be 'terminated immediately.'' By December 2024, Dawson was fired from her position. Being prejudiced against someone for their race, religion, gender, or sexuality is the weakest thing a person can do. Yet it's interesting that whenever a white man is accused of racism, all he's expected to do is take an anti-bias class, make an apology, and the consequences are waved away. What Dawson is accused of is objectively awful, yet one can't help but see the double standard in how she's being treated compared to the multitudes of white men who have actually been recorded saying equally if not more heinous things and are still given chance after chance to redeem themselves. The University of Michigan has stood by its decision to fire Dawson. 'Rachel Dawson was appropriately terminated from her employment at the University of Michigan,' school spokeswoman Kay Jarvis told the Free Press in an email. 'We will vigorously defend this matter.' Dawson filed her lawsuit in federal court and intends to file a state court discrimination claim as well. Dawson's suit asks the court to declare the University of Michigan violated her civil rights and to award her an undisclosed amount in damages. SEE ALSO: UVA President Resigns Over Trump's Anti-DEI Investigation UNC Asheville Dean Of Students Fired For Pro-DEI Comments SEE ALSO Black Woman Sues University Of Michigan For 'Racist' Firing was originally published on