Allahabad high court upholds trial court order, backs Sambhal mosque survey
Allahabad high court
dismissed on Monday the Sambhal Shahi Jama Masjid committee's petition challenging a Nov 19, 2024 trial court order directing an advocate commissioner to survey the structure, the subject of a suit claiming that the mosque was built in 1526 after demolishing a temple, reports Rajesh Kumar Pandey.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
While upholding the trial court's survey order, Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal vacated the interim stay on the
Hindu plaintiffs
' suit. The mosque committee had asked for the suit to be dismissed on the ground that the Hindu side's claim to the site was prima facie barred under the Places of Worship Act, 1991. The legislation prohibits conversion of any place of worship and mandates maintaining the religious character of any such site that existed on Aug 15, 1947.
HC: Plaintiffs only seeking right to access to Sambhal site
This is not a case where any conversion of place of worship is taking place or the religious character is being changed. The plaintiffs have only sought right to access to a protected monument, declared in 1920 under Section 18 of Ancient Monument and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the 45-page judgment states. In its petition, the mosque committee contended that the civil judge (junior division) ordered the survey "hastily" and "without issuing notice".
Based on the Nov 19 directive, a survey was conducted that very day and another one on Nov 24.
Later that month, SC stayed proceedings in the trial court until the mosque committee's petition against the survey order was heard by an HC bench.
Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) said in its submission to the bench that the mosque had been designated as a protected monument under the
Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act
, 1958.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
This effectively means that its status is governed by preservation laws rather than religious classification. ASI also mentioned that nowhere in official records was the mosque described as a religious place.
The Hindu plaintiffs contend that the disputed Sambhal mosque stands at what used to be site of an ancient Harihar temple dedicated to Kalki, last avatar of Vishnu. The suit claims in 1526, on orders of Mughal emperor Babar, the temple was partially demolished and a mosque built over it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC dismisses plea against MBBS admission criteria
Panaji: The high court has dismissed a petition filed by a student seeking admission to the first year of the degree course of MBBS at GMC. She approached the HC after being aggrieved by the stipulations for admission in 2025-26, which restrict the eligibility of candidates in the general category to those who have passed Class XII or equivalent from schools or colleges in Goa, and are the state's residents. She stated that she was born to parents originally from Udupi in Karnataka, who in 2004 chose to settle down in Calangute. Both parents are doctors. The petitioner completed her schooling at Sharada Mandir and then got admitted to a college in Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, which runs a residential programme in higher studies. This was because her brother had secured admission to BITS Hyderabad, and her parents, being professionals, were at times required to travel out of Goa. She appeared for her Class XII examination in Andhra Pradesh and secured 98.1% marks. The HC held that there is enough competition among students in Goa who have continued to reside in the state and also took the qualifying examination from an institution in Goa before appearing for NEET-UG and securing a ranking. 'Such candidates form a distinct class from those students who passed the qualifying examination from an institution outside the state of Goa, and, according to us, the classification between the two is reasonable and has a nexus with the object of reserving 85% of seats in govt medical college for those students who are domiciled in the state and also who cleared the qualifying examination from an institute within the state,' the HC said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ranked: The 25 Best Cities To Live In The World Learn More Undo It said, 'It is also not a case that the petitioner is completely ousted from the competition, as she can still compete in the 15% of seats, which are reserved in the All India quota in the state of Goa, and depending on her merit and standing in the merit list, she may take up a seat in Goa Medical College, which the rules permit,' said the division bench comprising justices Bharati Dangre and Nivedita Mehta.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dhirios banned in Goa, but still held: Petitioner to HC
Panaji: Govt has assured the high court that it would look into the issue of bullfights, known as 'dhirios' in Goa. Advocate general Devidas Pangam gave this assurance after the HC was informed that dhirios were occurring rampantly in the state. Radhakrishna Salgaonkar has filed a contempt petition in the HC, alleging that despite the court's directions and a ban on bullfights in Goa, the activity has continued unabated. As proof, he presented an Instagram post promoting bullfights. He also drew the court's attention to a detailed complaint he had made to authorities, including the chief secretary, the DGP, the Animal Welfare Board, the director of animal husbandry and veterinary services, and the cybercrime police station. He alleged that none of the authorities took any cognisance of his complaint. The HC told the advocate general to obtain instructions regarding Salgaonkar's contention that some social media profiles were now deleted, but information about bullfights, and the sale of bulls for these fights, remained on social media. The division bench of the HC said that before issuing a notice to govt under the Contempt of Courts Act, the advocate general has assured the court that he would look into the matter. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read More Undo The court asked Salgaonkar to provide any information on dhirios to the advocate general and directed that the petition be listed on Aug 18. In 2023, the HC directed the DGP to prepare an action plan to prevent bullfights in Goa. The court directed the DGP to identify the organisers and suggest mechanisms with which police officers would be granted authority to prevent bullfights. People for Animals filed a contempt petition attaching several news reports, including six by TOI between Jan and Aug 2021, on bullfights taking place in Goa and bulls dying as a result. TOI reported at the time that bullfights were occurring almost every day between 3pm and 4pm, when there was less movement on roads, in the jurisdiction of the Colva police station. Statistics at the time indicated that South Goa accounted for double the illegal bullfight cases compared to North Goa, with the HC informed that most of these took place in the jurisdiction of the Colva police station. In Jan this year, TOI reported that one of the attendees of a bullfight near Benaulim beach was gored to death. Last month, the South Goa collector held a high-level law and order coordination meeting to prevent such events. The collector issued directions to police to maintain round-the-clock surveillance and take immediate action to prevent dhirios. She directed the deployment of various intelligence-gathering methods to identify locations where the illegal activities were being planned and to ensure swift intervention.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
NALSA launches Veer Parivaar Sahayata Yojana to aid defence personnel
The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) on Saturday launched the Veer Parivaar Sahayata Yojana 2025 here to strengthen legal aid for defence personnel. The yojana was launched in collaboration with the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh and the Jammu & Kashmir Legal Services Authority during the North Zone Regional Conference on "Reaffirming the Constitutional Vision of Justice for Defence Personnel and Tribals" at SKICC here. Presiding over the event, Supreme Court Judge and Executive Chairman of NALSA, Justice Surya Kant, said the gathering in Kashmir was not just about technical discussions, but also about national integration and honouring the selfless service of the armed forces. Justice Kant said Veer Parivaar Sahayata Yojana 2025 marks a historic step in NALSA's 30-year journey of delivering justice to the marginalised. "Members of our armed forces and their families face legal hurdles like any other citizen whether land disputes, service entitlements, or matrimonial issues but their unique service conditions make access to justice more difficult. This scheme is our solemn pledge to stand beside those who protect our borders, ensuring that their rights are not left unprotected," he said. He outlined the three pillars of the yojana a dedicated network of legal services clinics at Zilla, Rajya, and Kendriya Sainik Boards; trained nodal officers, legal aid counsels and PLVs (including ex-servicemen) to assist families in a compassionate and timely manner; and digital access and online redressal mechanisms such as e-Lok Adalats and online mediation to ensure speed and convenience. Justice Kant said the Constitution, through Article 39A, mandates equal access to justice for all, and "if we fail to extend this support to our jawans and their families, we fail in our constitutional duty". "This yojana is our way of saying that just as they safeguard our freedom, we safeguard their dignity and rights," he said. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal commended NALSA's initiative, stating that the scheme resonates with the government's commitment to inclusive justice, digital empowerment, and fast-tracking cases involving defence personnel. Chief Justice of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, Justice Arun Palli, praised the scheme and emphasised the need for judiciary-led technological interventions to prioritise and fast-track such cases, ensuring that the limited leave time of defence personnel is not spent in prolonged legal processes. The launch of Veer Parivaar Sahayata Yojana 2025 marks a milestone in bridging the gap between legal services and the nation's defenders, echoing NALSA's motto of "Access to Justice for All.
