'True Indian wouldn't say so': Supreme Court rebukes Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Army
Rahul Gandhi
, in connection with his alleged remarks about the Indian Army during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra.
Targeting the government over Chinese action at the line of actual control, Gandhi had reportedly said that "Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel in Arunachal Pradesh".
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Before granting him interim relief, a division bench comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih, strongly disapproved of Gandhi's remarks.
"Why don't you say this in Parliament? Why do you have to say this on social media posts? How do you get to know when 2,000 sq km was acquired by China? Were you there? Do you have any credible evidence?" Justice Datta verbally remarked.
Further cornering Gandhi for his remarks, Justice Datta orally observed: "If you were a true Indian you would not have said this. When there is a cross-border conflict, can you say all this? Why can't you ask these questions in Parliament? ...Being a responsible leader of the Opposition, you cannot say this...just because you have 19(1)(a) [freedom of speech] you cannot say anything".
Live Events
Appearing on behalf of Gandhi, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued that Gandhi's remarks cannot be a ground for a third party to file a defamation suit.
"But you cannot harass somebody like this with defamation charges. The high court says he (complainant) was not a person aggrieved but defamed. The high court's reasoning was not correct," Singhvi argued.
Issuing a notice on Gandhi's plea, the bench stayed proceedings pending before a Lucknow magistrate. The matter will come up for resumed hearing after three weeks. The development took place during the resumed hearing of an appeal filed by Gandhi against an Allahabad High Court ruling which had upheld the summons issued by a Lucknow court to Gandhi in connection with the case.
The case originated from a complaint filed by lawyer Vivek Tiwari on behalf of Uday Shankar Srivastava, a former director of the Border Roads Organisation with a rank equivalent to an Army Colonel.
Tiwari alleged that Gandhi's remarks on December 16, 2022, regarding the December 9, 2022 clash between the Indian and Chinese armies were derogatory and defamatory towards the Indian military forces.
A Lucknow magistrate had directed Gandhi to appear on March 24. Aggrieved, Gandhi had petitioned the Allahabad High Court. While dismissing Gandhi's plea against the magistrate's order, the Allahabad High Court had, on June 4, observed that under Section 199(1) of the CrPC, an individual who is not the direct victim of an offence can still be regarded as an "aggrieved person" if the offence has caused them harm or adversely affected them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
42 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC prohibits construction and commercial use near historic Gumti structure in Defence Colony
New Delhi, Aug 4 (UNI) The Supreme Court has directed that the park adjacent to the historic Gumti structure located in Defence Colony, New Delhi, must not be used for any purpose other than public recreation and preservation. The Court made it clear that no construction of facilities like badminton or basketball courts, nor any form of commercial activity, will be permitted due to the sensitive nature and spatial constraints of the area. A Bench comprising Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah was hearing a writ petition filed in 2019 seeking protection of the Gumti under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. "The only direction which needs to be given here is that the park should not be used for any other purpose. No activities such as construction of a badminton or basketball court shall be undertaken, considering the limitations of the area itself," the Bench observed. It added, 'Needless to say, there shall be no commercial activity or kiosks/shops allowed in the vicinity.' The petition was filed after the Defence Colony Welfare Association (DCWA) allegedly carried out unauthorized alterations near the monument, despite its historical significance. Representing the petitioner was Senior Advocate Shikhil Shiv Suri. Senior Advocates Garima Prasad and Gopal Sankaranarayanan, along with Advocate Shubhranshu Padhi, represented the respondents, with Sankaranarayanan also serving as the Court Commissioner. The case has a long history. In 2004, the Central Government issued a gazette notification intending to declare the Gumti as a monument of national importance. However, this was met with objections from the DCWA, causing delays within the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). After the Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea for protection under the 1958 Act, the matter was brought before the Supreme Court. In a significant development on July 16, 2025, the apex court criticized the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) for its actions, noting that they appeared to obstruct justice. The Court had then considered issuing contempt notice and directed the CBI to conduct a preliminary inquiry into the unauthorized occupation and modifications around the monument. The Court also instructed the MCD to demolish all unauthorised structures, clean the area, and hand it over to the Department of Archaeology. The Bench took note of ongoing efforts and pending tasks including, finalising and completing the Gumti's restoration plan. Publishing the official notification declaring it a protected monument. Clearing remaining debris and leveling the park area and finalizing the landscape plan with permissible public activities like cycling and walking. The Bench emphasized that the park, which consists of four quadrants, should be maintained and beautified for the benefit of the general public while preserving its natural character. The matter has been adjourned for further compliance and monitoring. UNI SNG RN
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Civil society groups hold symbolic hunger strike in Pune protesting atrocities against Palestinians
UNDER THE banner 'A Hunger Strike of Solidarity – For Gaza!', several progressive organisations and concerned citizens from Pune came together on Saturday to protest the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Palestine. The symbolic hunger strike, held at Sambhaji Garden, called for an immediate end to the violence in Gaza and demanded urgent food and medical aid for the Palestinian people. Chanting slogans such as 'Stop the genocide in Palestine!', 'Start food aid immediately!' and 'Free Palestine!', protesters demanded that the Indian government take a firm and unequivocal stand in support of Palestine, continuing its historical position of backing Palestinian sovereignty and justice. For nearly two years, and even before, Israel has been accused of carrying out relentless attacks on Gaza. Protesters highlighted that innocent women, children, and men are being killed daily in aerial bombings, and that the situation has worsened with Israel blocking the supply of essential goods such as food and medicines. They pointed out that this amounts to a deliberate starvation strategy , which can amount to a war crime. The protest in Pune was part of a larger international campaign from July 27 to August 3, during which citizens across the globe staged hunger strikes and solidarity demonstrations. The event was jointly organised by several progressive groups including the Stree Mukti Andolan Sampark Samiti, National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), Pune Collective, DYFI, SFI, Nava Samajwadi Paryay, Lokshahi Utsav Samiti, PUCL, among others. Several notable voices addressed the gathering. Prof. Dr. Parimal Maya Sudhakar spoke of India's historic opposition to the partition of Palestine and its consistent support for peaceful resistance led by Yasser Arafat. He warned against Israel's expansionist ambitions across Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon and urged the Indian government to uphold its legacy by supporting Palestinian liberation. Prof. Shruti Tambe highlighted multiple cases of gender-based violence committed by Israeli forces, and the cruel targeting of refugee camps and civilians asking for food. She cited alarming figures — over 18,000 Palestinian children have died in the past two months alone, many now dying due to hunger. Writer and academic Anjali Chipalkatti called the assault on Gaza a profiteering land grab disguised as war. 'This is not war,' she said, 'but a colonial strategy to displace a population and occupy land.' She emphasised that resisting such injustice is a moral and scientific imperative. The protest concluded with a united pledge by all participants to continue raising their voice for the people of Palestine, and to oppose injustice in all its forms across the world.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
US tightens rules for issuing Green Cards with focus on married couples; how will it affect Indians?
(Representational image: New Delhi: America has tightened the rules for issuing green cards for married couples. The US Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) has issued a guideline in this regard. It talks about tightening the scrutiny of family-based immigrant visa applications, especially marriage-based applications. Its purpose is to eliminate fraudulent claims and ensure that green cards are approved only based on genuine relationships. This decision will also have a direct impact on Indian citizens, as Indians make up a large number of foreigners living in America. When were the new rules implemented? The new rules regarding green cards have come into effect on August 1. It also applies to all pending and newly filed petitions. USCIS has said that fraudulent visa petitions undermine confidence in family-based methods of obtaining lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. In such a situation, we are committed to keeping Americans safe by detecting foreigners with bad intentions. What are the new changes? The new guidelines tighten strict scrutiny and documentation processes. These include improved eligibility checks and adjudication processes for family-based petitions. Clear documentation along with photos, shared financial details and family affidavits will be required to prove a bona fide marriage. Couples will also undergo mandatory personal interviews, aimed at evaluating the authenticity of the relationship. Along with this, there will be a thorough scrutiny of immigration history. USCIS has added more stringent checks to its policy, especially for applicants who are already in the US on other visas and seek status adjustment through marriage. If a US citizen sponsors a foreign spouse, such as someone from India, then the couple will now have to provide solid proof of a bona fide relationship. What is the Green Card? The Green Card is officially called the US Permanent Resident Card. It is proof of the right to live and work permanently in the USA. It looks like a plastic card. It contains the person's information, photo, and fingerprints. The Green Card holder is considered a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR).
