Superloop 2 bus proposed to replace 472 route
The 472 is the bus route where a teenage boy was fatally stabbed 27 times earlier this year.It would mean the 472 bus being scrapped and effectively replaced by the SL11 – except for during the night, when the N472 would continue to run. The SL11 would only operate between 05:00 and midnight.It is also hoped that the bus service would support the early stages of regeneration plans in Thamesmead, which is one of London's hardest-to-reach areas due to the lack of any Tube or railway services. The new Superloop route is being looked at alongside existing proposals to extend the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) from Gallions Reach, with new stations at Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead.The SL11 would utilise double-decker buses with USB charging points and would link up with the existing SL3 route that runs from Thamesmead down to Bromley.
'Affordable and green'
At the end of January, the mayor also detailed his plans for the "Bakerloop" bus service, which will follow the route of the proposed Bakerloo line extension from Elephant and Castle down to Lewisham. That route is similarly being consulted on, with feedback on the proposal welcomed until 14 March.Geoff Hobbs, TfL's director of public transport service planning, said buses "are still the most affordable and green way to travel around the capital".He added: "We are committed to working closely with the relevant boroughs to ensure these express bus routes work for all communities, as well as complementing the growth plans of these local authorities."Averil Lekau, Greenwich Council's deputy leader and cabinet member for transport, said: "A faster and more reliable bus service will encourage increased public transport usage, which is essential to cutting carbon emissions and achieving our target of reaching net zero emissions by 2030."
The SL11 consultation runs until Sunday 13 April.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer boasts of 'real sense of pride' at marking first year in power... as he faces biggest Labour revolt yet, Channel boats hit grim new record, and taxes are set to rise AGAIN
Keir Starmer boasted of his 'real sense of pride and achievement' at marking his first year in power today - despite being engulfed in crisis on multiple fronts. The PM 'reflected' on the looming anniversary of his July 4 election landslide as he gathered Cabinet. However, Sir Keir's upbeat tone came as the government looks down the barrel of its biggest revolt yet, with dozens of MPs preparing to vote against benefits reforms tonight. He was reportedly forced to issue a warning at the meeting that briefing against his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney must stop. Channel migrants have already hit 20,000 this year, the earliest the tally has been reached. Meanwhile, there are mounting fears that Rachel Reeves will have to hike taxes again this Autumn as the economy stalls and angry MPs force U-turns wrecking her plans to balance the books. Polls have shown the government's popularity nosediving since securing one of the biggest majorities in modern UK politics. Nigel Farage's Reform are now enjoying a clear advantage in support, with panic rising in Labour circles about Sir Keir's leadership. London and Manchester Mayors Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham are said to be on manoeuvres, while Angela Rayner's allies are also talking up her credentials. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has been trying to quell Labour unrest on benefits The premier caused more dismay at the weekend by backtracking on his 'island of strangers' remark about the dangers of uncontrolled immigration. Surveys showed the striking comment had been well-received by Brits. But Sir Keir admitted he regretted making it as he was accused of echoing Enoch Powell. A readout of the Cabinet meeting from No10 said the PM took the opportunity to 'reflect on the last year in office, saying we could all rightly look back with a real sense of pride and achievement'. 'The Prime Minister said that because of tough decisions the Government had taken, it had a platform to build on, with three trade deals, the spending review that was well received by the public and an industrial strategy received well by businesses, both large and small,' the No10 spokesman said. 'He pointed to a cut in NHS waiting lists, more than 4million extra appointments, investment in transport, major infrastructure decisions, funding for social and affordable housing, extending free school meals and introducing free breakfast clubs.' The spokesman also pointed to the 'four interest rate cuts in a row while global firms were choosing to back Britain', and the exemptions from US tariffs for the car and aerospace industries which 'meant the world to Jaguar Land Rover workers'. The spokesman added: 'He said the Government's work is all designed and focused on improving the lives of working people and giving them the chance to thrive, not just survive, and the Government should be proud of those achievements as a team.' The spokesman denied the PM thought his Cabinet had needed 'cheering up'. 'No, I think it's a natural point at which to reflect on the first year in office, and as the Prime Minister detailed there are a number of achievements of which the Cabinet can rightly feel proud, but he is equally of the view that there is much still to be done,' the spokesman said. Asked whether the Prime Minister thought the public shared his assessment of the Government's record, the spokesman said: 'I think the public feel the impact of the Government's work already for interest rate cuts, three trade deals… but as with every Cabinet member, he is looking forward, not backwards, and intent on moving further and faster to improve the lives of working people up and down the country and help them thrive, not just survive.'
The Independent
16 hours ago
- The Independent
Labour's rebel MPs have weakened Starmer – but the greatest damage is to themselves
Divided parties do not win elections, and yet Labour cannot help itself. The damage done to Keir Starmer by the rebellion over welfare changes is not just the number of MPs who vote against the Labour whip today, but the revelation that so much of the party is in a state of boiling resentment against its own government. It is not just MPs. Andy Burnham and Sadiq Khan, the two elected Labour politicians with the largest democratic mandates of their own, oppose the disability benefits bill. And Survation polls of Labour members reveal that they rate Rachel Reeves, Liz Kendall and Keir Starmer – the architects of the welfare changes – lowest among cabinet ministers. Two-thirds of them think the party should 'move to the left', and more want a change of leadership before the next election (42 per cent) than want Starmer to stay on (40 per cent). Of course, there is a legitimate debate about the welfare bill. Kendall has not made her case well, allowing the changes to appear to be purely Treasury-driven. And the leaders of the Labour rebellion sought to be constructive, making their representations in private. The prime minister has undoubtedly bungled his response, saying: 'I'm putting this as context rather than an excuse: I was heavily focused on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend.' Even as an excuse, this is thin – the rebels alerted the chief whip weeks and weeks ago. But there are bigger issues at stake. The rising cost of disability benefits is a genuine problem that needs to be solved. The government may not be going about it the right way, but the rebels seem to give the impression that they think more public spending is always the answer. If the government and the rebels were engaged in a genuine negotiation, they would be looking at the Channel 4 documentary made by Fraser Nelson, the former editor of The Spectator, which described the incentives for assessors to grant personal independence payments (PIP). Instead of crudely cutting eligibility, the government should be focused on making the existing system work as intended. Where are the ministers making this case? Where is Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister? Should she not be rallying behind Starmer, explaining to Labour MPs and party members that when they signed up for difficult decisions, this is what it meant? Where is Rachel Reeves, the iron chancellor who models herself on Gordon Brown? Brown, for all his flaws, saw welfare as part of his policy empire and sought to make the argument for reforms to get people off benefits and into work. Instead, we have the Labour Party tail wagging the government dog. Starmer has U-turned at a cost of £2.5bn a year by the end of parliament, wiping out half the original savings, which means the welfare budget is going to continue to rise – not as fast as originally forecast, but faster than Reeves hoped when the changes were first announced in March. The outcome will please no one and make the prime minister look weak. Meanwhile, the rebellion has drawn attention to the reality that a large number of Labour MPs, leading elected Labour politicians outside parliament and the majority of party members, oppose the government across a range of policies. How long can a party function in permanent opposition to itself? Labour members can see the danger. That Survation poll for Labour List finds that 72 per cent of them say that Nigel Farage's Reform party is ' Labour's biggest electoral threat '. Yet, they appear to think that the way to meet this threat is to increase further spending on disability benefits that most voters already think is too high, and to make it obvious to the electorate that the party is in a state of civil war.
Daily Mail
16 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Are Labour mayors gunning for Keir Starmer's job? Relations between Downing Street, Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham sink further as they spearhead welfare revolt
Sir Keir Starmer 's hopes of a long-term stay in Downing Street are under fresh scrutiny as two of Labour 's most senior figures lead a revolt against the PM. Sir Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, and Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, are both publicly opposing the Government over welfare cuts. They have both spoken out against Sir Keir's plans to tighten access to benefits as the PM faces the prospect of a humiliating House of Commons rebellion. Despite Sir Keir having caved to rebel MPs by watering down the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, Sir Sadiq told ministers to 'go further'. 'The mission of the Labour Government should be to support people out of poverty and this Bill still needs radical transformation to be fit for purpose,' Sir Sadiq said. Meanwhile, Mr Burnham has urged Labour MPs to vote against the Bill as he condemned Sir Keir for performing only 'half a U-turn' on benefits changes. Their public opposition, as the PM endures one of the worst spells of his premiership, has sparked fresh speculation that Sir Sadiq and Mr Burnham want to replace Sir Keir. It has also seen relations between the two men and Sir Keir's team in Downing Street sink even further. Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, has urged Labour MPs to vote against the Bill as he condemned Sir Keir for performing only 'half a U-turn' on benefits changes. Mr Burnham, a former Cabinet minister who has twice stood for the Labour leadership, has repeatedly refused to rule out another bid for his party's top job. He has had an historically fraught relationship with Sir Keir's office, having once told the Labour leader's team to 'leave me alone' and end hostile briefings against him. As well as opposing the PM on welfare cuts, Mr Burnham - dubbed the 'King of the North' - has also publicly contradicted Sir Keir's position on recent issues such as a national grooming gangs inquiry, and calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. In a speech at the end of May, the Greater Manchester mayor - who was an MP between 2001 and 2017 - urged Labour to work on a 'substantially new offer for the public'. Some observers judged this to be an overt leadership pitch and a 'full-blooded rejection' of Sir Keir and Chancellor Rachel Reeves. Under Labour Party rules, leadership candidates must be a serving MP. Mr Burnham's speech and his subsequent criticism of Sir Keir and Ms Reeves' welfare plans led to claims he could soon attempt to find a route back to Westminster via a parliamentary by-election. A potential contest in Gorton and Denton, a Greater Manchester constituency currently held by Mr Burnham's long-time ally Andrew Gwynne, is seen as one possible option. In February, Mr Gwynne was sacked as a health minister and suspended from Labour after the emergence of offensive messages in a WhatsApp group. He is currently under investigation by a parliamentary watchdog. Meanwhile, a possible parliamentary by-election in Hampstead and Highgate could serve as a means for Sir Sadiq to make his own return to Parliament. The seat is currently held by Tulip Siddiq, who quit as a Treasury minister in January following allegations linked to her aunt's political movement in Bangladesh. But, unlike Mr Burnham, Sir Sadiq has ruled out a future Labour leadership bid. He said last year, prior to winning an historic third term as London mayor, that he had 'no interest at all to be a Labour leader or the next Labour leader'. 'I've got no ambitions to go back to the House of Commons,' he added, as he suggested Labour's next leader should be their first female leader. Yet, like Mr Burnham, Sir Sadiq is not afraid to publicly oppose Sir Keir on major issues and has endured an increasingly uneasy relationship with Downing Street. It is understood that tensions between City Hall and the Labour leadership flared during Ms Reeve's recent spending review and have not eased. Allies of Sir Sadiq were furious that the Chancellor pointedly directed investment to 'anywhere but London'. The mayor has previously rankled No10 by openly calling for the UK to rejoin the EU single market, while he has also defied Sir Keir by taking a different position on the Gaza crisis.
