Iran's supreme leader is fading into the shadows
But since Iran's 12-day war with Israel, things have become more complicated. The 86-year-old leader appears in public only rarely. His sermons, once lengthy, are brief. The question of succession looms larger than ever, with actors inside and outside the regime jostling for position, many openly advocating alternatives to 46 years of theocracy. The opacity around the fate of Iran's nuclear programme after the strikes by Israel and America is replicated across the political system. Iranians want to know whether their leaders will accept Donald Trump's terms for a deal. But they are no longer sure who is in charge.
Initially, the war appeared to stabilise Iran's politics. A wave of patriotism pulled rulers and ruled together after years of polarisation. Calls by Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, for Iranians to rise up fell on deaf ears. But since the ceasefire on June 24th the multiplicity of opinions on how to preserve unity has made the country look more fragmented.
Mr Khamenei's preferred option is cosmetic. To appeal to a population disenchanted with clerical rule, he is dressing his theocracy in nationalist clothes. During celebrations on July 5th for Ashura, the anniversary of the martyrdom of the Prophet Muhammad's grandson, Hussein, and the republic's holiest day, Mr Khamenei ordered a muezzin to drop his incantations and instead sing Ey Iran Iran, a rendition of a patriotic anthem that was popular before the Islamic revolution in 1979 and had since been suppressed. He has played Shia saints down and puffed up Iran's pre-Islamic past. New billboards in city squares give ancient Persian myths modern themes. Mr Khamenei has also turned a blind eye to a new crop of television shows, including a wildly popular Persian version of 'Love Island', where unmarried couples flirt and make out. In parts of Tehran, the capital, headscarves and long coats for women feel like a relic of the past.
But such concessions are designed to reduce the demand for political change, not herald its coming. Earlier this month Mr Khamenei reappointed his crusty Friday-prayer preacher and his 99-year-old head of the Guardian Council, the latter for the 33rd time. After a few brief post-war appearances, the state broadcaster has removed reformists from its airwaves. Executions are up; a widely expected amnesty for political prisoners looks far off.
Entering occultation
As the supreme leader tries to keep up the appearance of business as usual, rivals are circling. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the regime's praetorian guard, is using the continued confrontation with Israel to justify its hold on power. Before retreating into his bunker as Israel struck, Mr Khamenei handed decision-making to the generals, inviting the possibility of a military junta reducing him to a figurehead. Yet the generals are struggling to project unity. Israel's evident infiltration of their ranks has spread paranoia, complicating co-ordination. The IRGC's extensive business interests and rampant corruption mean some see it fragmenting into a hotch-potch of decentralised mafias.
Masoud Pezeshkian, the president, has called for a dialogue with the opposition and the return of exiles in an attempt to turn the unity produced by the war into lasting reconciliation. But he lacks the clout to deliver. Iranians blame him for blackouts and lengthy water cutoffs in the summer heat. He is also seen as responsible for the run on the rial, having failed to persuade Iran's sanctions-busting business folk to repatriate earnings.
Amid the discontent, two former presidents, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hassan Rouhani, are plotting a comeback. Both command a larger popular base than Mr Pezeshkian. Mr Rouhani, a cleric, might fancy his chances as Mr Khamenei's turbaned successor, reckoning he could end the stand-off with the West. The war, he said in a statement, 'should be a wake-up call to correct our course and rebuild the foundations of governance'. Ali Larijani, a former speaker of parliament, is acting like the executive president he once tried to be. He, rather than Mr Pezeshkian, recently led a delegation to Moscow that met Vladimir Putin, Russia's president.
Dissidents, too, are speaking out. On July 11th Mir-Hossein Moussavi, a former prime minister Mr Khamenei has kept under house arrest for 15 years, released a petition calling for a new constitution, which was signed by hundreds of intellectuals. Many younger Iranians want an overhaul without any past or present figures, including ageing dissidents like Mr Moussavi.
Domestic disunity weighs on foreign policy, where Iran has downsized its aspirations from regional domination to regime survival following Israel's campaign against its proxies. Hardliners advocate dashing for a nuclear bomb. Others hope China, Iran's primary market for oil, may come to the rescue with new warplanes. But with Israel threatening a resumption of bombing, any help would probably come too late. Russia, mired in Ukraine, has been slow to rebuild Iran's air defences.
That leaves America. Mr Trump's participation in Israel's war spooked Iran and put talks about a nuclear deal on hold. Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, says Iran is ready to resume them. It may even agree to a non-aggression pact with Israel. An agreement would release Iran from sanctions, end its isolation from the West and perhaps restore foreign investment, but it is hampered by differences over where Iran should be heading. For Iranians the decision is urgent. But they may no longer have a leader with the authority or the vision to make it.
Sign up to the Middle East Dispatch, a weekly newsletter that keeps you in the loop on a fascinating, complex and consequential part of the world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
10 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Deve Gowda slams Congress leaders for echoing Donald Trump's remark
BENGALURU: Former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda has slammed US President Donald Trump and Congress leaders over their remarks on the Indian economy. 'India has been the fastest-growing economy and is the fifth-largest in the globe. Trump must either be blind or ill-informed to designate our economy as 'dead', ' the JDS supremo stated in a strongly worded statement. Hitting out at Congress leaders, who echoed the US President's views, Gowda stated: 'A word of caution to some Opposition leaders who have rejoiced in the statements of Trump and have jumped to be his deluded spokespersons in India. I can understand their frustration, but they should not harm themselves and their parties, and end up in the dustbin of history alongside Trump.' He said even a small trader or a poor farmer in India, who conducts his business with great dignity, integrity and humanity, can teach many lessons to Trump. 'Like everybody else, I too have been surprised by US President Donald Trump's baseless and ill-tempered remarks on India and the Indian economy. I don't think modern history has seen another head of state who has been so volatile, uncivil and irresponsible,' the former PM said. Gowda said Trump has not just behaved badly with India, but with every other country across the world, including his own longstanding allies. 'There is something fundamentally wrong with him which reason, diplomacy, or statecraft cannot diagnose and address. It may not be correct to say anything more than this on his ill-tempered nature because it would mean lowering our own standards,' he stated. The former PM said India has the God-given ability and strength to negotiate all difficulties that come its way and emerge stronger. 'I am very happy and proud that India, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has not compromised our national interest. It has not blinked to Trump's bullying and has shown that it will never be dictated by threat,' he said. Gowda said the Modi government has gone the full length to protect the Indian agricultural sector as well as small and medium businesses on which more than half the nation's population is dependent. He emphasised that the strong decisions taken by the government will lead to a national resurgence on an unprecedented scale.
Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
What Bhagat Singh's ‘Why I Am an Atheist' taught me about my own belief
'It is cowardly to seek shelter in the idea of God.' The words struck me, not just for their audacity, but because they were written by Bhagat Singh, the revolutionary I had long revered as a fearless martyr. They appear in Why I Am an Atheist, his now-iconic essay, penned from prison in the final months of his life. To me, Bhagat Singh had always been a nationalist hero, not someone who would so boldly challenge faith. At first glance, the essay felt almost abrasive, a vain, unabashed dismissal of everything religion holds sacred. I scowled at what I perceived as Bhagat Singh's complete ignorance towards faith. What I as a believer considered to be a safe haven, the 'Shaheed-e-Azam' dubbed a mental crutch. But as I read more deeply, something unexpected happened: my mind, shaped by years of belief, began to stretch in ways I had not thought possible. After reading Why I am an Atheist and his other works, there was one thing I knew for sure: Bhagat Singh was not the man we came to know through the rosy lunettes of told history. Before he knew that he was a freedom fighter, the 23-year-old revolutionary knew that he was an atheist, writing words that could make any firm believer of God look inward. The textbook version of Bhagat Singh bears little resemblance to the man he believed himself to be. History books portray him as a fiery revolutionary figure, determined to free India from British rule. They recount his acts of defiance and his ultimate sacrifice, but rarely do they pause to examine the ideas that shaped him. His convictions, his intellect, and his inner conflicts are often lost beneath the weight of nationalist iconography. The essay introduced me to the mind of a 19-year-old man who was not just driven by the sentiment of boyish rebellion amid the freedom struggle, but one who questioned power and sought logic. Bhagat Singh was not a man of fiery speeches but of precise words, he did not shout at you from the page, but spoke gently of his firm convictions until he faced death head on – without fear, without prayer, without illusion. One of the most human moments in Bhagat Singh's collected writings is a letter he wrote to his father, Kishan Singh from jail. With his fate already sealed and death only months away, Bhagat Singh responded to his father's well-intentioned plea for clemency to the British authorities not with gratitude, but with sharp disapproval. It was the kind of defiance one might expect from any principled 23-year-old, but in Bhagat Singh's case, the stakes were unimaginably high. He saw his father's final attempt to save him not as love, but as weakness. 'Treachery,' he called it, refusing to compromise his convictions, even in the face of death. 'Father, I feel as though I have been stabbed in the back. Had any other person done it, I would have considered it to be nothing short of treachery. But in your case, let me say that it has been a weakness – a weakness of the worst kind.' An outburst of this extent was something I never thought I would witness from the legendary Bhagat Singh. What books and movies portrayed was a sepia-tinted image of a great man who made the ultimate sacrifice. However, after reading this letter, I saw him as a 23-year-old man mocking his father's choice as a parent, convinced that he knows better. In his letter to his father, Bhagat Singh angrily asserted that the last-ditch attempt to save his life diminished its purpose. He said he always wanted to be completely indifferent to the trial, saying that a politician should only defend himself from a political standpoint and never think about the legalities. Reading this letter was the first time I saw Bhagat Singh as a son and as a man with emotional depth. The essay, penned within the walls of Lahore Central Jail beneath the shadow of his looming execution, was his response to his fellow comrades in arms, including Batukeshwar Dutt, who questioned his lack of faith and thought he became an atheist because of his vanity. In his essay, Bhagat Singh explains that his atheism did not stem from vanity or superiority, but from realism, critical thinking, and lack of fear. Reading his essay, I came to the realisation that Bhagat Singh never viewed God as an evil idea, he was only against unconditional devotion. Bhagat Singh neither feared the consequences of his actions, nor did he fear death. He wrote that in his final days, after pondering for days, he chose not to pray. Most of faith is driven by the fear of what comes next, he explained, saying that once the noose is around his neck, he knows that his existence and his soul will cease to be. He said that as opposed to popular belief, he did not become an atheist after he gained recognition as a revolutionary. Despite being raised by an Arya Samaji grandfather and a Sikh father, Bhagat Singh questioned faith since he was a young boy when he was unaware of the depth of the atrocities happening under British rule. He looks back at difficult times in his life where he had the option to fall back on faith to spend his days in peace, but chose not to. This was not because of his ego but because he did not want to be trapped in a false narrative of fear and the promise of Divine rescue. For him, belief in God was not always about devotion, it was often about fear. Fear of the meaningless, fear of suffering and fear of death. He saw that people chose faith as a comfort, and the outward display of religion was only to make one feel centred in a chaotic world, filled with the unknown. One thing that resonated the most with me was that he did not challenge belief itself, but the involuntary reflex to believe without thinking. His atheism was not driven by anger, but by a refusal to be comforted by illusions. As a believer, Bhagat Singh's words were deeply uncomfortable to read. My mind understood the logic but was constantly in a frenzy to counter his words, to no avail. His essay made me ask myself – how much of my own faith is authentic, unaffected by fear or habit? Though somewhat offended at first, Bhagat Singh's atheism did not shake my belief, only illuminated it. His words made me realise that maybe I have always been somewhat of a sceptic. While I have never been a person who spent long hours at a temple or in a prayer, I did not spend those hours questioning the logic of faith either. For me, religion was always more about my memories than the metaphysics. My faith lives in the Diwali pujas I prepared for with my mother, the diyas I carefully placed across the house as my sister painted Lakshmi Charan near our front door, the crackle of Holika Dahan fire as we circled around it as a family. My faith was never built through theology, but through ritual, repetition and love. But now, Bhagat Singh's words made me question how much of a believer I actually was. Atheists have always been perceived as pessimists, mostly driven by rebellion, but such was not the case with Bhagat Singh. His version of atheism cuts through with precision of a scalpel. He chose to live, fight and die without Divine assurance, a clarity which is rare in most believers. Bhagat Singh's atheism did not make me feel threatened, but challenged me in the best way. He made me aware of the quiet spaces where the line between faith and fear blur. My faith found a room for thought and growth in this atheism. He made me understand that the essence of belief is not blind comfort: it is to have conviction without compromise.
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
'HP may vanish from map': SC tells Centre, state that 'earning revenue is not everything'
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has told the Centre and the Himachal Pradesh government that "earning revenue is not everything", warning that if the current trajectory of ecological degradation continues, "the entire State of HP may vanish into thin air from the map of the country". Adding grimly that "God forbid this doesn't happen", a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan said revenue generation cannot come at the cost of environmental and ecological destruction. The Justice Pardiwala-led Bench not only dismissed a private hotel company's plea challenging the Himachal Pradesh government's notification declaring Shri Tara Mata Hill a "green area", but also pulled up both the state and Union governments for failing to protect the fragile Himalayan ecology. The petitioner – M/s Pristine Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. – had challenged a June 6, 2025, notification restricting new private construction on Tara Mata Hill, arguing that the restrictions were imposed in contravention of the Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Act, 1977. After the Himachal Pradesh High Court had rejected the petition on the grounds that the company could not be said to be an aggrieved person as it did not have land ownership or permission to purchase land in the state, Pristine Hotels and Resorts moved a special leave petition before the Supreme Court. However, the apex court refused to intervene. "We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court," the apex court said, while turning the spotlight on the numerous environmental issues being faced by Himachal Pradesh. It observed that while the move to notify green areas was "laudable", it had come too late. "The situation in the state of Himachal Pradesh has gone from bad to worse. The severe ecological imbalance and other environmental conditions have led to serious natural calamities over a period of years," the Justice Pardiwala-led Bench said, citing repeated floods, landslides, and large-scale destruction of life and property. "It is not right to blame only nature for the disaster in Himachal Pradesh. Humans, not nature, are responsible for phenomena such as continuous land sliding of mountains, collapsing of houses and buildings, subsidence of roads, etc.," the Supreme Court added. The top court attributed the environmental degradation to hydro power projects, unregulated road construction, deforestation, and unchecked tourism. "Unrelenting building, tunnel, and road construction, frequently done without sufficient environmental planning, has increased the area's susceptibility to natural disasters and the effects of climate change," it said. Further, the apex court raised alarm over unchecked tourism, poor solid waste management, illegal mining, and the rapid pace of infrastructure development. "The uncontrolled growth of tourism has strained the state's environment. [H]ill towns often struggle with waste disposal and water shortages during tourist seasons…If left unchecked, the pressure from tourism could severely undermine the ecological and social fabric of the State." In the larger public interest, the Supreme Court ordered its registry to register a fresh suo motu writ petition to monitor environmental conditions in Himachal Pradesh. "We call upon the state of Himachal Pradesh to file its response to what has fallen from us, more particularly the issues which we have discussed in the preceding parts of this order," it said, asking the state government to submit a detailed action plan within four weeks. Fixing the next date of hearing on August 25, the apex court issued notices to the Chief Secretary of Himachal Pradesh and the Secretary of the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change.
