Less than half of pensioners aged 65-75 ‘confident their savings will last'
The survey, for Aviva and Age UK, took place among 1,000 people in this age group who are on a moderate retirement income, excluding people who only receive the state pension and those with more than £20,000 in annual household income from a defined benefit (DB) salary-related pension.
Those taking part in the survey, carried out by consultancy Ignition House in October and November 2024, said they did not pay for financial advice.
More than four-fifths (83%) said an income for life from their private pension savings has become more important to them as they get older, and the same number said they would be worried if their retirement income fell – with women more likely to feel this way than men (87% compared with 79%).
Two-thirds (65%) of those surveyed do not believe there is enough support for people managing their financial needs as they age.
Aviva and Age UK said the research highlights the 'pressing need' for regular financial reviews within retirement.
They suggested that a 'mid-retirement MOT' could offer pensioners guidance and support while they are in retirement andwould act as a financial and lifestyle review that could include a conversation about estate planning, fraud protection, access to state benefits, and managing finances if they start to experience cognitive decline.
Over-50s can access free guidance from the Government-backed Pension Wise service.
Doug Brown, chief executive of insurance, wealth and retirement at Aviva, said: 'Pensioners today clearly value financial security, but many seem to be sleepwalking into later retirement with a set and forget approach to their retirement income.'
Paul Farmer, Age UK's chief executive, said: 'We frequently hear from struggling pensioners, many of whom have a small private pension of their own, about how tough they have found the last few years.
'Managing your pension and other finances becomes harder as you get older – especially where people have suffered a major life-change like a bereavement or a dementia diagnosis.
He added: 'The mid-70s is often a point where people need to take stock and think through their options.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Free childcare crisis as surge in demand leaves Labour with funding black hole
Ministers have been warned the childcare sector is at risk of 'collapse' after a boom in demand for free care left a major government scheme in financial peril. A plan to expand free childcare for British families is set to cost the government an extra £1bn per year at a time when ministers are grappling to fill the gaping black hole in public finances. Labour has not spelled out how the funding gap will be filled, but experts predict the shortfall will create 'substantial pressure' on the government and could put the entire childcare sector under threat. In an exclusive interview with The Independent, Bridget Phillipson insisted the unexpectedly high take-up – a quarter higher than predicted – was a 'good problem to have' and would not leave children without places. But the education secretary could not guarantee that parents would get a space at their local nursery in September, when the scheme expands to offer eligible children aged nine months and older 30 hours a week of free childcare. Industry leaders said parents would be left 'disappointed' while nurseries warned a lack of staff meant they were already struggling to deliver the government's pledge. CEO of the Early Years Alliance, Neil Leitch, told The Independent: 'One thing is absolutely clear: if 80 per cent of all hours delivered are government hours, and those hours are inadequately funded, the infrastructure will collapse over a period of time. 'I can't say it will be one year or five years, but you can bet your bottom dollar if you don't give somebody enough money to deliver a service, at some point they stop.' Figures published in March show the number of people newly entitled to free childcare was 26 per cent higher than originally estimated – 379,000 compared to 302,000. This meant that the Department for Education spent £2bn on the policy last year, up from a planned £1.6bn. But this is only set to grow as further hours of free childcare are rolled out. According to the highly respected Institute for Fiscal Studies, the cost of extending free childcare to under-3s could end up costing £1bn more a year than previously expected, from 2026/7 onwards – up from around £4bn to approximately £5bn. A boost to funding announced in Rachel Reeves's spending review, of £640m, would 'go some way to filling this gap… [but] could still leave substantial pressure from higher-than-expected take-up', the IFS said. IFS associate director Christine Farquharson said the DfE will still likely face 'difficult choices' within its budget and may have to 'trim back' spending in other areas to meet its childcare commitments. 'They have a fixed pot of money. When one thing becomes more expensive, that puts more pressure on other areas of the [education] budget,' she told The Independent. Ms Farquharson said predictions for how many parents would take up the free hours were 'complex' but added: 'It does seem like [the Tories] underestimated take-up pretty systematically.' It is just one of many financial decisions facing the chancellor ahead of the autumn Budget after planned welfare cuts, aimed at saving £5bn annually, were reversed. Ms Reeves is being pushed to bend her rules on borrowing or to raise taxes to keep public finances on track. The free childcare policy was launched in December 2023 with great fanfare under former Tory chancellor Jeremy Hunt. The first stage was put in place from September 2024, when the government extended 15 hours a week of free term-time childcare to working parents with a child aged nine months and over. From September, that will be extended to 30 hours a week. Labour say they were left a 'pledge without a plan' when they entered government. Ministers have been working to massively expand the number of nursery spaces and staff but the task has been made more difficult by the fact that, unlike schools, many nurseries are private providers. Industry leaders warned that, with 8 in 10 of all nursery hours soon to be paid for by the government, the infrastructure was at risk of 'collapse' without more money. The sector has already been forced to absorb huge additional costs in recent years, including April's national insurance rise, it warned. Childcare in the UK is one of the most expensive in the world, according to the OECD. Mr Leitch added: 'What we have to bear in mind is that we've already got a recruitment and retention crisis. The reality is, many settings don't have the people to be able to accommodate those additional hours. So I'm afraid there will be parents that will be disappointed.' Sarah Ronan, the director of the Early Education and Childcare Coalition, said the IFS was right to sound the alarm, adding that if the government did not match demand with funding it is leaving providers with 'no choice' but to limit the number of places they offer – or raise fees. 'The harsh reality is that if providers don't do that, they'll face closure and then we'll have an even worse crisis on our hands,' she said. Purnima Tanuku, executive chair of the National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA), said the government's ambitions 'will be put at risk if there is not sufficient investment in early years'. She added that 'almost 70 per cent of nurseries told us that staff shortages mean they cannot offer the children's places they have room to deliver'. Munira Wilson, the Lib Dem education spokesperson, said providers had been left 'hanging by a thread and parents [are] facing the prospect of childcare deserts'. 'The government need to ensure that the funding for childcare hours matches the actual costs of delivery,' she said. Official statistics released last week showed a 7.2 per cent increase in early years staff, the largest annual rise since the series began. The Department for Education would not be drawn on where any extra money might come from. But Ms Phillipson insisted she was unafraid of the policy's popularity. She urged families to check what they are entitled to, adding: 'I want as many parents as possible to take up the offer. It allows parents to juggle work and family life, but it also sets up children to succeed. And the demand that parents are showing is a good problem to have, because it also brings economic dividends as well. 'If people are able to work, or work a few more hours… that helps us all as a society as well and it gets economic growth going.' Ms Phillipson has previously warned that, as the policy expands again in September, parents in the first wave might not get their first choice of nursery. Asked if she could say that all parents who want a space would get one, she told The Independent: 'What I can't guarantee is that it will be as close to home as they would like or it will be their first choice, but we're confident that the rollout will go well in September.' Ms Farquharson did add that the higher uptake of free childcare could ultimately be a good sign for the economy, even if it is more expensive in the short-term. 'This higher uptake might mean that we're getting a lot more parents moving into paid work because of these entitlements than first predicted,' she said. 'If the goal for this policy is to drive growth, then this would be a fantastic success story.' However, the extent to which that is the case will only become apparent over the next few years, she said. A DfE spokesperson said: 'High-quality, affordable childcare plays a vital role in our Plan for Change, which is why early years funding will rise to over £9bn next year, helping us meet our target of getting tens of thousands more children each year ready for school. 'We're backing families with this record investment including a £75m grant this year to support providers in delivering more places and a 45 per cent uplift in early year pupil premium, building on the real difference this is making for families as highlighted by the Coram survey who say costs for some has halved.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why does the White House want to redesign gas cans? Explaining the situation
The White House says it wants to 'Make Gas Cans Great Again.' Under a plan announced July 24 by President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency, the federal government is encouraging manufacturers to add vents to portable fuel containers, also known as gas cans. It would effectively reverse a 2009-rule by federal environmental officials at the time that required portable gas cans - used for lawnmowers, chainsaws, ATVS and stranded vehicles - to have special vents that stop the vapors from escaping. Proponents of that rule - which was finalized in 2007 - said the vapors that escape contributed to ozone pollution. But the 2009 rule created an online market for pre-ban gas cans among buyers dissatisfied with the new cans. Why does Trump want to redesign gas cans? 'Gas cans used to pour gas,' Trump's head of the EPA, Lee Zeldin, said on X, formerly Twitter. 'Now they just dribble like a child's sippy cup.' But many modern designs are often infuriatingly ineffective at actually filling tanks because the vents work so poorly, critics argue. Instead of stopping vapors from flowing out the complicated spouts and relief valves, the new designs often cause gasoline spills, which some critics say are far worse than a tiny amount of vapor escaping from an older design. Some rules for gas cans will still remain in place Other rules for gas cans have to remain in place under federal law, like making sure they're child-resistant and limiting the risk of flash fires. What happens next for gas cans? The EPA's announcement is non-binding for manufacturers and doesn't prohibit the vents. Rather, the EPA is asking manufacturers to redesign the gas cans to have vents 'to facilitate fast and smooth fuel flow.' This article contains material from USA TODAY Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook This article originally appeared on Gas can redesign considered by Trump White House. Here's why
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Real Reason Quantum Computing Stocks Are Soaring (It's Not What You Think)
Key Points Government mandates to prepare for quantum computer attacks on current encryption have validated the quantum threat, transforming pure-play companies from speculative investments to strategic national assets. While Wall Street focuses on breakthrough announcements and artificial intelligence (AI) applications, the urgent cybersecurity validation represents a fundamental shift in how investors perceive quantum computing companies. The $7.1 billion in federal post-quantum cryptography spending primarily flows to cybersecurity firms, but also creates powerful indirect benefits for quantum hardware companies through partnerships, funding, and increased credibility. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › Wall Street loves a good narrative, and quantum computing stocks have delivered several over the past year. Alphabet demonstrated breakthrough quantum capabilities with its Willow processor in late 2024, triggering a surge of investment into companies promising to solve optimization problems and accelerate drug discovery. But the surface-level excitement misses the real story: The quantum surge isn't primarily driven by these breakthroughs or potential AI synergies. The true catalyst is an urgent, government-mandated cybersecurity crisis that has transformed quantum computing from a speculative technology into a validated strategic threat. "Q-Day" -- the hypothetical moment when quantum computers can break current encryption -- has moved from academic theory to operational emergency, providing powerful validation for the entire ecosystem. The performance of pure-play quantum stocks tells the story. IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) has gained 423% over the past 12 months, D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) has surged over 1,700%, and Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) has jumped more than 1,300%. These aren't typical tech stock rallies -- instead, they signal the market's definitive recognition that quantum computing has evolved from a laboratory curiosity to a validated national security priority. The encryption emergency driving quantum validation The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released the first three post-quantum cryptography standards in August 2024, including CRYSTALS-Kyber for key establishment and CRYSTALS-Dilithium for digital signatures. Rather than academic exercises, NIST delivered operational blueprints for defending against quantum computer attacks that could render current encryption worthless within a decade. Government response has moved far beyond research grants. The Office of Management and Budget has issued binding directives requiring all federal agencies to inventory cryptographic systems and develop transition plans. The White House estimates the federal transition alone will cost $7.1 billion between 2025 and 2035, representing massive spending on quantum-resistant cybersecurity solutions that will primarily benefit established cybersecurity firms and cloud providers rather than pure-play quantum companies. However, this urgent government validation of the quantum threat has created powerful tailwinds for the entire quantum ecosystem. John Young, chief operating officer at Quantum eMotion America, warns that "most businesses remain dangerously unprepared for Q-Day," while government agencies face compliance deadlines. This recognition that quantum computers represent an existential cybersecurity threat has transformed investor perception of quantum hardware companies from speculative science projects to strategic national assets. Pure-play companies capture the quantum opportunity IonQ has emerged as the highest-profile beneficiary despite challenging fundamentals. The company reported $7.6 million in first-quarter revenue, essentially flat year over year, while posting a $32.3 million net loss. However, IonQ maintains $697 million in cash and recently completed a $1 billion equity offering, providing substantial runway for continued development and acquisitions across quantum computing and networking. D-Wave Quantum has taken a different commercial approach, focusing on quantum annealing technology for specific optimization problems. First-quarter results demonstrated viability, with revenue reaching $15 million -- a 509% year-over-year increase driven by system sales and cloud access programs. The company's quantum-computing-as-a-service model allows organizations to access quantum capabilities without massive capital investments. Meanwhile, Rigetti Computing represents the highest-risk option, with its full-stack approach combining processor development, system integration, and cloud services. However, recent results show execution challenges: First-quarter revenue declined to $1.5 million from $3.1 million, while operating expenses totaled $22.1 million. The company's 84-qubit Ankaa-3 system represents a technological milestone, but converting achievements into sustainable revenue remains unproven. Yes, but speculation risks remain elevated All three companies trade at extreme valuations that price in flawless execution and rapid market adoption. IonQ trades at approximately 219 times trailing sales, while D-Wave and Rigetti command similarly premium multiples. The quantum computing market remains early stage, with limited commercial applications and uncertain technology winners. Technical breakthroughs from well-funded competitors, including IBM, Alphabet, and Microsoft, could disrupt smaller players' market positions. Current quantum systems remain error-prone and expensive, limiting commercial viability outside specialized use cases. Investment in pure-play quantum stocks requires tolerance for extreme volatility and extended development timelines. Capitalizing on quantum's validation moment The government's urgent preparation for Q-Day has transformed quantum computing from speculative technology to validated strategic necessity. While the $7.1 billion in federal post-quantum cryptography spending will primarily flow to cybersecurity firms and cloud providers implementing defensive solutions, this massive investment validates the quantum threat and elevates pure-play quantum companies from laboratory curiosities to strategic national assets. Yes, the valuations are extreme, and the fundamentals remain challenging. Quantum computing remains a small, speculative subsector with limited current commercial applications, and predicting which companies will ultimately dominate this emerging technology remains impossible. But the Q-Day validation provides a real catalyst that has shifted investor perception and could accelerate development timelines. For investors seeking exposure to this validation story, a diversified approach across the quantum landscape offers the best risk-adjusted opportunity. Consider allocating a small speculative portion of growth portfolios across the major pure-play names: IonQ for its comprehensive approach and strong balance sheet, D-Wave for its early commercial traction, and potentially Rigetti for its full-stack development strategy. This approach acknowledges the difficulty of picking winners in an emerging technology while capturing potential upside as the space transitions from government validation to broader commercial adoption. Should you buy stock in IonQ right now? Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $634,627!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,046,799!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,037% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 George Budwell has positions in D-Wave Quantum, IonQ, Microsoft, and Rigetti Computing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, International Business Machines, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Real Reason Quantum Computing Stocks Are Soaring (It's Not What You Think) was originally published by The Motley Fool
