
Caribbean slavery reparations group takes fight to Westminster and Brussels
On Tuesday, the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Afrikan Reparations, a group of UK MPs and peers calling for an apology and reparative justice for the historical and ongoing impact of slavery and colonialism, hosted an independent delegation of Caribbean researchers and activists who are lobbying for reparations.
Diane Abbott MP, Dawn Butler MP, Paulette Hamilton MP, Juliet Campbell MP, Lady Margaret Curran and Lord Marvin Rees were among those who met with the delegation in Westminster, days after the Jamaican government announced plans to ask King Charles to request legal advice from the privy council on slavery reparations.
The Westminster event came the day after meetings in Brussels, where delegates, hosted by the Irish MEP Seán Kelly, met MEPs from the European parliament's political groups to build support for reparations from former colonial powers.
The Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy, chair of the APPG, said the Westminster meeting 'made it very clear that reparations were not a fringe issue' dominated by British activists, but a matter of global significance, adding that Jamaica's approach to King Charles was 'key'.
She said: 'I think it's important that people are moving forward with legal remedies, because ultimately enslavement was ended with the law, the reparations to slave owners happened under the law, and so reparations to those affected must happen under legislation.'
The lobbying event was organised by the Repair Campaign, an independent group funded by the Irish telecoms billionaire Denis O'Brien, which commissioned the researchers to produce plans for what reparations might look like in different Caribbean countries.
According to the Repair Campaign, the plans, which are unofficial, received support from representatives of Portugal, Italy, Spain, Denmark, France and Ireland during a meeting with members of the European parliament in Brussels on Tuesday.
Acting outside the scope of the complex diplomatic negotiations of Commonwealth nations, Repair has been able to produce them with relative speed – in three years – hopeful that they will support the broader case from Caribbean and African politicians.
O'Brien, who founded the major Caribbean mobile phone network Digicel, said the Repair Campaign had spoken to, among others, governments, groups such as Heirs of Slavery, Indigenous communities, Jamaican Maroons and Rastafarians, and had aligned '15 fully costed economic and social development plans' drawn up by University of the West Indies academics, with a 10-point plan for reparatory justice by Caricom, the grouping of 20 countries in the Caribbean and the Americas.
'We've gone to government departments in the Caribbean and said, 'what would you do if you had the budget to transform your country?' And they've talked about land rights, justice, education, health service, culture and memorialisation, judicial reform and human rights and debt cancellation,' O'Brien said at the Westminster event, adding that the programmes were tailored to each island's circumstances, with Haiti needing extra 'for roads, water and electricity'.
He believes the European Union and the British Ggovernment should each fund 50% of the plan, 'because they're both equally culpable'.
At the same time, Sir Hilary Beckles, chair of the Caricom Reparations Movement (CRC), issued a statement on Wednesday in response to media reporting about 'a Caribbean group visiting Britain and the European Union with a reparations agenda'. It clarified that 'these persons who have arrived in Europe are neither members of the CRC nor formally affiliated'.
The statement added that the CRC would be launching a 'European public relations campaign to share its vision of reparations with political stakeholders and the general public'.
The issue of reparations for transatlantic slavery has been heating up over the last year, dominating headlines in October when the British prime minister, Keir Starmer, resisted pressure from member states to include reparations on the agenda at the Commonwealth summit.
Pressure is intensifying from different sections of the global reparations movement on European countries involved in the kidnap, trafficking, forced labour, torture and sexual exploitation of millions of enslaved African peoples over a 300-year period.
Caribbean leaders have remained resolute in their pursuit of justice, with Barbados's prime minister, Mia Mottley, stressing the importance of a face-to-face discussion on the issue and the prime minister of the Bahamas, Philip Davis, pointing to 'legal avenues … if the negotiations fail'.
In June it emerged that Jamaica was seeking legal remedy, asking King Charles, who remains the island's head of state, to use his authority to request legal advice from the judicial committee of the London-based privy council, the final court of appeal for UK overseas territories and some Commonwealth countries, on whether the forced transport of Africans to Jamaica was lawful, if it constituted a crime against humanity, and whether Britain was under obligation to provide a remedy to Jamaica for slavery and its enduring consequences.
Responding to questions about whether King Charles is obliged to honour Jamaica's request, the deputy chair of the country's National Reparations Council, Bert Samuels, said if King Charles, who is part of the monarchy that benefited from slavery, refuses to refer the issue or if the privy council does not come back giving 'positive recognition to the three questions' there would be a global 'avalanche of criticism' of Britain.
He added that the toppling of the statue of the slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol in 2020 anti-racism protests was evidence of 'an across-the-board rejection for the celebration of the slave trade, no matter how long ago it was'.
Samuels added that Jamaica may take the matter to the international courts if it fails to get justice in Britain's legal system.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
an hour ago
- Times
After a terrible anniversary week, is Keir Starmer finished?
At the Spectator summer party, one of the biggest events of Westminster's social calendar, much of the conversation centred around one man — Nigel Farage. The Reform UK leader and his allies adjourned to a private terrace overlooking the Spectator garden and private security cordoned off the stairs. There they sipped Dom Perignon while cabinet ministers and senior Tories including Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick circled the garden below. When the news broke that Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, was planning to found a new party there were cheers from the Reform terrace. A new Corbyn-led hard left party meant yet more pain for Starmer — and a bad end to a truly terrible anniversary week for the prime minister. Senior Tories were disparaging about Farage and his coterie of supporters. 'They're so cocky,' said one shadow cabinet minister. Labour ministers said Farage offered 'no answers'. But both parties were alive to the threat posed by the man standing a few yards from them. At a cabinet meeting on Tuesday Starmer expressed his pride in his government's achievements after a year in power, listing off what he views as the successes. Free school meals, increasing defence spending to 2.6 per cent of GDP, trade deals with the US, the EU and India. The list went on. But within a few hours he was forced to make an extraordinary retreat in the face of a mass rebellion by Labour MPs over the government's welfare reforms, leaving a £5 billion hole in the exchequer. Then it got worse. On Wednesday Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, broke down in tears at the dispatch box, prompting a frenzy in the bond markets. As the dust settles this weekend, some cabinet ministers are asking the question: is it terminal? Will Starmer, who secured a landslide majority at the last election, lead Labour into the next election? 'It feels like it's done,' said one. Certainly the polling is bleak — and far worse than that for any party in recent political history that won a landslide just twelve months before. Research by YouGov for The Times this week found that just one in five voters (21 per cent) think that Labour has done well in office so far and less than a third think they are any better than the previous Conservative government. Across a range of issues the party's voters are deeply dissatisfied with the government's performance. On the cost of living, 62 per cent of those who backed Labour at the election say the government is doing badly, while 46 per cent are unhappy with the government's handling of the NHS. On Starmer himself: 69 per cent of voters think he's weak, 65 per cent say he doesn't care about people like them and 49 per cent say he's dishonest. Anthony Wells, head of European political research at YouGov, said: 'Labour's problem is that despite their landslide victory last year there was never any great enthusiasm for them in the first place — people were voting against the Tories. So as they have made some unpopular decisions they have not had any goodwill in the bank to fall back on.' Yet concerns about whether Starmer can survive need a reality check — Labour does not have the same appetite for regicide as the Tories or the same mechanisms for removing a leader. Even his most ardent critics concede that there there is no obvious successor who is capable of uniting Starmer's fragmenting electoral coalition. Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, appeals to those on the left of the party but there are questions about whether she could command broader support. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has the same problem the other way — he can appeal to those in the centre but has more limited appeal to those on the left. The YouGov polling also shows that all the plausible Labour alternatives, including Rayner and Streeting, are seen as more likely to be worse than Starmer. The speculation about Starmer's future stems in part from the knowledge that things are likely to get much worse. As difficult as the first year has been, the challenges of the second will eclipse them — the biggest of which will be the budget. At the cabinet on Tuesday, before the week's calamitous events, Reeves sounded a warning to ministers. At that stage the government had only made a partial about turn on welfare, protecting all existing claimants at a cost of £2.5 billion. Reeves said the compromise came at a cost, and that money would need to be raised. She said the last budget, painful as it was with £40 billion worth of tax rises, represented the 'low-hanging fruit'. The next budget would be more challenging. The tax rises are likely to be big. The cost of the change in direction on welfare and winter fuel payments came to around £6 billion, but economists are much more concerned about the anaemic levels of economic growth and a potential downgrade in forecasts. Some put the figure that needs to be raised as high as £30 billion, which would require huge tax rises. Cabinet ministers privately acknowledge that the benefits U-turn means all options for raising tax are now on the table. That includes potentially breaking the manifesto pledge not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, although ministers are loath to do so. A tax raid on pension savings is also being considered. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute of Fiscal Studies, said it would be very hard for Labour to find the money necessary without touching those 'big three' taxes. 'I don't really think there is [a way of doing it],' he said. 'We don't really know what kind of levels of money the chancellor will need to find but if we are looking at £30 billion, which is quite plausible, I can't see a way in which she raises that kind of money without hitting people on middle incomes as they did with the national insurance increase.' One minister said that while they would prefer spending restraint over tax rises, they appear to be unavoidable. They said that all options would need to be considered. The Times has been told that the government will not reopen the spending review despite the scale of the gap in the public minister was philosophical. The reality was that on many occasions the government had to choose between 'bad choices or very bad choices'. That, at times, government is effectively a Sophie's choice, with no good options on the table.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Starmer would be foolish not to recognise the threat posed by a left-wing Corbyn party
Those of us who remember Jeremy Corbyn's leadership of the Labour Party with a fond nostalgia will never forget how chaotic it was. I recall a shadow cabinet reshuffle briefing that took place after midnight and, on another occasion, a phone call at 1.50am to inform me Mr Corbyn had sacked Hilary Benn from the shadow cabinet. And so we shouldn't be surprised that his attempt to launch a new left-wing party to challenge Sir Keir Starmer has already descended into chaos and farce. And it hasn't even been launched yet and doesn't have a name! As botched launches go, so far it's classic Corbyn. Though to be fair, the chaos isn't entirely his fault. The Financial Times quoted an ally of Mr Corbyn claiming he was frustrated that Zarah Sultana, the 31-year-old MP for Coventry South, announced he was launching a new party without consulting him first. "Zarah has really overplayed her hand," according to the ally. "She jumped the gun to get the data and the donations." Then came an embarrassing rebuff from Mr Corbyn's two most senior allies during his leadership, his shadow chancellor John McDonnell and shadow home secretary Diane Abbott. Mr McDonell told me: "Just to be absolutely clear, I am a Labour Party member. I have had the whip suspended, that's all, and I expect it back. "Sad to see Zarah has gone, but I am remaining in the party and hope the whip will be restored soon." Labour's opponents, not surprisingly, are gloating, however. "He has awful policies but is a vastly superior politician to Starmer," declared Reform UK's Zia Yusuf. "His new party will be enough to lose Labour many, many seats in 2029. Likelihood of a Reform majority thus improve nicely." Sir Keir will no doubt claim Mr Corbyn's new party demonstrates how much his Labour Party has changed. It's a claim we've heard many times before. But the Labour leader and his top team would be foolish to dismiss the threat posed by Mr Corbyn, if and when he does indeed launch a new party. The other abiding memory of the Corbyn leadership is those mass rallies, with his adoring supporters singing "Oh, Jeremy Corbyn!" Let's not forget, either, how he rocked Glastonbury in 2017. Mr Corbyn may not get the backing of many Labour or independent pro-Gaza MPs. But left-wing Labour activists will flock to join a new Corbyn party in their thousands. Mr Corbyn is promising "real change", a "new kind of political party" and he says "discussions are ongoing". Watch this space, in other words. Some things never change, of course. Those things include the chaotic style of Mr Corbyn's leadership. But even with a botched launch, once his party is up and running it could potentially inflict real damage on Sir Keir's party. In elections next year and beyond, Labour could face the prospect of losing votes on the right to Reform UK and votes on the left to Mr Corbyn. With his massive cult following, Mr Corbyn has already demonstrated his ability to embarrass Sir Keir, when he won his Islington North seat as an independent in last year's general election. Now 76, opponents will claim Mr Corbyn is growing old disgracefully. But the old rebel loves nothing more than a protest, a march and a rally.


Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Jeremy Corbyn confirms new party but left-wing allies not joining
Jeremy Corbyn has confirmed plans for a new political party to challenge Sir Keir Starmer on the left in a bungled launch that has failed to secure the backing of the former Labour leader's traditional allies. Corbyn said discussions were ongoing and that 'the democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape'. Zarah Sultana, the former Labour MP, announced on Thursday night that she would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with Corbyn. But the former Labour leader was said to be angry with the intervention, which he saw as premature. In a statement on Friday, he did not confirm Sultana's co-leadership role, only saying that she 'will help us build a real alternative'. Some of Corbyn 's most senior backers during his time as Labour leader are understood not to be interested in joining the new party. John McDonnell, the former shadow chancellor, Diane Abbott, the former shadow home secretary, and Clive Lewis, the former shadow defence secretary, have all indicated they will not be resigning from the Labour Party to join the new project. Polling from More in Common suggests a hypothetical new party with Corbyn as leader could receive 10 per cent of the vote and become the most popular single party among 18 to 24-year-olds. Labour's overall vote would decrease from 23 per cent to 20 per cent, the polling suggests, and cut the Green Party's support from 9 per cent to 5 per cent. Corbyn has been building a network of former Labour and pro-Gaza independent councillors for months, in a bid to stand formal candidates in time for the May local elections next year. He said on Friday: 'Real change is coming. One year on from the election, this Labour government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. Our country needs to change direction, now. • 'Congratulations to Zarah Sultana on her principled decision to leave the Labour Party. I am delighted that she will help us build a real alternative. The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. 'Discussions are ongoing, and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve. Together, we can create something that is desperately missing from our broken political system: hope.' Sultana said on Thursday night that she was quitting Starmer's party, accusing the government of 'wanting to make disabled people suffer', and being an 'active participant in genocide' in Gaza. In a dig at the government's much-revised welfare reform, Sultana accused the government of wanting to 'make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much'. Four of the seven MPs who had the Labour whip suspended last summer for supporting an amendment to the King's Speech relating to the two-child benefit cap had it restored earlier this year. The three who remain as independents are McDonnell, Sultana and Apsana Begum. McDonnell said he was 'dreadfully sorry' to see Sultana quit the party. Last year Corbyn formed an independent alliance with four others who were elected as independents in the general election, all standing on a pro-Palestine ticket in heavily Muslim inner-city areas. Sultana's departure makes her the sixth MP in the alliance, alongside Corbyn, giving the group a bigger presence in the Commons than the Greens and Plaid Cymru. The creation of a new party would consolidate independents but could also splinter the vote on the left. But Zack Polanski, the favourite to win the Green leadership contest, suggested he could work with the new party. 'Anyone who wants to take on the Tories, Reform and this failing Labour government is a friend of mine', he said. 'Looking forward to seeing what this looks like in practice.' George Galloway, whose Workers Party candidate came within 700 votes of unseating Jess Phillips, the Home Office minister, said he would not be joining up because of 'significant differences on the issues of trans and LGBTQ+, the Russia-Ukraine war, net zero and other things'. But, he added, 'we are open to an electoral agreement which avoids us both fighting each other for the benefit of Starmer'. Corbyn was suspended from Labour in 2020 after he refused to fully accept the Equality and Human Rights Commission's findings that the party had broken equality law when he was in charge, and said antisemitism had been 'dramatically overstated for political reasons'. He was blocked from standing for Labour at last year's general election and expelled in the spring of 2024 after announcing he would stand as an independent candidate in his Islington North constituency, which he won with a majority of more than 7,000.