Rights Aotearoa Applauds Human Rights Commission's Powerful Stand Against Regulatory Standards Bill
Rights Aotearoa warmly welcomes the impressive and authoritative submission from Te Kāhui Tika Tangata | Human Rights Commission on the Regulatory Standards Bill. The Commission's return to formidable analytical strength is a significant and encouraging development for the entire human rights sector in Aotearoa.
Its submission masterfully deconstructs the Bill's profound threats to our constitutional framework, perfectly articulating the core concern that the Bill attempts to create a false and dangerous hierarchy of human rights. This aligns precisely with Rights Aotearoa's analysis that the Bill selectively elevates narrow economic and property-based principles over fundamental social, cultural, and environmental rights that protect the well-being of all New Zealanders. We commend the Commission for reinforcing the fundamental truth that there is no hierarchy of human rights, and that all human rights are indivisible.
The Commission's detailed critique—covering the Bill's constitutional overreach, its complete disregard for Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and its flawed, undemocratic process—provides an unassailable case for its complete rejection. This submission is a testament that even though the Chief Human Rights Commissioner does not meet the statutory requirements for the job, the Commission's legal team, led by their extremely capable Chief Legal Officer, are highly talented.
The commission's work provides a powerful, unifying voice for all who are dedicated to defending a fair, just, and democratic Aotearoa, and we are proud to stand alongside them in calling for this dangerous Bill to be withdrawn. The Human Rights Commission must be protected at all costs against voices—like those of ACT MP Todd Stephenson—who call for its dissolution.
Rights Aotearoa's submission can be found here: https://www.rightsaotearoa.nz/regulatory-standards-bill/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: electricity, bombs and gumboots
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including when cheap power was an advantage, why nuclear bombs are no good to Iran, and the charm of gumboots. Shooting ourselves in the foot over reforms In New Zealand we seem to have developed a talent for turning competitive advantages into disadvantages. Remember the days when cheap electricity was a competitive advantage for New Zealand. We had industries here based on that cheap electricity. Then we had the Bradford reforms to make electricity even cheaper. Somehow that ended up maximising the price for all New Zealanders and contributing to the closure of those once burgeoning industries. Now something similar seems to be happening to other New Zealand products. Dairy and other commodity export prices are good, benefitting some. However, as detailed in the ODT (18.6.25), the hospitality industry is finding that butter, cheese and milk are becoming luxury items. If we are indeed the most efficient producers of dairy products in the world, why is this not giving a competitive advantage to other related New Zealand businesses and why are consumers being held to ransom? Economists I have heard on the subject simply shrug their shoulders and say we are an export-led economy. To me that sounds too simplistic, and I do not think it passes the sniff test. Something is off. There is no doubt that we need to seriously rework our electricity system. I think that present circumstances, where good export income results in benefit for a few, and high prices and inflation for the rest, suggests that there are other areas that deserve close attention. PTSD In response to Dave Tackney (Letters ODT 24.6.25), hasn't it occurred to Mr Tackney that Māori people, as a collective and in general, have Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. After being invaded by the English, lied to, manipulated, subjugated with superior weapons, their land and sources of food stolen, made third-class citizens and impoverished, it is understandable that a chasm would manifest in their spirit. And let's not forget that the English, whether royalists or Cromwellians had perfected their tactics on the Irish for centuries, leading to expulsion from their land and famine. I will not say that the Māori people are victims of abuse by a foreign power because the word victim is demeaning and patronising to them. Obviously, their trauma and anger are misdirected and it is always with sorrow that we hear about the children who are victims in their turn. Metiria Stanton Turei is not trying to divide the country along racial lines, the arrival of the colonising English did it, then subsequent governments enforced it. Atomic fallout Re Greg Glendining letter (25.6.25) claiming our learned Prof Robert Patman to be stunningly naive believing Iran's claims they don't want a nuclear bomb, they just want uranium for peaceful purposes like other countries for electricity etc. A fact Mr Glendining strongly disagrees with. Well I will tell you why a nuclear bomb is no good to Iran and useless on Israel. Grab a map of the Middle East and see how close the borders are to Gaza, Lebanon and Syria. These countries are packed together. If they drop a nuclear bomb on Israel the nuclear radiation fallout would destroy the very people Iran claims to be fighting for. That's why they have developed non-nuclear drones and missiles. At the same time, if Iran did have a nuclear weapon as a deterrent against attack, Israel and the Zionists of Israel and America would not have attacked Iran, the very same reason they haven't attacked North Korea which has nuclear weapons as a deterrent. Photo heart-warming moment in week of woes Amongst all the doom and gloom of articles and photographs in current newspapers, especially those relating to terrible events overseas, how lovely to see that wonderful photograph on the front page of the Otago Daily Times (25.6.25), of the little boy seated amongst all the discarded muddy gumboots, as one of his own falls to the ground. Hopefully his mum or dad was standing there to retrieve it for him. I often smile when I see rows of bashful muddy gumboots standing in a row outside country cafes in New Zealand. I find the sight quite charming, as it is I think very much a Kiwi custom; I never saw this in any other country overseas. How nice of our farmers and workmen to be so considerate, and also not to risk a rebuke if they trail mud inside. The only thing I wonder at, looking at that photo of the very many pairs left in rows of disarray outside the Hindon Hall on Saturday, is that they all look the same (apart from various layers of mud on them) and how does each owner recognise his or her own rightful pair? But I bet they do. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Sentencing reforms come into effect as govt targets crime
By Natalie Akoorie of RNZ Sentencing reforms which will cap discounts judges can give to an offender and introduce aggravating factors at sentencing, have come into effect as the government targets tougher crime consequences. The Labour Party says the move will only exacerbate an already clogged court system, add huge costs to the taxpayer by increasing the prison population, and will not reduce crime or the number of victims. But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the sentencing reforms, which came into effect on Sunday, were about restoring real consequences for crime. Communities and hardworking New Zealanders should not be made to live and work in fear of criminals who had a "flagrant disregard for the law, corrections officers and the general public", he said. "We know that undue leniency has resulted in a loss of public confidence in sentencing, and our justice system as a whole. We had developed a culture of excuses." The tougher stance was part of the government's plan to "restore law and order, which we know is working", he said. "It signals to victims that they deserve justice, and that they are our priority." The changes include: • Capping sentence discounts when considering mitigating factors • Preventing repeat discounts for youth and remorse • Introducing aggravating factors at sentencing for offences against sole charge workers and those whose home and business are interconnected • Encouraging the use of cumulative sentencing when someone commits a crime on bail, in custody or on parole • Requiring courts to take victims' needs and interests into account at sentencing Act backs reforms Act MP Nicole McKee welcomed the new rules saying there had been a steady erosion of public confidence in the justice system. "Offenders faced fewer and shorter prison sentences, while communities paid the price." She said police data showed a 134 percent increase in serious assault leading to injury from 2017 to 2023 under "Labour's failed experiment of being kind to criminals". "We've restored Three Strikes, and from today additional measures are coming into force to make the message even clearer." She said the vulnerability of people who worked alone or in a business attached to their home would be "recognised in law" thanks to Act's coalition agreement to crack down on retail crime with the introduction of the aggravating factors. 'Smart on crime' Labour's spokesperson for Justice Duncan Webb, however, said tough on crime sounded good but did not actually have the effect of reducing crime. "We've got to be smart on crime as well. We've got to address the causes of crime which we know are poverty, family violence, mental illness and addiction, and until we address those, there'll continue to be crime and there'll continue to be victims." Tougher sentences were just one option, he said. "If we're gonna be serious about reducing crime and reducing harm, we've got to address those causes of crime." Evidence showed tough on crime initiatives such as the Three Strikes law, which the government had reinstated, did not reduce victims, Webb said. "Victims are absolutely central to the approach and the best thing we could ever have is avoiding someone becoming a victim and that means addressing the causes of crime before crime occurs. "And absolutely I understand that when people are victims of crime they want to see the perpetrator punished and that's the right thing to happen, but I'd rather see the appropriate amount of resources put into mental health, reducing poverty, [and] eliminating homelessness, because those are things that create crime and we've seen them all increase under this government." The fact white collar crime such as fraud - which was one of the few crimes that responded to deterrents - was not captured by Three Strikes was inconsistent, Webb said. Webb said he had sought feedback from those in the social services, intervention, and criminal justice sectors. "They're all frustrated with the fact the direction that's being taken is going to clog up the courts, it's going to create more offenders, it's going to create more victims and it's not actually going to address what we really want to address which is the things that cause crime."
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Sentencing reforms to 'restore law and order' come into effect
By Natalie Akoorie of RNZ Sentencing reforms which will cap discounts judges can give to an offender and introduce aggravating factors at sentencing, have come into effect as the government targets tougher crime consequences. The Labour Party says the move will only exacerbate an already clogged court system, add huge costs to the taxpayer by increasing the prison population, and will not reduce crime or the number of victims. But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the sentencing reforms, which came into effect on Sunday, were about restoring real consequences for crime. Communities and hardworking New Zealanders should not be made to live and work in fear of criminals who had a "flagrant disregard for the law, corrections officers and the general public", he said. "We know that undue leniency has resulted in a loss of public confidence in sentencing, and our justice system as a whole. We had developed a culture of excuses." The tougher stance was part of the government's plan to "restore law and order, which we know is working", he said. "It signals to victims that they deserve justice, and that they are our priority." The changes include: • Capping sentence discounts when considering mitigating factors • Preventing repeat discounts for youth and remorse • Introducing aggravating factors at sentencing for offences against sole charge workers and those whose home and business are interconnected • Encouraging the use of cumulative sentencing when someone commits a crime on bail, in custody or on parole • Requiring courts to take victims' needs and interests into account at sentencing Act backs reforms Act MP Nicole McKee welcomed the new rules saying there had been a steady erosion of public confidence in the justice system. "Offenders faced fewer and shorter prison sentences, while communities paid the price." She said police data showed a 134 percent increase in serious assault leading to injury from 2017 to 2023 under "Labour's failed experiment of being kind to criminals". "We've restored Three Strikes, and from today additional measures are coming into force to make the message even clearer." She said the vulnerability of people who worked alone or in a business attached to their home would be "recognised in law" thanks to Act's coalition agreement to crack down on retail crime with the introduction of the aggravating factors. 'Smart on crime' Labour's spokesperson for Justice Duncan Webb, however, said tough on crime sounded good but did not actually have the effect of reducing crime. "We've got to be smart on crime as well. We've got to address the causes of crime which we know are poverty, family violence, mental illness and addiction, and until we address those, there'll continue to be crime and there'll continue to be victims." Tougher sentences were just one option, he said. "If we're gonna be serious about reducing crime and reducing harm, we've got to address those causes of crime." Evidence showed tough on crime initiatives such as the Three Strikes law, which the government had reinstated, did not reduce victims, Webb said. "Victims are absolutely central to the approach and the best thing we could ever have is avoiding someone becoming a victim and that means addressing the causes of crime before crime occurs. "And absolutely I understand that when people are victims of crime they want to see the perpetrator punished and that's the right thing to happen, but I'd rather see the appropriate amount of resources put into mental health, reducing poverty, [and] eliminating homelessness, because those are things that create crime and we've seen them all increase under this government." The fact white collar crime such as fraud - which was one of the few crimes that responded to deterrents - was not captured by Three Strikes was inconsistent, Webb said. Webb said he had sought feedback from those in the social services, intervention, and criminal justice sectors. "They're all frustrated with the fact the direction that's being taken is going to clog up the courts, it's going to create more offenders, it's going to create more victims and it's not actually going to address what we really want to address which is the things that cause crime."
