
Nursing student, 19, held by ICE after traffic stop makes surprising revelation about deputy who detained her
Caroline Dias Goncalves, a University of Utah scholarship recipient and one of 2.5 million undocumented Dreamers living in the US, was pulled over June 5 on a stretch of Interstate 70 in Loma, Colorado.
The stop, initiated for following a semi-truck too closely, Goncalves hand over all of her documentation and paperwork and ended with a cordial conversation - but it spiraled into a 15-day nightmare that saw her locked in an ICE detention facility, fearing she might never see her family again.
Now free after a judge ordered her release on June 18, Goncalves has released a powerful public statement.
And in a twist that has left many stunned, she thanked the very deputy whose actions helped lead to her arrest - Investigator Alexander Zwinck of the Mesa County Sheriff's Office.
'Even to the ICE officer who detained me… he kept apologizing and told me he wanted to let me go, but his hands were tied. There was nothing he could do, even though he knew it wasn't right,' Goncalves wrote.
'I want you to know - I forgive you. Because I believe that people can make better choices when they're allowed to.'
Body camera footage reviewed by DailyMail.com showed Zwinck pulling Goncalves over and issuing her a warning.
During the encounter, he casually asked about her background: 'Where are you from? You have a bit of an accent.'
'I'm from Utah,' she responded, cautiously.
Zwinck then asked if she had been born and raised there. 'No,' she admitted, after a pause. 'I was born in - gosh, I always forget the town… down in Brazil.'
'My parents moved here,' she added.
The officer appeared unfazed by her answer, moving on to ask her questions about her boyfriend, her weekend plans and her dreams of becoming a nurse.
But just minutes later as she exited the freeway, ICE agents pulled her over again.
She was arrested and taken to the Aurora Contract Detention Facility outside Denver.
Goncalves' name and travel details had been shared in a multi-agency law enforcement group chat, originally intended to coordinate drug trafficking enforcement - but now revealed to be quietly exploited by federal immigration agents.
The Mesa County Sheriff's Office has since confirmed its deputies, including Zwinck, were part of the chat group and said it was unaware the information was being used for ICE arrests.
The department has pulled out of the group and placed Zwinck on leave pending an investigation.
'This use of information is contradictory to Colorado law… Unfortunately, it resulted in the later contact between ICE and Miss Dias Goncalves,' the agency said in a public statement.
Goncalves' full statement, released days after her release, paints a harrowing picture of life inside the Aurora facility.
'We were given soggy wet food - even the bread was all soggy. We were kept on confusing schedules,' she wrote.
'And the moment they realized I spoke English, I saw a change - suddenly I was treated better than others who didn't. That broke my heart.'
Despite having lived in the US since she was seven years old, Goncalves said she was 'treated like I didn't matter.'
Her detention occurred amid President Donald Trump's renewed push to ramp up deportations, particularly in Democratic-run cities.
The administration has publicly instructed ICE to prioritize arrests in urban hubs like New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, where, Trump claims, 'Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside.'
His immigration architect, Stephen Miller, has called for 3,000 arrests per day - a staggering increase over the daily averages early in Trump's first term.
And although enforcement actions in high-traffic industries like agriculture and hospitality have reportedly been paused, the president has continued to push for visible, symbolic crackdowns such as Goncalves' arrest.
Her statement is telling both in its emotional honesty and unexpected grace.
'I hope no one else has to go through what I did. But I know that right now, over 1,300 people are still in that same nightmare in Aurora detention,' she wrote.
'They are just like me - people who've grown up here, who love this country, who want nothing more than a chance to belong.'
She reserved special thanks for her attorney, her family, community groups, and the US senators who intervened on her behalf.
She also gave credit to her best friends and legal fund supporters - more than $28,000 has been raised for her case through GoFundMe.
And yet, despite the trauma, Goncalves did not call for punishment or retribution for Zwinck, who according to her own account expressed regret even as he followed protocol.
'Immigrants like me - we're not asking for anything special. Just a fair chance to adjust our status, to feel safe, and to keep building the lives we've worked so hard for.'
After 15 days in detention, Goncalves says she's returning to work, school, and 'healing.'
'I'm going to try to move forward now... but I won't forget this. And I hope others won't either.'
Goncalves is a recipient of the TheDream.US national scholarship, granted to undocumented students pursuing higher education. She is studying to become a nurse.
While her father's asylum case remains pending, her own legal status hangs in the balance. It is understood her family arrived in the US on a tourist visa, which they overstayed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Top DOJ official to meet today with Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell inside a Florida federal prison
A senior Justice Department official plans to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend and accomplice, on Thursday in Florida, where she is serving time for her role in a scheme to abuse girls, according to a report. As questions swirled around the handling of the so-called Epstein files, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Tuesday he planned to meet with Maxwell in the 'coming days.' That meeting is expected to happen Thursday, ABC News reported. Earlier this week, Maxwell's attorneys confirmed their client was 'in discussions' with the government. The 63-year-old was sentenced to 20 years in 2021 for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse multiple girls with Epstein and is serving time at the Florida Correctional Institution-Tallahassee. Her attorneys have taken an appeal of her conviction to the Supreme Court. The development comes amid an uproar around the Epstein files after the Wall Street Journal reported that President Donald Trump was told in May that his name appeared in the files 'multiple times.' The president filed a $10 billion defamation suit against the paper and its owners after it published a report claiming that Trump gave Epstein a bawdy birthday card in 2003; he has vehemently denied the claims. 'This is another fake news story, just like the previous story by The Wall Street Journal,' White House communications director Steven Cheung told the paper about the claims Trump was named. However, Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed Trump was told that he is in the files. Being mentioned is not an indication of wrongdoing and officials say hundreds of names appear. Shortly after Blanche's announcement Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee approved a subpoena for Maxwell. Speaking to reporters at the White House later that day, Trump said that the subpoena for Maxwell "sounds appropriate." Last week, Trump requested Attorney General Pam Bondi release 'any and all pertinent' grand jury transcripts related to the Epstein case. Bondi then asked the judges overseeing the cases of Epstein and Maxwell; two judges have so far denied these requests. Trump's request came as the White House attempted to quell the noise following the DOJ's July 6 memo, which stated that no further disclosures were necessary in the Epstein matter.


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Why Trump's political playbook is failing in the Epstein case
The problem with a successful playbook is that you eventually keep doing the same thing mechanically. Fresh from intimidating ABC and CBS with meritless lawsuits, Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal reporters who broke the story of a lewd birthday message for Jeffrey Epstein. But, unlike with the frivolous allegations against the big broadcasters, there's clearly a fact of the matter here: an authentic letter either exists or it does not; and there is plenty to be revealed in the process of finding out. Trump's time-proven move – whatever happens, just counter-attack – is likely to keep the very story he wants to kill alive. Meanwhile, the other elements of his playbook – deny, deflect, distract – only work if journalists and Democrats play along. They, not the seemingly all-important Trump base, are the actors to watch. We still debate whether Trumpism is a substantial ideology or not; what we are missing is that Trumpism, for sure, is a set of tactics for exploiting weaknesses in the US political, legal and media systems. Some of these tactics were inherited from his mentor Roy Cohn and many are now being adopted by Trump's followers – one must never admit guilt; one must always swing back; and one must reject, or ideally entirely bury, defeats (such as Trump's case against Bob Woodward and Woodward's publisher being dismissed recently). But there is also a less obvious element and it has to do with managing political time (a challenge for all politicians, come to think of it). The point is not just seizing opportunities or exploiting opponents' weaknesses in a timely manner; rather, it is about the art of speeding things up or slowing them down to one's advantage. Think of how we appear to have become inured to Trump doing and saying things that would have ended previous presidencies (OK, previous presidents did not have AI-generated images of themselves as kings or popes available, but still). One reason is this: an administration that faces one or two big scandals in a four-year period may well be damaged beyond repair; one that produces three very big scandals a day seems to have nothing to worry about since no one can keep up. It is difficult to stick with one story, as the newest outrage already appears so much bigger (the Qatar plane scandal can feel like it happened years ago). To be sure, not all scandals are consciously produced, but there is little doubt that Trump's posting an AI-generated clip of Barack Obama being arrested in the White House and identifying Obama as a 'ringleader' of election fraud are meant to distract – which is not to deny that they would justify impeachment. While the frequency of scandals is maximized to game the news cycle, the legal system is used to slow things down. Releasing the grand jury testimonies in the Epstein case will take time, if the request is not rejected altogether by courts (as has already happened in Florida). Even if they are released, they are unlikely to contain anything relevant about Trump. The calculation is that, a few weeks from now, the files will be forgotten. None of this is to suggest Trump is a master Machiavellian who can manipulate Americans (or even just his base) at will. His approach partly works because institutional and cultural contexts have changed: news cycles are shorter, as are attention spans. His behavior has become progressively normalized – and generalized: shamelessness once unique to him is now in the manual of required GOP conduct (just think of blatant lies about Medicaid). Most important, a free press sticking relentlessly with scandals and ignoring intimidation can no longer be taken for granted; broadcasters in particular have become vulnerable to parent companies putting profits before everything else. Democrats, understandably not wanting to look like they mainly focus on the sordid details of the Epstein story, are tempted to move on and deal with the vaunted 'kitchen-table issues'. But it should give them pause that the story is apparently so scary for the other side that Republicans would rather shut down the House than deal with it in any shape or form. Are they right to panic? For sure, Trump made a mistake with his social media post urging followers to move on, which was the equivalent of 'don't think of an elephant' (while also providing further evidence for the Streisand effect: censorship generates the very attention meant to be avoided). Trump lobbying Murdoch to kill the story will give pause to all still naive enough to think of Republicans as free speech defenders. By now, the fact that releasing only the grand jury testimony is relatively meaningless has sunk in and – never mind the base – what political scientists call 'low-information voters' will be left with a lasting impression of a Trump-Epstein connection or at least a chaotic administration. In the lawsuit, Trump has to prove 'actual malice' on the part of the newspaper – a difficult hurdle to jump. Unlike with the Russia investigation, Trump himself is the instigator of a lengthy process overshadowing his presidency; unlike with the many investigations between his presidential terms, when his lawyers outran the clock, time is not really on his side. In fact, he might be lucky if the case is dismissed on a technicality – he apparently failed to comply with a Florida law that requires giving defendants five days' notice. Jan-Werner Müller is a Guardian US columnist and a professor of politics at Princeton University


The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Newsman or businessman? Murdoch walks tightrope in battle with Trump
Rupert Murdoch had made up his mind. 'We want to make Trump a nonperson,' he assured one of his former executives in a 2021 email, two days after the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. Over seven decades, Murdoch has sought to charm, challenge and change prime ministers and presidents as he built one of the world's most powerful media empires. In this particular endeavor, however, he failed. Donald Trump, far from being made a nonperson, became the first defeated US president in 132 years to win back the White House. And from the Club World Cup final to the Oval Office, Murdoch has been seen by his side. As the Wall Street Journal prepared to report that Trump provided a bawdy birthday letter to the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein last week, the president appealed to Murdoch – chair emeritus of News Corporation, the newspaper's owner – to kill the story, claiming it was false. The story ran. But the story did not receive the same treatment across Murdoch's empire. The Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham went on air 15 minutes after the Journal published its story, and talked about Epstein. 'We have new news coming on about this, as well, from the Wall Street Journal. A new report tonight – next,' she said, throwing to a commercial break. When The Ingraham Angle returned, the new news did not feature. Preston Padden, who worked at Fox in the 1990s, is the veteran media industry operator whom Murdoch told of his plan to make Trump a 'nonperson' in 2021. He was not surprised to see how his former boss, and his array of outlets, handled this story. 'You've got the Wall Street Journal, and you've got the cable news channel. And they represent two different sides of Rupert's brain,' Padden said in an interview. 'He is, in his heart, a serious newsman, and that's the Wall Street Journal. He's also a brilliant businessman, and that's Fox News.' Murdoch's businesses are divided between two companies: Fox Corporation, which houses Fox News and the Tubi streaming platform, and News Corp, home to newspapers including the Australian, the Sun, the Journal; the digital real estate network REA; and HarperCollins, the publishing giant. 'There is a more of a focus on the business than the journalism at Fox, than seems to be the case at News Corp,' said Brian Wieser, an analyst and former banker. 'It always appeared to me that business was first' for Murdoch, he added. 'Influence was a means to an end.' News Corp's Dow Jones division – where the Wall Street Journal sits – generated revenue of $575m in the first three months of the year. Fox Corp's cable network programming arm, meanwhile – led by Fox News, and also including Fox Sports – generated $1.64bn over the same period. 'Fox News is the primordial asset of the collection of assets,' said media analyst Claire Enders, who said the network 'has drawn no attention to the matter, exactly as the president has wished'. Covering the Journal's reporting on Trump and Epstein 'would not be good for business' at Fox News, suggested Padden, who observed how the network previously endured a backlash from the president's supporters when it strayed significantly from his narrative. 'And so you can watch this debate,' he claimed. 'Should we report the truth, and lose viewers, or should we report what our viewers want?' In 2023, Fox reached a $787.5m settlement with Dominion Voting Systems over the voting equipment firm's defamation lawsuit against the network over the false narrative that the 2020 election had been stolen from Trump. Trump, who has in recent days promoted Fox News segments on his Truth Social platform, seems perfectly happy with its output. But he promptly sued Murdoch, News Corp and the Journal reporters behind the story on his ties with Epstein, publicly goading Murdoch about the threat of testifying. Murdoch and Trump have engaged in a transactional relationship spanning decades, noted Enders. 'There is also a very longstanding friendship between Trump and Mr Murdoch. And a symbiotic relationship with the cashflow machine,' she said. 'They have fallen out before and made up quickly.' In December, Disney's ABC agreed to pay $15m to a foundation and museum as part of a settlement in a defamation lawsuit filed by Trump. Earlier this month, Paramount reached a $16m settlement with the president over another lawsuit he filed over an interview with Kamala Harris, the Democrat candidate for president, by CBS News. Trump's latest lawsuit raises the prospect of another prominent media organization – this time News Corp – potentially settling to avoid a lengthy legal battle. A Dow Jones spokesperson said: 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.' 'We do not anticipate any lasting repercussions from this unless the WSJ has in fact been hoaxed,' said Enders. 'Otherwise, it will be shuffled away with a smaller settlement. That is how previous ginormous Trump lèse-majesté cases have been dealt with.' Fox News has covered the lawsuit sparingly in recent days, reporting on Trump's initial filing on Friday, referencing the story briefly on Saturday, and then analyzing it in a segment on Sunday. The network declined to comment. Murdoch, 94, retired from management in 2023, when he handed over the reins at Fox Corp and News Corp to his son, Lachlan. At the time, however, he stressed he would remain 'involved every day' in the businesses. 'As long as he's around, it's his candy store,' said Padden.