Federal employees union sues over Trump move to block collective bargaining
President Trump last week signed an order that directed agencies to terminate already-signed collective bargaining agreements and to 'cease participating in grievance procedures.'
The Civil Service Reform Act that gives federal employees the right to unionize does have exceptions for national security, but in its suit the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) argues Trump went beyond authority that allows its use if an agency 'primarily does intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work.'
'The President's sweeping Executive Order is inconsistent with this narrow authority. The Administration's own issuances show that the President's exclusions are not based on national security concerns, but instead a policy objective of making federal employees easier to fire and political animus against federal sector unions,' NTEU wrote in its suit.
While the order targets agencies it says have a national security mission, many of the departments don't have a strict national security connection.
In addition to agencies with clear national security ties, the order also covers the Treasury Department, all agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, the General Services Administration and many more.
NTEU said that the statute may only be used 'in a manner consistent with national security requirements and considerations.'
The suit, filed in Washington, D.C., comes as the Trump administration took the unusual move of filing its own legal action in Texas last week, making the first move in litigation by asking a judge to declare as legal its plans to terminate the contracts.
That suit was filed in a single-judge district in Texas, possibly setting the stage for a square-off in the Supreme Court.
The NTEU suit goes through each of the offices and agencies represented by the suit, which ranges from the IRS to the Bureau of Land Management, writing that they do 'not primarily perform security, investigative, or intelligence work.'
The suit argues that the order, a White House fact sheet, and an accompanying memo from the Office of Personnel Management all reference broader plans to fire federal employees.
'The OPM Guidance on the Executive Order shows that the President's primary motivation for the mass exclusion of agencies from the Statute's coverage is to make their employees easier to fire,' it states.
'The same White House Fact Sheet reveals the secondary motivation for the Executive Order: political retribution. In justifying the Executive Order, the Fact Sheet states that '[c]ertain Federal unions have declared war on President Trump's agenda.''
The fact sheet said that current law 'enables hostile Federal unions to obstruct agency management.'
NTEU wrote, 'Neither facilitating employee firings nor political retribution is an appropriate basis for invoking Section 7103(b)(1)'s national security exemption.'
'These are nonetheless the President's declared bases for excluding about two-thirds of the federal workforce from the Statute through this narrow exemption.'
Updated: 2:34 p.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Want to buy a house with crypto? What to expect.
So, you put a little mad money into bitcoin a few years ago. Now, your crypto-fueled profit means you have a sweet nest egg to put toward a house. But can you buy a house with crypto rather than using cash or a traditional mortgage loan? What are the roadblocks? And what about taxes? Read more: What is a mortgage, and how does it work? The Trump effect President Trump wants the United States to be "the crypto capital of the world." In that spirit, in late June, Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) William J. Pulte ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to "prepare their businesses to count cryptocurrency as an asset for a mortgage." The FHFA supervises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that fund a major portion of the mortgage industry. Pulte said the housing system "needs a massive upgrade," adding, 'I want people who own cryptocurrency to be able to buy homes like everyone else. I believe cryptocurrency is an asset. I believe Americans should be able to use their crypto if they want to. It's time the housing system caught up.' This signals what could be a fundamental change to how cryptocurrency may be used to qualify for a mortgage. Until now, crypto owners have been commonly advised to cash out digital currency holdings and convert them into dollars to use as assets that can be considered on a financial statement or as reserves for an applicant's home loan. Fervent crypto collectors are not likely to do that, believing there is too much future upside to sell now. Learn more: Trump has called for a strategic bitcoin reserve. Here's how it would work. How crypto volatility could affect buying a home Most crypto assets continue to have one strength, which can also be their crucial weakness: volatility. Investors thrive on "buying the dips" when crypto prices dive, but a similar sudden drop in value when crypto is used as part of a net worth statement could be troubling — even worse if crypto becomes a financial foundation for a mortgage. Imagine you deposit some crypto for your down payment and sign the buy-sell agreement. Days later, the crypto value crashes. As a result, you'll need a sizable additional deposit to keep the purchase valid. That's a call that's going to be hard to answer. Keep reading: The average down payment on a house Up Next Up Next Using cryptocurrency as loan collateral While the FHFA aims to introduce crypto into mortgage transactions as a legitimate asset, the reality may be something less. The point made above regarding volatility is an example. However, the crypto solution may be stablecoins. Designed to maintain a steady value, stablecoins weren't created to be an appreciating asset. That folds neatly into the mortgage loan process. However, this means buying a house with crypto may still require converting a volatile cryptocurrency into stablecoins — which would not appeal to most crypto investors' long-term hold mortgages There has been some movement on crypto mortgages, yet they're still scarce. The idea is to allow a home loan to be issued using digital currencies such as bitcoin or ethereum as collateral without liquidating the position. Players in the space include lenders named Milo, Arch Lending, Figure, and Ledn, though loan availability varies by location. Buyers would deposit an amount of crypto equal to the property's sales price — or sometimes twice the value, or more — for an interest-only mortgage loan. Again, crypto volatility plays an important role in the viability of such a loan. This embedded content is not available in your region. Dig deeper: How to invest in real estate Smart contracts Beyond the transfer of cryptocurrency assets, blockchain-based legal agreements called "smart contracts" might speed up the real estate purchase process. The blockchain is a digital record of transactions accessible anywhere, so embedding such smart contracts on the "distributed ledger" can track when contingencies are completed, funds are transferred, and contracts are signed. While that has nothing to do with buying a house with crypto, it may be the first hurdle to clear in adopting the framework of all crypto, the blockchain, into the real estate transaction space. The IRS is calling Capital gains taxes may be another reason "hodlers" (a colloquial term based on a typo for long-term holders of bitcoin) may not be quick to sell their crypto to buy a house. The Internal Revenue Service will take a big chunk of the profits of any crypto sale in capital gains taxes. Can you buy a house with cryptocurrency? FAQs Has anyone bought a house with crypto? We haven't been able to confirm the published claims of any homes bought with cryptocurrencies. However, if current listings are any clue, it's likely that they weren't ranch-style 3/2s with a carport and a fenced backyard in modest neighborhoods. Crypto Emporium recently listed homes for bitcoin sale that included a modern estate in Mexico and an eight-bedroom manor in Norway. Both are offered for around 290 bitcoin, which is currently worth a little more than $33 million. Do you pay taxes if you buy a house with crypto? Oh, yes. If you sell the bitcoin to buy the house, the IRS says you'll owe capital gains taxes. However, if you were to put bitcoin up as collateral for an interest-only crypto mortgage, you wouldn't have to sell your holdings, so no tax would be due. Can you actually buy anything with crypto? You can use bitcoin, ethereum, litecoin, dogecoin, and other cryptocurrencies to buy real estate, merchandise, gift cards, travel packages, and hundreds of other items. Third-party providers such as BitPay enable the transactions, though some companies accept crypto payments directly. Laura Grace Tarpley edited this article.


UPI
17 minutes ago
- UPI
Rwanda accepts 250 U.S.-deported migrants
Aug. 5 (UPI) -- Rwanda on Tuesday agreed to accept hundreds of U.S.-deported migrants as part of a broad effort by the Trump administration to get African nations to take in deportees. "Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement," Rwandan government spokesperson Yolande Makolo told Politico and The New York Times. Rwanda's societal values, Makolo claimed in a statement, were "founded on reintegration and rehabilitation." Rwanda's foreign minister Olivier J.P. Nduhungirehe initially confirmed the talks in May. Its notorious 1994 genocide that killed over 800,000 Tutsi and Hutu peoples and later recovery made the small African country stand on its own in the eyes of the global community. The Trump administration issued requests to at least 15 African nations, including South Sudan and Eswatini, to accept illegal migrants supposedly unable to return to their native country. A second Rwandan government official told said the United States will provide funding but declined to outline a figure. Last month, an internal memo out of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement indicated the federal agency intended to expand its effort to deport immigrants to other countries abroad where they do not hold citizenship. The White House previously signed off on a $6 million infusion of U.S. dollars to El Salvador to imprison Venezuelan and Salvadoran citizens. Meanwhile, Rwandan officials said the U.S.-infused money will support further work and training programs by its immigration authority. The Rwandan official granted anonymity indicated its government agreed to demands as an opportunity to form closer ties to Washington. In early July, President Donald Trump met at the White House with the leaders of Senegal, Liberia, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania and Gabon to talk over trade. Within days the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the administration was permitted to deport eight migrants to war-torn South Sudan held at a U.S. military base in neighboring Djibouti. The anonymous Rwandan government official said Tuesday that as a small country, "any time you can find a way consistent with your own policies and values, to be able to talk to a major country about something that it is interested in and not just asking them to take an interest in your issues," that it creates a "more productive" and a "more balanced" diplomatic relationship "that's good for both sides." However, the official did state that it's an "obviously not equal" relationship.

USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker rallies with Texas Democrats, calls Trump a ‘cheater'
Joined by national and state Democratic leaders, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker accused President Donald Trump and Republicans of trying to cheat American democracy ahead of the 2026 midterm elections by redrawing Texas' congressional maps. The 60-year-old Illinois leader, a possible presidential contender, said Democratic governors cannot ignore Trump's aggressive steps, which under the Texas GOP plan would push as many as five House Democrats out of office. Such a move would provide national Republicans with a slightly heftier cushion next year to protect their slim majority in the House of Representatives as they prepare to defend Trump's agenda and other controversial moves. "Donald Trump is a cheater... and if they're going to cheat, then all of us have to take a hard look at what the effect of that cheating is on democracy, and that means we've all got to stand up and do the right thing," Pritzker said at an Aug. 5 press conference, flanked by Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin along with Texas Democrats and others. "So as far as I'm concerned, everything is on the table," he added. The comments underscore a noticeable shift within the Democratic ranks among even institutionally-minded party and elected leaders who have been hesitant to embrace the mantra of "fighting fire with fire." But many grassroots progressives and their allies have demanded for months that the party take a more aggressive approach, citing how the administration and its MAGA-aligned allies have been bending several U.S. institutions to their will since Trump's return to power. Asked if Texas is providing Democratic-controlled state leaders with a roadmap on how to draw their own maps, Martin told reporters at the press conference that the party will fight back in the same way. "Our constitution is under assault. Voting rights are being completely violated," he said. "Now is not the time for one party to play by the rules while the other party has completely ignored it." Earlier in the day, Trump, appearing on CNBC by telephone, said Republicans were "entitled" to the five new seats drafted by a Texas House committee on Aug. 2, and called out the group of Texas Democrats who fled to liberal-leaning states, saying those places have been using the same tactics when crafting their congressional districts. "Do you notice they go to Illinois for safety, but that's all gerrymandered," he said. "California is gerrymandered. We should have many more seats in Congress. It's all gerrymandered." This story will be updated.