WhatsApp introduces first major advertising features
Until now, the platform's advertising consisted primarily of WhatsApp Business promotional messages to opted-in customers and some limited Status ad testing in select markets.
The messaging app has no display ads in chat feeds or conversations.
The company said it will roll out three new monetization features exclusively within its Updates tab, which houses both Channels and Status features used by 1.5 billion people daily and became widely available last year.
The company stressed that users who only use WhatsApp for personal messaging will see no changes to their experience, as all new features are confined to the Updates tab that can be deactivated in the settings.
"We've been talking about our plans to build a business that does not interrupt your personal chats for years and we believe the Updates tab is the right place for these new features to work," WhatsApp said.
The new features include paid channel subscriptions, promoted channels in the Discovery directory, and advertisements within Status, WhatsApp's version of Instagram Stories.
WhatsApp emphasized that the new advertising features are designed with privacy safeguards.
"I want to be really clear about one thing: Your personal messages, calls and statuses will remain end-to-end encrypted. This means no one, not even us, can see or hear them, and they cannot be used for ads," Nikila Srinivasan, vice president of product management at Meta, told reporters.
The company committed to never selling or sharing phone numbers to advertisers and said personal messages, calls, and group memberships will not influence ad targeting.
"To show ads in Status or Channels, we're going to use basic information like your country or city, your device language and your activity in the Updates tab," Srinivasan said.
The introduction of advertising represents Meta's effort to monetize WhatsApp's massive user base of over two billion monthly active users.
Industry analysts have long speculated that Meta would eventually bring advertising to WhatsApp given its scale and engagement rates.
The timeline for these features was not specified in the announcement.
"They're going to be rolling out slowly over the next few months, so it might be a while until you see them in your countries," Srinivasan said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
How is a messaging app improving public health in China?
Everyone loves the idea of personalised healthcare, but when it's been trialled in the past, the cost is often too high, both for the pharmaceutical companies producing the drugs and for the patients and healthcare systems. 'That's why the pharma companies like to develop 'blockbusters'. It's just one drug for all,' Dr Alex Ng told Euronews Health. But what if AI could change all that? We sat down with Dr Alex Ng, president of Tencent Healthcare, to hear about the game-changing possibilities of AI in healthcare and living up to the company's motto of 'tech for good'. Access to healthcare Whilst we all know technology can bring some great innovations and development to an industry, Ng is very conscious of the problems a lack of access can create as a service becomes more digitised. 'What we have seen with history is that with digitisation, with more and more machines, you are actually inadvertently widening the inequality gap,' Ng explained. 'A lot of that may be due to access, and a lot will be due to reimbursement, payments, [and] ability to pay. Now, we've seen that with every single wave of technology development, it gets wider and wider'. Tencent is a Chinese technology conglomerate but it is best known for its popular messaging app, WeChat. By leveraging the popularity of the app, Tencent have added extra features to help increase access to healthcare for their users in China. Users can book hospital or clinic appointments, get a tele-consultation and browse health and drug information through their equivalent of WhatsApp. 'We used to write a lot of medical articles to do health education, health awareness. But now, people are going to AI, whether it's actually ChatGPT or chatbots,' Ng said. 'We can make sure that the answer that they get is much more rigid and verified and much more peer-reviewed, versus a lot of the hallucinations that AI can sometimes get'. This is a particularly important service in China, where, Ng explained, patients receive their test results at the same time as a doctor. And like most of us would do too, many patients look to the internet to interpret the results before their follow-up appointment with their doctor. 'A lot of the time, we provide tools against AI to actually explain to them what these test results mean. Of course, with the usual caveat, that we cannot replace the doctor's advice,' he explained. 'Even if we didn't provide a rigorous AI engine to help them with that, they would just do it on any other random AI that is not healthcare specific. If they just go to a random tool and they do it, the hallucination inaccuracy might be even higher. 'And so we come from a vantage point where we are well aware of the seriousness of supporting the patient and the user in interpreting some of the results. So we try to offer a much more ground truth alternative'. Can we accept AI that makes mistakes in healthcare? The results of using AI for the greater good of public health seem obvious but where the debate gets interesting is our capacity to accept mistakes. When working with humans, we appear to be much more accepting of human error, yet expect AI, a human-created technology, not to make any mistakes. 'AI is never perfect. Just like drugs, each drug is intended for a certain indication, but you also accept that it will have side effects and some mild, some moderate, some serious, for the whole population. And there's a regulator, there are laws around to protect that, because otherwise no one will be investing in developing new drugs,' Ng said. 'I think the same for AI. If we have one AI being developed for a specific task, it might be better than humans already, but it is not faultless. If there are certain faults within a boundary, that is acceptable, how do you regulate that? 'How do we, as a health system, work with the regulators, work with health systems in some way, work with society on what is acceptable? And I think that line is very different for China, Southeast Asia, the US, Europe, and the UK because I think the expectation is very different'.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
US Senate says no to deregulating AI in 99-1 vote
US senators defeated a proposal that would ban states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI) companies. The US Senate voted 99-1 on Tuesday to get rid of the provision from President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks that would've banned any AI regulation for 10 years at the state level. Under the original proposal, states that wanted federal AI investment would have to 'pause any enforcement of any state restrictions, as specified, related to AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems' for a decade. Republicans tried to save the provision by bringing it down to five years but that was later abandoned when Republican senators Edward Markey, Maria Cantwell and Marsha Blackburn introduced a late-night motion to scrap the entire proposal. 'Massive bipartisan opposition' State lawmakers and AI safety advocates argued that the rule is a gift to an industry that wants to avoid accountability for its products. "Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires," Senator Markey said in a statement after the vote, noting that the provision to strip AI regulation is "dangerous". Max Tegmark, president of the Future of Life Institute, said in a statement that the "overwhelming rejection" to the amendment "underscores the massive bipartisan opposition to letting AI companies run amok". "The CEO's of these corporations have admitted they cannot control the very systems they're building, and yet they demand immunity from any meaningful oversight," he wrote. Those in President Trump's camp like argue that a patchwork of state and local AI laws could hinder the country's progress in the industry and could hurt its capability of competing with China. Earlier this year, a report from Stanford University found that the US is still in the lead, followed closely by China, in the global race to become an AI leader. World leaders say that winning the race is critical to national security, developments in health, business and technology. What do US Big Tech companies think? Big Tech companies are split on how far AI regulation should go and who should be enforcing it. OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT, said in its submission for the US AI Action Plan that it favours a "regulatory strategy that ensures the freedom to innovate," which would include "voluntary partnership" between government and the private sector. Google advised lawmakers to "preempt a chaotic patchwork of state-level rules on frontier AI development," by focusing on the existing regulations that are already in place. In its submission, Meta quoted US Vice President JD Vance who said earlier this year that "excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry just as its taking off". Meta specified that it considers regulations that impose restrictions on AI models "based on obsolete measurements," or impose "onerous" reporting or testing would "impede innovation in the US". Along with changes to state AI legislation, Meta also asked the Trump administration to "reduce barriers to AI infrastructure investment," such as permitting barriers for data centre investments. What has Trump done so far on AI? In one of the first acts of his second term, Trump released an executive order that called for the end of "AI policies and directives that act as barriers to American AI innovation," so the country can retain "global leadership". Trump also removed a 2023 executive order from former president Joe Biden that increased the federal government's capacity to "regulate, govern and support responsible use of AI". Trump has also introduced another executive order to enhance the use and teaching of AI systems in US schools, revised government procurement laws so agencies can adopt AI and launched an AI action plan that is currently under review.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Meta announces new ‘superintelligence' unit to work on AI
Meta announced a new division to create an artificial intelligence (AI) system that is as intelligent as humans. Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, wrote in an internal memo on Monday that Meta Superintelligence Labs, MSL, will be a dedicated part of the company focused on artificial general intelligence (AGI). The memo said that MSL would house several research teams that are working on foundational AI models such as Llama software. It will be lead by Alexandr Wang, the former CEO of Scale AI, an American data annotation company that builds training data sets for AI companies. Meta bought a 49 percent share in Scale AI last month for $14.3 billion (€12.4 billion), with the company saying at the time that it would employ Wang and a few other members of his team. Meta's hiring spree Zuckerberg's memo included the names of several more people joining Meta from rivals OpenAI, Google and Anthropic. Former OpenAI leaders Hongyu Ren, Jiahui Yu, Shengjia Zhao and researchers Trapit Bansal, Shuchao Bi, Huiwen Chang and Ji Lin are now being brought into Meta, Zuckerberg's internal memo added. Euronews Next contacted OpenAI to get their reaction to the news but did not receive an immediate reply. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently accused Meta of offering his employees $100 million (€87 million) signing bonuses if they joined his company. Altman told his brother Jack in his podcast at the time that he respects Meta's 'aggression' in competing with the company but that promising 'a ton of upfront guarnateed comp(ensation) … [won't] set up a great culture'. 'I think people look at the two paths [OpenAI vs Meta] and they say OpenAI's got a really good shot, a much better shot on actually delivering on super intelligence and may eventually be the more valuable company,' he said.
