Local Alcohol Policy: Napier to retain 3am bar closing times after council reversal
'I'm not prepared to take that away from our community who are growing up and doing their thing and learning about the world.
'How are they going to learn about the world sitting at home playing on a PlayStation?'
The earlier closing time was a major part of the draft Local Alcohol Policy (LAP), which also included that no more off-licences be issued for bottle stores in Maraenui, Marewa and Onekawa – the Reserve, Suburban Commercial and Residential Zone.
However, during the meeting, Mayor Kirsten Wise called for an amendment to the proposed LAP based on what she was hearing around the table.
'What I'm going to propose is an amendment to the officers' recommendation yet to be debated, and voted on but as our starting position, is we retain the provisions in the existing LAP regarding maximum trading hours, regarding the 3am closing for nightclubs and 7am selling at grocery stores.'
In all, 44% of submitters supported the proposed changes, with their reasons including helping reduce the harm caused by antisocial behaviour and alcohol, while 56% were against the changes, with reasons including unnecessary pressure being placed on the hospitality industry.
Chris Sullivan, a publican who has been in the industry for 47 years, had earlier said the proposed changes in the closing hours were crazy.
He said if bars had issues they were 'not being run right, with little or no security'.
Sullivan, who owns Napier nightclub Roxof, spoke at the meeting about the importance of creating a safe environment using security and cameras.
Another issue identified by officers on the proposed LAP was consistency and alignment with Hastings District Council.
Hastings bars are open until 2am.
However, McGrath said he kept hearing about Hastings.
'I was voted in for Napier. It's about time perhaps Hastings looked at itself and said 'hey actually Napier's going to three, if we think there's a big enough issue with the different closing times, we will match Napier'.
'It doesn't always have to be us going the other way, they can match us. We are a tourist town, perhaps they aren't so much.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Wellington's longest-serving city councillor Iona Pannett won't stand in upcoming local body elections
Iona Pannett had the backing of the Green Party for many years. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Wellington's longest-serving city councillor Iona Pannett has announced she will not be standing again in the upcoming local body elections . Representing the Pukehīnau Lambton ward, she was first elected in 2007. For many years she had the backing of the Green Party, but in 2022 she was dropped from the ticket, with her advocacy for preserving heritage and character areas clashing with party values. She said representing her constituents had been "an enormous privilege". But she said it was time for her to explore opportunities in the areas of health, history, the environment and social justice. "I am deeply grateful to the many hundreds of people who have supported me during my time on council - my family, friends, constituents, stakeholders, colleagues and volunteers on my campaigns," she said. "Having this support has been such a gift." "I have been proud to be a strong voice for the environment and climate, for social inclusion and for investing in the city for current and future generations," Pannett said. Among her proudest achievements she listed the declaration of the climate and ecological emergency and plans to reduce emissions, helping to stop the Basin Reserve flyover, advocating for the protection of listed heritage buildings and increasing protection of the Town Belt. With local elections coming up in October, see who's in the running for the Wellington mayoralty here . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
5 days ago
- NZ Herald
Hawke's Bay's flagship F.A.W.C! festival paused due to funding woes
Then in February, Napier City Council, Hastings District Council and Central Hawke's Bay District Council voted to contribute a share of the $1 million needed by the tourism agency to keep it afloat. Napier City Council contributed $450,000, Hastings District Council contributed $462,500 and Central Hawke's Bay District Council contributed $75,000. However, Hawke's Bay Tourism chief executive Hamish Saxton said because of 'funding challenges', they are not in a position to deliver the programme at the high standards they've established. 'We don't want to run the risk of damaging the brand by not meeting our loyal F.A.W.C!ers' and sponsors' expectations,' he said. 'Hawke's Bay's reputation as New Zealand's Food and Wine Country remains strong, bolstered by its global status as a Great Wine Capital. This recognition continues to attract discerning domestic and international visitors and is an accolade we will continue to build on.' Saxton said Hawke's Bay Tourism will continue to champion the region's hospitality industry and promote it domestically and worldwide and he remains optimistic about the future. 'We look forward to welcoming F.A.W.C! back when the time is right, delivering the premium experiences our community and visitors have come to expect,' he said. Clearview Estate co-owner Tim Turvey shares a wine with Kim Alebardi to promote the car boot wine tasting event during F.A.W.C! in 2020. Photo / Warren Buckland Clearview Estate Winery co-founder Tim Turvey has run many F.A.W.C! events at his vineyard restaurant. He was surprised by the announcement of the festival's pause and said he will miss holding festival events at his restaurant. 'I like the creativity of it and it makes us think outside the square and it attracts people to Hawke's Bay from around the country and overseas,' Turvey said. 'It's been well supported, and generally all the events have been sold out. 'It has worked for us and I'll miss it.' Back in 2017, Kiwi celebrity chef and then F.A.W.C! ambassador Ray McVinnie said the event was world-class. 'I've been to a lot of these festivals all over the globe and on a world scale it's one of the best ... if they held this in Italy they'd love it, they'd just all go nuts. 'Many of the events are sold out so I guess New Zealand must understand how good it is, but for a lot of Kiwis I think they don't really get it.'
NZ Herald
25-07-2025
- NZ Herald
The rates crisis – a canny view for New Zealand: Nick Stewart
Council rates increased 12.2% annually.¹ The Taxpayers' Union documents cumulative rate increases of 34.52% over three years whilst inflation totalled just 13.7%. This is systematic wealth confiscation by people who face no market discipline for their decisions, and the Hastings District Council provides a fine example of the melee ahead. Yet, Hastings is simply one example among many bad apples across NZ. Rate increases, or daylight robbery? In Hastings, ratepayers who budgeted for normal 3-4% increases got hammered with 19% in 2024-25, followed by 15% in 2025-26. That's a compound 37% increase over two years for Hastings ratepayers. An average Hastings family paying $3000 in rates now face $4300 annually – that's $1300 extracted from household budgets that could have funded children's education or emergency savings. The timing makes this especially vicious. Right as petrol prices fell 8% – providing families with a glimmer of relief – councils threw on rate increases that more than wiped out these savings. It's almost as if they calculated how much breathing room households gained … then took it. Hastings has projected debt rising from $400 million to $700m by 2030. We're witnessing a council that has grown beyond what its ratepayer base can sustain. The rider has become heavier than the horse, which spells eventual capitulation. Every private business understands that customers have a finite capacity to pay. Exceed that capacity and customers disappear. Councils operate under no such constraint. They simply send bigger bills to ratepayers who can't escape. Like the pigs in Orwell's Animal Farm, today's councillors have forgotten they're supposed to serve ratepayers – not rule them. While private-sector businesses slash costs and implement redundancies to survive, councils expand their fiefdoms with impunity. The contrast couldn't be starker. Business managers whose jobs depend on efficiency face market discipline daily. Councillors face elections every three years, where complex budget decisions get reduced to campaign slogans. Meanwhile, they enjoy inflation-plus salary increases and gold-plated job security while imposing austerity on the very ratepayers who fund them. Richardson's Democratic Solution Ruth Richardson captures the fundamental problem: councils have become 'arrogant', 'unaccountable', and 'wasteful' and 'have got to be brought to heel'. Her proposed solution cuts through the bureaucratic nonsense: cap rate increases at inflation unless ratepayers approve higher amounts through binding referenda. This isn't radical – it's basic democratic consent for taxation. An inflation cap would restore planning certainty overnight whilst forcing councils to choose between genuine necessities and bureaucratic empire-building. Critics claim this assumes ratepayers lack perfect information about 'complex' infrastructure trade-offs, but that misses the point entirely. The current system assumes councils have perfect information about ratepayers' financial capacity – an assumption that Hastings' compound 37% increase rudely disproves. When families face financial warfare dressed up as fiscal responsibility, the 'complexity' argument becomes irrelevant. Hastings, the bellwether? The upcoming Hastings mayoral election represents more than political choice – it's an opportunity for forensic examination of fiscal responsibility: every council vote recorded, every budget decision documented, and no way for candidates to escape their fiscal DNA through clever spin and newfound fiscal enlightenment. Some councillors already express concern about 'diminishing borrowing capacity' – a tacit admission that current spending is unsustainable. When the reality finally penetrates the bureaucratic bubble, it's too late for the ratepayers. This same dynamic is playing out from Auckland to Invercargill. Yes, New Zealand faces genuine infrastructure challenges. Ageing water systems, earthquake strengthening, and climate adaptation create real costs. But this reality has become the perfect smokescreen for herculean spending growth. The question isn't whether infrastructure needs exist. The infrastructure bill was always coming due. It's whether councils have used it to justify spending that extends far beyond pipes and roads – into glamour projects, consultant fees and bureaucratic expansion. Again – when the rider becomes heavier than the horse, the system collapses regardless of how noble the rider's intentions. Why can't RBNZ just drive rates down? The Reserve Bank faces an impossible choice. It cannot provide the interest rate relief the rest of us desperately need whilst councils pump 13% of total inflation into the economy. We all need to row the boat and play our part – including the public sector. A dollar is a dollar, whether it comes from a rates bill or a grocery receipt. When councils exempt themselves from inflation discipline, they force the RBNZ to keep interest rates higher for longer – crushing mortgage holders and businesses who had no say in council spending decisions. Every responsible household and business starts the year with careful financial planning. These assume government costs increase roughly in line with inflation – a reasonable expectation in a functioning democracy. The problem lies in the fact that our councils have abandoned this social contract. When rates contribute 13% of national inflation whilst representing a fraction of household spending, councils have become the primary destroyer of private planning. Families who budget carefully find their fiscal discipline rendered meaningless by public sector excess they cannot control or escape. Voters, now's your chance … Real reform requires acknowledging that councils have become the enemy of household financial stability. October's elections offer a chance to demand proven fiscal discipline, not conversion stories. The question isn't whether New Zealand can afford fiscal responsibility – it's whether families and businesses can survive another term of public sector excess. The arithmetic doesn't lie. It simply raises the question of whether voters will finally hold councils accountable for the mathematical reality they've created.
