It Just Got Harder to Get a Driver's License in Ohio, but That's Not a Bad Thing
A new state budget requires any Ohioan under the age of 21 to complete a full driver-training course.
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine had also looked to move driver training into the public school system, but that's not currently happening.
Thanks to a newly passed state budget in Ohio, adults looking to get a driver's license in the state will have to complete a driver education class, similar to that required for new drivers under the age of 18. If you're not an Ohio resident, it may come as a surprise that this wasn't already a requirement, but it's true. Previously, if you deferred getting your driving license from 16 until 18, all you needed to do was pass a road test or complete a four-hour course.
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has been calling for a change to this loophole for months, and has now signed into the budget the requirement that any Ohioan 21 and under will be required to pass a full course. He cites local collision records as proof positive that current driving training isn't cutting it: in 2024, more than half of fatal crashes with teen drivers involved 18- or 19-year-olds. From the statistics, younger drivers may actually be better trained.
If you're a new driver under the age of 18 in Ohio, required driver training is about the same as in many other states: 24 hours of classroom instruction (online is also allowable) is followed by eight hours of on-the-road driving, with a requirement of a further 50 hours of instruction by a parent or guardian. A temporary driving permit has to be held for at least six months.
With it being so easy to just wait until an 18th birthday and wing it, many young drivers choose the path of least resistance. Now, that route is closed, although it's not all good news for public safety.
Gov. DeWine had also looked for an inclusion in the state budget that would make driver education part of the public school curriculum. Other legislators nixed this, keeping driving schools in the private sector. Students will, however, be allowed to leave school outside of core classes to attend a driving class.
If you live in a rural part of Ohio, the new rules might be something of a pain, as accessibility to driving schools is limited. However, the online component at least should be straightforward, and requiring more education and time behind the wheel is undoubtedly a good thing for road safety as a whole.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cell Phone Forensics: Why Trucking Defense Attorneys Fail At Plaintiff Phone Discovery—And How To Succeed
When an eighty-thousand-pound commercial vehicle collides with a passenger car, the resulting litigation can reach eight figures. Yet despite billions in annual settlements, a critical evidence source in trucking accident cases remains inconsistently accessed by defense teams: the plaintiff's smartphone. While many trucking companies routinely preserve their driver's phone for forensic examination, defense attorneys face significant challenges obtaining the same evidence from plaintiffs. This creates a fundamental asymmetry in trucking accident litigation. Today, commercial carriers are expected to rapidly preserve their driver's cell phone for forensic examination, understanding that courts generally expect cooperation and transparency from businesses involved in accidents. However, obtaining comparable access to plaintiff phones requires different strategies, targeted negotiations, and sometimes extended legal proceedings. The challenge lies in the complexity of digital evidence and the legitimate privacy concerns that fuel resistance. As a digital forensics expert, I spend much of my time educating attorneys about cell phone forensics. I know firsthand the technical requirements and strategic approaches that have proven successful in gaining access to plaintiff cell phones. Cell Phone Forensics Is Best Evidence The evidence contained in smartphones can be decisive. Cell phone forensics provides precise timestamps, location coordinates, and device interaction data that can definitively prove what someone was doing in the moments before an accident. Unlike phone bills and call detail records, forensic analysis of the physical cell phone can prove whether fingers were actually touching the screen, which applications were active, and whether notifications were seen or ignored. Most defense attorneys struggle to obtain this evidence because they approach plaintiff phone discovery the same way they would request any other document. This traditional approach consistently fails because it ignores both the technical realities of cell phone forensics and the strategic considerations that make cooperation more likely. The typical discovery cycle follows a predictable pattern: This pattern repeats frequently because the approach triggers predictable objections that courts often find persuasive when weighing individual privacy rights against discovery needs. Smartphones contain vast amounts of deeply personal information: intimate communications, financial data, medical information, photos and digital records that create a comprehensive picture of someone's private life. While plaintiff opposition reflects legitimate concerns, these can be addressed with thoughtful defense strategies. Why "Just Get the Text Messages" Won't Work In Trucking Accident Cases Many attorneys assume they can simply request "text messages and calls from the time of the accident" and sidestep privacy concerns. This approach fundamentally misunderstands how cell phone forensics works and will leave you missing the most critical evidence in trucking cases. The evidence that actually determines liability in trucking accidents requires a cell phone forensic data extraction from the physical smartphone—but not just any type of extraction. In trucking accident cases, a full file system data extraction is the gold standard. This extraction recovers forensic artifacts showing screen touches, keyboard caches revealing what was typed, application usage data, and notification interaction records. All the data must be collected upfront as a technical necessity because of how cell phone forensic tools work and to preserve the critical evidence that proves what actually happened in the moments before impact. Cell Phone Forensics: The Technical Game-Changer This technical necessity of complete data collection through full file system extraction becomes the foundation for strategic negotiations. The key insight that successful attorneys understand is that complete data collection doesn't require complete data analysis. This distinction allows for protocols that satisfy technical requirements while addressing privacy concerns through meaningful limitations on what data will actually be examined. Attempting selective data extraction during the forensic process would compromise data integrity and potentially create problems with evidence admissibility. Forensic tools cannot distinguish between "relevant" and "irrelevant" data during extraction. They must image the entire device to maintain proper evidence handling and preserve deleted information that might be crucial to understanding what happened. Moreover, attempting selective data extraction during the forensic process could compromise data integrity and potentially create problems with evidence admissibility. This technical reality provides the foundation for protocol-based negotiations that satisfy both technical requirements and privacy concerns. Getting Plaintiff Phones: The Protocol-Based Approach That Works The most successful trucking defense attorneys have moved beyond traditional discovery battles to a protocol-based approach that separates data collection from data analysis. These protocols acknowledge technical realities while providing meaningful privacy protections that make cooperation more likely. Effective protocols typically include several key elements: Clearly defined time boundaries: Shows precision and reasonableness by focusing analysis on a specific, defensible timeframe directly relevant to the accident. This addresses judicial concerns about overbreadth while ensuring you capture the critical evidence window. The narrow focus demonstrates you're conducting a targeted investigation, not a fishing expedition through the plaintiff's digital life. Professional handling requirements: Builds credibility and addresses competency concerns by specifying that only qualified digital forensics professionals will access the sensitive data. This requirement shows respect for the technical complexity of digital evidence and assures courts that the examination will follow industry standards. Comprehensive privacy protections: Directly tackles the core privacy concerns that drive plaintiff resistance by implementing specific safeguards for irrelevant personal information. These protections demonstrate genuine respect for privacy rights while preserving evidentiary value, making cooperation more likely and court approval more probable. Specific data destruction timelines: Offers concrete assurance that sensitive data won't be retained indefinitely, addressing long-term privacy exposure concerns. Written certification creates accountability and demonstrates good faith compliance with agreed-upon limitations. This approach offers a strategic advantage: it shows technical competence and genuine respect for privacy interests while keeping focus on obtaining evidence necessary to understand what happened in the critical moments before the accident. Plaintiff Phones: A Case Study In Strategic Success A recent high-stakes trucking case shows the power of the protocol approach: The Initial Challenge: The plaintiff claimed they had safely ended a phone call minutes before the accident and put their device away. Cellular carrier phone records seemed to support this claim, showing the call had ended three minutes before impact. Traditional Approach Failed: Traditional discovery requests for phone data met strong resistance. Opposing counsel argued that phone records were sufficient and that broader access violated privacy rights. The Strategic Pivot: Rather than filing a broad motion to compel, the defense team crafted a detailed protocol that: Court Success: When negotiations failed, the defense team's motion to compel included this carefully structured protocol. The court was impressed by the professional approach and meaningful limitations, finding that the protocol properly balanced the need for relevant evidence with legitimate privacy concerns. The court granted the motion, ordering the forensic examination under the proposed protocol terms. The Game-Changing Discovery: The resulting forensic examination revealed that while the phone call had indeed ended three minutes before impact, the plaintiff had immediately opened a texting application and was actively typing a message at the moment of collision. The device's interaction logs showed precise screen touches at the time of impact, and the incomplete text message was preserved in the phone's memory. Case Resolution: This evidence completely transformed the case dynamics, shifting focus from alleged truck driver negligence to documented plaintiff phone use while driving. The case ultimately settled for a fraction of the original demand. Plaintiff Phone Discovery: Critical Strategic Elements Successful phone discovery requires understanding several strategic elements that can significantly improve outcomes: The Education Component: Many resistance issues stem from genuine misunderstanding about what cell phone forensics involves. Judges and plaintiff attorneys may believe that selective data extraction is technically possible and view complete imaging requests as unnecessary overreach. Explaining technical realities builds credibility and shows that your approach stems from necessity rather than opportunism. Technical Credibility: Without proper expert support, discovery requests look like fishing expeditions rather than necessary technical requirements. Qualified digital forensics experts can explain why complete data collection is required while demonstrating how protocols protect privacy interests. Privacy Balance: Effective protocols don't dismiss privacy concerns—they address them head-on with specific, meaningful protections that demonstrate genuine respect for legitimate interests while preserving evidentiary value. Timing Considerations: Digital evidence degrades over time as devices are used, applications update, and data gets overwritten. Early action is essential to preserve potentially crucial evidence before it disappears forever. When Negotiations Fail: Court Motions Even well-crafted protocols don't guarantee cooperation. When court motions become necessary, success depends on elements that extend beyond traditional discovery arguments. Successful motions include: The most effective motions also address common objections technically and proactively. They explain why alternative methods can't provide equivalent evidentiary value and demonstrate that proposed protocols include meaningful privacy protections rather than broad, unfocused data requests. Plaintiff Cell Phone Discovery: The Path Forward The difference between success and failure often comes down to understanding subtle nuances: the specific protocol language that makes cooperation more likely, the technical explanations that build credibility with both opposing counsel and courts, and the strategic approaches that transform resistance into cooperation. In our increasingly digital reality where smartphones are central to daily life, the evidence they contain can be decisive in trucking accident litigation. For trucking defense attorneys, developing expertise in obtaining plaintiff cell phones has become essential for representing motor carriers and uncovering the full picture about what happened in the critical moments before an accident.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
How the Dutch Make Intersections Safer for Cyclists, Pedestrians
In a growing handful of North American cities, intersections are going Dutch. From Fremont, California, to Washington, DC, to a few cities in Canada, officials are installing a kind of protected intersection widely adopted in the Netherlands. The 'Dutch-style' design features football-shaped corner islands that position cyclists and pedestrian in easy view of drivers, helping minimize zones of conflict and decreasing the likelihood and severity of collisions. In this configuration, cyclists riding straight through a junction, for example, are less likely to be victims of 'right hook' crashes, in which a driver turning left turns directly into their path. Read more from contributor Kevin Schoenmakers today on CityLab: The Dutch Intersection Is Coming to Save Your Life
The Drive
an hour ago
- The Drive
Sung Kang Confirms Live-Action Drift Movie With Big-Name Car Guys and Audience Participation
The latest car news, reviews, and features. Sung Kang, known as 'Han' in the Fast and Furious flicks (coincidentally being referenced for the second time today) has just confirmed he's making a live-action drift movie called Drifter with a handful of other well-known car-world personalities. They're going to be shooting part of it at a public drift event this summer. We've been hearing that Kang's been working on a drift movie for years—as of 2023, the rumor was it was going to be a live-action Initial D kind of thing. But now I'm guessing that's just how it was being pitched to investors. In an Instagram post that just went up today, Kang was joined by Brian Scotto (founding member of The Hoonigans) and Adam LZ (famous American drifter and YouTuber) in announcing that they're going to be doing a drift movie that's 'real,' along with Rutledge Wood (previous Top Gear USA host) and James Pumphrey (Donut Media OG). They're going to be shooting at least part of it at the Legends Of Drift event coming up next month (August 23-25) at Englishtown, New Jersey's Raceway Park. The event itself put out an announcement with a few more details. I'll drop it in here: 'Legends of Drift is more than just an event – it's a live-action celebration of drift culture, the car community, and cinematic storytelling. Taking over Raceway Park in Englishtown, NJ on August 23–24, 2025, this two-day experience blends a real drift competition and car show (just like what you've come to love and expect from the LZ World Tour events by Adam LZ & Drift Games) with the filming of DRIFTER — a passion project directed by and starring Fast & Furious icon Sung Kang. Expect non-stop tire-shredding action, an epic car show, fantasy battles, vendor booths, crowd giveaways, and much more. Joining us are some of the biggest names in drifting and car culture: Adam LZ, Brian Scotto, James Pumphrey, Rutledge Wood, Dai Yoshihara, Chelsea DeNofa, Luke Fink, Dave Egan, Jarod DeAnda, Grant Anderson, Chris Rudnik, Nate Hamilton, and many more guests still to be announced.' I guess if you get yourself tickets and wave your arms like an inflatable guy outside a used car dealership, you just might see yourself in the bleachers when you go to watch the movie! The emphasis on 'realness' in the promo video below makes it sound like this won't be a work of fiction, but I suppose they could do real stunts with a made-up narrative for drama. Either way, I'm excited! Got any more Hollywood tips for us? Drop us a line at tips@
